Lessons learned from 12 years using the Woven Endobridge for the treatment of cerebral aneurysms in a multi-center series.
Aneurysm occlusion
Angiographic
Flow-disruption
Intrasaccular
Stroke
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
16 10 2024
16 10 2024
Historique:
received:
11
10
2023
accepted:
01
10
2024
medline:
16
10
2024
pubmed:
16
10
2024
entrez:
15
10
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Intrasaccular flow disruption with the Woven Endobridge (WEB) has become a well-established endovascular technique for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. This study presents our 12-year experience with the WEB and evaluates its evolving indications, procedures, and outcomes. A consecutive series of 324 aneurysms treated with WEB between 2011 and 2023 at three neurovascular centers was retrospectively analyzed and the study group was divided into four treatment periods. Uni- and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate factors associated with technical success, thromboembolic complications, and angiographic outcome. The mean aneurysm size was 7.0 ± 3.6 mm and decreased during the study period, while the proportion of atypical sites for WEB implantation increased. WEB implantation was technically successful in 96.0%, and the ratio of WEB width to dome width increased during the study period, indicating oversizing. The neurological complication rate was 4.9% (1.5% major, 3.4% minor) and the mid-term complete occlusion rate was 60.6% (81.9% adequate occlusion), with no statistical differences in either outcome measure between the study periods. In multivariate analyses, the use of WEB 17 was associated with increased technical success (HR: 7.4, 95%CI: 2.4-23.6, p<0.01), whereas ruptured aneurysm status (HR: 2.5, 95%CI: 1.0-6.0, p=0.04) and the use of additional stents (HR: 4.8, 95%CI: 1.6-14.4, p<0.01) predicted thromboembolic complications. Appropriate oversizing of the WEB favored mid-term complete occlusion (HR: 10.5, 95%CI: 1.3-83.3, p=0.03). The results suggest an expansion of the indications for WEB implantation and highlight the importance of oversizing for treatment efficacy.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39406822
doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-75064-2
pii: 10.1038/s41598-024-75064-2
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
24212Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Dmytriw, A. A. et al. International study of intracranial aneurysm treatment using Woven EndoBridge: results of the WorldWideWEB Consortium. Stroke. 53, e47–e49 (2022).
doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.037609
Al Saiegh, F. et al. Treatment of Acutely Ruptured Cerebral Aneurysms With the Woven EndoBridge Device: Experience Post-FDA Approval. Neurosurgery. 87.1, E16-E22 (2020).
Arthur, A. S. et al. The safety and effectiveness of the Woven EndoBridge (WEB) system for the treatment of wide-necked bifurcation aneurysms: final 12-month results of the pivotal WEB intrasaccular therapy (WEB-IT) study. J. Neurointerventional Surg. 11, 924–930 (2019).
doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-014815
Goertz, L. et al. Low-Profile Intra-aneurysmal Flow Disruptor WEB 17 versus WEB Predecessor systems for treatment of small intracranial aneurysms: comparative analysis of Procedural Safety and Feasibility. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 40, 1766–1772 (2019).
Pennig, L. et al. The Woven EndoBridge (WEB) versus Conventional Coiling for Treatment of Patients with Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Haemorrhage: Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of Clinical and Angiographic Outcome Data. World Neurosurg. 146, e1326-e1334 (2020).
Pierot, L. et al. Safety and efficacy of aneurysm treatment with WEB: results of the WEBCAST study. J. Neurosurg. 124, 1250–1256 (2016).
doi: 10.3171/2015.2.JNS142634
Pierot, L. et al. Safety and efficacy of aneurysm treatment with the WEB: results of the WEBCAST 2 study. Am J Neuroradiol. 38.6, 1151-1155 (2017).
Goyal, N. et al. How to WEB: a practical review of methodology for the use of the Woven EndoBridge. J. Neurointerventional Surg. 12, 512–520 (2020).
doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-015506
Herbreteau, D. et al. Are anatomic results influenced by WEB shape modification? Analysis in a prospective, single-Center Series of 39 patients with aneurysms treated with the WEB. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 37, 2280–2286 (2016).
doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A4918
Sabuzi, F. et al. How a decade of aneurysms embolization with the Woven EndoBridge has changed our understanding and practices? J Neuroradiol. 50.5, 518-522 (2023).
Pierot, L. Ten years of clinical evaluation of the Woven EndoBridge: a safe and effective treatment for wide-Neck bifurcation aneurysms. Neurointervention. 16, 211–221 (2021).
doi: 10.5469/neuroint.2021.00395
Pagano, P. & Cortese, J. Aneurysm Treatment with Woven EndoBridge-17: angiographic and clinical results at 12 months from a Retrospective. 2-Center Ser. 44, 467–473 (2023).
Aguiar, G., Caroff, J. & Mihalea, C. WEB device for treatment of posterior communicating artery aneurysms. J. Neurointerventional Surg. 14, 362–365 (2022).
Goertz, L. & Liebig, T. Treatment of proximal posterior inferior cerebellar artery aneurysms by Intrasaccular Flow disruption: a Multicenter experience. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol.43, 1158–1163 (2022).
Goertz, L. et al. Extending the indication of Woven EndoBridge (WEB) embolization to internal carotid artery aneurysms: a multicenter safety and feasibility study. World Neurosurg. 126, e965-e974 (2019).
