Sensory representations in primary visual cortex are not sufficient for subjective imagery.

aphantasia consciousness fMRI mental imagery natural sounds primary visual cortex representations spontaneous

Journal

Current biology : CB
ISSN: 1879-0445
Titre abrégé: Curr Biol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9107782

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
10 Oct 2024
Historique:
received: 29 03 2024
revised: 10 08 2024
accepted: 23 09 2024
medline: 18 10 2024
pubmed: 18 10 2024
entrez: 17 10 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

The contemporary definition of mental imagery is characterized by two aspects: a sensory representation that resembles, but does not result from, perception, and an associated subjective experience. Neuroimaging demonstrated imagery-related sensory representations in primary visual cortex (V1) that show striking parallels to perception. However, it remains unclear whether these representations always reflect subjective experience or if they can be dissociated from it. We addressed this question by comparing sensory representations and subjective imagery among visualizers and aphantasics, the latter with an impaired ability to experience imagery. Importantly, to test for the presence of sensory representations independently of the ability to generate imagery on demand, we examined both spontaneous and voluntary imagery forms. Using multivariate fMRI, we tested for decodable sensory representations in V1 and subjective visual imagery reports that occurred either spontaneously (during passive listening of evocative sounds) or in response to the instruction to voluntarily generate imagery of the sound content (always while blindfolded inside the scanner). Among aphantasics, V1 decoding of sound content was at chance during voluntary imagery, and lower than in visualizers, but it succeeded during passive listening, despite them reporting no imagery. In contrast, in visualizers, decoding accuracy in V1 was greater in voluntary than spontaneous imagery (while being positively associated with the reported vividness of both imagery types). Finally, for both conditions, decoding in precuneus was successful in visualizers but at chance for aphantasics. Together, our findings show that V1 representations can be dissociated from subjective imagery, while implicating a key role of precuneus in the latter.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39419033
pii: S0960-9822(24)01330-7
doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2024.09.062
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of interests The authors declare no competing interests.

Auteurs

Giulia Cabbai (G)

School of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9QH, UK; Sussex Neuroscience, School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9RH, UK. Electronic address: g.cabbai@sussex.ac.uk.

Chris Racey (C)

School of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9QH, UK; Sussex Neuroscience, School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9RH, UK.

Julia Simner (J)

School of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9QH, UK; Sussex Neuroscience, School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9RH, UK.

Carla Dance (C)

School of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9QH, UK.

Jamie Ward (J)

School of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9QH, UK; Sussex Neuroscience, School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9RH, UK.

Sophie Forster (S)

School of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9QH, UK; Sussex Neuroscience, School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9RH, UK.

Classifications MeSH