Handgrip Strength and Dehydroepiandrosterone Sulfate in a Frailty Unit: A Retrospective Study.

dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate frail scale frailty frailty unit handgrip strength

Journal

Cureus
ISSN: 2168-8184
Titre abrégé: Cureus
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101596737

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Sep 2024
Historique:
accepted: 16 09 2024
medline: 21 10 2024
pubmed: 21 10 2024
entrez: 21 10 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Frailty is characterized by vulnerability and decline in physical, mental, and social activity, significantly contributing to adverse health outcomes. Frailty encompasses nutritional status, muscle strength, inflammation, and hormones. Dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEAS) is one of the hormones hypothesized to play a role in frailty. Handgrip strength (HGS) correlates with overall muscle strength. The fatigue, resistance, ambulation, illnesses, and loss of weight (FRAIL) scale can be used to readily screen frailty. Identifying markers associated with frailty can facilitate its early diagnosis, risk stratification, and target interventions to prevent or mitigate its negative consequences. This study sought to evaluate the associations between frailty, HGS, and DHEAS in a Portuguese frailty unit (FU). We developed an observational retrospective study in an FU. Patients admitted to the FU underwent a rehabilitation program. We assessed frailty with the FRAIL scale. We assayed DHEAS upon admission to the FU. We measured HGS at admission (i-HGS) and discharge (f-HGS). We also considered HGS variation (∆ HGS) and length of stay. Out of 119 subjects, 97 fulfilled the eligibility criteria (mean age 78.35 ± 9.58 years; 44.33% men). Overall, 88 (90.72%) patients had a FRAIL scale score of 3 or more. DHEAS values were not significantly different in either the categories of the FRAIL scale or frailty status. DHEAS values were also not significantly correlated with either i-HGS, f-HGS, ∆ HGS, age, or FU length of stay. Frail patients had a significantly lower i-HGS (p = 0.002) and f-HGS (p = 0.001) and a significantly higher length of stay (p = 0.006). Also, the i-HGS and f-HGS significantly decreased with the increase of the FRAIL scale score (p < 0.0001 for both). The cut-off values of the i-HGS and the f-HGS for detecting frail patients in our study were 13.3 kg and 19.1 kg, respectively (p < 0.0001 for both). The i-HGS was significantly and independently associated with the frailty status of frail (p = 0.001), with a 15% probability reduction of a patient being frail for every kilogram increase in the i-HGS. Frail patients assessed with the FRAIL scale had a significantly lower i-HGS and f-HGS and a higher length of stay. In this study, we found frailty and DHEAS to be not associated and DHEAS values to be not correlated with i-HGS or f-HGS. In our opinion, the creation of an FU with an initial FRAIL scale screening and HGS measurement might have a significant impact on identifying frail people and ensuring the implementation of a multimodal multidisciplinary approach.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39429393
doi: 10.7759/cureus.69753
pmc: PMC11490317
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e69753

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024, Caires et al.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Human subjects: Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Ethics Committee of the Autonomous Region of Madeira Health Care System issued approval nº38/2022. Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Auteurs

Daniano Caires (D)

Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Hospital Central do Funchal, Funchal, PRT.

Miguel Homem Costa (MH)

Internal Medicine, Hospital Central do Funchal, Funchal, PRT.

João Miguel Freitas (JM)

Internal Medicine, Hospital Central do Funchal, Funchal, PRT.

Rafael Ferreira Nascimento (RF)

Internal Medicine, Hospital Central do Funchal, Funchal, PRT.

Tiago Teófilo (T)

Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Hospital Central do Funchal, Funchal, PRT.

Luís Ramos Dos Santos (L)

Internal Medicine, Hospital Central do Funchal, Funchal, PRT.

João Gouveia (J)

Internal Medicine, Hospital Central do Funchal, Funchal, PRT.

Carolina Carvalhinha (C)

Internal Medicine, Hospital Central do Funchal, Funchal, PRT.

Classifications MeSH