Short insemination during conventional in vitro fertilization increases embryo quality.

embryo insemination morphokinetics time lapse

Journal

Andrology
ISSN: 2047-2927
Titre abrégé: Andrology
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101585129

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
17 Oct 2024
Historique:
revised: 01 09 2024
received: 04 04 2024
accepted: 27 09 2024
medline: 17 10 2024
pubmed: 17 10 2024
entrez: 17 10 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

To compare clinical outcomes using short and long co-incubation protocols in sibling oocytes based on embryo morphokinetic outcomes measured by time-lapse incubator with stratification based on a woman's age and sperm quality. Our study included 72 cycles with >6 oocytes retrieved. Sibling oocytes were distributed for two parallel protocols: short (3 h; n = 421) or long (16-20 h; n = 434) insemination, using the same amount of spermatozoa from the same prepared sample. Oocytes were then washed and incubated for 5 days. Time-lapse annotations of embryos were performed by experienced embryologists and artificial intelligence-based Known Implantation Data scores for day 3 and day 5 were calculated with EmbryoScope software. Short-insemination group exhibited a higher blastulation rate, better morphokinetic indicators, and higher Known Implantation Data scores on day 3 and day 5 of the utilized embryos. However, the fertilization rate and clinical pregnancy rate per embryo transfer did not differ between experimental groups. A higher rate of abnormal fertilization (>2 pronuclei) after long insemination was recorded in women under 35 years old or with a total motile sperm count above 5 million and above 40% motility after preparation. A higher rate of usable embryos was observed after short insemination with a total motile sperm count above 30 million before preparation or 5 million and over 40% motility after preparation. Our results suggest that a short insemination protocol results in better embryo quality and should be considered as a favorable protocol, especially in young female patients or male patients with high sperm quality.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39415620
doi: 10.1111/andr.13781
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© 2024 American Society of Andrology and European Academy of Andrology.

