Effect of the Stretch-Shortening Cycle on the Relationship Between Maximum Number of Repetitions and Lifting Velocity During the Prone Bench Pull.
fatigue
level of effort
linear position transducer
strength training
velocity-based training
Journal
Sports health
ISSN: 1941-0921
Titre abrégé: Sports Health
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101518422
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
18 Oct 2024
18 Oct 2024
Historique:
medline:
19
10
2024
pubmed:
19
10
2024
entrez:
19
10
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
The fastest mean (MV Velocity values associated with each RTF would show higher values for eccentric-concentric and multiple-point methods compared with concentric-only and 2-point methods. Cross-sectional study. Level 3. After determining the prone bench pull (PBP) 1-repetition maximum (1RM), 23 resistance-trained male participants randomly performed 2 sessions (1 for each PBP exercise), consisting of single sets of RTFs against 3 relative loads (60%-80%-70%1RM). Individualized RTF-velocity relationships were constructed using the multiple-point (60%-80%-70%1RM) and 2-point (60%-80%1RM) methods. Goodness-of-fit was very high and comparable for concentric-only (RTF-MV These results suggest that the inclusion of the SSC does not impair the goodness-of-fit of RTF-velocity relationships, but these relationships should be determined specifically for each PBP exercise (ie, concentric-only and eccentric-concentric). In addition, the 2-point method serves as a quick and less strenuous procedure to estimate RTF. Practitioners only need to monitor the MV
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
UNASSIGNED
The fastest mean (MV
HYPOTHESIS
UNASSIGNED
Velocity values associated with each RTF would show higher values for eccentric-concentric and multiple-point methods compared with concentric-only and 2-point methods.
STUDY DESIGN
UNASSIGNED
Cross-sectional study.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
UNASSIGNED
Level 3.
METHODS
UNASSIGNED
After determining the prone bench pull (PBP) 1-repetition maximum (1RM), 23 resistance-trained male participants randomly performed 2 sessions (1 for each PBP exercise), consisting of single sets of RTFs against 3 relative loads (60%-80%-70%1RM). Individualized RTF-velocity relationships were constructed using the multiple-point (60%-80%-70%1RM) and 2-point (60%-80%1RM) methods.
RESULTS
UNASSIGNED
Goodness-of-fit was very high and comparable for concentric-only (RTF-MV
CONCLUSION
UNASSIGNED
These results suggest that the inclusion of the SSC does not impair the goodness-of-fit of RTF-velocity relationships, but these relationships should be determined specifically for each PBP exercise (ie, concentric-only and eccentric-concentric). In addition, the 2-point method serves as a quick and less strenuous procedure to estimate RTF.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE
UNASSIGNED
Practitioners only need to monitor the MV
Identifiants
pubmed: 39425248
doi: 10.1177/19417381241286519
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
19417381241286519Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors report no potential conflicts of interest in the development and publication of this article.