Structure of endothelin ET
Journal
Communications biology
ISSN: 2399-3642
Titre abrégé: Commun Biol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101719179
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
16 Oct 2024
16 Oct 2024
Historique:
received:
03
04
2024
accepted:
16
09
2024
medline:
17
10
2024
pubmed:
17
10
2024
entrez:
16
10
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Endothelin type B receptor (ET
Identifiants
pubmed: 39414992
doi: 10.1038/s42003-024-06905-z
pii: 10.1038/s42003-024-06905-z
doi:
Substances chimiques
Receptor, Endothelin B
0
GTP-Binding Protein alpha Subunits, Gi-Go
EC 3.6.5.1
EDNRB protein, human
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1303Subventions
Organisme : Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED)
ID : JP21am0101118
Organisme : Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED)
ID : JP23ama121004
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Kedzierski, R. M. & Yanagisawa, M. Endothelin system: The double-edged swords in health and disease. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 41, 851–876 (2001).
pubmed: 11264479
doi: 10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.41.1.851
Davenport, A. P. et al. Endothelin. Phamacol. Rev. 68, 357–418 (2016).
Barton, M. & Yanagisawa, M. Endothelin: 30 years from discovery to therapy. Hypertension 74, 1232–1265 (2019).
pubmed: 31679425
doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.119.12105
Enevoldsen, F. C. et al. Endothelin receptor antagonists: status quo and future perspectives for targeted therapy. J. Clin. Med. 9, 824 (2020).
pubmed: 32197449
pmcid: 7141375
doi: 10.3390/jcm9030824
Ranjan, A. K. & Gulati, A. Sovateltide mediated endothelin B receptors agonism and curbing neurological disorders. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 23, 3146 (2022).
pubmed: 35328566
pmcid: 8955091
doi: 10.3390/ijms23063146
Doi, T., Sugimoto, H., Arimoto, I., Hiroaki, Y. & Fijiyoshi, Y. Interactions of endothelin receptor subtypes A and B with Gi, Go, and Gq in reconstituted phospholipid vesicles. Biochemistry 38, 3090–3099 (1999).
pubmed: 10074362
doi: 10.1021/bi981919m
Inoue, A. et al. Illuminating G-Protein-Coupling Selectivity of GPCRs. Cell 177, 1933–1947 (2019).
pubmed: 31160049
pmcid: 6773469
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.04.044
Avet, C. et al. Effector membrane translocation biosensors reveal G protein and βarrestin coupling profiles of 100 therapeutically relevant GPCRs. eLife 11, e74101 (2022).
pubmed: 35302493
pmcid: 9005190
doi: 10.7554/eLife.74101
Ballesteros, J. A. & Weinstein, H. Integrated methods for the construction of three dimensional models and computational probing of structure-function relations in G protein-coupled receptors. Methods Neurosci. 25, 366–428 (1995).
doi: 10.1016/S1043-9471(05)80049-7
Venkatakrishnan, J. et al. Diverse activation pathways in class A GPCRs converge near the G-protein-coupling region. Nature 536, 484–487 (2016).
pubmed: 27525504
pmcid: 5008462
doi: 10.1038/nature19107
Weis, W. I. & Kobilka, B. K. The molecular basis of G protein-coupled receptor activation. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 87, 897–919 (2018).
pubmed: 29925258
pmcid: 6535337
doi: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-060614-033910
Thal, D. M., Glukhova, A., Sexton, P. M. & Christopoulos, A. Structural insights into G-protein-coupled receptor allostery. Nature 559, 45–53 (2018).
pubmed: 29973731
doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0259-z
Carpenter, B. & Tate, C. G. Active state structures of G protein-coupled receptors highlight the similarities and differences in the G protein and arrestin coupling interfaces. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 45, 124–132 (2017).
pubmed: 28482214
doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2017.04.010
Manglik, A. & Kruse, A. C. Structural Basis for G Protein-Coupled Receptor Activation. Biochemistry 56, 5628–5634 (2017).
pubmed: 28967738
doi: 10.1021/acs.biochem.7b00747
Glukhova, A. et al. Rules of Engagement: GPCRs and G Proteins. ACS Pharmacol. Transl. Sci. 1, 73–83 (2018).
pubmed: 32219204
pmcid: 7089011
doi: 10.1021/acsptsci.8b00026
Hilger, D. The role of structural dynamics in GPCR-mediated signaling. FEBS J. 288, 2461–2489 (2021).
pubmed: 33871923
doi: 10.1111/febs.15841
Venkatakrishnan, A. J. et al. Diverse GPCRs exhibit conserved water networks for stabilization and activation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 3288–3293 (2019).
