The contact lens-tear film interface: Investigating the tear envelope.

Albumin Contact lens/tear protein interaction Interfacial tear envelope Material influence

Journal

Contact lens & anterior eye : the journal of the British Contact Lens Association
ISSN: 1476-5411
Titre abrégé: Cont Lens Anterior Eye
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9712714

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
15 Oct 2024
Historique:
received: 01 05 2024
revised: 23 09 2024
accepted: 09 10 2024
medline: 17 10 2024
pubmed: 17 10 2024
entrez: 16 10 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

To explore the complex interface between the tear film, a unique mucosal fluid which is fundamental to ocular homeostasis and optimal vision, and an in-situ contact lens. This study exploits the use of a unique tear envelope (TE) extraction technique, which harvests the material-influenced layer of tear film that is in intimate contact with the lens during wear, to specifically investigate the influence of contact lens wear on tear film protein dynamics. TEs were collected from freshly removed worn lens using a novel microcentrifuge 'piggyback' technique. Two distinct ex vivo studies were performed to investigate the key influencing factors involved. Non lens-wearing tear samples were also collected from all wearers. A compositional protein profile for each TE and tear film (TF) sample was obtained using an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer lab-on-a-chip microfluidic assay which detected proteins in a 14-230 kDa range. The data demonstrated that the TE protein compositional profile was quite distinct from either that of tear components deposited on the lens or those held in the tear menisci. For example, for one of the participant subgroups the tear protein average values in tears (n = 39) were determined at 35.2 ± 2.5 % lysozyme, 17.2 ± 0.6 % lipocalin, 7.3 ± 1.6 % IgA, 20.3 ± 1.3 % lactoferrin and 0.4 ± 0.4 % albumin as a function of total protein detected. In contrast, the average TE values were measured at 49.2 ± 3.7 %, 21.3 ± 3.9 %, 7.8 ± 1.6 % and 10.2 ± 1.7 % and 1.3 ± 2.8 % respectively with omafilcon A wear. In addition, 63 % of all TE samples (n = 180) (wearing lotrafilcon B and omafilcon A lenses) were albumin positive compared with only 19 % of all pre-lens insertion tear film samples (n = 237). The TE approach not only allows material differentiation, but it can determine changes in the ocular host response that may otherwise be missed by sole non lens-wearing tear film sample analysis.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39414493
pii: S1367-0484(24)00212-1
doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2024.102319
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

102319

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

Aisling M Mann (AM)

Biomaterials Research Unit, School of Engineering and Applied Chemistry, Aston University, Birmingham B4 7ET, UK. Electronic address: mannam@aston.ac.uk.

James S Wolffsohn (JS)

Ophthalmic Research Group, School of Life and Health Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham B4 7ET, UK.

Graeme Young (G)

Visioncare Research Limited, Craven House, West Street, Farnham, Surrey GU9 7EN, UK.

Brian J Tighe (BJ)

Biomaterials Research Unit, School of Engineering and Applied Chemistry, Aston University, Birmingham B4 7ET, UK.

Classifications MeSH