Retrograde Cricopharyngeal Dysfunction: A Google Search Analysis.
Internet
RCPD
quality
readability
retrograde cricopharyngeus dysfunction
search engine
Journal
Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery
ISSN: 1097-6817
Titre abrégé: Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8508176
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
16 Oct 2024
16 Oct 2024
Historique:
revised:
20
07
2024
received:
28
05
2024
accepted:
04
08
2024
medline:
16
10
2024
pubmed:
16
10
2024
entrez:
16
10
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
No studies describe what patients search for online in relation to retrograde cricopharyngeal dysfunction (RCPD). Our objectives were to describe the Google search volume for RCPD, identify the most common queries related to RCPD, and evaluate the available online resources. Observational. Google Database. Using Ahrefs and Search Response, Google search volume for RCPD and "People Also Ask" (PAA) questions were documented. PAA questions were categorized based on intent, and the websites were categorized on source. The quality and readability of the sources were determined using the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria, Flesch Reading Ease score, and Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level. Search volume for RCPD-related content has continually increased since 2021, with a combined average volume of 6287 searches per month. Most PAA questions were related to technical details (61.07%) and treatments (32.06%) for RCPD. Websites provided to answer these questions were most often from academic (25.95%) and commercial (22.14%) sources. None of the sources met the criteria for universal readability, and only 15% met all quality metrics set forth by JAMA. Interest in RCPD is at an all-time high, with information related to its diagnosis and treatment most popular among Google users. Significantly, none of the resources provided by Google met the criteria for universal readability, preventing many patients from fully comprehending the information presented. Future work should aim to address questions related to RCPD in a suitable way for all patient demographics.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2024 American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Foundation.
Références
Fox S. The Social Life of Health Information. Pew Research Center. 2014.
Fox S. Online Health Search. Pew Research Center. 2006.
Internet growth statistics today's road to e‐commerce and global trade Internet technology reports. Internet World Stats. 2020.
Clement J. Global digital population as of January 2024. Statista. 2024.
Murphy M. Dr google will see you now: search giant wants to cash in on your medical queries. The Telegraph. 2019.
Fassas SN, Krane NA, Zonner JG, Sykes KJ, Kriet JD, Humphrey CD. Google search analysis: what do people want to know about rhinoplasty and where do they find the answers? Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med. 2022;24(5):363‐368. doi:10.1089/fpsam.2021.0100
Davies D. A Complete Guide to the Google RankBrain Algorithm. Search Engine Journal. 2020.
Shen TS, Driscoll DA, Islam W, Bovonratwet P, Haas SB, Su EP. Modern Internet search analytics and total joint arthroplasty: what are patients asking and reading online? J Arthroplasty. 2021;36(4):1224‐1231. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2020.10.024
Nayak P. Understanding searches better than ever before. The Keyword. Google. 2019.
Wu MP, Miller LE, Meyer CD, Feng AL, Richmon JD. Online searches related to total laryngectomy. Laryngoscope. 2023;133:2971‐2976. doi:10.1002/lary.30643
Fassas SN, Peterson AM, Farrokhian N, et al. Sinus surgery and balloon sinuplasty: what do patients want to know. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022;167(4):777‐784. doi:10.1177/01945998221076803
Bastian RW, Smithson ML. Inability to belch and associated symptoms due to retrograde cricopharyngeus dysfunction: diagnosis and treatment. OTO Open. 2019;3(1):2473974X19834553. doi:10.1177/2473974X19834553
Kahrilas PJ, Dodds WJ, Hogan WJ. Dysfunction of the belch reflex. Gastroenterology. 1987;93(4):818‐822. doi:10.1016/0016-5085(87)90445-8
Miller ME, Lina I, Akst LM. Retrograde cricopharyngeal dysfunction: a review. J Clin Med. 2024;13(2):413. doi:10.3390/jcm13020413
Siddiqui SH, Sagalow ES, Fiorella MA, Jain N, Spiegel JR. Retrograde cricopharyngeus dysfunction: the Jefferson experience. Laryngoscope. 2023;133(5):1081‐1085. doi:10.1002/lary.30346
Hoesli RC, Wingo ML, Bastian RW. The Long‐term efficacy of botulinum toxin injection to treat retrograde cricopharyngeus dysfunction. OTO Open. 2020;4(2):2473974X20938342. doi:10.1177/2473974X20938342
Doruk C, Pitman MJ. Lateral transcervical in‐office botulinum toxin injection for retrograde cricopharyngeal dysfunction. Laryngoscope. 2024;134(1):283‐286. doi:10.1002/lary.30871
Karagama Y. Abelchia: inability to belch/burp—a new disorder? retrograde cricopharyngeal dysfunction (RCPD). Eur Arch Otrhinolaryngol. 2021;278(12):5087‐5091. doi:10.1007/s00405-021-06790-w
Moorhead SA, Hazlett DE, Harrison L, Carroll JK, Irwin A, Hoving C. A new dimension of health care: systematic review of the uses, benefits, and limitations of social media for health communication. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(4):e85. doi:10.2196/jmir.1933
Silver JA, Roy CF, Young J, Kost KM. Retrograde cricopharyngeus dysfunction: a Canadian experience fueled by social media. Ear Nose Throat J. 2023;2:014556132311622. doi:10.1177/01455613231162203
Rothwell D. Mixed Company: Communicating in Small Groups. 8th ed. Wadsworth Publishing; 2012.
Peter Kincaid J., Fishburne Jr., RP, Rogers RL, Chissom BS. Derivation of New Readability Formulas (Automated Readability Index, Fog Count and Flesch Reading Ease Formula) for Navy Enlisted Personnel. University of Central Florida. 1975. http://library.ucf.edu
Cotugna N, Vickery CE, Carpenter‐Haefele KM. Evaluation of literacy level of patient education pages in health‐related journals. J Community Health. 2005;30(3):213‐219. doi:10.1007/s10900-004-1959-x
Starman JS, Gettys FK, Capo JA, Fleischli JE, Norton HJ, Karunakar MA. Quality and content of Internet‐based information for ten common orthopaedic sports medicine diagnoses. J Bone Jt Surg. 2010;92(7):1612‐1618. doi:10.2106/JBJS.I.00821
López‐Jornet P, Camacho‐Alonso F. The quality of internet sites providing information relating to oral cancer. Oral Oncol. 2009;45(9):e95‐e98. doi:10.1016/j.oraloncology.2009.03.017
Silberg WM. Assessing, controlling, and assuring the quality of medical information on the Internet. JAMA. 1997;277(15):1244. doi:10.1001/jama.1997.03540390074039
Fan KS, Ghani SA, Machairas N, et al. COVID‐19 prevention and treatment information on the internet: a systematic analysis and quality assessment. BMJ Open. 2020;10(9):e040487. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040487
Arslan D, Tutar MS, Kozanhan B. Evaluating the readability, understandability, and quality of online materials about chest pain in children. Eur J Pediatr. 2020;179(12):1881‐1891. doi:10.1007/s00431-020-03772-8
Wu V, Lee DJ, Vescan A, Lee JM. Evaluating YouTube as a source of patient information for functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Ear Nose Throat J. 2022;101(6):396‐401. doi:10.1177/0145561320962867
Wei K, Fritz C, Rajasekaran K. Answering head and neck cancer questions: an assessment of ChatGPT responses. Am J Otolaryngol. 2024;45(1):104085. doi:10.1016/j.amjoto.2023.104085
Moons P, Van Bulck L. Using ChatGPT and Google Bard to improve the readability of written patient information: a proof of concept. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2024;23(2):122‐126. doi:10.1093/eurjcn/zvad087
Shi M, Hanna J, Clavell C, et al. Assessing readability of patient education materials: a comparative study of ASRS resources and AI‐generated content by popular large language models (ChatGPT 4.0 and Google Bard). Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2024;65(7):5646.
Rohrich RJ, Weinstein A. Paging Dr. Google: the changing face of plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021;148(5S):104S‐107S. doi:10.1097/01.prs.0000794912.60516.94
Suarez‐Lledo V, Alvarez‐Galvez J. Prevalence of health misinformation on social media: systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(1):e17187. doi:10.2196/17187
Rocha YM, de Moura GA, Desidério GA, de Oliveira CH, Lourenço FD, de Figueiredo Nicolete LD. The impact of fake news on social media and its influence on health during the COVID‐19 pandemic: a systematic review. J Public Health (Bangkok). 2023;31(7):1007‐1016. doi:10.1007/s10389-021-01658-z