pubmed: 30728297
pmcid: 6386714
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1809251116
Koehl, A. et al. Structure of the μ-opioid receptor-G
pubmed: 29899455
pmcid: 6317904
doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0219-7
Mobbs, J. I. et al. Structures of the human cholecystokinin 1 (CCK1) receptor bound to Gs and Gq mimetic proteins provide insight into mechanisms of G protein selectivity. PLoS Biol. 19, e3001295 (2021).
pubmed: 34086670
pmcid: 8208569
doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001295
Shihoya, W. et al. Activation mechanism of endothelin ET
pubmed: 27595334
doi: 10.1038/nature19319
Okuta, A., Tani, K., Nishimura, S., Fujiyoshi, Y. & Doi, T. Thermostabilization of the human endothelin type B receptor. J. Mol. Biol. 428, 2265–2274 (2016).
pubmed: 27038509
doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2016.03.024
Shihoya, W. et al. X-ray structures of endothelin ET
doi: 10.1038/nsmb.3450
Liang, Y.-L. et al. Dominant negative G proteins enhance formation and purification of agonist-GPCR‑G Protein complexes for structure determination. ACS Pharmacol. Transl. Sci. 1, 12–20 (2018).
pubmed: 32219201
pmcid: 7089020
doi: 10.1021/acsptsci.8b00017
Maeda, S. et al. Development of an antibody fragment that stabilizes GPCR/G protein complexes. Nat. Commun. 9, 3712 (2018).
pubmed: 30213947
pmcid: 6137068
doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-06002-w
Doi, T., Kikuta, K. & Tani, K. Characterization of critical residues in the extracellular and transmembrane domains of the endothelin type-B receptor for propagation of the endothelin-1 signal. Biochemistry 59, 1718–1727 (2020).
pubmed: 32343134
doi: 10.1021/acs.biochem.0c00158
Thom, C. et al. Structures of neurokinin 1 receptor in complex with G
pubmed: 34878828
pmcid: 8654284
doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abk2872
Harris, J. A. et al. Selective G protein signaling driven by substance P–neurokinin receptor dynamics. Nat. Chem. Biol. 18, 109–115 (2022).
pubmed: 34711980
doi: 10.1038/s41589-021-00890-8
Kato, H. E. et al. Conformational transitions of a neurotensin receptor 1-G
pubmed: 31243364
pmcid: 7065593
doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1337-6
Flock, T. et al. Universal allosteric mechanism for Gα activation by GPCRs. Nature 524, 173–179 (2015).
pubmed: 26147082
pmcid: 4866443
doi: 10.1038/nature14663
Sun, D. et al. Probing Gα
pubmed: 26258638
pmcid: 4876908
doi: 10.1038/nsmb.3070
Ji, Y. et al. Structural basis of peptide recognition and activation of endothelin receptors. Nat. Commun. 14, 1268 (2023).
pubmed: 36882417
pmcid: 9992518
doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-36998-9
Peng, S. et al. Structures of human gastrin-releasing peptide receptors bound to antagonist and agonist for cancer and itch therapy. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 1ss20, e2216230120 (2023).
doi: 10.1073/pnas.2216230120
Sano, F. K., Akasaka, H., Shihoya, W. & Nureki, O. Cryo-EM structure of the endothelin-1-ET
pubmed: 37096326
pmcid: 10129325
doi: 10.7554/eLife.85821
Dror, R. O. et al. Structural basis for nucleotide exchange in heterotrimeric G proteins. Science 348, 1361–1365 (2015).
pubmed: 26089515
pmcid: 4968074
doi: 10.1126/science.aaa5264
Yamaguchi, T., Arimoto-Tahara, I., Fujiyoshi, Y. & Doi, T. Characterization and application of monoclonal antibodies against human endothelin B receptor expressed in insect cells. Biotech. Lett. 26, 293–299 (2004).
doi: 10.1023/B:BILE.0000015428.68786.39
Rosenthal, P. B. & Henderson, R. Optimal determination of particle orientation, absolute hand, and contrast loss in single-particle electron cryomicroscopy. J. Mol. Biol. 333, 721–745 (2003).
pubmed: 14568533
doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2003.07.013
Yonekura, K., Maki-Yonekura, S., Naitow, H., Hamaguchi, Y. & Takaba, K. Machine learning-based real-time object locator/evaluator for cryo-EM data collection. Commun. Biol. 4, 1044 (2021).
pubmed: 34493805
pmcid: 8423793
doi: 10.1038/s42003-021-02577-1
Zheng, S. Q. et al. MotionCor2: anisotropic correction of beam-induced motion for improved cryo-electron microscopy. Nat. Methods 14, 331–332 (2017).
pubmed: 28250466
pmcid: 5494038
doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4193
Rohou, A. & Grigorieff, N. Fast and accurate defocus estimation from electron micrographs. J. Struct. Biol. 192, 216–221 (2015).