Références

Saleh RA, Agarwal A. Oxidative stress and male infertility: from research bench to clinical practice. J Androl. 2002;23(6):737‐752.
Kowalczyk A. The role of the natural antioxidant mechanism in sperm cells. Reprod Sci. 2022;29(5):1387‐1394. doi:10.1007/s43032‐021‐00795‐w
Mahfouz R, Sharma R, Thiyagarajan A, et al. Semen characteristics and sperm DNA fragmentation in infertile men with low and high levels of seminal reactive oxygen species. Fertil Steril. 2010;94(6):2141‐2146. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.12.030
Dirnfeld M, Shiloh H, Bider D, et al. A prospective randomized controlled study of the effect of short coincubation of gametes during insemination on zona pellucida thickness. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2003;17(5):397‐403. doi:10.1080/09513590312331290288
Gianaroli L, Magli MC, Ferraretti AP, et al. Reducing the time of sperm‐oocyte interaction in human in‐vitro fertilization improves the implantation rate. Hum Reprod. 1996;11(1):166‐171. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019011
Le Bras A, Hesters L, Gallot V, Tallet C, Tachdjian G, Frydman N. Shortening gametes co‐incubation time improves live birth rate for couples with a history of fragmented embryos. Syst Biol Reprod Med. 2017;63(5):331‐337. doi:10.1080/19396368.2017.1336581
Sasaki H, Hamatani T, Kamijo S, et al. Impact of oxidative stress on age‐associated decline in oocyte developmental competence. Front Endocrinol. 2019;10:811. doi:10.3389/fendo.2019.00811
Bungum M, Bungum L, Humaidan P. A prospective study, using sibling oocytes, examining the effect of 30 seconds versus 90 minutes gamete co‐incubation in IVF. Hum Reprod. 2006;21(2):518‐523. doi:10.1093/humrep/dei350
Fan Y, Wu Z, Peng F, Peng H, Liang X, Zhu S. Brief and long co‐incubation of sperm and oocytes for in vitro fertilization: a meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023;23(1):200. doi:10.1186/s12884‐023‐05490‐z
Liu W, Liu J, Zhang X, Han W, Xiong S, Huang G. Short co‐incubation of gametes combined with early rescue ICSI: an optimal strategy for complete fertilization failure after IVF. Hum Fertil. 2014;17(1):50‐55. doi:10.3109/14647273.2013.859746
Canipari R. Oocyte‐granulosa cell interactions. Hum Reprod Update. 2000;6(3):279‐289. doi:10.1093/humupd/6.3.279
Kattera S, Chen C. Short coincubation of gametes in in vitro fertilization improves implantation and pregnancy rates: a prospective, randomized, controlled study. Fertil Steril. 2003;80(4):1017‐1021. doi:10.1016/S0015‐0282(03)01154‐3
Huang Z, Li J, Wang L, Yan J, Shi Y, Li S. Brief co‐incubation of sperm and oocytes for in vitro fertilization techniques. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;2013(4):CD009391. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD009391.pub2
Lundqvist M, Johansson U, Lundkvist ö, Milton K, Westin C, Simberg N. Reducing the time of co‐incubation of gametes in human in‐vitro fertilization has no beneficial effects. Reprod Biomed Online. 2001;3(1):21‐24. doi:10.1016/S1472‐6483(10)61959‐1
Barraud‐Lange V, Sifer C, Pocaté K, et al. Short gamete co‐incubation during in vitro fertilization decreases the fertilization rate and does not improve embryo quality: a prospective auto controlled study. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2008;25(7):305‐310. doi:10.1007/s10815‐008‐9240‐3
Pongsuthirak P. Comparison of short and long co‐incubation time of gametes for in vitro fertilization. Int J Reprod Contraception Obstet Gynecol. 2019;8(11):4366. doi:10.18203/2320‐1770.ijrcog20194548
Meseguer M, Herrero J, Tejera A, Hilligsoe KM, Ramsing NB, Remohi J. The use of morphokinetics as a predictor of embryo implantation. Hum Reprod. 2011;26(10):2658‐2671. doi:10.1093/humrep/der256
Sayed S, Reigstad MM, Petersen BM, Schwennicke A, Wegner Hausken J, Storeng R. Time‐lapse imaging derived morphokinetic variables reveal association with implantation and live birth following in vitro fertilization: a retrospective study using data from transferred human embryos. PLoS One. 2020;15(11):e0242377. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0242377
Apter S, Ebner T, Freour T, et al. Good practice recommendations for the use of time‐lapse technology. Hum Reprod Open. 2020;2020(2):hoaa008. doi:10.1093/hropen/hoaa008
World Health Organization. WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination and Processing of Human Semen. World Health Organization; 2021.

Auteurs

Luba Nemerovsky (L)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IVF Unit, Meir Medical Center, Kfar Saba, Israel.
Faculty of Medicine, Tel aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

Yehudith Ghetler (Y)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IVF Unit, Meir Medical Center, Kfar Saba, Israel.

Danit Israel Bakhshi (DI)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IVF Unit, Meir Medical Center, Kfar Saba, Israel.

Tal Rom (T)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IVF Unit, Meir Medical Center, Kfar Saba, Israel.

Ayelet Itskovich (A)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IVF Unit, Meir Medical Center, Kfar Saba, Israel.

Noga Yeres (N)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IVF Unit, Meir Medical Center, Kfar Saba, Israel.

Rita Yefimov (R)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IVF Unit, Meir Medical Center, Kfar Saba, Israel.

Olga Kaplanski (O)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IVF Unit, Meir Medical Center, Kfar Saba, Israel.

Amir Wiser (A)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IVF Unit, Meir Medical Center, Kfar Saba, Israel.
Faculty of Medicine, Tel aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

Mattan Levi (M)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IVF Unit, Meir Medical Center, Kfar Saba, Israel.
Faculty of Medicine, Tel aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

Classifications MeSH