Birthweight charts customised for maternal height optimises the classification of small and large-for-gestational age newborns.
Hadlock
birthweight
customised birthweight chart
epidemiology
fetal growth
large for gestational age
maternal height
prescriptive birthweight chart
small for gestational
Journal
Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992)
ISSN: 1651-2227
Titre abrégé: Acta Paediatr
Pays: Norway
ID NLM: 9205968
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2024
Oct 2024
Historique:
revised:
09
06
2024
received:
12
01
2024
accepted:
13
06
2024
medline:
16
10
2024
pubmed:
16
10
2024
entrez:
16
10
2024
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To construct birthweight charts customised for maternal height and evaluate the effect of customization on SGA and LGA classification. Data were extracted (n = 21 350) from the MiCaS project in the Netherlands (2012-2020). We constructed the MiCaS-birthweight chart customised for maternal height using Hadlock's method. We defined seven 5-centimetre height categories from 153 to 157 cm until 183-187 cm and calculated SGA and LGA prevalences for each category, using MiCaS and current Dutch birthweight charts. The MiCaS-chart showed substantially higher birthweight values between identical percentiles with increasing maternal height. In the Dutch birthweight chart, not customised for maternal height, the prevalence of SGA (<p10) decreased with increasing maternal height category, from 19.7% in the lowest height category to 3.4% in the highest category (range 16.3%). Conversely, the prevalence of LGA (>p90) increased with increasing height category, from 1.4% in the lowest height category to 21.8% in the highest category (range 20.4%). In the MiCaS-birthweight chart, SGA and LGA prevalences were more constant across maternal heights, similar to overall prevalences (SGA range 3.3% and LGA range 1.7%). Compared to the current Dutch birthweight chart, the MiCaS-birthweight chart customised for maternal height shows a more even distribution of SGA and LGA prevalences across maternal heights.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2203-2211Informations de copyright
© 2024 Foundation Acta Paediatrica. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
Chauhan SP, Rice MM, Grobman WA, et al. Neonatal morbidity of small‐ and large‐for‐gestational‐age neonates born at term in uncomplicated pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;130(3):511‐519.
Dowdall D, Flatley C, Kumar S. Birth weight centiles, risk of intrapartum compromise, and adverse perinatal outcomes in term infants. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017;30(17):2126‐2132.
Malin GL, Morris RK, Riley R, Teune MJ, Khan KS. When is birthweight at term abnormally low? A systematic review and meta‐analysis of the association and predictive ability of current birthweight standards for neonatal outcomes. BJOG. 2014;121(5):515‐526.
Damhuis SE, Ganzevoort W, Gordijn SJ. Abnormal fetal growth: small for gestational age, fetal growth restriction, large for gestational age: definitions and epidemiology. Obstet Gynecol Clin N Am. 2021;48(2):267‐279.
Hoftiezer L, Hof MHP, Dijs‐Elsinga J, Hogeveen M, Hukkelhoven C, van Lingen RA. From population reference to national standard: new and improved birthweight charts. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019;220(4):383.e1‐383.e17.
Gardosi J, Mongelli M, Wilcox M, Chang A. An adjustable fetal weight standard. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1995;6(3):168‐174.
Chiossi G, Pedroza C, Costantine MM, Truong VTT, Gargano G, Saade GR. Customized vs population‐based growth charts to identify neonates at risk of adverse outcome: systematic review and Bayesian meta‐analysis of observational studies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017;50(2):156‐166.
Figueras F, Gardosi J. Should we customize fetal growth standards? Fetal Diagn Ther. 2009;25(3):297‐303.
Ego A, Subtil D, Grange G, et al. Should parity be included in customised fetal weight standards for identifying small‐for‐gestational‐age babies? Results from a French multicentre study. BJOG. 2008;115(10):1256‐1264.
Galjaard S, Ameye L, Lees CC, et al. Sex differences in fetal growth and immediate birth outcomes in a low‐risk Caucasian population. Biol Sex Differ. 2019;10(1):48.
