Inotropes and mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock: an instrumental variable analysis from the SWEDEHEART registry.


Journal

European heart journal. Cardiovascular pharmacotherapy
ISSN: 2055-6845
Titre abrégé: Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101669491

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
16 Oct 2024
Historique:
medline: 17 10 2024
pubmed: 17 10 2024
entrez: 17 10 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

The use of inotropic agents in treating cardiogenic shock (CS) remains controversial. This study investigates the effect of inotropes on 30-day mortality in CS patients using data from the SWEDEHEART registry (The Swedish Web-system for Enhancement and Development of Evidence-based care in Heart disease Evaluated According to Recommended Therapies). Data were sourced from the national SWEDEHEART registry for all CS patients in Sweden from 2000 to 2022. The primary endpoint was 30-day all-cause mortality. We employed multilevel Cox proportional-hazards regression with instrumental variable and inverse probability weighting propensity score to adjust for confounders. The treatment-preference instrument was the quintile of preference for inotrope use at the treating hospital. A total of 16 214 patients (60.5% men, 39.5% women) were included; 23.5% had diabetes, 10.2% had a previous myocardial infarction (MI), and 13.8% had previous heart failure (HF). The median age was 70 years (IQR; 19), with 66.4% over 70. Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) caused CS in 82.9%. Inotropes were administered to 43.8% of patients, while 56.2% did not receive them. There were 7 875 (48.1%) deaths. Patients treated with inotropes were, on average, two years younger and more likely to have ACS, while those not treated had more previous MI and were less likely to undergo PCI. The number of CS cases decreased by 12% per year (Ptrend < 0.001), and inotrope use increased by 5% per year (Ptrend < 0.001). Unadjusted mortality in CS rose by 2% per calendar year (Ptrend < 0.001). Inotropes were associated with higher mortality (adjusted HR 1.72; 95% CI 1.26-2.35; P = 0.001), with significant interactions between inotrope treatment, age, and diagnosis (Pinteraction < 0.001 and Pinteraction = 0.018). In this observational study, inotropes were linked to higher mortality in CS patients, particularly those younger than 70. While CS cases decreased, inotrope use and mortality increased in Sweden.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The use of inotropic agents in treating cardiogenic shock (CS) remains controversial. This study investigates the effect of inotropes on 30-day mortality in CS patients using data from the SWEDEHEART registry (The Swedish Web-system for Enhancement and Development of Evidence-based care in Heart disease Evaluated According to Recommended Therapies).
METHODS METHODS
Data were sourced from the national SWEDEHEART registry for all CS patients in Sweden from 2000 to 2022. The primary endpoint was 30-day all-cause mortality. We employed multilevel Cox proportional-hazards regression with instrumental variable and inverse probability weighting propensity score to adjust for confounders. The treatment-preference instrument was the quintile of preference for inotrope use at the treating hospital.
RESULTS RESULTS
A total of 16 214 patients (60.5% men, 39.5% women) were included; 23.5% had diabetes, 10.2% had a previous myocardial infarction (MI), and 13.8% had previous heart failure (HF). The median age was 70 years (IQR; 19), with 66.4% over 70. Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) caused CS in 82.9%. Inotropes were administered to 43.8% of patients, while 56.2% did not receive them. There were 7 875 (48.1%) deaths. Patients treated with inotropes were, on average, two years younger and more likely to have ACS, while those not treated had more previous MI and were less likely to undergo PCI. The number of CS cases decreased by 12% per year (Ptrend < 0.001), and inotrope use increased by 5% per year (Ptrend < 0.001). Unadjusted mortality in CS rose by 2% per calendar year (Ptrend < 0.001). Inotropes were associated with higher mortality (adjusted HR 1.72; 95% CI 1.26-2.35; P = 0.001), with significant interactions between inotrope treatment, age, and diagnosis (Pinteraction < 0.001 and Pinteraction = 0.018).
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
In this observational study, inotropes were linked to higher mortality in CS patients, particularly those younger than 70. While CS cases decreased, inotrope use and mortality increased in Sweden.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39415431
pii: 7824428
doi: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvae078
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.

Auteurs

Petur Petursson (P)

Department of Cardiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Institute of Medicine, Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Bruna stråket 16, 41345 Gothenburg, Sweden.

Thorsteinn Gudmundsson (T)

Department of Cardiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Institute of Medicine, Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Bruna stråket 16, 41345 Gothenburg, Sweden.

Truls Råmunddal (T)

Department of Cardiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Institute of Medicine, Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Bruna stråket 16, 41345 Gothenburg, Sweden.

Oskar Angerås (O)

Department of Cardiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Institute of Medicine, Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Bruna stråket 16, 41345 Gothenburg, Sweden.

Araz Rawshani (A)

Department of Cardiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Institute of Medicine, Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Bruna stråket 16, 41345 Gothenburg, Sweden.

Moman A Mohammad (MA)

Department of Cardiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Institute of Medicine, Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Bruna stråket 16, 41345 Gothenburg, Sweden.

Jonas Persson (J)

Department of Cardiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Institute of Medicine, Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Bruna stråket 16, 41345 Gothenburg, Sweden.

Joakim Alfredsson (J)

Department of Cardiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Institute of Medicine, Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Bruna stråket 16, 41345 Gothenburg, Sweden.

Robin Hofmann (R)

Department of Cardiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Institute of Medicine, Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Bruna stråket 16, 41345 Gothenburg, Sweden.

Tomas Jernberg (T)

Department of Cardiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Institute of Medicine, Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Bruna stråket 16, 41345 Gothenburg, Sweden.

Ole Fröbert (O)

Department of Cardiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Institute of Medicine, Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Bruna stråket 16, 41345 Gothenburg, Sweden.

David Erlinge (D)

Department of Cardiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Institute of Medicine, Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Bruna stråket 16, 41345 Gothenburg, Sweden.

Björn Redfors (B)

Department of Cardiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Institute of Medicine, Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Bruna stråket 16, 41345 Gothenburg, Sweden.

Elmir Omerovic (E)

Department of Cardiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Institute of Medicine, Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Bruna stråket 16, 41345 Gothenburg, Sweden.

Classifications MeSH