Cryo-EM structures of ryanodine receptors and diamide insecticides reveal the mechanisms of selectivity and resistance.


Journal

Nature communications
ISSN: 2041-1723
Titre abrégé: Nat Commun
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101528555

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
20 Oct 2024
Historique:
received: 07 02 2024
accepted: 14 10 2024
medline: 21 10 2024
pubmed: 21 10 2024
entrez: 20 10 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The resistance of pests to common insecticides is a global issue that threatens food production worldwide. Diamide insecticides target insect ryanodine receptors (RyRs), causing uncontrolled calcium release from the sarcoplasmic and endoplasmic reticulum. Despite their high potency and species selectivity, several resistance mutations have emerged. Using a chimeric RyR (chiRyR) approach and cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM), we investigate how insect RyRs engage two different diamide insecticides from separate families: flubendiamide, a phthalic acid derivative, and tetraniliprole, an anthranilic compound. Both compounds target the same site in the transmembrane region of the RyR, albeit with different poses, and promote channel opening through coupling with the pore-forming domain. To explore the resistance mechanisms, we also solve two cryo-EM structures of chiRyR carrying the two most common resistance mutations, I4790M and G4946E, both alone and in complex with the diamide insecticide chlorantraniliprole. The resistance mutations perturb the local structure, directly reducing the binding affinity and altering the binding pose. Our findings elucidate the mode of action of different diamide insecticides, reveal the molecular mechanism of resistance mutations, and provide important clues for the development of novel pesticides that can bypass the resistance mutations.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39428398
doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-53490-0
pii: 10.1038/s41467-024-53490-0
doi:

Substances chimiques

Ryanodine Receptor Calcium Release Channel 0
Insecticides 0
flubendiamide GEV84ZI4K6
Benzamides 0
chlorantranilipole 622AK9DH9G
ortho-Aminobenzoates 0
Diamide 10465-78-8
Sulfones 0
Insect Proteins 0
Fluorocarbons 0
Phthalimides 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

9056

Subventions

Organisme : Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China (Chinese Ministry of Science and Technology)
ID : 2022YFE0108400
Organisme : National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China)
ID : 32372580
Organisme : National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China)
ID : 32272576
Organisme : MEXT | Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS)
ID : 23K24067

Informations de copyright

© 2024. The Author(s).

