Effectiveness and costs of the recruitment strategies used in the MetA-bone trial, a randomized clinical trial to test the effects of soluble corn fiber supplementation for 1 year in children.

Bone Children Intervention Nutrition Recruitment fiber

Journal

Contemporary clinical trials
ISSN: 1559-2030
Titre abrégé: Contemp Clin Trials
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101242342

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
14 Oct 2024
Historique:
received: 23 06 2024
revised: 30 09 2024
accepted: 13 10 2024
medline: 17 10 2024
pubmed: 17 10 2024
entrez: 16 10 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Pediatric recruitment into clinical trials is very challenging. A recruitment plan was designed to recruit healthy children (9-14 years) in a trial testing the 1-year effect of corn soluble fiber supplementation on bone mass. We evaluated the effectiveness and costs of the recruitment strategies used in this trial. The recruitment plan included "Traditional" (mailings, flyers, posters, visits, snowball, etc.) or "Online" (email campaigns, social media, website, etc.) strategies. All strategies led to the pre-screening online form, which asked how they learned about the study. This analysis includes the number of pre-screenings and enrollment (consents signed), ineligibility, socio-demographics, and costs per strategy. Differences were analyzed using ANOVA or chi-square. 649 individuals completed the pre-screening; 37.1 % came from "Traditional", 46.7 % from "Online", 2.6 % from "Other", and 13.6 % from "Unknown" strategies. The most successful strategies were related to Florida International University (posting flyers around campus and email campaigns). The main reasons for ineligibility were obesity (38.9 %) or outside the age range (22.7 %). A total of 48.4 % of the children enrolled came from "Traditional", 50.2 % from "Online", and 1.4 % from "Other" strategies. The cost per screened participant was $1112 for "Traditional" and $512 for "Online" strategies, and the cost per enrolled participant was $2704 for "Traditional" and $1454 for "Online" strategies. The highest costs were staff salary. "Online" strategies were more effective and had a lower implementation cost than "Traditional" strategies, although these were also important in achieving the recruitment goal. Future pediatric trials should consider some of these strategies and their costs. gov registry number: NCT02916862.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Pediatric recruitment into clinical trials is very challenging. A recruitment plan was designed to recruit healthy children (9-14 years) in a trial testing the 1-year effect of corn soluble fiber supplementation on bone mass. We evaluated the effectiveness and costs of the recruitment strategies used in this trial.
METHODS METHODS
The recruitment plan included "Traditional" (mailings, flyers, posters, visits, snowball, etc.) or "Online" (email campaigns, social media, website, etc.) strategies. All strategies led to the pre-screening online form, which asked how they learned about the study. This analysis includes the number of pre-screenings and enrollment (consents signed), ineligibility, socio-demographics, and costs per strategy. Differences were analyzed using ANOVA or chi-square.
RESULTS RESULTS
649 individuals completed the pre-screening; 37.1 % came from "Traditional", 46.7 % from "Online", 2.6 % from "Other", and 13.6 % from "Unknown" strategies. The most successful strategies were related to Florida International University (posting flyers around campus and email campaigns). The main reasons for ineligibility were obesity (38.9 %) or outside the age range (22.7 %). A total of 48.4 % of the children enrolled came from "Traditional", 50.2 % from "Online", and 1.4 % from "Other" strategies. The cost per screened participant was $1112 for "Traditional" and $512 for "Online" strategies, and the cost per enrolled participant was $2704 for "Traditional" and $1454 for "Online" strategies. The highest costs were staff salary.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
"Online" strategies were more effective and had a lower implementation cost than "Traditional" strategies, although these were also important in achieving the recruitment goal. Future pediatric trials should consider some of these strategies and their costs.
CLINICALTRIALS RESULTS
gov registry number: NCT02916862.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39413989
pii: S1551-7144(24)00298-2
doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2024.107715
pii:
doi:

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02916862']

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

107715

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Auteurs

Cristina Palacios (C)

Dietetics and Nutrition Department, Robert Stempel College of Public Health & Social Work, Florida International University, United States of America. Electronic address: cristina.palacios@fiu.edu.

Julia Leone (J)

Dietetics and Nutrition Department, Robert Stempel College of Public Health & Social Work, Florida International University, United States of America.

Priscilla Clayton (P)

Dietetics and Nutrition Department, Robert Stempel College of Public Health & Social Work, Florida International University, United States of America.

Jacqueline Hernandez (J)

Dietetics and Nutrition Department, Robert Stempel College of Public Health & Social Work, Florida International University, United States of America.

María Angélica Trak-Fellermeier (MA)

Dietetics and Nutrition Department, Robert Stempel College of Public Health & Social Work, Florida International University, United States of America.

Alison Macchi (A)

Dietetics and Nutrition Department, Robert Stempel College of Public Health & Social Work, Florida International University, United States of America.

Daniela Ramirez-Roggio (D)

Dietetics and Nutrition Department, Robert Stempel College of Public Health & Social Work, Florida International University, United States of America.

Yivani Cobo (Y)

Dietetics and Nutrition Department, Robert Stempel College of Public Health & Social Work, Florida International University, United States of America.

Shanelle Bautista (S)

Dietetics and Nutrition Department, Robert Stempel College of Public Health & Social Work, Florida International University, United States of America.

Jeneene Connelly (J)

Dietetics and Nutrition Department, Robert Stempel College of Public Health & Social Work, Florida International University, United States of America.

Malik Elington (M)

Dietetics and Nutrition Department, Robert Stempel College of Public Health & Social Work, Florida International University, United States of America.

Jorge Romero (J)

Dietetics and Nutrition Department, Robert Stempel College of Public Health & Social Work, Florida International University, United States of America.

Rodolfo Galvan (R)

Dietetics and Nutrition Department, Robert Stempel College of Public Health & Social Work, Florida International University, United States of America.

Classifications MeSH