Impact of rehabilitation with dental implants on the quality of life of patients undergoing maxillofacial reconstruction: a systematic review.

Content validity Dental implant Patient reported outcome measure (PROM) Quality of life Reconstruction Surgical flaps

Journal

Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation
ISSN: 1573-2649
Titre abrégé: Qual Life Res
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9210257

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
17 Oct 2024
Historique:
accepted: 23 09 2024
medline: 17 10 2024
pubmed: 17 10 2024
entrez: 17 10 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Maxillofacial reconstruction with dental implants in microvascular tissue flaps aims to improve mastication. However, the quality of life (QoL) impact of this intervention is yet to be determined. This systematic review assessed the QoL impact of maxillofacial reconstruction with implant-supported teeth compared to no dental rehabilitation, removable dentures, and obturator (modified denture). Additionally, we examined instruments applied to measure QoL in maxillofacial reconstruction. Databases Ovid Medline and Embase, Scopus, Web of Science and Handle on QoL were searched. Cohort, case-control and randomized controlled trials (RCT) were narratively synthesized for QoL captured through validated instruments. Study methodological quality was assessed using Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 and Risk of Bias in Non-randomized studies of Exposure. Instruments underwent COSMIN content validity analysis. Of a total of 2735 studies screened, the three included studies (two cohort and one RCT) showed improved QoL with maxillofacial reconstruction compared to obturator and no dental rehabilitation. However, these studies have high risk of bias due to confounding. None of the instruments achieved a sufficient relevance rating for maxillofacial reconstruction, having been designed for other target populations and there is no evidence on their content validity for this population, but the EORTC QLQ30 H&N35 satisfied more COSMIN criteria than the UW-QOL and OHIP-14. Although studies showed favourable QoL with maxillofacial reconstruction involving dental implants, these have high risk of bias and further studies are needed to establish the impact. Existing QoL instruments lack content validity and tailored instruments are needed for QoL evaluation in maxillofacial reconstruction.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39417950
doi: 10.1007/s11136-024-03795-w
pii: 10.1007/s11136-024-03795-w
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© 2024. The Author(s).

