Treatment selection and influencing factors for chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a physician survey in Japan.
Chronic lymphocytic leukemia
Online survey
Treatment selection
Journal
International journal of clinical oncology
ISSN: 1437-7772
Titre abrégé: Int J Clin Oncol
Pays: Japan
ID NLM: 9616295
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
21 Oct 2024
21 Oct 2024
Historique:
received:
16
07
2024
accepted:
05
10
2024
medline:
21
10
2024
pubmed:
21
10
2024
entrez:
21
10
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is a rare form of lymphoma in Japan. This study aimed to explore hematologists' motivations and considerations in making treatment decisions for CLL. Responses from hematologists treating CLL, obtained through an online survey, were descriptively analyzed. Subgroup analyses by preferred first-line (1L) treatment, years of clinical experience, and level of interest in CLL were conducted. Out of 107 hematologists surveyed, 82.2% identified Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKi) as their primary choice for 1L treatment; the reasons included established clinical evidence (61.4%) and oral administration convenience (56.8%). Key factors influencing 1L treatment selection among those favoring BTKi included the presence of 17p deletion, TP53 mutation, and patient's fitness status. BTKi was favored by 92.6% of hematologists with < 10 years of clinical experience and by 78.8% with more experience. The main reasons for choosing BTKi included safety (50.0%) and tolerance (46.7%) among hematologists who stated they had a specific interest in CLL and the oral administration route (62.1%) among hematologists with lower interest. When BTKi was used as 1L therapy, venetoclax-based regimens were preferred for second-line treatment. The most common concern about BTKi was substantial out-of-pocket costs. Although many Japanese hematologists select their treatment based on clinical evidence, variations exist in treatment strategies, possibly associated with hematologists' experience and interest in CLL. These findings underscore the importance of further promoting evidence-based treatments to ensure that all physicians can make informed decisions. Future research should explore additional factors that influence CLL treatment decisions.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is a rare form of lymphoma in Japan. This study aimed to explore hematologists' motivations and considerations in making treatment decisions for CLL.
METHODS
METHODS
Responses from hematologists treating CLL, obtained through an online survey, were descriptively analyzed. Subgroup analyses by preferred first-line (1L) treatment, years of clinical experience, and level of interest in CLL were conducted.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Out of 107 hematologists surveyed, 82.2% identified Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKi) as their primary choice for 1L treatment; the reasons included established clinical evidence (61.4%) and oral administration convenience (56.8%). Key factors influencing 1L treatment selection among those favoring BTKi included the presence of 17p deletion, TP53 mutation, and patient's fitness status. BTKi was favored by 92.6% of hematologists with < 10 years of clinical experience and by 78.8% with more experience. The main reasons for choosing BTKi included safety (50.0%) and tolerance (46.7%) among hematologists who stated they had a specific interest in CLL and the oral administration route (62.1%) among hematologists with lower interest. When BTKi was used as 1L therapy, venetoclax-based regimens were preferred for second-line treatment. The most common concern about BTKi was substantial out-of-pocket costs.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Although many Japanese hematologists select their treatment based on clinical evidence, variations exist in treatment strategies, possibly associated with hematologists' experience and interest in CLL. These findings underscore the importance of further promoting evidence-based treatments to ensure that all physicians can make informed decisions. Future research should explore additional factors that influence CLL treatment decisions.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39432199
doi: 10.1007/s10147-024-02645-6
pii: 10.1007/s10147-024-02645-6
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Chihara D, Ito H, Matsuda T et al (2014) Differences in incidence and trends of haematological malignancies in Japan and the United States. Br J Haematol 164:536–545
doi: 10.1111/bjh.12659
pubmed: 24245986
Maruyama D, Wang C, Tanizawa Y et al (2023) Treatment patterns in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma post covalent Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment: a Japanese claims database study. J Clin Exp Hematop 63:219–229
doi: 10.3960/jslrt.23032
pubmed: 38148012
pmcid: 10861376
Wierda WG, Brown J, Abramson JS, et al (2024) NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma Version 1.2024. In: Treatment by Cancer Type. Available via https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/category_1 . Accessed Mar 2024
Japanese Society of Hematology (2023) Guidelines for the Practice of Hematopoietic Tumors, 2023. Tokyo
Takizawa J, Izutsu K, Nagai H et al (2021) Real world treatment practices for chronic lymphocytic leukemia in Japan: an observational database research study (CLIMBER-DBR). J Clin Exp Hematop 61:126–134
doi: 10.3960/jslrt.20044
pubmed: 34092721
pmcid: 8519248
M3, Inc. (2024) Research Panel Provision Service. In: M3, Inc. website. Available via https://corporate.m3.com/service/panel-provide/ . Accessed Apr 2024
Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (2022) Overview of Statistics of Physicians, Dentists and Pharmacists 2020. In: Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare website. Available via https://www.mhlw.go.jp/toukei/saikin/hw/ishi/20/dl/R02_gaikyo-b1.pdf . Accessed Apr 2024
Eichhorst B, Robak T, Montserrat E et al (2021) Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 32:23–33
doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.09.019
pubmed: 33091559
Cool A, Nong T, Montoya S et al (2024) BTK inhibitors: past, present, and future. Trends Pharmacol Sci 45:691–707
doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2024.06.006
pubmed: 39025681
Islam P (2023) Current treatment options in relapsed and refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma: a review. Curr Treat Options Oncol 24:1259–1273
doi: 10.1007/s11864-023-01112-0
pubmed: 37407887
American Society of Hematology (2024) Education - Hematology.org. In: American Society of Hematology website. Available via https://www.hematology.org/education . Accessed Apr 2024
Byrd JC, Hillmen P, Ghia P et al (2021) Acalabrutinib versus ibrutinib in previously treated chronic lymphocytic leukemia: results of the first randomized phase III trial. J Clin Oncol 39:3441–3452
doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.01210
pubmed: 34310172
pmcid: 8547923