Advancing Patient Safety: The Future of Artificial Intelligence in Mitigating Healthcare-Associated Infections: A Systematic Review.

artificial intelligence healthcare-associated infections infection prevention machine learning

Journal

Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2227-9032
Titre abrégé: Healthcare (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101666525

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 Oct 2024
Historique:
received: 16 09 2024
revised: 03 10 2024
accepted: 03 10 2024
medline: 16 10 2024
pubmed: 16 10 2024
entrez: 16 10 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Healthcare-associated infections are infections that patients acquire during hospitalization or while receiving healthcare in other facilities. They represent the most frequent negative outcome in healthcare, can be entirely prevented, and pose a burden in terms of financial and human costs. With the development of new AI and ML algorithms, hospitals could develop new and automated surveillance and prevention models for HAIs, leading to improved patient safety. The aim of this review is to systematically retrieve, collect, and summarize all available information on the application and impact of AI in HAI surveillance and/or prevention. We conducted a systematic review of the literature using PubMed and Scopus to find articles related to the implementation of artificial intelligence in the surveillance and/or prevention of HAIs. We identified a total of 218 articles, of which only 35 were included in the review. Most studies were conducted in the US (n = 10, 28.6%) and China (n = 5; 14.3%) and were published between 2021 and 2023 (26 articles, 74.3%) with an increasing trend over time. Most focused on the development of ML algorithms for the identification/prevention of surgical site infections (n = 18; 51%), followed by HAIs in general (n = 9; 26%), hospital-acquired urinary tract infections (n = 5; 9%), and healthcare-associated pneumonia (n = 3; 9%). Only one study focused on the proper use of personal protective equipment (PPE) and included healthcare workers as the study population. Overall, the trend indicates that several AI/ML models can effectively assist clinicians in everyday decisions, by identifying HAIs early or preventing them through personalized risk factors with good performance. However, only a few studies have reported an actual implementation of these models, which proved highly successful. In one case, manual workload was reduced by nearly 85%, while another study observed a decrease in the local hospital's HAI incidence from 1.31% to 0.58%. AI has significant potential to improve the prevention, diagnosis, and management of healthcare-associated infections, offering benefits such as increased accuracy, reduced workloads, and cost savings. Although some AI applications have already been tested and validated, adoption in healthcare is hindered by barriers such as high implementation costs, technological limitations, and resistance from healthcare workers. Overcoming these challenges could allow AI to be more widely and cost-effectively integrated, ultimately improving patient care and infection management.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Healthcare-associated infections are infections that patients acquire during hospitalization or while receiving healthcare in other facilities. They represent the most frequent negative outcome in healthcare, can be entirely prevented, and pose a burden in terms of financial and human costs. With the development of new AI and ML algorithms, hospitals could develop new and automated surveillance and prevention models for HAIs, leading to improved patient safety. The aim of this review is to systematically retrieve, collect, and summarize all available information on the application and impact of AI in HAI surveillance and/or prevention.
METHODS METHODS
We conducted a systematic review of the literature using PubMed and Scopus to find articles related to the implementation of artificial intelligence in the surveillance and/or prevention of HAIs.
RESULTS RESULTS
We identified a total of 218 articles, of which only 35 were included in the review. Most studies were conducted in the US (n = 10, 28.6%) and China (n = 5; 14.3%) and were published between 2021 and 2023 (26 articles, 74.3%) with an increasing trend over time. Most focused on the development of ML algorithms for the identification/prevention of surgical site infections (n = 18; 51%), followed by HAIs in general (n = 9; 26%), hospital-acquired urinary tract infections (n = 5; 9%), and healthcare-associated pneumonia (n = 3; 9%). Only one study focused on the proper use of personal protective equipment (PPE) and included healthcare workers as the study population. Overall, the trend indicates that several AI/ML models can effectively assist clinicians in everyday decisions, by identifying HAIs early or preventing them through personalized risk factors with good performance. However, only a few studies have reported an actual implementation of these models, which proved highly successful. In one case, manual workload was reduced by nearly 85%, while another study observed a decrease in the local hospital's HAI incidence from 1.31% to 0.58%.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
AI has significant potential to improve the prevention, diagnosis, and management of healthcare-associated infections, offering benefits such as increased accuracy, reduced workloads, and cost savings. Although some AI applications have already been tested and validated, adoption in healthcare is hindered by barriers such as high implementation costs, technological limitations, and resistance from healthcare workers. Overcoming these challenges could allow AI to be more widely and cost-effectively integrated, ultimately improving patient care and infection management.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39408177
pii: healthcare12191996
doi: 10.3390/healthcare12191996
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Auteurs

Davide Radaelli (D)

Department of Medical Surgical and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, 34127 Trieste, Italy.

Stefano Di Maria (S)

Department of Medical Surgical and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, 34127 Trieste, Italy.

Zlatko Jakovski (Z)

Institute of Forensic Medicine, Criminalistic and Medical Deontology, University Ss. Cyril and Methodius, 1000 Skopje, North Macedonia.

Djordje Alempijevic (D)

Institute of Forensic Medicine 'Milovan Milovanovic', School of Medicine, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.

Ibrahim Al-Habash (I)

Forensic Medicine Department, Mutah University, Karak 61710, Jordan.

Monica Concato (M)

Department of Medical Surgical and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, 34127 Trieste, Italy.

Matteo Bolcato (M)

Department of Medicine, Saint Camillus International University of Health and Medical Sciences, 00131 Rome, Italy.

Stefano D'Errico (S)

Department of Medical Surgical and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, 34127 Trieste, Italy.

Classifications MeSH