Multidimensional phenotyping to distinguish among central (CSA), obstructive (OSA) and co-existing central and obstructive sleep apnea (CSA-OSA) phenotypes in real-world data.
Central sleep apnea
Obstructive sleep apnea
Journal
Sleep medicine
ISSN: 1878-5506
Titre abrégé: Sleep Med
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 100898759
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 Oct 2024
03 Oct 2024
Historique:
received:
02
07
2024
revised:
04
09
2024
accepted:
28
09
2024
medline:
16
10
2024
pubmed:
16
10
2024
entrez:
15
10
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
When navigating the landscape of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), central sleep apnea (CSA) and intersection of the two diseases (co-existing CSA-OSA), there are significant knowledge gaps. Data are scarce regarding the respective prevalence and differences in clinical presentation of the three conditions. One major issue for characterization of the prevalence of the different sleep apnea entities is the scoring of central versus obstructive hypopneas which is not included in the routine practice of many sleep laboratories. We prospectively assessed multidomain symptoms and collected data on comorbidities, medications and treatment indications in a large monocentric real-life dataset (n > 2400) of patients referred for suspicion of sleep apnea. We have systematically distinguished central versus obstructive hypopneas to define OSA, CSA and co-existing CSA-OSA. When CSA was defined by the proportion of central apneas (and hypopneas were considered obstructive by default), the prevalence of CSA was 4.59 % (co-existing CSA-OSA: 11.03 %, and OSA: 84.37 %). When the distinction between obstructive and central hypopneas was used to classify the sleep disordered breathing, the prevalence of CSA was fourfold higher at 19.69 % (co-existing: 19.16 %, OSA: 61.16 %). The burden of cardiovascular and metabolic comorbidities was the highest in the CSA and co-existing sleep apnea subgroups. The three sleep apnea groups exhibited different constellations of symptoms but most of the patients with CSA, co-existing and OSA were symptomatic after comprehensive evaluation. The CSA group exhibited the most severe disturbances in sleep architecture on polysomnography. Therapeutic indications differed depending on the subtype of respiratory events. Our findings imply that not differentiating between central and obstructive hypopneas will underestimate the severity of central sleep disordered breathing abnormalities that mislead therapeutic decisions and might limit improvements in quality of life and sleepiness that are expected in appropriately treated patients with CSA.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39406130
pii: S1389-9457(24)00461-1
doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2024.09.040
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
426-433Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Jean-Louis Pepin reports financial support was provided by ZOLLRespicardia Inc. Scott McKane reports a relationship with ZOLLRespicardia Inc that includes: employment. Robin Germany reports a relationship with ZOLLRespicardia Inc that includes: employment. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.