Survival of Patients with Metastatic Melanoma Treated with Ipilimumab after PD-1 Inhibitors: A Single-Center Real-World Study.

BRAF NRAS immunotherapy ipilimumab melanoma

Journal

Cancers
ISSN: 2072-6694
Titre abrégé: Cancers (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101526829

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
04 Oct 2024
Historique:
received: 05 08 2024
revised: 27 09 2024
accepted: 02 10 2024
medline: 16 10 2024
pubmed: 16 10 2024
entrez: 16 10 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

When monotherapy with PD-1 inhibitors in metastatic melanoma fails, there are currently no standard second-line choices. In case of the unavailability of clinical trials, ipilimumab represents a possible alternative treatment. We collected data of 44 patients who received ipilimumab after the failure of PD-1 inhibitors from July 2017 to May 2023 at our Institute. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and post-progression survival (PPS) based on BRAF or NRAS mutation status, sex, and the presence of brain metastases were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox regression was used to evaluate independence in multivariate analysis. The objective response rate (ORR) was estimated based on RECIST 1.1. Among the 44 patients enrolled in this study, 28 BRAF-wildtype, 9 BRAF-mutated, and 7 NRAS-mutated patients were identified. OS analysis showed a significant difference between wildtype and BRAF- or NRAS-mutated patients: 23.2 months vs 5.3 and 4.59, respectively, In case of failure to enroll patients in innovative clinical trials, second-line ipilimumab still represents an effective therapy in patients with metastatic wildtype melanoma and in the absence of brain metastases.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
When monotherapy with PD-1 inhibitors in metastatic melanoma fails, there are currently no standard second-line choices. In case of the unavailability of clinical trials, ipilimumab represents a possible alternative treatment.
METHODS METHODS
We collected data of 44 patients who received ipilimumab after the failure of PD-1 inhibitors from July 2017 to May 2023 at our Institute. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and post-progression survival (PPS) based on BRAF or NRAS mutation status, sex, and the presence of brain metastases were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox regression was used to evaluate independence in multivariate analysis. The objective response rate (ORR) was estimated based on RECIST 1.1.
RESULTS RESULTS
Among the 44 patients enrolled in this study, 28 BRAF-wildtype, 9 BRAF-mutated, and 7 NRAS-mutated patients were identified. OS analysis showed a significant difference between wildtype and BRAF- or NRAS-mutated patients: 23.2 months vs 5.3 and 4.59, respectively,
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
In case of failure to enroll patients in innovative clinical trials, second-line ipilimumab still represents an effective therapy in patients with metastatic wildtype melanoma and in the absence of brain metastases.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39410017
pii: cancers16193397
doi: 10.3390/cancers16193397
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Subventions

Organisme : Ministero della Salute
ID : RC2021-2024

Auteurs

Sofia Verkhovskaia (S)

Department of Oncology, Istituto Dermopatico dell'Immacolata IDI-IRCCS, 00167 Rome, Italy.

Rosa Falcone (R)

Department of Oncology, Istituto Dermopatico dell'Immacolata IDI-IRCCS, 00167 Rome, Italy.

Francesca Romana Di Pietro (FR)

Department of Oncology, Istituto Dermopatico dell'Immacolata IDI-IRCCS, 00167 Rome, Italy.

Maria Luigia Carbone (ML)

Clinical Trial Center, Istituto Dermopatico dell'Immacolata IDI-IRCCS, 00167 Rome, Italy.

Tonia Samela (T)

Epidemiology Units, Istituto Dermopatico dell'Immacolata IDI-IRCCS, 00167 Rome, Italy.

Marie Perez (M)

Department of Histopathology, Istituto Dermopatico dell'Immacolata IDI-IRCCS, 00167 Rome, Italy.

Giulia Poti (G)

Department of Oncology, Istituto Dermopatico dell'Immacolata IDI-IRCCS, 00167 Rome, Italy.

Maria Francesca Morelli (MF)

Department of Oncology, Istituto Dermopatico dell'Immacolata IDI-IRCCS, 00167 Rome, Italy.

Albina Rita Zappalà (AR)

Department of Oncology, Istituto Dermopatico dell'Immacolata IDI-IRCCS, 00167 Rome, Italy.

Zorika Christiana Di Rocco (ZC)

Department of Oncology, Istituto Dermopatico dell'Immacolata IDI-IRCCS, 00167 Rome, Italy.

Roberto Morese (R)

Department of Oncology, Istituto Dermopatico dell'Immacolata IDI-IRCCS, 00167 Rome, Italy.

Gabriele Piesco (G)

Department of Oncology, Istituto Dermopatico dell'Immacolata IDI-IRCCS, 00167 Rome, Italy.

Paolo Chesi (P)

Department of Oncology, Istituto Dermopatico dell'Immacolata IDI-IRCCS, 00167 Rome, Italy.

Paolo Marchetti (P)

Department of Oncology, Istituto Dermopatico dell'Immacolata IDI-IRCCS, 00167 Rome, Italy.

Damiano Abeni (D)

Epidemiology Units, Istituto Dermopatico dell'Immacolata IDI-IRCCS, 00167 Rome, Italy.

Cristina Maria Failla (CM)

Experimental Immunology Laboratory, Istituto Dermopatico dell'Immacolata IDI-IRCCS, 00167 Rome, Italy.

Federica De Galitiis (F)

Department of Oncology, Istituto Dermopatico dell'Immacolata IDI-IRCCS, 00167 Rome, Italy.

Classifications MeSH