Supplementing provider counseling with an educational video prior to scheduled induction of labor.
Birth satisfaction
Education innovation
Induction
Multilingual patients
Pragmatic implementation
Quality improvement
Video
Journal
BMC pregnancy and childbirth
ISSN: 1471-2393
Titre abrégé: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100967799
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
18 Oct 2024
18 Oct 2024
Historique:
received:
16
02
2024
accepted:
18
09
2024
medline:
19
10
2024
pubmed:
19
10
2024
entrez:
18
10
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Induction of labor (IOL) is common with one in four labors being induced in the United States (US). IOL has been associated with lower birth satisfaction. Video education can address gaps in education and promote anticipatory guidance. Prior studies in obstetrics have focused on randomized designs in English-speaking patients, leaving opportunities to explore how these tools perform in a pragmatic fashion with diverse patient populations. Our objective was to evaluate the effects of a video education tool on patient satisfaction and knowledge of IOL experience in English and Spanish-speaking patients scheduled for IOL at a tertiary care hospital. This was a single site pragmatic implementation of a quality improvement measure at an academic hospital. A bilingual survey was developed to evaluate the impact of an educational video on birth satisfaction and knowledge of IOL procedures. The video is freely available in English and Spanish. Baseline postpartum surveys were collected from June to July 2021. The video was subsequently recommended by providers when scheduling IOLs. Post-intervention surveys were collected from September to November 2021 after an implementation period. Groups were compared using t-tests for satisfaction scores and chi-square analyses for categorical variables. Thirty-two participants completed the baseline survey and 72 completed the post-implementation survey with response rates of 88.9% and 91.1%, respectively. There were no statistically significant changes between mean total satisfaction scores (26.9 vs 28.0 out of 40.0, p = 0.290). 61 participants were English speaking (58%) and 43 Spanish (42%). Thirty (42%) patients reported watching the video. Correct identification of amniotomy use improved in the post-intervention group (p = 0.002). No changes were seen in anticipated duration of labor nor in whether patients would choose to be induced again. Recommendation of video education before scheduled IOL was associated with little improvement in knowledge about IOL, but no significant improvement in patient satisfaction. While video education has improved these measures in randomized trials, our study demonstrated that real-world implementation and patient uptake may be initially difficult. This study may help providers emphasize direct education and counseling and promote optimal implementation of innovative educational media.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Induction of labor (IOL) is common with one in four labors being induced in the United States (US). IOL has been associated with lower birth satisfaction. Video education can address gaps in education and promote anticipatory guidance. Prior studies in obstetrics have focused on randomized designs in English-speaking patients, leaving opportunities to explore how these tools perform in a pragmatic fashion with diverse patient populations. Our objective was to evaluate the effects of a video education tool on patient satisfaction and knowledge of IOL experience in English and Spanish-speaking patients scheduled for IOL at a tertiary care hospital.
METHODS
METHODS
This was a single site pragmatic implementation of a quality improvement measure at an academic hospital. A bilingual survey was developed to evaluate the impact of an educational video on birth satisfaction and knowledge of IOL procedures. The video is freely available in English and Spanish. Baseline postpartum surveys were collected from June to July 2021. The video was subsequently recommended by providers when scheduling IOLs. Post-intervention surveys were collected from September to November 2021 after an implementation period. Groups were compared using t-tests for satisfaction scores and chi-square analyses for categorical variables.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Thirty-two participants completed the baseline survey and 72 completed the post-implementation survey with response rates of 88.9% and 91.1%, respectively. There were no statistically significant changes between mean total satisfaction scores (26.9 vs 28.0 out of 40.0, p = 0.290). 61 participants were English speaking (58%) and 43 Spanish (42%). Thirty (42%) patients reported watching the video. Correct identification of amniotomy use improved in the post-intervention group (p = 0.002). No changes were seen in anticipated duration of labor nor in whether patients would choose to be induced again.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Recommendation of video education before scheduled IOL was associated with little improvement in knowledge about IOL, but no significant improvement in patient satisfaction. While video education has improved these measures in randomized trials, our study demonstrated that real-world implementation and patient uptake may be initially difficult. This study may help providers emphasize direct education and counseling and promote optimal implementation of innovative educational media.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39425082
doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06842-z
pii: 10.1186/s12884-024-06842-z
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
676Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Osterman MJK, Hamilton BE, Martin JA, Driscoll AK, Valenzuela CP. Births: Final Data for 2021. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2023;72(1):1–53.
pubmed: 37252688
Tong CT, Mackeen AD, Berghella V. The effect of standardized counseling on patient knowledge about induction of labor. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012;25(12):2700–3.
doi: 10.3109/14767058.2012.703726
pubmed: 22708706
Hamm RF, McCoy J, Oladuja A, Bogner HR, Elovitz MA, Morales KH, et al. Maternal Morbidity and Birth Satisfaction After Implementation of a Validated Calculator to Predict Cesarean Delivery During Labor Induction. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(11):e2025582.