Références

Wang, L., Su, Y. X., & Liao, G. Q. (2009). Quality of life in osteoradionecrosis patients after mandible primary reconstruction with free fibula flap. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology, 108(2), 162–168.
doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.03.005
Zhang, J., Gu, Z., Jiang, L., et al. (2010). Ameloblastoma in children and adolescents. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 48(7), 549–554.
doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2009.08.020
Bray, F., Ferlay, J., Soerjomataram, I., et al. (2018). Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 68(6), 394–424.
McCrary, H. C., Seim, N. B., & Old, M. O. (2023). History, innovation, pearls, and pitfalls in complex midface reconstruction. Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America, 56(4), 703–713.
doi: 10.1016/j.otc.2023.04.010
Pellini, R., Mercante, G., & Spriano, G. (2012). Step-by-step mandibular reconstruction with free fibula flap modelling. ACTA Otorhinolaryngologica Italica, 32(6), 405–409.
pmcid: 3552535
Iyer, S., & Thankappan, K. (2014). Maxillary reconstruction: Current concepts and controversies. Indian Journal of Plastic Surgery, 47(1), 8–19.
pmcid: 4075223 doi: 10.4103/0970-0358.129618
Sharma, A. J., Nagrath, R., & Lahori, M. (2017). A comparative evaluation of chewing efficiency, masticatory bite force, and patient satisfaction between conventional denture and implant-supported mandibular overdenture: An in vivo study. Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society, 17(4), 361–372.
pmcid: 5730927 doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_76_17
Pappalardo, M., Tsao, C. K., Tsang, M. L., et al. (2018). Long-term outcome of patients with or without osseointegrated implants after resection of mandibular ameloblastoma and reconstruction with vascularized bone graft: Functional assessment and quality of life. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery, 71(7), 1076–1085.
doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2018.03.008
Kumar, V. V., Jacob, P. C., Ebenezer, S., et al. (2016). Implant supported dental rehabilitation following segmental mandibular reconstruction- quality of life outcomes of a prospective randomized trial. Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, 44(7), 800–810.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2016.04.013
Brandão, T. B., Vechiato, F. A. J., Prado, R. A. C., et al. (2016). Evaluation of use of acrylic resin-based surgical guide in the function and quality of life provided by mandibular prostheses with microvascular free fibula flap: A four-year, randomized, controlled trial. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 116(3), 457–463.
doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.02.012
Gabr, E. M., Kobayashi, M. R., Salibian, A. H., et al. (2004). Oromandibular reconstruction with vascularized free flaps: A review of 50 cases. Microsurgery, 24(5), 374–377.
doi: 10.1002/micr.20057
Attia, S., Wiltfang, J., Streckbein, P., et al. (2019). Functional and aesthetic treatment outcomes after immediate jaw reconstruction using a fibula flap and dental implants. Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, 47(5), 786–791.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2018.12.017
Okay, D. J., Buchbinder, D., Urken, M., et al. (2013). Computer-assisted implant rehabilitation of maxillomandibular defects reconstructed with vascularized bone free flaps. JAMA Otolaryngology Head Neck Surgery, 139(4), 371–381.
doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2013.83
Lodders, J. N., Van, B. G. J. C., Vergeer, M. R., et al. (2022). Implant-based dental rehabilitation in head and neck cancer patients after maxillofacial reconstruction with a free vascularized fibula flap: the effect on health-related quality of life. Support Care Cancer, 30(6), 5411–5420.
pmcid: 9046363 doi: 10.1007/s00520-022-06944-4
Said, M. M., Otomaru, T., Sumita, Y., et al. (2017). Systematic review of literature: functional outcomes of implant-prosthetic treatment in patients with surgical resection for oral cavity tumors. Journal of Investigative and Clinical Dentistry, 8(2), 1–9.
doi: 10.1111/jicd.12207
Wijbenga, J. G., Schepers, R. H., Werker, P. M., Witjes, M. J., & Dijkstra, P. U. (2016). A systematic review of functional outcome and quality of life following reconstruction of maxillofacial defects using vascularized free fibula flaps and dental rehabilitation reveals poor data quality. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery, 69(8), 1024–1036.
doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2016.05.003
Quadri, M. F. A., Alamir, A. W. H., John, T., et al. (2020). Effect of prosthetic rehabilitation on oral health-related quality of life of patients with head and neck cancer: A systematic review. Translational Cancer Research, 9(4), 3107–3118.
pmcid: 8797697 doi: 10.21037/tcr.2019.12.48
Singh, J., Sloan, J. A., & Johanson, N. A. (2010). Challenges with health-related quality of life assessment in arthroplasty patients: Problems and solutions. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 18(2), 72–82.
doi: 10.5435/00124635-201002000-00002
Pequeno, N. P. F., Cabral, N. L. A., Marchioni, D. M., Lima, S., & Lyra, C. O. (2020). Quality of life assessment instruments for adults: A systematic review of population-based studies. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 18(1), 208–217.
