Validation of a novel medical device (Chloe SED®) for the administration of analgesia during manual vacuum aspiration: a randomized controlled non-inferiority pilot study.
anesthesia
clinical trial
human rights
miscarriage
novel technology
paracervical block
safe abortion
syringe extension device
Journal
Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2673-561X
Titre abrégé: Front Pain Res (Lausanne)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 9918227269806676
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2024
2024
Historique:
received:
19
04
2024
accepted:
22
08
2024
medline:
16
10
2024
pubmed:
16
10
2024
entrez:
16
10
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Millions of women worldwide annually undergo manual vacuum aspiration (MVA) with no pain medication, which is a violation of their basic human dignity. We designed a novel device (Chloe SED®) to administer paracervical block (PCB) during MVA in countries where pain medication is not typically given due to the high cost of the necessary tools. We conducted a single-blinded, randomized controlled non-inferiority trial including 61 patients at two hospitals in Kisumu, Kenya, to validate Chloe SED® for administration of PCB during MVA. PCB administered with Chloe SED® was compared to PCB administered with a standard spinal needle. Patients requiring MVA were block randomized in blocks of six, each provider completing six PCBs-three with the Chloe SED® and three with the standard spinal needle. The trial was registered with the Kenya Pharmacy and Poisons Board, ECCT/19/03/01 (https://ctr.pharmacyboardkenya.org/applications/index/protocol_no:RUNDVC8xOS8wMy8wMQ__/filter:/investigator:/sites:/pages:5/start_date:/end_date:/disease_condition:/users:/ercs:/stages). An intention-to-treat analysis was completed. The primary outcome was the non-inferiority of the pain score during uterine evacuation with a non-inferiority margin of 2 points on an 11-point numerical rating scale. Secondary outcomes included the non-inferiority of the pain score at four other time points and patient satisfaction. Chloe SED® showed non-inferiority of the primary outcome with a mean pain score during evacuation of 3.8 [90% confidence interval (CI): 3.1-4.6] compared with the spinal needle at 4.1 (90% CI: 3.5-4.7). Non-inferiority of the pain score was shown at all time points. Most patients expressed a desire for the continued use of the device to administer PCB for MVA. No adverse events were noted. In summary, the Chloe SED® appears non-inferior to the spinal needle and desirable for the administration of PCB during MVA.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39411382
doi: 10.3389/fpain.2024.1326772
pmc: PMC11476421
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1326772Informations de copyright
© 2024 Ramanathan, Samenjo, Bailey, Imbamba, Odenyo, Koksal, Diehl, Omoto and Gwer.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Subsequent to the completion of this study, AR, SG, K-HT, and RB received grant funding from Grand Challenges Canada to complete a larger randomized controlled trial of the device, which is currently underway. AR, SG, K-HT, and EK have formed two start-up companies, Chloe Innovations, LLC, and Chloe SED, LLC, to hold the device intellectual property and to market the device. AR, SG, K-HT, and EK have received patent protection of the intellectual property in Kenya and internationally. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.