pubmed: 26278980
pmcid: 6760662
doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2015.08.008
Wagner, T. & Raunser, S. The evolution of SPHIRE-crYOLO particle picking and its application in automated cryo-EM processing workflows. Commun. Biol. 3, 61 (2020).
pubmed: 32047248
pmcid: 7012881
doi: 10.1038/s42003-020-0790-y
Zivanov, J. et al. New tools for automated high-resolution cryo-EM structure determination in RELION-3. eLife 7, e42166 (2018).
pubmed: 30412051
pmcid: 6250425
doi: 10.7554/eLife.42166
Bai, X. C., Rajendra, E., Yang, G., Shi, Y. & Scheer, S. H. Sampling the conformational space of the catalytic subunit of human gamma-secretase. eLife 4, e11182 (2015).
pubmed: 26623517
pmcid: 4718806
doi: 10.7554/eLife.11182
Pettersen, E. F. et al. UCSF Chimera-a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 25, 1605–1612 (2004).
pubmed: 15264254
doi: 10.1002/jcc.20084
Emsley, P., Lohkamp, B., Scott, W. G. & Cowtan, K. Features and development of Coot. Acta Cryst. D66, 486–501 (2010).
Adams, P. D. et al. PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Cryst. D66, 213–221 (2010).
Chen, V. B. et al. MolProbity: all-atom structure validation for macromolecular crystallography. Acta Crystallogr. D. Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 12–21 (2010).
pubmed: 20057044
doi: 10.1107/S0907444909042073
DeLano, W. L. The PyMOL molecular graphics system (DeLano Scientific, LCC, 2004).
Pettersen, E. F. et al. UCSF ChimeraX: Structure visualization for researchers, editors, and developers. Protein Sci. 30, 70–82 (2021).
pubmed: 32881101
doi: 10.1002/pro.3943
Martí-Renom, M. A. et al. Comparative protein structure modeling of genes and genomes. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 29, 291–325 (2000).
pubmed: 10940251
doi: 10.1146/annurev.biophys.29.1.291
Jo, S., Kim, T., Iyer, V. G. & Im, W. CHARMM-GUI: A web-based graphical user interface for CHARMM. J. Comput. Chem. 29, 1859–1865 (2008).
pubmed: 18351591
doi: 10.1002/jcc.20945
Huang, J. & MacKerell, A. D. CHARMM36 all-atom additive protein force field: Validation based on comparison to NMR data. J. Comput. Chem. 34, 2135–2145 (2013).
pubmed: 23832629
pmcid: 3800559
doi: 10.1002/jcc.23354
Huang, J. et al. CHARMM36m: An improved force field for folded and intrinsically disordered proteins. Nat. Methods 14, 71–73 (2016).
pubmed: 27819658
pmcid: 5199616
doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4067
Klauda, J. B. et al. Update of the CHARMM all-atom additive force field for lipids: validation on six lipid types. J. Phys. Chem. B 114, 7830–7843 (2010).
pubmed: 20496934
pmcid: 2922408
doi: 10.1021/jp101759q
Jorgensen, W. L., Chandrasekhar, J., Madura, J. D., Impey, R. W. & Klein, M. L. Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water. J. Chem. Phys. 79, 926–935 (1983).
doi: 10.1063/1.445869
Hoover, W. G. Canonical dynamics: Equilibrium phase-space distributions. Phys. Rev. A 31, 1695–1697 (1985).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.31.1695
Nosé, S. A molecular dynamics method for simulations in the canonical ensemble. Mol. Phys. 52, 255–268 (1984).
doi: 10.1080/00268978400101201
Parrinello, M. & Rahman, A. Crystal Structure and Pair Potentials: A Molecular-Dynamics Study. Phys. Rev. Lett. 45, 1196–1199 (1980).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.45.1196
Darden, T., York, D. & Pedersen, L. Particle mesh Ewald: An N⋅log(N) method for Ewald sums in large systems. J. Chem. Phys. 98, 10089–10092 (1993).
doi: 10.1063/1.464397
Hess, B., Bekker, H., Berendsen, H. J. C. & Fraaije, J. G. E. M. LINCS: A linear constraint solver for molecular simulations. J. Comput. Chem. 18, 1463–1472 (1997).
doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-987X(199709)18:12<1463::AID-JCC4>3.0.CO;2-H
Hess, B. P-LINCS: A parallel linear constraint solver for molecular simulation. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 4, 116–122 (2008).
pubmed: 26619985
doi: 10.1021/ct700200b
Abraham, M. J. et al. Gromacs: High performance molecular simulations through multi-level parallelism from laptops to supercomputers. SoftwareX 1, 19–25 (2015).
doi: 10.1016/j.softx.2015.06.001