Références

Gould, F., Brown, Z. S. & Kuzma, J. Wicked evolution: can we address the sociobiological dilemma of pesticide resistance? Science 360, 728–732 (2018).
pubmed: 29773742 doi: 10.1126/science.aar3780
TOHNISHI, Masanori et al. Flubendiamide, a novel insecticide highly active against lepidopterous insect pests. J. Pestic. Sci. 30, 354–360 (2005).
doi: 10.1584/jpestics.30.354
Hirooka, T., Nishimatsu, T., Kodama, H., Reckmann, U. & Nauen, R. The biological profile of flubendiamide, a new benzenedicarboxamide insecticide. Pflanzenschutz-Nachrichten Bayer. 60, 183–202 (2007).
Cordova, D. et al. Anthranilic diamides: a new class of insecticides with a novel mode of action, ryanodine receptor activation. Pestic. Biochem Phys. 84, 196–214 (2006).
doi: 10.1016/j.pestbp.2005.07.005
Lahm, G. P., Cordova, D. & Barry, J. D. New and selective ryanodine receptor activators for insect control. Bioorg. Med Chem. 17, 4127–4133 (2009).
pubmed: 19186058 doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2009.01.018
Nauen, R. Insecticide mode of action: return of the ryanodine receptor. Pest Manag Sci. 62, 690–692 (2006).
pubmed: 16770834 doi: 10.1002/ps.1254
Casida, J. E. & Bryant, R. J. The ABCs of pesticide toxicology: amounts, biology, and chemistry. Toxicol. Res-Uk 6, 755–763 (2017).
doi: 10.1039/c7tx00198c
Sparks, T. C., Wessels, F. J., Lorsbach, B. A., Nugent, B. M. & Watson, G. B. The new age of insecticide discovery-the crop protection industry and the impact of natural products. Pestic. Biochem Physiol. 161, 12–22 (2019).
pubmed: 31685191 doi: 10.1016/j.pestbp.2019.09.002
Franziniarmstrong, C. & Jorgensen, A. O. Structure and development of E-C coupling units in skeletal-muscle. Annu Rev. Physiol. 56, 509–534 (1994).
pubmed: 8010750 doi: 10.1146/annurev.ph.56.030194.002453
Coronado, R., Morrissette, J., Sukhareva, M. & Vaughan, D. M. Structure and function of ryanodine receptors. Am. J. Physiol. 266, C1485–C1504 (1994).
pubmed: 8023884 doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.1994.266.6.C1485
Woll, K. A. & Van Petegem, F. Calcium-release channels: Structure and function of IP3 receptors and ryanodine receptors. Physiological Rev. 102, 209–268 (2022).
doi: 10.1152/physrev.00033.2020
Fleischer, S., Ogunbunmi, E. M., Dixon, M. C. & Fleer, E. Localization of Ca2+ release channels with ryanodine in junctional terminal cisternae of sarcoplasmic reticulum of fast skeletal muscle. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 82, 7256–7259 (1985).
pubmed: 2414773 pmcid: 390828 doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.21.7256
Yao, R. et al. Monitoring and mechanisms of insecticide resistance in Chilo suppressalis (Lepidoptera: Crambidae), with special reference to diamides. Pest Manag. Sci. 73, 1169–1178 (2017).
pubmed: 27624654 doi: 10.1002/ps.4439
Kambrekar, D. et al. Tetraniliprole- new diamide insecticide molecule featuring novel mode of action against soybean insect pests. Biochemical Cell. Arch. 17, 801–804 (2017).
Kousika, J. & Kuttalam, S. Evaluation of tetraniliprole 200 sc against American serpentine leaf miner Liriomyza trifolii (Burgess) and its impact on natural enemies in Tomato. Pestic. Res. J. 32, 165 (2020).
doi: 10.5958/2249-524X.2020.00021.7
Jeschke, P. Status and outlook for acaricide and insecticide discovery. Pest Manag Sci. 77, 64–76 (2021).
pubmed: 32926594 doi: 10.1002/ps.6084
Boaventura, D. et al. Detection of a ryanodine receptor target-site mutation in diamide insecticide resistant fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda. Pest Manag. Sci. 76, 47–54 (2020).
pubmed: 31157506 doi: 10.1002/ps.5505
Roditakis, E. et al. Ryanodine receptor point mutations confer diamide insecticide resistance in tomato leafminer, Tuta absoluta (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). Insect Biochem Molec 80, 11–20 (2017).
doi: 10.1016/j.ibmb.2016.11.003
Zuo, Y. Y. et al. CRISPR/Cas9 mediated G4946E substitution in the ryanodine receptor of Spodoptera exigua confers high levels of resistance to diamide insecticides. Insect Biochem Molec 89, 79–85 (2017).
doi: 10.1016/j.ibmb.2017.09.005
Troczka, B. et al. Resistance to diamide insecticides in diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) is associated with a mutation in the membrane-spanning domain of the ryanodine receptor. Insect Biochem Molec 42, 873–880 (2012).
doi: 10.1016/j.ibmb.2012.09.001
Guo, L., Liang, P., Zhou, X. G. & Gao, X. W. Novel mutations and mutation combinations of ryanodine receptor in a chlorantraniliprole resistant population of Plutella xylostella (L.). Sci. Rep.-Uk 4, 6924 (2014).