Rodriguez-Calienes, A. & Vivanco-Suarez, J. Use of the Woven EndoBridge Device for Sidewall Aneurysms: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol.44, 165–170 (2023).
Caroff, J. et al. Woven EndoBridge device shape modification can be mitigated with an appropriate oversizing strategy: a VasoCT based study. J. NeuroInterv Surg14, (2022).
Herbreteau, D. et al. Are anatomic results influenced by WEB shape modification? Analysis in a prospective, single-Center Series of 39 patients with aneurysms treated with the WEB. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 37, 2280–2286 (2016).
doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A4918
Dmytriw, A. A. et al. The Woven EndoBridge (WEB) Device for the Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms: Ten Years of Lessons Learned and Adjustments in Practice from the WorldWideWEB Consortium. Trans Stroke Res. 14.4, 455-464 (2022).
Pierot, L. et al. Aneurysm treatment with Woven Endobridge in the cumulative population of three prospective, multicenter series: 2-year follow-up. Neurosurgery. 87.2, 357-367 (2020).
Pierot, L. et al. Aneurysm treatment with the Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device in the combined population of two prospective, multicenter series: 5-year follow-up. J. NeuroInterventional Surg. 15, 552–557 (2023).
doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2021-018414
Cognard, C. & Januel, A. C. Remnants and recurrences after the use of the WEB intrasaccular device in large-neck bifurcation aneurysms. Neurosurgery. 76, 522–530 (2015).
doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000669
Sivan-Hoffmann, R. et al. One-year Angiographic Follow-Up after WEB-SL Endovascular treatment of wide-Neck Bifurcation Intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 36, 2320–2324 (2015).
doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A4457
Caroff, J. et al. Occlusion assessment of intracranial aneurysms treated with the WEB device. Neuroradiology. 58, 887–891 (2016).
doi: 10.1007/s00234-016-1715-9
Caroff, J. et al. Management of aneurysmal recurrence after Woven EndoBridge (WEB) treatment. J NeuroInterv Surg. 15.10, 939-942 (2022)
Kabbasch, C. et al. Treatment strategies for recurrent and residual aneurysms after Woven Endobridge implantation. J. NeuroInterventional Surg. 11, 390–395 (2019).
doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014230
Kranawetter, B. et al. Microsurgical clipping as a retreatment strategy for previously ruptured aneurysms treated with the Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device: a mono-institutional case series. Acta Neurochir.165.7, 1881-1889 (2023).
Crinnion, W. et al. The Woven Endobridge as a treatment for acutely ruptured aneurysms: a review of the literature. Interventional Neuroradiol. 27, 602–608 (2021).
doi: 10.1177/1591019921991397
Harker, P. et al. The Woven EndoBridge device for ruptured intracranial aneurysms: international multicenter experience and updated meta-analysis. Neuroradiology. 63, 1891–1899 (2021).
doi: 10.1007/s00234-021-02727-6
Spelle, L. et al. CLinical Assessment of WEB device in ruptured aneurYSms (CLARYS): results of 1-month and 1-year assessment of rebleeding protection and clinical safety in a multicenter study. J. NeuroInterventional Surg. 14, 807–814 (2022).
doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2021-017416
Essibayi, M., Lanzino, G. & Brinjikji, W. Safety and efficacy of the Woven EndoBridge device for treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 42, 1627–1632 (2021).
doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A7174
Molyneux, A. & Group, I. S. A. T. C. International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised trial. Lancet. 360, 1267–1274 (2002).
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11314-6
Kabbasch, C., Mpotsaris, A., Reiner, M. & Liebig, T. WEB as part of a multimodality treatment in complex, large, and partially thrombosed intracranial aneurysms: a single-center observational study of technical success, safety, and recurrence. J. Neurointerventional Surg. 8, 1235–1239 (2016).
doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-012126
König, I. et al. Treatment of Ruptured and Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms with WEB 17 Versus WEB 21 Systems: Comparison of Indications and Early Angiographic Outcomes (2020).
Zhang, S. M., Liu, L. X., Ren, P. W., Xie, X. D. & Miao, J. Effectiveness, Safety and Risk factors of Woven EndoBridge device in the treatment of wide-Neck Intracranial aneurysms: systematic review and Meta-analysis. World Neurosurg. 136, e1–e23 (2020).
doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.08.023
Kabbasch, C. et al. Comparison of WEB embolization and coiling in unruptured intracranial aneurysms: safety and efficacy based on a propensity score analysis. World Neurosurg. 126, e937-e943 (2019).
Kabbasch, C. et al. WEB embolization versus stent-assisted coiling: comparison of complication rates and angiographic outcomes. J Neurointerv Surg. 11.8, 812-816(2019).
Pflaeging, M., Kabbasch, C., Schlamann, M., Pennig, L., Juenger, S. T., Grunz, J. P., ... & Goertz, L. (2021). Microsurgical clipping versus advanced endovascular treatment of unruptured middle cerebral artery bifurcation aneurysms after a “coil-first” policy.World Neurosurgery,149, e336-e344.
Goertz, L., Liebig, T., Siebert, E., Pennig, L., Laukamp, K. R., Celik, E., ... & Kabbasch, C. (2021). Woven Endobridge embolization versus microsurgical clipping for unruptured anterior circulation aneurysms: a propensity score analysis.Neurosurgery, 88 (4), 779-784.