pmcid: 7329518 doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01347-7
Petrovic, I., Panchal, H., De, S., Franca, P. D., et al. (2019). A systematic review of validated tools assessing functional and aesthetic outcomes following fibula free flap reconstruction of the mandible. Head and Neck, 41(1), 248–255.
doi: 10.1002/hed.25452
Mehta, T., Venkata, S. A., Chetter, I., & McCollum, P. (2003). Disease-specific quality of life assessment in intermittent claudication: review. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 25(3), 202–208.
doi: 10.1053/ejvs.2002.1837
Brennan, D. S. (2013). Oral health impact profile, EuroQol, and assessment of quality of life instruments as quality of life and health-utility measures of oral health. European Journal Oral Sciences, 121(3), 188–193.
doi: 10.1111/eos.12035
De, V. M., Ouwendijk, R., Kessels, A. G., et al. (2005). Comparison of generic and disease-specific questionnaires for the assessment of quality of life in patients with peripheral arterial disease. Journal of Vascular Surgery, 41(2), 261–268.
doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2004.11.022
Locker, D., & Allen, F. (2007). What do measures of ‘oral health-related quality of life’ measure? Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology, 35(6), 401–411.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2007.00418.x
Gaxiola-García, M. A., Kushida-Contreras, B. H., Albornoz, C. R., & Manrique, O. J. (2024). Quality of life assessment after microvascular head and neck reconstruction: A systematic review of available tools. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 62(1), 23–29.
Pusic, A., Liu, J. C., Chen, C. M., et al. (2007). A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures in head and neck cancer surgery. Otolaryngology Head Neck Surgery, 136(4), 525–535.
doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2006.12.006
Terrell, J. E., Nanavati, K. A., Esclamado, R. M., et al. (1997). Head and neck cancer-specific quality of life: Instrument validation. Archives of otolaryngology head & neck surgery, 123(10), 1125–1132.
doi: 10.1001/archotol.1997.01900100101014
Funk, G. F., Karnell, L. H., Christensen, A. J., Moran, P. J., & Ricks, J. (2003). Comprehensive head and neck oncology health status assessment. Head Neck, 25(7), 561–575.
doi: 10.1002/hed.10245
Boyes, H., Barraclough, J., Ratansi, R., Rogers, S. N., & Kanatas, A. (2018). Structured review of the patient-reported outcome instruments used in clinical trials in head and neck surgery. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 56(3), 161–167.
doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2017.10.019
Kanatas, A. N., & Rogers, S. N. (2010). A systematic review of patient self-completed questionnaires suitable for oral and maxillofacial surgery. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 48(8), 579–590.
doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2009.12.004
Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., et al. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ, 339, 2700.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2700
World Health Organization. ICD-DA. (1995) Application of the International Classification of Diseases to Dentistry and Stomatology. England.
Flemyng, E., Moore, T. H., Boutron, I., et al. (2023). Using Risk of Bias 2 to assess results from randomised controlled trials: guidance from Cochrane. BMJ Evidence Based Medicine, 28(4), 260–266.
doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2022-112102
Sterne, J. A. C., Page, M. J., Elbers, R. G., Blencowe, N. S., et al. (2019). RoB 2: A revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ, 366, 4898.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4898
Higgins, J. P. T., Morgan, R. L., Rooney, A. A., et al. (2024). A tool to assess risk of bias in non-randomized follow-up studies of exposure effects (ROBINS-E). Environment International, 24, 186.
Terwee, C. B., Jansma, E. P., Riphagen, I. I., & de Vet, H. C. (2009). Development of a methodological PubMed search filter for finding studies on measurement properties of measurement instruments. Quality of Life Research, 18(8), 1115–1123.
pmcid: 2744791 doi: 10.1007/s11136-009-9528-5
Terwee, C. B., Prinsen, C. A. C., Chiarotto, A., et al. (2018). COSMIN methodology for evaluating the content validity of patient-reported outcome measures: A Delphi study. Quality of Life Research, 27(5), 1159–1170.
pmcid: 5891557 doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1829-0
Mokkink, L. B., de, Vet, H.C.W., Prinsen, C.A.C., et al. (2018). COSMIN risk of bias checklist for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Quality of Life Research, 27(5), 1171–1179.
doi: 10.1007/s11136-017-1765-4
Mokkink, L.B., Patrick, D.L., Alonso, J., Bouter, L.M., de, Vet, H.C.W., Terwee, C.B. (2018). COSMIN methodology for systematic reviews of Patient‐Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs). Amsterdam Public Health research institute, VU University Medical Center, Retrieved January 20, 2024, from https://www.cosmin.nl/wp-content/uploads/COSMIN-syst-review-for-PROMs-manual_version-1_feb-2018-1.pdf
Terwee, C.B., Chiarotto, A., De, Vet, H.C.W., Bouter, L.M., Alonso, J., Westerman, M.J., Patrick, D.L., Mokkink, L.B. (2018). COSMIN methodology for assessing the content validity of PROMs. VU University Medical Center, Retrieved Januart 20, 2024, from https://www.cosmin.nl/wp-content/uploads/COSMIN-methodology-for-content-validity-user-manual-v1.pdf .
