Patient preferences for ocular hypertension monitoring: a discrete choice experiment.


Journal

BMJ open ophthalmology
ISSN: 2397-3269
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open Ophthalmol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101714806

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
17 Oct 2024
Historique:
received: 10 01 2024
accepted: 06 09 2024
medline: 18 10 2024
pubmed: 18 10 2024
entrez: 17 10 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

To elicit the preferences and calculate the willingness to pay (WTP) of patients with ocular hypertension (OHT) for eye monitoring services in the UK. Patients with OHT aged at least 18 years recruited from four NHS ophthalmology departments were included in the study. Patients' preferences and WTP for an OHT monitoring service in the National Health Service were elicited using a discrete choice experiment (DCE) within a postal survey based on six attributes: (1) how OHT monitoring is organised, (2) monitoring frequency, (3) travel time from home, (4) use of a risk calculator for conversion to glaucoma, (5) risk of developing glaucoma in the next 10 years and (6) cost of monitoring. We used a sequential mixed-methods approach to design the survey. 360 patients diagnosed with OHT were recruited with a mean age of 69 years. In the DCE, reducing the risk of conversion to glaucoma was the most important factor influencing respondents' choice of monitoring service. Respondents preferred hospital-based monitoring services to community optometrist monitoring, and annual monitoring compared with more frequent (every 6 months) and less frequent (every 18 or 24 months) monitoring. These results can be monetised using WTP. Results of heterogeneity analysis suggest that patients with prior experience in community optometrist monitoring preferred this to hospital-based monitoring. Although hospital-based monitoring is generally preferred, patients with prior experience in community services have a different opinion, suggesting that patients who are unfamiliar with community optometry services may need additional support to accept monitoring in this setting.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND/AIMS OBJECTIVE
To elicit the preferences and calculate the willingness to pay (WTP) of patients with ocular hypertension (OHT) for eye monitoring services in the UK.
METHODS METHODS
Patients with OHT aged at least 18 years recruited from four NHS ophthalmology departments were included in the study. Patients' preferences and WTP for an OHT monitoring service in the National Health Service were elicited using a discrete choice experiment (DCE) within a postal survey based on six attributes: (1) how OHT monitoring is organised, (2) monitoring frequency, (3) travel time from home, (4) use of a risk calculator for conversion to glaucoma, (5) risk of developing glaucoma in the next 10 years and (6) cost of monitoring. We used a sequential mixed-methods approach to design the survey.
RESULTS RESULTS
360 patients diagnosed with OHT were recruited with a mean age of 69 years. In the DCE, reducing the risk of conversion to glaucoma was the most important factor influencing respondents' choice of monitoring service. Respondents preferred hospital-based monitoring services to community optometrist monitoring, and annual monitoring compared with more frequent (every 6 months) and less frequent (every 18 or 24 months) monitoring. These results can be monetised using WTP. Results of heterogeneity analysis suggest that patients with prior experience in community optometrist monitoring preferred this to hospital-based monitoring.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Although hospital-based monitoring is generally preferred, patients with prior experience in community services have a different opinion, suggesting that patients who are unfamiliar with community optometry services may need additional support to accept monitoring in this setting.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39419584
pii: bmjophth-2024-001639
doi: 10.1136/bmjophth-2024-001639
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Multicenter Study

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: GG: Consulting: Alcon, Allergan, Belkin, Elios, Equinox, Genentech/Roche, Glaukos, Ivantis, McKinsey, Rayner, Reichert, Ripple Therapeutics, Santen, Sight Sciences, Thea, Vialase, Visufarma, Zeiss; Grants: Thea, Santen; Honoraria: Alcon, Allergan, Belkin, Glaukos, Ivantis, Lumibird, McKinsey, Reichert, Sight Sciences, Thea; Travel: Ivantis, Thea; Board membership: Glaucoma UK, UK & Ireland Glaucoma Society. AK: Advisory Board: Thea & Abbvie. DPC: Consulting: Apellis; Financial Support: Apellis, Santen; Recipient: Allergan/Abbvie, Janssen, Santen, Thea. YT: Grants: National Institute of Health Research. VW: Chief Scientist Office, Scotland; National Institute for Health Research; Economic and Social Research Council; Economic and Social Research Council and Global Challenges Research Fund; Imperial College London; The Urology Foundation. RH: Grants: Chief Scientist Office, Scotland; National Institute of Health Research.

Auteurs

Hangjian Wu (H)

Health Economics Research Unit, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.

Rodolfo Hernández (R)

Health Economics Research Unit, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK r.a.hernandez@abdn.ac.uk.

David P Crabb (DP)

Department of Optometry & Visual Science, City University of London, London, UK.

Gus Gazzard (G)

Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
University College London, London, UK.

Robert A Harper (RA)

Manchester Royal Eye Hospital, Manchester, UK.

Anthony King (A)

Department of Ophthalmology, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.

James E Morgan (JE)

Centre for Vision Sciences, School of Optometry, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.

Yemisi Takwoingi (Y)

Department of Applied Health Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.

Augusto Azuara-Blanco (A)

Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.

Verity Watson (V)

Health Economics Research Unit, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH