Association Between Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction and Exercise Capacity in Dilated Cardiomyopathy.

Dilated cardiomyopathy cardiovascular magnetic resonance exercise capacity myocardial perfusion reserve

Journal

Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
ISSN: 1532-429X
Titre abrégé: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9815616

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
17 Oct 2024
Historique:
received: 11 06 2024
revised: 21 09 2024
accepted: 10 10 2024
medline: 20 10 2024
pubmed: 20 10 2024
entrez: 19 10 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Aerobic exercise capacity is an independent predictor of mortality in dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), but the central mechanisms contributing to exercise intolerance in DCM are unknown. Characterize coronary microvascular function in DCM and determine if cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) measures are associated with aerobic exercise capacity. Prospective case-control comparison of adults with DCM and matched controls. Adenosine-stress perfusion CMR to assess cardiac structure, function and automated inline myocardial blood flow quantification, and cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) to determine peak VO Sixty-six patients with DCM (mean age 61 years, 71% male) were propensity-matched to 66 controls (mean age 59 years, 71% male) based on age, sex, body mass index and diabetes. DCM patients had markedly lower peak VO In comparison to controls, DCM patients have lower stress myocardial blood flow and MPR. In DCM, MPR, LV ejection fraction and fibrosis are independently associated with aerobic exercise capacity.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Aerobic exercise capacity is an independent predictor of mortality in dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), but the central mechanisms contributing to exercise intolerance in DCM are unknown.
OBJECTIVES OBJECTIVE
Characterize coronary microvascular function in DCM and determine if cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) measures are associated with aerobic exercise capacity.
METHODS METHODS
Prospective case-control comparison of adults with DCM and matched controls. Adenosine-stress perfusion CMR to assess cardiac structure, function and automated inline myocardial blood flow quantification, and cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) to determine peak VO
RESULTS RESULTS
Sixty-six patients with DCM (mean age 61 years, 71% male) were propensity-matched to 66 controls (mean age 59 years, 71% male) based on age, sex, body mass index and diabetes. DCM patients had markedly lower peak VO
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
In comparison to controls, DCM patients have lower stress myocardial blood flow and MPR. In DCM, MPR, LV ejection fraction and fibrosis are independently associated with aerobic exercise capacity.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39426603
pii: S1097-6647(24)01135-9
doi: 10.1016/j.jocmr.2024.101108
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

101108

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. The author is an Editorial Board Member/Editor-in-Chief/Associate Editor/Guest Editor for [Journal name] and was not involved in the editorial review or the decision to publish this article.

Auteurs

Abhishek Dattani (A)

Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester and the National Institute for Health and Care Research Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Leicester, UK. Electronic address: ad530@leicester.ac.uk.

Benjamin A Marrow (BA)

Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester and the National Institute for Health and Care Research Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Leicester, UK.

Gaurav S Gulsin (GS)

Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester and the National Institute for Health and Care Research Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Leicester, UK.

Jian L Yeo (JL)

Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester and the National Institute for Health and Care Research Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Leicester, UK.

Amitha Puranik (A)

Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester and the National Institute for Health and Care Research Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Leicester, UK.

Emer M Brady (EM)

Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester and the National Institute for Health and Care Research Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Leicester, UK.

David Adlam (D)

Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester and the National Institute for Health and Care Research Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Leicester, UK.

Anvesha Singh (A)

Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester and the National Institute for Health and Care Research Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Leicester, UK.

Mohammedimran M Ansari (MM)

University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK.

Jayanth R Arnold (JR)

Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester and the National Institute for Health and Care Research Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Leicester, UK.

Hui Xue (H)

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.

Peter Kellman (P)

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.

James S Ware (JS)

National Heart and Lung Institute & MRC Laboratory of Medical Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK.

Gerry P McCann (GP)

Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester and the National Institute for Health and Care Research Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Leicester, UK.

Classifications MeSH