Efficacy of extended infusion of β-lactam antibiotics for the treatment of febrile neutropenia in haematologic patients (BEATLE): a randomised, multicentre, open-label, superiority clinical trial.
Cefepime
Extended infusion
Febrile neutropenia
Meropenem
Piperacillin-tazobactam
Randomised controlled trial
β-lactam antibiotics
Journal
Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases
ISSN: 1469-0691
Titre abrégé: Clin Microbiol Infect
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9516420
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
19 Oct 2024
19 Oct 2024
Historique:
received:
25
07
2024
revised:
02
10
2024
accepted:
05
10
2024
medline:
22
10
2024
pubmed:
22
10
2024
entrez:
21
10
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
The efficacy of extended infusions (EI) of β-lactam antibiotics for optimising outcomes in febrile neutropenia is unclear. We assessed whether the administration of β-lactams was more effective in EI than in intermittent infusion (II) for the treatment of febrile neutropenia. We performed a randomised, open-label, superiority clinical trial of patients with febrile neutropenia at four Spanish university hospitals. Patients undergoing haematopoietic stem cell transplantation or with acute leukaemia receiving chemotherapy who required empirical antibiotic treatment for febrile neutropenia were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive EI of β-lactam or II after a first dose in bolus. The choice of antipseudomonal β-lactam was left to the discretion of the attending physician. The primary endpoint was treatment success at day 5, defined as defervescence without modifying the antibiotic treatment. Secondary endpoints included adverse events, attainment of the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic target of 50, 75 and 100%ƒ Between November 19, 2019 and June 22, 2022, 295 patients we screened for eligibility, of whom 150 were randomly assigned to receive EI (n=77) or II (n=73) of the antipseudomonal β-lactam of choice. In the intention-to-treat analysis, treatment success at day 5 was achieved in 39/77 patients (50.6%) receiving EI versus 46/73 patients (63.0%) receiving II (risk difference -12.4%; 95% confidence interval, -29.4 to 4.7, p=0.17). The pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic targets of 75 and 100% ƒ Our findings do not support the routine use of empirical EI of β-lactams in febrile neutropenia. Further studies should consider the clinical heterogeneity of febrile neutropenia and focus on patients with sepsis/septic shock and microbiologically documented infections, particularly those with infections caused by microorganisms less susceptible to β-lactams.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39433124
pii: S1198-743X(24)00488-9
doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2024.10.006
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of interests We declare no competing interests regarding the BEATLE trial and its publication.