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.25582
pubmed: 33185679
pmcid: 7666421
Shetty A, Burt R, Rice P, Templeton A. Women’s perceptions, expectations and satisfaction with induced labour–a questionnaire-based study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2005;123(1):56–61.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.03.004
pubmed: 15905017
Hamm RF, Srinivas SK, Levine LD. Risk factors and racial disparities related to low maternal birth satisfaction with labor induction: a prospective, cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19(1):530.
doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2658-z
pubmed: 31888529
pmcid: 6937753
Calik KY, Karabulutlu O, Yavuz C. First do no harm - interventions during labor and maternal satisfaction: a descriptive cross-sectional study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018;18(1):415.
doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-2054-0
pubmed: 30355293
pmcid: 6201531
Lou S, Hvidman L, Uldbjerg N, Neumann L, Jensen TF, Haben JG, et al. Women’s experiences of postterm induction of labor: A systematic review of qualitative studies. Birth. 2019;46(3):400–10.
doi: 10.1111/birt.12412
pubmed: 30561053
Goodman P, Mackey MC, Tavakoli AS. Factors related to childbirth satisfaction. J Adv Nurs. 2004;46(2):212–9.
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2003.02981.x
pubmed: 15056335
Novak CB, Mak L, Chang M. Evaluation of written and video education tools after mallet finger injury. J Hand Ther. 2019;32(4):452–6.
doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2018.03.005
pubmed: 30017408
Miremberg H, Yirmiya K, Vinter D, Lauterbach R, Yefet E, Nassra R, et al. An informative video before planned cesarean delivery and maternal anxiety-a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2022;4(3):100604.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2022.100604
pubmed: 35240345
Rahman S, Kripalani S, Keegan E, Sparks A, Amdur R, Moawad G, et al. An educational video’s impact on the induction of labor experience: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2022;4(1):100495.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2021.100495
pubmed: 34571210
Che YJ, Gao YL, Jing J, Kuang Y, Zhang M. Effects of an Informational Video About Anesthesia on Pre- and Post-Elective Cesarean Section Anxiety and Recovery: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Med Sci Monit. 2020;26:e920428.
doi: 10.12659/MSM.920428
pubmed: 32265432
pmcid: 7165245
Martin CR, Hollins Martin C, Redshaw M. The Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised Indicator (BSS-RI). BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17(1):277.
doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1459-5
pubmed: 28851307
pmcid: 5575858
Romero-Gonzalez B, Peralta-Ramirez MI, Caparros-Gonzalez RA, Cambil-Ledesma A, Hollins Martin CJ, Martin CR. Spanish validation and factor structure of the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R). Midwifery. 2019;70:31–7.
doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2018.12.009
pubmed: 30572202
Coates D, Thirukumar P, Henry A. Women’s experiences and satisfaction with having a cesarean birth: An integrative review. Birth. 2020;47(2):169–82.
doi: 10.1111/birt.12478
pubmed: 31891986
Wong MS, Spiegel BMR, Gregory KD. Virtual Reality Reduces Pain in Laboring Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Am J Perinatol. 2021;38(S 01):e167–72.
Stortz SK, Mulligan S, Snipes M, Hippman C, Shridhar NN, Stoll K, et al. A Randomized Controlled Trial on the Effect of Standardized Video Education on Prenatal Genetic Testing Choices: Uptake of Genetic Testing. Am J Perinatol. 2023;40(3):267–73.
doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1727229
pubmed: 33878774
Rimsza RR, Perez M, Woolfolk C, Kelly JC, Carter EB, Frolova AI, et al. Video Instruction for Pushing in the Second Stage: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023;228(6):732 e1-e11.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.03.024
Fryer K, Lewis G, Munoz C, Stuebe AM. Identifying Barriers and Facilitators to Prenatal Care for Spanish-Speaking Women. N C Med J. 2021;82(1):7–13.
pubmed: 33397748
pmcid: 7927271