Experience with luspatercept therapy in patients with transfusion-dependent low-risk myelodysplastic syndromes in real-world clinical practice: exploring the positive effect of combination with erythropoietin alfa.

anemia epoetin alfa luspatercept myelodysplastic syndromes treatment

Journal

Frontiers in oncology
ISSN: 2234-943X
Titre abrégé: Front Oncol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101568867

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2024
Historique:
received: 09 03 2024
accepted: 19 07 2024
medline: 17 10 2024
pubmed: 17 10 2024
entrez: 17 10 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Luspatercept, an inhibitor of the transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β) pathway, is a novel treatment for anemic patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) with transfusion dependence (TD) who do not respond to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESA) therapy or are not suitable candidates for this treatment. We present real-world experience with luspatercept therapy from two hematology centers in the Czech Republic. By January 2024, 54 MDS patients (33 men, 21 women) with a median age of 74 years (range, 55-95) were treated with luspatercept ± ESA at two Charles University hematology centers in Prague and Hradec Králové. According to the WHO 2016 classification, the cohort included 32 MDS-RS-MLD, seven MDS-MLD, two patients with 5q- + ring sideroblasts (RS), 12 RARS-T, and 1 patient with CMML-0 + RS. Only patients who received luspatercept for ≥ 8 weeks (51 patients) were assessed. We evaluated the achievement of transfusion independence (TI) lasting 8, 12, 16, and 24 weeks. Thirty-two (62.7%) patients achieved TI for ≥ 8 weeks, 31 (60.7%) for ≥ 12 weeks, 29 (56.8%) for ≥ 16 weeks, and 25 (49%) for ≥ 24 weeks. Hematologic improvement (HI) without TI was achieved in six patients (11.7%). Overall, HI + TI was achieved in 38 patients (74.5%). Epoetin alfa was used simultaneously in 31 patients (60.7%). In 21 (55.2%) of all responding patients, concomitant therapy with epoetin alfa led to an improved response, with 16 reaching TI. Thirteen (25.5%) patients were nonresponders. Eight (21%) patients experienced therapy failure and became transfusion-dependent again. Optimal response required a gradual increase in the luspatercept dose to 1.75 mg/kg in up to 35 patients, with 23 responders (TI + HI). Response rates varied by transfusion burden: 79% in LTB and 50% in HTB reached TI. Of RS+ patients, 70% reached TI, while only one out of five RS- patients achieved TI. Among 39 We have demonstrated in real-world clinical practice that luspatercept is a very effective agent, even in an unselected, pretreated, significantly TD MDS population. The effect was particularly high in the IPSS-M low and very low groups. We believe that the relatively high response rate in our patients was influenced by the frequent use of a higher dose (1.75 mg/kg) and especially by adding ESA to luspatercept in poorly responding patients.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
Luspatercept, an inhibitor of the transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β) pathway, is a novel treatment for anemic patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) with transfusion dependence (TD) who do not respond to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESA) therapy or are not suitable candidates for this treatment. We present real-world experience with luspatercept therapy from two hematology centers in the Czech Republic.
Methods UNASSIGNED
By January 2024, 54 MDS patients (33 men, 21 women) with a median age of 74 years (range, 55-95) were treated with luspatercept ± ESA at two Charles University hematology centers in Prague and Hradec Králové. According to the WHO 2016 classification, the cohort included 32 MDS-RS-MLD, seven MDS-MLD, two patients with 5q- + ring sideroblasts (RS), 12 RARS-T, and 1 patient with CMML-0 + RS.
Results UNASSIGNED
Only patients who received luspatercept for ≥ 8 weeks (51 patients) were assessed. We evaluated the achievement of transfusion independence (TI) lasting 8, 12, 16, and 24 weeks. Thirty-two (62.7%) patients achieved TI for ≥ 8 weeks, 31 (60.7%) for ≥ 12 weeks, 29 (56.8%) for ≥ 16 weeks, and 25 (49%) for ≥ 24 weeks. Hematologic improvement (HI) without TI was achieved in six patients (11.7%). Overall, HI + TI was achieved in 38 patients (74.5%). Epoetin alfa was used simultaneously in 31 patients (60.7%). In 21 (55.2%) of all responding patients, concomitant therapy with epoetin alfa led to an improved response, with 16 reaching TI. Thirteen (25.5%) patients were nonresponders. Eight (21%) patients experienced therapy failure and became transfusion-dependent again. Optimal response required a gradual increase in the luspatercept dose to 1.75 mg/kg in up to 35 patients, with 23 responders (TI + HI). Response rates varied by transfusion burden: 79% in LTB and 50% in HTB reached TI. Of RS+ patients, 70% reached TI, while only one out of five RS- patients achieved TI. Among 39
Conclusion UNASSIGNED
We have demonstrated in real-world clinical practice that luspatercept is a very effective agent, even in an unselected, pretreated, significantly TD MDS population. The effect was particularly high in the IPSS-M low and very low groups. We believe that the relatively high response rate in our patients was influenced by the frequent use of a higher dose (1.75 mg/kg) and especially by adding ESA to luspatercept in poorly responding patients.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39416466
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1398331
pmc: PMC11480566
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

1398331

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 Jonasova, Sotakova, Belohlavkova, Minarik, Stopka, Jonas, Aghova and Zemanova.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Auteurs

Anna Jonasova (A)

First Department of Medicine, Hematology, General University Hospital and First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czechia.

Slavka Sotakova (S)

First Department of Medicine, Hematology, General University Hospital and First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czechia.

Petra Belohlavkova (P)

4th Department of Internal Medicine-Hematology, Charles University Hospital, Hradec Kralove, Czechia.

Lubomir Minarik (L)

First Department of Medicine, Hematology, General University Hospital and First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czechia.

Tomas Stopka (T)

First Department of Medicine, Hematology, General University Hospital and First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czechia.
BIOCEV, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czechia.

Jan Jakub Jonas (JJ)

University College of London, London, United Kingdom.

Tatiana Aghova (T)

Center of Oncocytogenomics, Institute of Clinical Biochemistry and Laboratory Diagnostics, General University Hospital and First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czechia.

Zuzana Zemanova (Z)

Center of Oncocytogenomics, Institute of Clinical Biochemistry and Laboratory Diagnostics, General University Hospital and First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czechia.

Classifications MeSH