Prinsen, C. A. C., Mokkink, L. B., Bouter, L. M., et al. (2018). COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Quality of Life Research, 27(5), 1147–1157.
pmcid: 5891568 doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1798-3
Politi, M., & Toro, C. (2012). Iliac flap versus fibula flap in mandibular reconstruction. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 23(3), 774–779.
doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e31824dbd8a
Utyuzh, A. S., Yumashev, A. V., Lang, H. W., Zekiy, A. O., & Lushkov, R. M. (2018). Comprehensive treatment and rehabilitation of patients with osteosarcoma of the mandible. Implant Dentistry, 27(3), 332–341.
doi: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000756
Gao, N., Fu, K., Cai, J., & He, W. (2023). A retrospective study on application of fibula/iliac flap surgical techniques to mandibular defects. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 16505.
pmcid: 10545820 doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-43643-4
Sandoval, M. L., Rosen, E. B., Robert, A. J., et al. (2020). Immediate dental implants in fibula free flaps to reconstruct the mandible: A pilot study of the short-term effects on radiotherapy for patients with head and neck cancer. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, 22(1), 91–95.
doi: 10.1111/cid.12870
De, G., & R.J., Rieger, J.M., Rosenberg, A., Merkx, M.A.W., Speksnijder, C.M. (2020). A pilot study of masticatory function after maxillectomy comparing rehabilitation with an obturator prosthesis and reconstruction with a digitally planned, prefabricated, free, vascularized fibula flap. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 124(1), 616–622.
Ciocca, L., Tarsitano, A., Mazzoni, S., et al. (2015). Evaluation of masticatory efficiency and QoL improvements after prosthetic rehabilitation of mandibular cancer patients reconstructed with a fibula free flap. International Journal of Prosthodontics, 28(4), 418–424.
doi: 10.11607/ijp.4156
Bjordal, K., Ahlner-Elmqvist, M., Tollesson, E., et al. (1994). Development of a European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) questionnaire module to be used in quality of life assessments in head and neck cancer patients. Eortc Quality of Life Study Group Acta Oncologica, 33(8), 879–885.
doi: 10.3109/02841869409098450
Schiegnitz, E., Reinicke, K., Sagheb, K., et al. (2022). Dental implants in patients with head and neck cancer-A systematic review and meta-analysis of the influence of radiotherapy on implant survival. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 33(10), 967–999.
doi: 10.1111/clr.13976
Mustapha, A. D., Salame, Z., & Chrcanovic, B. R. (2021). Smoking and dental implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), 58(1), 1–15.
Leung, A. C. F., & Cheung, L. K. (2003). Dental implants in reconstructed jaws: Patients’ evaluation of functional and quality-of-life outcomes. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, 18(1), 127–134.
Bozec, A., Majoufre, C., De Boutray, M., et al. (2020). Oral and oropharyngeal cancer surgery with free-flap reconstruction in the elderly: Factors associated with long-term quality of life, patient needs and concerns. A GETTEC cross-sectional study. Surgical Oncology, 35(1), 81–88.
Islas-Granillo, H., Borges-Yanez, S. A., Medina-Solis, C. E., et al. (2017). Dental prosthetic treatment needs in mexican elders: Influence of socioeconomic position. Dental and Medical Problems, 54(4), 383–387.
doi: 10.17219/dmp/78029
Korn, P., Spalthoff, S., Hammersen, J., et al. (2022). Socio-demographic aspects and treatment-related factors on oral cancer patients’ participation in rehabilitation. GMS Interdisciplinary Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery DGPW, 11(1), 1–8.
Garner, S. J., Patel, S., Pollard, A. J., & Jerreat, M. P. (2023). Post-treatment evaluation of oral health-related quality of life in head and neck cancer patients after dental implant rehabilitation. British dental journal, 24(1), 1–10.
Ferrari, S., Bianchi, B., Savi, A., et al. (2008). Fibula free flap with endosseous implants for reconstructing a resected mandible in bisphosphonate osteonecrosis. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 66(5), 999–1003.
doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2007.06.631
Dholam, K. P., Bachher, G. K., Yadav, P. S., Quazi, G. A., & Pusalkar, H. A. (2011). Assessment of quality of life after implant-retained prosthetically reconstructed maxillae and mandibles postcancer treatments. Implant Dentistry, 20(1), 85–94.
doi: 10.1097/ID.0b013e31820031ab
Bodard, A. G., Salino, S., Desoutter, A., & Deneuve, S. (2015). Assessment of functional improvement with implant-supported prosthetic rehabilitation after mandibular reconstruction with a microvascular free fibula flap: A study of 25 patients. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 113(2), 140–145.
doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.08.005
Fang, W., Liu, Y. P., Ma, Q., Liu, B. L., & Zhao, Y. M. (2015). Long-Term results of mandibular reconstruction of continuity defects with fibula free flap and implant-borne dental rehabilitation. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, 30(1), 169–178.
