Spatial-transcriptomic profiling: a new lens for understanding myelofibrosis pathophysiology.
Jak inhibitors
Myelofibrosis
Myeloproliferative neoplasms
Personalized medicine
Spatial transcriptomics
Spleen
Journal
Cell communication and signaling : CCS
ISSN: 1478-811X
Titre abrégé: Cell Commun Signal
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101170464
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
21 Oct 2024
21 Oct 2024
Historique:
received:
19
06
2024
accepted:
05
10
2024
medline:
22
10
2024
pubmed:
22
10
2024
entrez:
21
10
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Myelofibrosis (MF) is a complex myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by abnormal hematopoietic stem cell proliferation and subsequent bone marrow (BM) fibrosis. First documented in the late 19th century, MF has since been extensively studied to unravel its pathophysiology, clinical phenotypes, and therapeutic interventions. MF can be classified into primary and secondary forms, both driven by mutations in genes such as JAK2, CALR, and MPL, which activate the JAK-STAT signaling pathway. These driver mutations are frequently accompanied by additional non-driver mutations in genes like TET2, SRSF2, and TP53, contributing to disease complexity. The BM microenvironment, consisting of stromal cells, extracellular matrix, and cytokines such as TGF-β and TNF-α, plays a critical role in fibrosis and aberrant hematopoiesis. Clinically, MF manifests with symptoms ranging from anemia, splenomegaly, and fatigue to severe complications such as leukemic transformation. Splenomegaly, caused by extramedullary hematopoiesis, leads to abdominal discomfort and early satiety. Current therapeutic strategies include JAK inhibitors like Ruxolitinib, which target the JAK-STAT pathway, alongside supportive treatments such as blood transfusions, erythropoiesis-stimulating agents and developing combinatorial approaches. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation remains the only curative option, though it is limited to younger, high-risk patients. Recently approved JAK inhibitors, including Fedratinib, Pacritinib, and Momelotinib, have expanded the therapeutic landscape. Spatially Resolved Transcriptomics (SRT) has revolutionized the study of gene expression within the spatial context of tissues, providing unprecedented insights into cellular heterogeneity, spatial gene regulation, and microenvironmental interactions, including stromal-hematopoietic dynamics. SRT enables high-resolution mapping of gene expression in the BM and spleen, revealing molecular signatures, spatial heterogeneity, and pathological niches that drive disease progression. These technologies elucidate the role of the spleen in MF, highlighting its transformation into a site of abnormal hematopoietic activity, fibrotic changes, and immune cell infiltration, functioning as a "tumor surrogate." By profiling diverse cell populations and molecular alterations within the BM and spleen, SRT facilitates a deeper understanding of MF pathophysiology, helping identify novel therapeutic targets and biomarkers. Ultimately, integrating spatial transcriptomics into MF research promises to enhance diagnostic precision and therapeutic innovation, addressing the multifaceted challenges of this disease.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39434124
doi: 10.1186/s12964-024-01877-3
pii: 10.1186/s12964-024-01877-3
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
510Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Arber DA, et al. International Consensus classification of myeloid neoplasms and Acute Leukemias: integrating morphologic, clinical, and genomic data. Blood. 2022;140:1200–28.
pubmed: 35767897
pmcid: 9479031
doi: 10.1182/blood.2022015850
Bertozzi I, et al. Thrombotic risk correlates with mutational status in true essential thrombocythemia. Eur J Clin Invest. 2016;46:683–9.
pubmed: 27271054
doi: 10.1111/eci.12647
Heuck G. Zwei Falle Von Leukamie Mit Eigenthumlichem Blut- resp. Knochenmarksbefund. (two cases of leukemia with peculiar blood and BM findings, respectively). Arch Pathol Anat Physiol Virchows. 1879;78:475–96.
doi: 10.1007/BF01878089
Yogarajah M, Tefferi A. Leukemic Transformation in Myeloproliferative neoplasms: a literature review on risk, characteristics, and Outcome. Mayo Clin Proc. 2017;92:1118–28.
pubmed: 28688466
doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2017.05.010
Polverelli N, et al. Splenomegaly in patients with primary or secondary myelofibrosis who are candidates for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: a position paper on behalf of the Chronic Malignancies Working Party of the EBMT. Lancet Haematol. 2023;10:e59–70.
pubmed: 36493799
doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(22)00330-1
Rumi E, et al. Clinical effect of driver mutations of JAK2, CALR, or MPL in primary myelofibrosis. Blood. 2014;124:1062–9.
pubmed: 24986690
pmcid: 4133481
doi: 10.1182/blood-2014-05-578435
Baxter EJ, et al. Acquired mutation of the tyrosine kinase JAK2 in human myeloproliferative disorders. Lancet. 2005;365:1054–61.
pubmed: 15781101
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)71142-9
Hautin M et al. Splicing anomalies in Myeloproliferative neoplasms: paving the way for New Therapeutic venues. Cancers (Basel) 12, (2020).
