Comparison of Biomechanical Properties of the iCover and VBX Stent Grafts When Used as Bridge Stents in Fenestrated Endografts: An In Vitro Study.

angulation balloon-expandable stents bending fatigue fenestrated stent graft flaring in vitro model patency pullout force shear force stent fracture

Journal

Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists
ISSN: 1545-1550
Titre abrégé: J Endovasc Ther
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100896915

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
18 Oct 2024
Historique:
medline: 18 10 2024
pubmed: 18 10 2024
entrez: 18 10 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

The objective of this study was to compare in vitro the different biomechanical properties of 2 balloon-expandable covered stents, VBX (Viabahn VBX, W.L. Gore & Associates, Flagstaff, AZ) and iCover (iVascular, Barcelona, Spain), as bridging stents in fenestrated aortic endoprostheses. Three biomechanical tests were performed to evaluate a total of 12 stents (6 VBX 6 × 59 mm and 6 iCover 6 × 57m). First, a 3-point bending test was performed with a calibrated dynamometer to evaluate the bending strength of the 40% and 150% deformation of the system in its crimped state and the force necessary to deform the expanded stent by 40% with respect to its initial diameter. Then the stents were expanded to their nominal diameter inside a 6-mm-diameter handmade fenestration and flared up to 8 and 10 mm. The whole set was fixed in the dynamometer to carry out the pullout-force (perpendicular dislocation) and shear-stress-force (axial dislocation) tests. The resulting forces were recorded via the force transducer. Load, deformation, and displacement data were recorded in newtons. The results of each stent test were examined under the microscope, and both stent types were compared. Higher forces were required to bend the crimped VBX (16.24 N [IQR, 13.87-17.47 N] for the iCover and 19.01 N [IQR, 16.01-19.50 N] for VBX; After evaluating the stents under in vitro conditions, the VBX and iCover stents showed similar results in terms of biomechanical properties, which demonstrates their competence in in vitro conditions. Further in vitro comparisons with other stent grafts are required. The BECS used in FEVAR / BEVAR must ensure some properties to avoid the most frequent complications derived from the failure of these bridging stents (stenosis, thrombosis, stent integrity, dislodgement or endoleaks) that represent the most common cause for reintervention. This paper adds to the limited data available, information to the clinician after comparing some properties of two BECS used in these techniques that demonstrate their competence in in-vitro conditions.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39422262
doi: 10.1177/15266028241289291
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

15266028241289291

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Conflicting InterestsGaspar Mestres received speaker fees from W.L. Gore & Associates. Vincent Riambau received consulting and speaker fees from iVascular and research grants from W.L. Gore & Associates and iVascular.

Auteurs

Carla L Blanco Amil (CL)

Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Cardiovascular Institute Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

Gaspar Mestres (G)

Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Cardiovascular Institute Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

Fabricio Barahona (F)

Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Cardiovascular Institute Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

Clara Raventós (C)

Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Cardiovascular Institute Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

Xavier Alomar (X)

Radiology Department, Clínica Creu Blanca, Barcelona, Spain.

Vincent Riambau (V)

Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Cardiovascular Institute Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

Classifications MeSH