An exploration of the Return to Practice experience of nursing students: An evaluative mixed methods research study.

NMC registration Nursing careers Retirement Return to nursing Return to practice Wating lists

Journal

Nurse education in practice
ISSN: 1873-5223
Titre abrégé: Nurse Educ Pract
Pays: Scotland
ID NLM: 101090848

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
11 Oct 2024
Historique:
received: 16 04 2024
revised: 23 09 2024
accepted: 25 09 2024
medline: 17 10 2024
pubmed: 17 10 2024
entrez: 16 10 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

This study was conducted to explore the experiences of nursing students on a Return to Practice course; including their confidence levels and intention to remain on the nursing register. Nurses and midwives whose registration with the NMC (Nursing & Midwifery Council) has lapsed may choose to undertake a Return to Practice course. This course enables those who have left the profession to update their skills and knowledge and to re-join the register. Currently, little information exists concerning the experience of returners as they prepare to re-enter the nursing workforce. Exploring the confidence levels and preparedness of Return to Practice nursing students and measuring the effectiveness of a Return to Practice course using an online questionnaire. Mixed methods research design was used to address the evaluative research questions. An anonymous questionnaire was administered online to collect quantitative and qualitative data reflecting the experiences of the Return to Practice nursing students. Return to Practice nursing students feel well prepared by their Return to Practice course and report a high level of confidence in returning to the clinical workforce. Despite their concerns around aspects of nursing, such as the highly pressured working environment, most Return to Practice students intend to continue as a nurse for the remainder of their careers and should therefore be supported with this route into the nursing profession.

Sections du résumé

AIM OBJECTIVE
This study was conducted to explore the experiences of nursing students on a Return to Practice course; including their confidence levels and intention to remain on the nursing register.
BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Nurses and midwives whose registration with the NMC (Nursing & Midwifery Council) has lapsed may choose to undertake a Return to Practice course. This course enables those who have left the profession to update their skills and knowledge and to re-join the register. Currently, little information exists concerning the experience of returners as they prepare to re-enter the nursing workforce.
DESIGN METHODS
Exploring the confidence levels and preparedness of Return to Practice nursing students and measuring the effectiveness of a Return to Practice course using an online questionnaire.
METHODS METHODS
Mixed methods research design was used to address the evaluative research questions. An anonymous questionnaire was administered online to collect quantitative and qualitative data reflecting the experiences of the Return to Practice nursing students.
RESULTS RESULTS
Return to Practice nursing students feel well prepared by their Return to Practice course and report a high level of confidence in returning to the clinical workforce.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Despite their concerns around aspects of nursing, such as the highly pressured working environment, most Return to Practice students intend to continue as a nurse for the remainder of their careers and should therefore be supported with this route into the nursing profession.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39413575
pii: S1471-5953(24)00281-6
doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2024.104152
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

104152

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

Helen Freedman (H)

Kingston Hill, Kingston upon Thames, Surrey KT2 7LB, United Kingdom. Electronic address: h.freedman@kingston.ac.uk.

Ann Ooms (A)

Kingston Hill, Kingston upon Thames, Surrey KT2 7LB, United Kingdom.

Classifications MeSH