Sharma V, Wright KL, Epling-Burnette PK, Reuther GW. Metabolic vulnerabilities and Epigenetic Dysregulation in Myeloproliferative Neoplasms. Front Immunol. 2020;11:604142.
pubmed: 33329600
pmcid: 7734315
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.604142
Tefferi A, Gangat N, Pardanani A, Crispino JD. Myelofibrosis: genetic characteristics and the Emerging Therapeutic Landscape. Cancer Res. 2022;82:749–63.
pubmed: 34911786
pmcid: 9306313
doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-21-2930
Abbou N et al. Impact of Molecular Biology in Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Therapeutic Management of. Cells 12, (2022).
Yao JC et al. TGF-β signaling in myeloproliferative neoplasms contributes to myelofibrosis without disrupting the hematopoietic niche. J Clin Invest 132, (2022).
Ghosh K, Shome DK, Kulkarni B, Ghosh MK. Fibrosis and bone marrow: understanding causation and pathobiology. J Transl Med. 2023;21:703.
pubmed: 37814319
pmcid: 10561412
doi: 10.1186/s12967-023-04393-z
Mascarenhas J, et al. Biological drivers of clinical phenotype in myelofibrosis. Leukemia. 2023;37:255–64.
pubmed: 36434065
doi: 10.1038/s41375-022-01767-y
Yan X, et al. Non-driver mutations landscape in different stages of primary myelofibrosis determined ASXL1 mutations play a critical role in disease progression. Blood Cancer J. 2023;13:56.
pubmed: 37080954
pmcid: 10119377
doi: 10.1038/s41408-023-00829-3
Faria C, Tzankov A. Progression in myeloid neoplasms: beyond the myeloblast. Pathobiology. 2024;91:55–75.
pubmed: 37232015
doi: 10.1159/000530940
Chifotides HT, Verstovsek S, Bose P. Association of Myelofibrosis Phenotypes with Clinical manifestations, Molecular profiles, and treatments. Cancers (Basel) 15, (2023).
Hernández-Sánchez A, et al. The prognostic impact of non-driver gene mutations and variant allele frequency in primary myelofibrosis. Am J Hematol. 2024;99:755–8.
pubmed: 38291566
doi: 10.1002/ajh.27203
Guglielmelli P, MIPSS70, et al. Mutation-enhanced international prognostic score system for transplantation-age patients with primary myelofibrosis. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36:310–8.
pubmed: 29226763
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.76.4886
Tefferi A, et al. MIPSS70 + version 2.0: mutation and karyotype-enhanced International Prognostic Scoring System for primary myelofibrosis. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36:1769–70.
pubmed: 29708808
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2018.78.9867
Shi G, et al. The spatiotemporal heterogeneity of the biophysical microenvironment during hematopoietic stem cell development: from embryo to adult. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2023;14:251.
pubmed: 37705072
pmcid: 10500792
doi: 10.1186/s13287-023-03464-8
Bose P, Verstovsek S. JAK inhibition for the treatment of myelofibrosis: limitations and Future perspectives. Hemasphere. 2020;4:e424.
pubmed: 32903304
pmcid: 7375176
doi: 10.1097/HS9.0000000000000424
Polverelli N et al. How We Manage Myelofibrosis Candidates for Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation. Cells 11, (2022).
Tefferi A, Primary myelofibrosis. 2021 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification and management. Am J Hematol. 2021;96:145–62.
pubmed: 33197049
doi: 10.1002/ajh.26050
Wang F, Qiu T, Wang H, Yang Q. State-of-the-art review on myelofibrosis therapies. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2022;22:e350–62.
pubmed: 34903489
doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2021.11.007
Barranco-Lampón G, et al. Myelofibrosis: diagnosis and treatment. Gac Med Mex. 2022;158:26–37.
pubmed: 37734057
Barbui T, et al. In contemporary patients with polycythemia vera, rates of thrombosis and risk factors delineate a new clinical epidemiology. Blood. 2014;124:3021–3.
pubmed: 25377561
doi: 10.1182/blood-2014-07-591610
Morrison SJ, Scadden DT. The bone marrow niche for haematopoietic stem cells. Nature. 2014;505:327–34.
pubmed: 24429631
pmcid: 4514480
doi: 10.1038/nature12984
Nasillo V et al. Inflammatory microenvironment and Specific T Cells in Myeloproliferative neoplasms: Immunopathogenesis and Novel immunotherapies. Int J Mol Sci 22, (2021).