doi: 10.1038/srep06924
Douris, V. et al. Investigation of the contribution of RyR target-site mutations in diamide resistance by CRISPR/Cas9 genome modification in Drosophila. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 87, 127–135 (2017).
pubmed: 28669775 doi: 10.1016/j.ibmb.2017.06.013
Jiang, D. et al. Varying contributions of three ryanodine receptor point mutations to diamide insecticide resistance in Plutella xylostella. Pest Manag Sci. 77, 4874–4883 (2021).
pubmed: 34176224 doi: 10.1002/ps.6534
Sun, Y. et al. Chlorantraniliprole resistance and its biochemical and new molecular target mechanisms in laboratory and field strains of Chilo suppressalis (Walker). Pest Manag Sci. 74, 1416–1423 (2018).
pubmed: 29235708 doi: 10.1002/ps.4824
Huang, J. M. et al. Multiple target-site mutations occurring in lepidopterans confer resistance to diamide insecticides. Insect Biochem Molec 121, 103367 (2020).
doi: 10.1016/j.ibmb.2020.103367
Ma, R. et al. Structural basis for diamide modulation of ryanodine receptor. Nat. Chem. Biol. 16, 1246 (2020).
pubmed: 32807966 doi: 10.1038/s41589-020-0627-5
Kobayashi, T. et al. Molecular basis for gating of cardiac ryanodine receptor explains the mechanisms for gain- and loss-of function mutations. Nat Commun 13, 2821 (2022).
Iyer, K. A. et al. Structural mechanism of two gain-of-function cardiac and skeletal RyR mutations at an equivalent site by cryo-EM. Sci. Adv. 6, eabb2964 (2020).
pubmed: 32832689 pmcid: 7439390 doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abb2964
Murayama, T. et al. Efficient high-throughput screening by endoplasmic reticulum ca2+ measurement to identify inhibitors of ryanodine receptor Ca2+-release channels. Mol. Pharm. 94, 722–730 (2018).
doi: 10.1124/mol.117.111468
Chen, J., Xue, L., Wei, R., Liu, S. & Yin, C.-C. The insecticide chlorantraniliprole is a weak activator of mammalian skeletal ryanodine receptor/Ca2+ release channel. Biochem Bioph Res Co. 508, 633–639 (2019).
doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2018.11.180
Troczka, B. J. et al. Stable expression and functional characterisation of the diamondback moth ryanodine receptor G4946E variant conferring resistance to diamide insecticides. Sci. Rep.-Uk 5, 14680 (2015).
doi: 10.1038/srep14680
Zhao, J. et al. Characterization of six diamide insecticides on ryanodine receptor: resistance and species selectivity. J. Agr. Food Chem. 71, 11001–11007 (2023).
doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.3c01750
Casida, J. E. Golden Age of RyR and GABA-R diamide and isoxazoline insecticides: common genesis, serendipity, surprises, selectivity, and safety. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 28, 560–566 (2015).
pubmed: 25688713 doi: 10.1021/tx500520w
Qi, S. Z. & Casida, J. E. Species differences in chlorantraniliprole and flubendiamide insecticide binding sites in the ryanodine receptor. Pestic. Biochem Phys. 107, 321–326 (2013).
doi: 10.1016/j.pestbp.2013.09.004
Isaacs, A. K., Qi, S., Sarpong, R. & Casida, J. E. Insect ryanodine receptor: distinct but coupled insecticide binding sites for [N-C3H3] chlorantraniliprole, flubendiamide, and [3H] ryanodine.Chem. Res. Toxicol. 25, 1571–1573 (2012).
pubmed: 22856329 pmcid: 4631119 doi: 10.1021/tx300326m
Wang, X. L., Cao, X. W., Jiang, D., Yang, Y. H. & Wu, Y. D. CRISPR/Cas9 mediated ryanodine receptor I4790M knockin confers unequal resistance to diamides in Plutella xylostella. Insect Biochem Molec 125, 103453 (2020).
doi: 10.1016/j.ibmb.2020.103453
Haji-Ghassemi, O. et al. Cryo-EM analysis of scorpion toxin binding to Ryanodine Receptors reveals subconductance that is abolished by PKA phosphorylation. Sci. Adv. 9, eadf4936 (2023).
pubmed: 37224245 pmcid: 10208580 doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adf4936
Melville, Z., Kim, K., Clarke, O. B. & Marks, A. R. High-resolution structure of the membrane-embedded skeletal muscle ryanodine receptor. Structure 30, 172–180.e3 (2022).
pubmed: 34469755 doi: 10.1016/j.str.2021.08.001
Qi, S. Z., Lummen, P., Nauen, R. & Casida, J. E. Diamide insecticide target site specificity in the heliothis and musca ryanodine receptors relative to toxicity. J. Agr. Food Chem. 62, 4077–4082 (2014).
doi: 10.1021/jf501236h
Kobayashi, T. et al. Molecular basis for gating of cardiac ryanodine receptor explains the mechanisms for gain- and loss-of function mutations. Nat. Commun. 13, 2821 (2022).
pubmed: 35595836 pmcid: 9123176 doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-30429-x
