Comparison of Biomechanical Properties of the iCover and VBX Stent Grafts When Used as Bridge Stents in Fenestrated Endografts: An In Vitro Study.
angulation
balloon-expandable stents
bending
fatigue
fenestrated stent graft
flaring
in vitro model
patency
pullout force
shear force
stent fracture
Journal
Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists
ISSN: 1545-1550
Titre abrégé: J Endovasc Ther
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100896915
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
18 Oct 2024
18 Oct 2024
Historique:
medline:
18
10
2024
pubmed:
18
10
2024
entrez:
18
10
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
The objective of this study was to compare in vitro the different biomechanical properties of 2 balloon-expandable covered stents, VBX (Viabahn VBX, W.L. Gore & Associates, Flagstaff, AZ) and iCover (iVascular, Barcelona, Spain), as bridging stents in fenestrated aortic endoprostheses. Three biomechanical tests were performed to evaluate a total of 12 stents (6 VBX 6 × 59 mm and 6 iCover 6 × 57m). First, a 3-point bending test was performed with a calibrated dynamometer to evaluate the bending strength of the 40% and 150% deformation of the system in its crimped state and the force necessary to deform the expanded stent by 40% with respect to its initial diameter. Then the stents were expanded to their nominal diameter inside a 6-mm-diameter handmade fenestration and flared up to 8 and 10 mm. The whole set was fixed in the dynamometer to carry out the pullout-force (perpendicular dislocation) and shear-stress-force (axial dislocation) tests. The resulting forces were recorded via the force transducer. Load, deformation, and displacement data were recorded in newtons. The results of each stent test were examined under the microscope, and both stent types were compared. Higher forces were required to bend the crimped VBX (16.24 N [IQR, 13.87-17.47 N] for the iCover and 19.01 N [IQR, 16.01-19.50 N] for VBX; After evaluating the stents under in vitro conditions, the VBX and iCover stents showed similar results in terms of biomechanical properties, which demonstrates their competence in in vitro conditions. Further in vitro comparisons with other stent grafts are required. The BECS used in FEVAR / BEVAR must ensure some properties to avoid the most frequent complications derived from the failure of these bridging stents (stenosis, thrombosis, stent integrity, dislodgement or endoleaks) that represent the most common cause for reintervention. This paper adds to the limited data available, information to the clinician after comparing some properties of two BECS used in these techniques that demonstrate their competence in in-vitro conditions.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39422262
doi: 10.1177/15266028241289291
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
15266028241289291Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Conflicting InterestsGaspar Mestres received speaker fees from W.L. Gore & Associates. Vincent Riambau received consulting and speaker fees from iVascular and research grants from W.L. Gore & Associates and iVascular.