Coproduction in Social Prescribing Initiatives: Protocol for a Scoping Review.

clinical setting codevelopment community programs coproduction health care system health education nonmedical need pilot-tested policy social need social prescribing social prescription user involvement

Journal

JMIR research protocols
ISSN: 1929-0748
Titre abrégé: JMIR Res Protoc
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101599504

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
17 Oct 2024
Historique:
received: 03 02 2024
accepted: 20 09 2024
revised: 31 07 2024
medline: 18 10 2024
pubmed: 18 10 2024
entrez: 17 10 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Social prescribing (SP) takes a holistic approach to health by linking clients from clinical settings to community programs to address their nonmedical needs. The emerging evidence base for SP demonstrates variability in the design and implementation of different SP initiatives. To effectively address these needs, coproduction among clients, communities, stakeholders, and policy makers is important for tailoring SP initiatives for optimal uptake. This study aims to explore the role of coproduction in SP initiatives. The research question is as follows: How and for what purpose has coproduction been incorporated across a range of SP initiatives for different clients? A review of international literature will be conducted following the JBI guidelines for scoping reviews. We will search multiple databases including Scopus, MEDLINE, and the PAIS Index, as well as gray literature, from 2000 to 2023. The primary studies included will describe a nonmedical need for clients, a nonmedical SP program or initiative, coproduction of the SP program, and any follow-up. Review articles and commentaries will be excluded. Titles, abstracts, and full-text articles will be screened, and data will be extracted by at least 2 research team members using Covidence and a pilot-tested extraction template. Clients with lived experience will also participate in the research process. Findings will be descriptively summarized and thematically synthesized to answer the research question. The project was funded in 2023, and the results are expected to be submitted for publication in early 2025. Descriptions of what coproduction is meant to accomplish may differ from theoretical aspirations. Continued understanding of how coproduction has been designed and executed across varied international SP models is important for framing engagement in practice for future SP arrangements and their evaluation. We anticipate this review will guide clients, communities, stakeholders, and policy makers in further developing SP practice within health care systems. Open Science Framework Registries B8U4Z; https://osf.io/b8u4z. DERR1-10.2196/57062.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Social prescribing (SP) takes a holistic approach to health by linking clients from clinical settings to community programs to address their nonmedical needs. The emerging evidence base for SP demonstrates variability in the design and implementation of different SP initiatives. To effectively address these needs, coproduction among clients, communities, stakeholders, and policy makers is important for tailoring SP initiatives for optimal uptake.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
This study aims to explore the role of coproduction in SP initiatives. The research question is as follows: How and for what purpose has coproduction been incorporated across a range of SP initiatives for different clients?
METHODS METHODS
A review of international literature will be conducted following the JBI guidelines for scoping reviews. We will search multiple databases including Scopus, MEDLINE, and the PAIS Index, as well as gray literature, from 2000 to 2023. The primary studies included will describe a nonmedical need for clients, a nonmedical SP program or initiative, coproduction of the SP program, and any follow-up. Review articles and commentaries will be excluded. Titles, abstracts, and full-text articles will be screened, and data will be extracted by at least 2 research team members using Covidence and a pilot-tested extraction template. Clients with lived experience will also participate in the research process. Findings will be descriptively summarized and thematically synthesized to answer the research question.
RESULTS RESULTS
The project was funded in 2023, and the results are expected to be submitted for publication in early 2025.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Descriptions of what coproduction is meant to accomplish may differ from theoretical aspirations. Continued understanding of how coproduction has been designed and executed across varied international SP models is important for framing engagement in practice for future SP arrangements and their evaluation. We anticipate this review will guide clients, communities, stakeholders, and policy makers in further developing SP practice within health care systems.
TRIAL REGISTRATION BACKGROUND
Open Science Framework Registries B8U4Z; https://osf.io/b8u4z.
INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) UNASSIGNED
DERR1-10.2196/57062.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39419498
pii: v13i1e57062
doi: 10.2196/57062
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e57062

Informations de copyright

©Madeline Dougherty, Tamara Tompkins, Elaine Zibrowski, Jesse Cram, Maureen C Ashe, Le-Tien Bhaskar, Kiffer George Card, Christina Godfrey, Paul Hebert, Ron Lacombe, Caitlin Muhl, Kate Mulligan, Gillian Mulvale, Michelle L A Nelson, Myrna Norman, Bobbi Symes, Gary Teare, Vivian Welch, Anita Kothari. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (https://www.researchprotocols.org), 17.10.2024.

Auteurs

Madeline Dougherty (M)

Faculty of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Western University, London, ON, Canada.

Tamara Tompkins (T)

Faculty of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Western University, London, ON, Canada.

Elaine Zibrowski (E)

Faculty of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Western University, London, ON, Canada.

Jesse Cram (J)

Faculty of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Western University, London, ON, Canada.

Maureen C Ashe (MC)

Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

Le-Tien Bhaskar (LT)

Department of Health Research, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

Kiffer George Card (KG)

Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada.

Christina Godfrey (C)

School of Nursing, Collaboration for Health Care Quality: A JBI Centre of Excellence, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.

Paul Hebert (P)

School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

Ron Lacombe (R)

Patient Advisory Counsel, Canadian Institute for Social Prescribing, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Caitlin Muhl (C)

Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.

Kate Mulligan (K)

Institute of Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Gillian Mulvale (G)

Department of Health Research, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

Michelle L A Nelson (MLA)

Institute of Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Myrna Norman (M)

Patient Advisory Counsel, Canadian Institute for Social Prescribing, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Bobbi Symes (B)

United Way British Columbia, Burnaby, BC, Canada.

Gary Teare (G)

Alberta Health Systems, Edmonton, AB, Canada.

Vivian Welch (V)

Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

Anita Kothari (A)

Faculty of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Western University, London, ON, Canada.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH