The efficacy of an intracoronary cocktail administration in preventing no-reflow during excimer laser coronary angioplasty in patients with in-stent restenosis: A pilot study. (ELCA- cocktail study).

Cocktail Contrast infusion Excimer laser coronary angioplasty In-stent restenosis No-reflow

Journal

International journal of cardiology
ISSN: 1874-1754
Titre abrégé: Int J Cardiol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 8200291

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
17 Oct 2024
Historique:
received: 30 08 2024
revised: 12 10 2024
accepted: 16 10 2024
medline: 20 10 2024
pubmed: 20 10 2024
entrez: 19 10 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

The no-reflow phenomenon is a significant complication during excimer laser coronary angioplasty (ELCA) procedures, which can lead to adverse outcomes. This study explores the efficacy of intracoronary administration of a cocktail solution comprising nitroglycerin, heparin, and verapamil on preventing no-reflow during ELCA in patients with in-stent restenosis (ISR). This study included patients undergoing ELCA with contrast infusion for ISR. Based on whether receiving the intracoronary cocktail solution during ELCA, participants were divided into two groups: the cocktail (+) group and the cocktail (-) group. The primary endpoint was the incidence of no-reflow, which was defined as the cessation of blood flow into the distal coronary artery in the absence of a clear angiographic explanation for impairment of flow. A total of 54 lesions in 51 patients were included. The mean age of the study population was 61.8 ± 9.7 years, with 84.3 % male. Baseline clinical characteristics were well-balanced. The incidence of no-reflow was significantly lower in the cocktail (+) group compared to the cocktail (-) group (0 % vs. 17.9 %, P = 0.024). No cases of hypotension, major bleeding or coronary perforation in either group. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) within 6-month were no significant difference between the groups (4.0 % vs. 3.8 %, P = 0.977). The pilot study suggests that intracoronary administration of a cocktail comprising heparin, nitroglycerin, and verapamil may reduce the incidence of no-reflow during ELCA in patients with ISR. However, given the limited sample size and the non-randomized design, these findings should be considered hypothesis-generating. Future validation needs to be confirmed through multicenter studies with larger sample sizes.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The no-reflow phenomenon is a significant complication during excimer laser coronary angioplasty (ELCA) procedures, which can lead to adverse outcomes. This study explores the efficacy of intracoronary administration of a cocktail solution comprising nitroglycerin, heparin, and verapamil on preventing no-reflow during ELCA in patients with in-stent restenosis (ISR).
METHODS METHODS
This study included patients undergoing ELCA with contrast infusion for ISR. Based on whether receiving the intracoronary cocktail solution during ELCA, participants were divided into two groups: the cocktail (+) group and the cocktail (-) group. The primary endpoint was the incidence of no-reflow, which was defined as the cessation of blood flow into the distal coronary artery in the absence of a clear angiographic explanation for impairment of flow.
RESULTS RESULTS
A total of 54 lesions in 51 patients were included. The mean age of the study population was 61.8 ± 9.7 years, with 84.3 % male. Baseline clinical characteristics were well-balanced. The incidence of no-reflow was significantly lower in the cocktail (+) group compared to the cocktail (-) group (0 % vs. 17.9 %, P = 0.024). No cases of hypotension, major bleeding or coronary perforation in either group. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) within 6-month were no significant difference between the groups (4.0 % vs. 3.8 %, P = 0.977).
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
The pilot study suggests that intracoronary administration of a cocktail comprising heparin, nitroglycerin, and verapamil may reduce the incidence of no-reflow during ELCA in patients with ISR. However, given the limited sample size and the non-randomized design, these findings should be considered hypothesis-generating. Future validation needs to be confirmed through multicenter studies with larger sample sizes.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39426421
pii: S0167-5273(24)01288-9
doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2024.132666
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

132666

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflict of interest statement This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Auteurs

Pan He (P)

Department of Cardiology, Yingtan City People's Hospital, Yingtan City, Jiangxi Province, China; Department of Cardiology, Sixth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.

Haiwei Chen (H)

Department of Cardiology, Sixth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.

Junjie Yang (J)

Department of Cardiology, Sixth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.

Lei Gao (L)

Department of Cardiology, Sixth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.

Jun Guo (J)

Department of Cardiology, Sixth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.

Yundai Chen (Y)

Department of Cardiology, Sixth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.

Qi Wang (Q)

Department of Cardiology, Sixth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China. Electronic address: doctorwq301@163.com.

Classifications MeSH