Effect of a closed-loop medication order executive system on safe medication administration at a tertiary hospital: a quasi-experimental study.

closed-loop electronic medication management system medication error patient safety

Journal

Therapeutic advances in drug safety
ISSN: 2042-0986
Titre abrégé: Ther Adv Drug Saf
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101549074

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2024
Historique:
received: 15 04 2024
accepted: 13 09 2024
medline: 15 10 2024
pubmed: 15 10 2024
entrez: 15 10 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Closed-loop electronic medication management systems are effective measures for preventing medication errors (MEs). However, there is limited evidence supporting this, and few studies have evaluated the long-term effects of these systems on safe medication. To evaluate the long-term effects of implementing a closed-loop medication order executive system on the safe clinical use of medications. A quasi-experimental design. Data from 2017 to 2023 were extracted and retrospectively analyzed. The primary outcome indicator was the ME rate. Secondary outcome indicators were the accuracy of order verification and patient identification and the implementation rate of fresh medicine dispensing. The autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) model in time-series analysis was used to evaluate the level and trend changes in ME rates using SPSS 25.0 before and after system implementation. Root cause analysis and descriptive statistics were used to assess changes in types, stages, and causes of ME rates. The independent samples Overall, 295 MEs were reported with a mean of 0.26 ± 0.26 ME rates per month during 2017-2023. The ARIMA model showed a decrease in the average level of ME rates after system implementation, with no statistically significant decrease in the long term, and a significant drop in the ME rate in the short and medium term ( Adopting a closed-loop executive system is beneficial for ensuring patient medication safety, but a single integrated system does not completely eliminate MEs. Optimizing system functionalities and applying structured handoff tools are recommended to meet clinical needs and enhance system usability. The study used some quality management indicators to evaluate the effect of a medication order executive system on the safety of medication administration Why was the study done? Medication errors (MEs) may cause harm to patients. A medication order execution system can effectively prevent MEs, but its long-term effects have not been fully identified. What did the researchers do? The research team collected some quality management indicators at the Jiangsu Province Hospital, such as ME rates and accuracy of patient identification, from pre-implementation to post-implementation in the short, medium, and long term. What did the researchers find? The use of the system significantly reduced ME rates, especially in the short term. The accuracy and timeliness of execution of medication orders were improved. What do the findings mean? The system can ensure the safety of medication administration to a certain extent, but the prevention and control of human risks are limited. The system can still be continuously improved by optimizing the functions of the system and using tools to further reduce the occurrence of adverse events.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
Closed-loop electronic medication management systems are effective measures for preventing medication errors (MEs). However, there is limited evidence supporting this, and few studies have evaluated the long-term effects of these systems on safe medication.
Objective UNASSIGNED
To evaluate the long-term effects of implementing a closed-loop medication order executive system on the safe clinical use of medications.
Design UNASSIGNED
A quasi-experimental design.
Method UNASSIGNED
Data from 2017 to 2023 were extracted and retrospectively analyzed. The primary outcome indicator was the ME rate. Secondary outcome indicators were the accuracy of order verification and patient identification and the implementation rate of fresh medicine dispensing. The autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) model in time-series analysis was used to evaluate the level and trend changes in ME rates using SPSS 25.0 before and after system implementation. Root cause analysis and descriptive statistics were used to assess changes in types, stages, and causes of ME rates. The independent samples
Results UNASSIGNED
Overall, 295 MEs were reported with a mean of 0.26 ± 0.26 ME rates per month during 2017-2023. The ARIMA model showed a decrease in the average level of ME rates after system implementation, with no statistically significant decrease in the long term, and a significant drop in the ME rate in the short and medium term (
Conclusion UNASSIGNED
Adopting a closed-loop executive system is beneficial for ensuring patient medication safety, but a single integrated system does not completely eliminate MEs. Optimizing system functionalities and applying structured handoff tools are recommended to meet clinical needs and enhance system usability.
The study used some quality management indicators to evaluate the effect of a medication order executive system on the safety of medication administration Why was the study done? Medication errors (MEs) may cause harm to patients. A medication order execution system can effectively prevent MEs, but its long-term effects have not been fully identified. What did the researchers do? The research team collected some quality management indicators at the Jiangsu Province Hospital, such as ME rates and accuracy of patient identification, from pre-implementation to post-implementation in the short, medium, and long term. What did the researchers find? The use of the system significantly reduced ME rates, especially in the short term. The accuracy and timeliness of execution of medication orders were improved. What do the findings mean? The system can ensure the safety of medication administration to a certain extent, but the prevention and control of human risks are limited. The system can still be continuously improved by optimizing the functions of the system and using tools to further reduce the occurrence of adverse events.

Autres résumés

Type: plain-language-summary (eng)
The study used some quality management indicators to evaluate the effect of a medication order executive system on the safety of medication administration Why was the study done? Medication errors (MEs) may cause harm to patients. A medication order execution system can effectively prevent MEs, but its long-term effects have not been fully identified. What did the researchers do? The research team collected some quality management indicators at the Jiangsu Province Hospital, such as ME rates and accuracy of patient identification, from pre-implementation to post-implementation in the short, medium, and long term. What did the researchers find? The use of the system significantly reduced ME rates, especially in the short term. The accuracy and timeliness of execution of medication orders were improved. What do the findings mean? The system can ensure the safety of medication administration to a certain extent, but the prevention and control of human risks are limited. The system can still be continuously improved by optimizing the functions of the system and using tools to further reduce the occurrence of adverse events.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39403550
doi: 10.1177/20420986241288421
pii: 10.1177_20420986241288421
pmc: PMC11472417
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

20420986241288421

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s), 2024.

Auteurs

Xuwen Yin (X)

School of Nursing, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China.

Haiyan Song (H)

School of Nursing, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China.

Jieyu Lu (J)

School of Nursing, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China.

Jing Yang (J)

School of Nursing, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China.

Rong Wang (R)

Department of Nursing, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.

Zheng Lin (Z)

Department of Nursing, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.

Shudi Jiang (S)

Department of Nursing, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.

Hui Yuan (H)

Department of Nursing, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.

Xumei Wang (X)

Department of Nursing, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.

Dongmei Xu (D)

Department of Nursing, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.

Chunhong Gao (C)

Department of Nursing, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.

Yuan Zhou (Y)

School of Nursing, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.

Jiayi Xu (J)

School of Nursing, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China.

Chen Chen (C)

School of Nursing, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.

Chenyu Gu (C)

School of Nursing, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China.

Qingqing Diao (Q)

Department of Nursing, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.

Fang Li (F)

Department of Nursing, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.

Zejuan Gu (Z)

School of Nursing, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210029, China.
Department of Nursing, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, China.

Classifications MeSH