Okuma, D. M., Cuenca, A., Nauen, R. & Omoto, C. Large-scale monitoring of the frequency of ryanodine receptor target-site mutations conferring diamide resistance in Brazilian field populations of fall armyworm, spodoptera frugiperda (lepidoptera: noctuidae). Insects 13, 626 (2022).
pubmed: 35886802 pmcid: 9323691 doi: 10.3390/insects13070626
Jouraku, A. et al. Ryanodine receptor mutations (G4946E and I4790K) differentially responsible for diamide insecticide resistance in diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella L. Insect Biochem Mol. Biol. 118, 103308 (2020).
pubmed: 31863874 doi: 10.1016/j.ibmb.2019.103308
Sutko, J. L., Airey, J. A., Welch, W. & Ruest, L. The pharmacology of ryanodine and related compounds. Pharm. Rev. 49, 53–98 (1997).
pubmed: 9085309
Valdivia, H. H., Kirby, M. S., Lederer, W. J. & Coronado, R. Scorpion toxins targeted against the sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca(2+)-release channel of skeletal and cardiac muscle. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 89, 12185–12189 (1992).
pubmed: 1334561 pmcid: 50723 doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.24.12185
des Georges, A. et al. Structural basis for gating and activation of RyR1. Cell 167, 145 (2016).
pubmed: 27662087 pmcid: 5142848 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.08.075
Lindsay, A. R., Tinker, A. & Williams, A. J. How does ryanodine modify ion handling in the sheep cardiac sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca(2+)-release channel? J. Gen. Physiol. 104, 425–447 (1994).
pubmed: 7807056 doi: 10.1085/jgp.104.3.425
Welch, W. et al. Structural components of ryanodine responsible for modulation of sarcoplasmic reticulum calcium channel function. Biochemistry 36, 2939–2950 (1997).
pubmed: 9062124 doi: 10.1021/bi9623901
Santulli, G.; Lewis, D.; des Georges, A.; Marks, A. R.; Frank, J., Ryanodine receptor structure and function in health and disease. Membrane protein complexes: structure and function. 87, 329–352 (2018).
Van Petegem, F. Ryanodine receptors: structure and function. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 31624–31632 (2012).
pubmed: 22822064 pmcid: 3442496 doi: 10.1074/jbc.R112.349068
Szentandrassy, N. et al. Therapeutic approaches of ryanodine receptor-associated heart diseases. Int J. Mol. Sci. 23, 4435 (2022).
pubmed: 35457253 pmcid: 9031589 doi: 10.3390/ijms23084435
Suzuki, J. et al. Imaging intraorganellar Ca2+ at subcellular resolution using CEPIA. Nat. Commun. 5, 4153 (2014).
pubmed: 24923787 doi: 10.1038/ncomms5153
Murayama, T. et al. Dual role of the S5 segment in type 1 ryanodine receptor channel gating. Commun. Biol. 7, 1108 (2024).
pubmed: 39294299 pmcid: 11411075 doi: 10.1038/s42003-024-06787-1
Bers, D. M., Patton, C. W. & Nuccitelli, R. A practical guide to the preparation of Ca2+ buffers. Methods Cell Biol. 40, 3–29 (1994).
pubmed: 8201981 doi: 10.1016/S0091-679X(08)61108-5
Gong, D. S. et al. Modulation of cardiac ryanodine receptor 2 by calmodulin. Nature 572, 347 (2019).
pubmed: 31278385 doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1377-y
Punjani, A., Rubinstein, J. L., Fleet, D. J. & Brubaker, M. A. cryoSPARC: algorithms for rapid unsupervised cryo-EM structure determination. Nat. Methods 14, 290 (2017).
pubmed: 28165473 doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4169
Pettersen, E. F. et al. UCSF Chimera–a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput Chem. 25, 1605–1612 (2004).
pubmed: 15264254 doi: 10.1002/jcc.20084
Adams, P. D. et al. PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D.-Struct. Biol. 66, 213–221 (2010).
doi: 10.1107/S0907444909052925
Emsley, P. & Cowtan, K. Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr D. Biol. Crystallogr 60, 2126–2132 (2004).
pubmed: 15572765 doi: 10.1107/S0907444904019158
Croll, T. I. ISOLDE: a physically realistic environment for model building into low-resolution electron-density maps. Acta Crystallogr D. Struct. Biol. 74, 519–530 (2018).
pubmed: 29872003 pmcid: 6096486 doi: 10.1107/S2059798318002425
Smart, O. S., Neduvelil, J. G., Wang, X., Wallace, B. A. & Sansom, M. S. HOLE: a program for the analysis of the pore dimensions of ion channel structural models. J. Mol. Graph 14, 354–360 (1996).
pubmed: 9195488 doi: 10.1016/S0263-7855(97)00009-X
Mackoy, T.; Kale, B.; Papka, M. E.; Wheeler, R. A., viewSq, a Visual Molecular Dynamics (VMD) module for calculating, analyzing, and visualizing X-ray and neutron structure factors from atomistic simulations .Comput. Phys. Commun. 264, 107881 (2022).

