Recommended Physiotherapy Modalities for Oncology Patients with Palliative Needs and Its Influence on Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: A Systematic Review.

neoplasms palliative care patient-reported outcome measures physical therapist physical therapy physiotherapist physiotherapy quality of life

Journal

Cancers
ISSN: 2072-6694
Titre abrégé: Cancers (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101526829

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 Oct 2024
Historique:
received: 26 08 2024
revised: 24 09 2024
accepted: 27 09 2024
medline: 16 10 2024
pubmed: 16 10 2024
entrez: 16 10 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

This review aims to explore the role of physiotherapy in early and traditional palliative care (PC) for oncology patients, focusing on its impact on six patient-reported outcomes (PROMs), namely fatigue, pain, cachexia, quality of life (QoL), physical functioning (PHF), and psychosocial functioning (PSF). The purpose is to assess the effectiveness of various physiotherapy interventions and identify gaps in the current research to understand their potential benefits in PC better. A systematic literature search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science, concluding on 21 December 2023. Two independent reviewers screened the articles for inclusion. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 2 was employed to assess the risk of bias, while the GRADE approach was used to evaluate the certainty of the evidence. Nine randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included, with most showing a high risk of bias, particularly in outcome measurement and missing data. Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) was the only intervention that significantly reduced fatigue, enhanced PHF, and improved QoL and emotional functioning. Graded exercise therapy (GET) did not yield significant results. Combined interventions, such as education with problem-solving or nutritional counseling with physical activity, showed no significant effects. Massage significantly improved QoL and reduced pain, while physical application therapies were effective in pain reduction. Mindful breathing exercises (MBE) improved QoL but had a non-significant impact on appetite. The overall certainty of the evidence was low. Physiotherapy can positively influence PROMs in oncology PC; however, the low quality and high risk of bias in existing studies highlight the need for more rigorous research to confirm these findings and guide clinical practice.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
This review aims to explore the role of physiotherapy in early and traditional palliative care (PC) for oncology patients, focusing on its impact on six patient-reported outcomes (PROMs), namely fatigue, pain, cachexia, quality of life (QoL), physical functioning (PHF), and psychosocial functioning (PSF). The purpose is to assess the effectiveness of various physiotherapy interventions and identify gaps in the current research to understand their potential benefits in PC better.
METHODS METHODS
A systematic literature search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science, concluding on 21 December 2023. Two independent reviewers screened the articles for inclusion. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 2 was employed to assess the risk of bias, while the GRADE approach was used to evaluate the certainty of the evidence.
RESULTS RESULTS
Nine randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included, with most showing a high risk of bias, particularly in outcome measurement and missing data. Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) was the only intervention that significantly reduced fatigue, enhanced PHF, and improved QoL and emotional functioning. Graded exercise therapy (GET) did not yield significant results. Combined interventions, such as education with problem-solving or nutritional counseling with physical activity, showed no significant effects. Massage significantly improved QoL and reduced pain, while physical application therapies were effective in pain reduction. Mindful breathing exercises (MBE) improved QoL but had a non-significant impact on appetite. The overall certainty of the evidence was low.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Physiotherapy can positively influence PROMs in oncology PC; however, the low quality and high risk of bias in existing studies highlight the need for more rigorous research to confirm these findings and guide clinical practice.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39409991
pii: cancers16193371
doi: 10.3390/cancers16193371
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Auteurs

Luna Gauchez (L)

Physiotherapy Human Physiology and Anatomy Department (KIMA), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090 Brussels, Belgium.
Rehabilitation Research, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090 Brussels, Belgium.
End-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel & Ghent University, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090 Brussel, Belgium.

Shannon Lauryn L Boyle (SLL)

Physiotherapy Human Physiology and Anatomy Department (KIMA), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090 Brussels, Belgium.

Shinfu Selena Eekman (SS)

Physiotherapy Human Physiology and Anatomy Department (KIMA), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090 Brussels, Belgium.

Sarah Harnie (S)

Physiotherapy Human Physiology and Anatomy Department (KIMA), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090 Brussels, Belgium.
Rehabilitation Research, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090 Brussels, Belgium.
Medical Oncology Department, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, Belgium.

Lore Decoster (L)

End-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel & Ghent University, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090 Brussel, Belgium.
Medical Oncology Department, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, Belgium.

Filip Van Ginderdeuren (F)

Physiotherapy Human Physiology and Anatomy Department (KIMA), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090 Brussels, Belgium.
Rehabilitation Research, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090 Brussels, Belgium.
Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, Belgium.

Len De Nys (L)

Physiotherapy Human Physiology and Anatomy Department (KIMA), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090 Brussels, Belgium.
Rehabilitation Research, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090 Brussels, Belgium.

Nele Adriaenssens (N)

Physiotherapy Human Physiology and Anatomy Department (KIMA), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090 Brussels, Belgium.
Rehabilitation Research, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090 Brussels, Belgium.
Medical Oncology Department, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, Belgium.

Classifications MeSH