Rochow N, AlSamnan M, So HY, et al. Maternal body height is a stronger predictor of birth weight than ethnicity: analysis of birth weight percentile charts. J Perinat Med. 2018;47(1):22‐29.
Zeegers B, Offerhaus P, Peters L, Budé L, Verhoeven C, Nieuwenhuijze M. Impact of maternal height on birthweight classification in singleton births at term: a cohort study in The Netherlands. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022;35(16):3167‐3174.
Voigt M, Rochow N, Jährig K, Straube S, Hufnagel S, Jorch G. Dependence of neonatal small and large for gestational age rates on maternal height and weight—an analysis of the German perinatal survey. J Perinat Med. 2010;38(4):425‐430.
Yearwood L, Bone JN, Wen Q, et al. Does maternal stature modify the association between infants who are small or large for gestational age and adverse perinatal outcomes? A Retrospective Cohort Study. BJOG. 2023;130(5):464‐475.
Mylrea‐Foley B, Napolitano R, Gordijn S, et al. Do differences in diagnostic criteria for late fetal growth restriction matter? Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2023;5(11):101117.
Blue NR, Savabi M, Beddow ME, et al. The Hadlock method is superior to newer methods for the prediction of the birth weight percentile. J Ultrasound Med. 2019;38(3):587‐596.
Mikolajczyk RT, Zhang J, Betran AP, et al. A global reference for fetal‐weight and birthweight percentiles. Lancet. 2011;377(9780):1855‐1861.
Hocquette A, Durox M, Wood R, et al. International versus national growth charts for identifying small and large‐for‐gestational age newborns: a population‐based study in 15 European countries. Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2021;8:100167.
Pouwels A, Offerhaus P, Merkx A, Zeegers B, Nieuwenhuijze MJ. Detailed registration of care in midwifery practices in The Netherlands: an opportunity for research within a healthy pregnant population. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020;20(1):366.
Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. Report of a WHO consultation. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 2000;894:i‐253.
Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Martinez‐Poyer J. In utero analysis of fetal growth: a sonographic weight standard. Radiology. 1991;181(1):129‐133.
Hocquette A, Monier I, Blondel B, Dufourg MN, Heude B, Zeitlin J. Testing the assumptions of customized intrauterine growth charts using national birth studies. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2022;101(4):405‐416.
Voigt M, Rochow N, Guthmann F, Hesse V, Schneider KT, Schnabel D. Geburtsgewichtsperzentilwerte für Mädchen und Knaben unter Berücksichtigung der Körperhöhe der Mutter [Birth weight percentile values for girls and boys under consideration of maternal height]. Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol. 2012;216(5):212‐219.
Fay E, Hugh O, Francis A, et al. Customized GROW vs INTERGROWTH‐21st birthweight standards to identify small for gestational age associated perinatal outcomes at term. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022;4(2):100545.
Figueras F, Figueras J, Meler E, et al. Customised birthweight standards accurately predict perinatal morbidity. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2007;92(4):F277‐F280.
Gardosi J, Francis A, Turner S, Williams M. Customized growth charts: rationale, validation and clinical benefits. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;218(2s):S609.
Monier I, Ego A, Benachi A, et al. Comparison of the performance of estimated fetal weight charts for the detection of small‐ and large‐for‐gestational age newborns with adverse outcomes: a French population‐based study. BJOG. 2022;129(6):938‐948.
Melamed N, Baschat A, Yinon Y, et al. FIGO (International Federation of Gynecology and obstetrics) initiative on fetal growth: best practice advice for screening, diagnosis, and management of fetal growth restriction. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2021;152 Suppl 1(Suppl. 1):3‐57.
Trojner Bregar A, Blickstein I, Steblovnik L, Verdenik I, Lucovnik M, Tul N. Do tall women beget larger babies? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;29(8):1311‐1313.
Raneen AS, Lina DS, Safrai M, Matan L, Porat S. Is birthweight influenced equally by maternal and paternal anthropometry? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022;35(25):9792‐9799.