Auteurs

Lianyun Lin (L)

Tianjin Key Laboratory for Modern Drug Delivery and High-Efficiency, Frontiers Science Center for Synthetic Biology, School of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
Haihe Laboratory of Sustainable Chemical Transformations, Tianjin, China.

Changshi Wang (C)

Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Life Sciences Institute, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Wenlan Wang (W)

Tianjin Key Laboratory for Modern Drug Delivery and High-Efficiency, Frontiers Science Center for Synthetic Biology, School of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
Haihe Laboratory of Sustainable Chemical Transformations, Tianjin, China.

Heng Jiang (H)

Tianjin Key Laboratory for Modern Drug Delivery and High-Efficiency, Frontiers Science Center for Synthetic Biology, School of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
Haihe Laboratory of Sustainable Chemical Transformations, Tianjin, China.

Takashi Murayama (T)

Department of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Takuya Kobayashi (T)

Department of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Hadiatullah Hadiatullah (H)

Tianjin Key Laboratory for Modern Drug Delivery and High-Efficiency, Frontiers Science Center for Synthetic Biology, School of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
Haihe Laboratory of Sustainable Chemical Transformations, Tianjin, China.

Yu Seby Chen (YS)

Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Life Sciences Institute, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Shunfan Wu (S)

College of Plant Protection, State & Local Joint Engineering Research Center of Green Pesticide Invention and Application, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.

Yiwen Wang (Y)

Tianjin Key Laboratory for Modern Drug Delivery and High-Efficiency, Frontiers Science Center for Synthetic Biology, School of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.

Henryk Korza (H)

Syngenta Jealott's Hill International Research Centre, Bracknell, Berkshire, UK.

Yucheng Gu (Y)

Syngenta Jealott's Hill International Research Centre, Bracknell, Berkshire, UK.

Yan Zhang (Y)

Tianjin Key Laboratory for Modern Drug Delivery and High-Efficiency, Frontiers Science Center for Synthetic Biology, School of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
Haihe Laboratory of Sustainable Chemical Transformations, Tianjin, China.

Jiamu Du (J)

Institute of Plant and Food Science, Department of Biology, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.

Filip Van Petegem (F)

Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Life Sciences Institute, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. filip.vanpetegem@gmail.com.

Zhiguang Yuchi (Z)

Tianjin Key Laboratory for Modern Drug Delivery and High-Efficiency, Frontiers Science Center for Synthetic Biology, School of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China. yuchi@tju.edu.cn.
Haihe Laboratory of Sustainable Chemical Transformations, Tianjin, China. yuchi@tju.edu.cn.
Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture (Shenzhen Branch), Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China. yuchi@tju.edu.cn.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Photosynthesis Ribulose-Bisphosphate Carboxylase Carbon Dioxide Molecular Dynamics Simulation Cyanobacteria
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice

Classifications MeSH