doi: 10.11607/jomi.3606
Buurman, D. J. M., Speksnijder, C. M., Engelen, B., & Kessler, P. (2020). Masticatory performance and oral health-related quality of life in edentulous maxillectomy patients: A cross-sectional study to compare implant-supported obturators and conventional obturators. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 31(5), 405–416.
pmcid: 7319476 doi: 10.1111/clr.13577
De, G., R.J., Rieger, J.M., Chuka, R., et al. (2019). Functional outcomes and quality of life after segmental mandibulectomy and reconstruction with a reconstruction plate or bone graft compared to a digitally planned fibula free flap. International Journal of Prosthodontics, 32(5), 393–401.
doi: 10.11607/ijp.6250
Wang, F., Huang, W., Zhang, C., et al. (2017). Functional outcome and quality of life after a maxillectomy: A comparison between an implant supported obturator and implant supported fixed prostheses in a free vascularized flap. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 28(2), 137–143.
doi: 10.1111/clr.12771
Kumar, V. V., Jacob, P. C., Ebenezer, S., et al. (2016). Implant supported dental rehabilitation following segmental mandibular reconstruction- quality of life outcomes of a prospective randomized trial. Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, 44(7), 800–810.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2016.04.013
Dellavia, C., Romeo, E., Ghisolfi, M., et al. (2007). Electromyographic evaluation of implant-supported prostheses in hemimandibulectomy-reconstructed patients. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 18(3), 388–395.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01333.x
Kniha, K., Möhlhenrich, S. C., Foldenauer, A. C., et al. (2017). Evaluation of bone resorption in fibula and deep circumflex iliac artery flaps following dental implantation: A three-year follow-up study. Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, 45(4), 474–478.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2017.01.014
Meloni, S. M., De, R., & G., Pisano, M., Massarelli, O., Tullio, A. (2012). Computer assisted dental rehabilitation in free flaps reconstructed jaws: One year follow-up of a prospective clinical study. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 50(8), 726–731.
doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2011.12.006
Ettl, T., Weindler, J., Gosau, M., et al. (2016). Impact of radiotherapy on implant-based prosthetic rehabilitation in patients with head and neck cancer: A prospective observational study on implant survival and quality of life-Preliminary results. Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, 44(9), 1453–1462.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2016.07.016
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., et al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, 71–79.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71
Aaronson, N. K., Ahmedzai, S., Bergman, B., et al. (1993). The european organization for research and treatment of cancer QLQ-C30: A quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 85(5), 365–376.
doi: 10.1093/jnci/85.5.365
Bjordal, K., Hammerlid, E., Ahlner-Elmqvist, M., et al. (1999). Quality of life in head and neck cancer patients: Validation of the European organization for research and treatment of cancer quality of life questionnaire-H&N35. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 17(3), 1008–1019.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.3.1008
Carrillo, J. F., Ortiz-Toledo, M. A., Salido-Noriega, Z., et al. (2013). Validation of the Mexican Spanish version of the EORTC QLQ-H&N35 instrument to measure health-related quality of life in patients with head and neck cancers. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 20(5), 1417–1426.
doi: 10.1245/s10434-012-2712-9
Chie, W. C., Hong, R. L., Lai, C. C., Ting, L. L., & Hsu, M. M. (2003). Quality of life in patients of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Validation of the Taiwan Chinese version of the EORTC QLQ-C30 and the EORTC QLQ-H&N35. Quality of Life Research, 12(1), 93–98.
doi: 10.1023/A:1022070220328
Jensen, K., Jensen, A. B., & Grau, C. (2006). A cross sectional quality of life study of 116 recurrence free head and neck cancer patients. The first use of EORTC H&N35 in Danish. Acta Oncologica, 45(1), 28–37.
doi: 10.1080/02841860500417536
Zahid, N., Martins, R. S., Zahid, W., et al. (2022). Psychometric properties of the Urdu version of the EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (European organization for research and treatment of cancer head and neck module) quality of life tool. BMC Psychology, 10(1), 194.
pmcid: 9358845 doi: 10.1186/s40359-022-00900-x
Davudov, M. M., Rahimov, C., Harirchi, I., et al. (2020). Psychometric evaluation of Azeri version of the head and neck cancer specific quality of life questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-H&N43). Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 18(1), 1–8.
doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01500-2
Davudov, M. M., Harirchi, I., Amiraliyev, N., et al. (2020). The azeri version of european organization for research and treatment of cancer core quality of life questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30): Translation and validation. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, 21(1), 267–271.
