The efficacy of an intracoronary cocktail administration in preventing no-reflow during excimer laser coronary angioplasty in patients with in-stent restenosis: A pilot study. (ELCA- cocktail study).
Cocktail
Contrast infusion
Excimer laser coronary angioplasty
In-stent restenosis
No-reflow
Journal
International journal of cardiology
ISSN: 1874-1754
Titre abrégé: Int J Cardiol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 8200291
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
17 Oct 2024
17 Oct 2024
Historique:
received:
30
08
2024
revised:
12
10
2024
accepted:
16
10
2024
medline:
20
10
2024
pubmed:
20
10
2024
entrez:
19
10
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
The no-reflow phenomenon is a significant complication during excimer laser coronary angioplasty (ELCA) procedures, which can lead to adverse outcomes. This study explores the efficacy of intracoronary administration of a cocktail solution comprising nitroglycerin, heparin, and verapamil on preventing no-reflow during ELCA in patients with in-stent restenosis (ISR). This study included patients undergoing ELCA with contrast infusion for ISR. Based on whether receiving the intracoronary cocktail solution during ELCA, participants were divided into two groups: the cocktail (+) group and the cocktail (-) group. The primary endpoint was the incidence of no-reflow, which was defined as the cessation of blood flow into the distal coronary artery in the absence of a clear angiographic explanation for impairment of flow. A total of 54 lesions in 51 patients were included. The mean age of the study population was 61.8 ± 9.7 years, with 84.3 % male. Baseline clinical characteristics were well-balanced. The incidence of no-reflow was significantly lower in the cocktail (+) group compared to the cocktail (-) group (0 % vs. 17.9 %, P = 0.024). No cases of hypotension, major bleeding or coronary perforation in either group. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) within 6-month were no significant difference between the groups (4.0 % vs. 3.8 %, P = 0.977). The pilot study suggests that intracoronary administration of a cocktail comprising heparin, nitroglycerin, and verapamil may reduce the incidence of no-reflow during ELCA in patients with ISR. However, given the limited sample size and the non-randomized design, these findings should be considered hypothesis-generating. Future validation needs to be confirmed through multicenter studies with larger sample sizes.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The no-reflow phenomenon is a significant complication during excimer laser coronary angioplasty (ELCA) procedures, which can lead to adverse outcomes. This study explores the efficacy of intracoronary administration of a cocktail solution comprising nitroglycerin, heparin, and verapamil on preventing no-reflow during ELCA in patients with in-stent restenosis (ISR).
METHODS
METHODS
This study included patients undergoing ELCA with contrast infusion for ISR. Based on whether receiving the intracoronary cocktail solution during ELCA, participants were divided into two groups: the cocktail (+) group and the cocktail (-) group. The primary endpoint was the incidence of no-reflow, which was defined as the cessation of blood flow into the distal coronary artery in the absence of a clear angiographic explanation for impairment of flow.
RESULTS
RESULTS
A total of 54 lesions in 51 patients were included. The mean age of the study population was 61.8 ± 9.7 years, with 84.3 % male. Baseline clinical characteristics were well-balanced. The incidence of no-reflow was significantly lower in the cocktail (+) group compared to the cocktail (-) group (0 % vs. 17.9 %, P = 0.024). No cases of hypotension, major bleeding or coronary perforation in either group. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) within 6-month were no significant difference between the groups (4.0 % vs. 3.8 %, P = 0.977).
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The pilot study suggests that intracoronary administration of a cocktail comprising heparin, nitroglycerin, and verapamil may reduce the incidence of no-reflow during ELCA in patients with ISR. However, given the limited sample size and the non-randomized design, these findings should be considered hypothesis-generating. Future validation needs to be confirmed through multicenter studies with larger sample sizes.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39426421
pii: S0167-5273(24)01288-9
doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2024.132666
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
132666Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflict of interest statement This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.