Comparative effectiveness of glucagon-like peptide-1 agonists, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors, and sulfonylureas on the risk of dementia in older individuals with type 2 diabetes in Sweden: an emulated trial study.

Antidiabetic drugs Dementia Emulated trial study

Journal

EClinicalMedicine
ISSN: 2589-5370
Titre abrégé: EClinicalMedicine
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101733727

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jul 2024
Historique:
received: 14 03 2024
revised: 25 05 2024
accepted: 30 05 2024
medline: 21 10 2024
pubmed: 21 10 2024
entrez: 21 10 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The comparative effectiveness of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonists, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, and sulfonylureas on the risk of dementia in older individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is unknown. We conducted a sequential trial emulation from 1st January 2010 to 30th June 2020 using data from Swedish national registers. Swedish residents who were aged 65 or older, had type 2 diabetes (T2DM), and initiated GLP-1 agonists, DPP-4 inhibitors, or sulfonylureas were followed for up to 10 years to assess the risk of dementia. Participants who had dementia, used the three drug classes, or had contraindications were excluded from enrollment. The characteristics between arms were balanced through the application of propensity scores estimated from predefined covariates. Intention-to-treat effects were analysed with all enrolled participants, while the per-protocol effects were analysed with participants who adhered to the assigned treatment. The pooled trial included 88,381 participants who received prescriptions for GLP-1 agonists (n = 12,351), DPP-4 inhibitors (n = 43,850), or sulfonylureas (n = 32,216) at baseline and were followed for an average of 4.3 years. A total of 4607 dementia cases developed during follow-up: 278 for the GLP-1 agonist initiators (incidence rate: 6.7 per 1000 person years), 1849 for DPP-4 inhibitor initiators (IR: 11.8), and 2480 for sulfonylurea initiators (IR: 13.7). In an intention-to-treat analysis, GLP-1 agonist initiation was associated with a reduced risk of dementia compared to sulfonylureas (hazard ratio: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.60-0.79, p < 0.0001) and DPP-4 inhibitors (HR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.68-0.88, p < 0.0001), after adjusting for age, enrollment year, sex, socioeconomic factors, health conditions, and past medication uses. These findings were consistent in several sensitivity analyses, including a per-protocol analysis (HR for sulfonylureas: 0.41, 95% CI: 0.32-0.53, p < 0.0001; HR for DPP-4 inhibitors: 0.38, 95% CI: 0.30-0.49, p < 0.0001). Our research suggested that GLP-1 agonists were associated with a lower risk of dementia compared to sulfonylureas and DPP-4 inhibitors in older individuals with T2DM. Further clinical trials are needed to validate these findings. Swedish Research Council, Karolinska Institutet, the National Institute on Aging, the National Institutes of Health, and Riksbankens Jubileumsfond.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
The comparative effectiveness of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonists, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, and sulfonylureas on the risk of dementia in older individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is unknown.
Methods UNASSIGNED
We conducted a sequential trial emulation from 1st January 2010 to 30th June 2020 using data from Swedish national registers. Swedish residents who were aged 65 or older, had type 2 diabetes (T2DM), and initiated GLP-1 agonists, DPP-4 inhibitors, or sulfonylureas were followed for up to 10 years to assess the risk of dementia. Participants who had dementia, used the three drug classes, or had contraindications were excluded from enrollment. The characteristics between arms were balanced through the application of propensity scores estimated from predefined covariates. Intention-to-treat effects were analysed with all enrolled participants, while the per-protocol effects were analysed with participants who adhered to the assigned treatment.
Findings UNASSIGNED
The pooled trial included 88,381 participants who received prescriptions for GLP-1 agonists (n = 12,351), DPP-4 inhibitors (n = 43,850), or sulfonylureas (n = 32,216) at baseline and were followed for an average of 4.3 years. A total of 4607 dementia cases developed during follow-up: 278 for the GLP-1 agonist initiators (incidence rate: 6.7 per 1000 person years), 1849 for DPP-4 inhibitor initiators (IR: 11.8), and 2480 for sulfonylurea initiators (IR: 13.7). In an intention-to-treat analysis, GLP-1 agonist initiation was associated with a reduced risk of dementia compared to sulfonylureas (hazard ratio: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.60-0.79, p < 0.0001) and DPP-4 inhibitors (HR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.68-0.88, p < 0.0001), after adjusting for age, enrollment year, sex, socioeconomic factors, health conditions, and past medication uses. These findings were consistent in several sensitivity analyses, including a per-protocol analysis (HR for sulfonylureas: 0.41, 95% CI: 0.32-0.53, p < 0.0001; HR for DPP-4 inhibitors: 0.38, 95% CI: 0.30-0.49, p < 0.0001).
Interpretation UNASSIGNED
Our research suggested that GLP-1 agonists were associated with a lower risk of dementia compared to sulfonylureas and DPP-4 inhibitors in older individuals with T2DM. Further clinical trials are needed to validate these findings.
Funding UNASSIGNED
Swedish Research Council, Karolinska Institutet, the National Institute on Aging, the National Institutes of Health, and Riksbankens Jubileumsfond.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39429814
doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102689
pii: S2589-5370(24)00268-2
pmc: PMC11490655
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

102689

Informations de copyright

© 2024 The Author(s).

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

All authors have provided signed conflict of interest forms and declared no competing interests.

Auteurs

Bowen Tang (B)

Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Arvid Sjölander (A)

Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Jonas W Wastesson (JW)

Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Géric Maura (G)

Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Pierre-Olivier Blotiere (PO)

Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Máté Szilcz (M)

Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Jonathan K L Mak (JKL)

Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacy, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.

Chenxi Qin (C)

Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Michael Alvarsson (M)

Division of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.

Dorota Religa (D)

Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society (NVS), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Kristina Johnell (K)

Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Sara Hägg (S)

Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Classifications MeSH