pmcid: 7294001 doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2020.21.1.267
Hassan, S.J., Weymuller, Jr, E.A., (1993). Assessment of quality of life in head and neck cancer patients. Head and Neck. 1993, 15(6):485–496.
Rogers, S. N., Gwanne, S., Lowe, D., et al. (2002). The addition of mood and anxiety domains to the University of Washington quality of life scale. Head and Neck, 24(6), 521–529.
doi: 10.1002/hed.10106
Nejatidanesh, F., Bonakdarchian, H., Savabi, G., et al. (2022). Clinical performance of implant supported mandibular overdentures with cantilever bar and stud attachments: A retrospective study. Clinical implant dentistry and related research, 14(1), 1–10.
Adnane, C., Oubahmane, T., Adouly, T., et al. (2016). Cross-cultural and moroccan validation of the university of Washington quality of life questionnaire for patients with head and neck cancer. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology, 125(2), 151–159.
doi: 10.1177/0003489415601687
Katre, C., Johnson, I. A., Humphris, G. M., Lowe, D., & Rogers, S. N. (2008). Assessment of problems with appearance, following surgery for oral and oro-pharyngeal cancer using the University of Washington appearance domain and the Derriford appearance scale. Oral Oncology, 44(10), 927–934.
doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2007.12.006
Rogers, S. N., Lowe, D., Brown, J. S., & Vaughan, E. D. (1998). A comparison between the University of Washington Head and neck disease- specific measure and the medical short form 36, EORTC QOQ-C33 and EORTC head and neck 35. Oral Oncology, 34(5), 361–372.
doi: 10.1016/S1368-8375(98)00031-1
Rogers, S. N., Lowe, D., Yueh, B., & Weymuller, E. A., Jr. (2010). The physical function and social-emotional function subscales of the University of Washington quality of life questionnaire. Archives of Otolaryngologyhead & Neck Surgery, 136(4), 352–357.
doi: 10.1001/archoto.2010.32
Thomas, L., Jones, T. M., Tandon, S., et al. (2009). Speech and voice outcomes in oropharyngeal cancer and evaluation of the University of Washington quality of life speech domain. Clinical Otolaryngology, 34(1), 34–42.
doi: 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2008.01830.x
Thomas, L., Jones, T. M., Tandon, S., et al. (2008). An evaluation of the University of Washington quality of life swallowing domain following oropharyngeal cancer. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 265(1), 29-S37.
doi: 10.1007/s00405-007-0470-2
Zuydam, A. C., Ghazali, N., Lowe, D., Skelly, R., & Rogers, S. N. (2013). Evaluation of the limitations of using the University of Washington quality of life swallowing domain alone to screen patients in the routine clinical setting. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 51(7), 148–154.
doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2012.05.009
D’Cruz, A. K., Yueh, B., Das, A. K., et al. (2007). Validation of the University of Washington quality of life questionnaires for head and neck cancer patients in India. Indian Journal of Cancer, 44(4), 147–154.
doi: 10.4103/0019-509X.39377
Nazar, G., Garmendia, M. L., Royer, M., et al. (2010). Spanish validation of the University of Washington quality of life questionnaire for head and neck cancer patients. Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 143(6), 801–807.
doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2010.08.008
Şenkal, H. A., Hayran, M., Karakaya, E., et al. (2012). The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the University of Washington quality of life questionnaire for patients with head and neck cancer. American Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Medicine and Surgery, 33(4), 417–426.
Vartanian, J. G., Carvalho, A. L., Yueh, B., et al. (2006). Brazilian-Portuguese validation of the University of Washington Quality of Life questionnaire for patients with head and neck cancer. Head and Neck, 28(12), 1115–1121.
doi: 10.1002/hed.20464
Slade, G. D. (1997). Derivation and validation of a short-form oral health impact profile. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology, 25(4), 284–290.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1997.tb00941.x
Tesic, M., Cankovic, M., Jevtic, M., & Stevanovic, D. (2020). Validation of the oral health impact profile - 14 in patients with head and neck cancer. Medicina Oral, Patologia Oral, Cirugia Bucal, 25(6), 739–744.
doi: 10.4317/medoral.23765
El, O., & N., Haddad, E., Fakhouri, J., Saad, R., El, Osta, L. (2021). Comparison of psychometric properties of GOHAI, OHIP-14, and OHIP-EDENT as measures of oral health in complete edentulous patients aged 60 years and more. Quality of Life Research, 30(4), 1199–1213.
doi: 10.1007/s11136-020-02709-w

Auteurs

Simra Azher (S)

Melbourne Dental School. Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. s.azher@student.unimelb.edu.au.

Roisin McGrath (R)

Melbourne Dental School. Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Yasaman Mohammadi Kamalabadi (YM)

Department of Dental Medicine and Oral Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.

Georgios Tsakos (G)

Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, UCL, London, UK.

Felix Sim (F)

Melbourne Dental School. Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Ankur Singh (A)

Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, Melbourne Dental School, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Classifications MeSH