Chakravarthy A, Khan L, Bensler NP, Bose P, De Carvalho DD. TGF-β-associated extracellular matrix genes link cancer-associated fibroblasts to immune evasion and immunotherapy failure. Nat Commun. 2018;9:4692.
pubmed: 30410077
pmcid: 6224529
doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-06654-8
Lee-Thedieck C, Schertl P, Klein G. The extracellular matrix of hematopoietic stem cell niches. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2022;181:114069.
pubmed: 34838648
doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2021.114069
Hermouet S. Mutations, inflammation and phenotype of myeloproliferative neoplasms. Front Oncol. 2023;13:1196817.
pubmed: 37284191
pmcid: 10239955
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1196817
Fisher DAC, et al. Cytokine production in myelofibrosis exhibits differential responsiveness to JAK-STAT, MAP kinase, and NFκB signaling. Leukemia. 2019;33:1978–95.
pubmed: 30718771
pmcid: 6813809
doi: 10.1038/s41375-019-0379-y
Nielsen HM, et al. Epigenetic changes in myelofibrosis: distinct methylation changes in the myeloid compartments and in cases with ASXL1 mutations. Sci Rep. 2017;7:6774.
pubmed: 28754985
pmcid: 5533802
doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-07057-3
Song MK, Park BB, Uhm JE. Understanding splenomegaly in Myelofibrosis: Association with Molecular Pathogenesis. Int J Mol Sci 19, (2018).
Oon SF, et al. Primary myelofibrosis: spectrum of imaging features and disease-related complications. Insights Imaging. 2019;10:71.
pubmed: 31388788
pmcid: 6684717
doi: 10.1186/s13244-019-0758-y
Avanzini MA, et al. The spleen of patients with myelofibrosis harbors defective mesenchymal stromal cells. Am J Hematol. 2018;93:615–22.
pubmed: 29359451
doi: 10.1002/ajh.25047
Wang X, et al. Spleens of myelofibrosis patients contain malignant hematopoietic stem cells. J Clin Invest. 2012;122:3888–99.
pubmed: 23023702
pmcid: 3484080
doi: 10.1172/JCI64397
Peroni E, et al. Deciphering the spleen microenvironment in myelofibrosis with spatial transcriptomic. HemaSphere. 2024;8:5277–8.
Kröger N, et al. Indication and management of allogeneic haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation in myelofibrosis: updated recommendations by the EBMT/ELN International Working Group. Lancet Haematol. 2024;11:e62–74.
pubmed: 38061384
doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(23)00305-8
Passamonti F, Mora B. Myelofibrosis Blood. 2023;141:1954–70.
pubmed: 36416738
doi: 10.1182/blood.2022017423
Polverelli N, et al. Impact of spleen size and splenectomy on outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for myelofibrosis: a retrospective analysis by the chronic malignancies working party on behalf of European society for blood and marrow transplantation (EBMT). Am J Hematol. 2021;96:69–79.
pubmed: 33064301
doi: 10.1002/ajh.26020
Robin M, et al. The impact of splenectomy in myelofibrosis patients before allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transpl. 2017;23:958–64.
doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2017.03.002
Pemmaraju N, et al. Ten years after ruxolitinib approval for myelofibrosis: a review of clinical efficacy. Leuk Lymphoma. 2023;64:1063–81.
pubmed: 37081809
doi: 10.1080/10428194.2023.2196593
Cervantes F, et al. Efficacy and safety of a novel dosing strategy for ruxolitinib in the treatment of patients with myelofibrosis and anemia: the REALISE phase 2 study. Leukemia. 2021;35:3455–65.
pubmed: 34017073
pmcid: 8632662
doi: 10.1038/s41375-021-01261-x
Chamseddine RS, et al. Cytoreductive therapy in younger adults with polycythemia vera: a meta-analysis of safety and outcomes. Blood Adv. 2024;8:2520–6.
pubmed: 38507746
pmcid: 11131058
doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2023012459
Bacigalupo A, et al. Allogeneic hemopoietic stem cell transplantation for myelofibrosis: 2021. Front Immunol. 2021;12:637512.
pubmed: 34017327
pmcid: 8129535
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.637512
O’Sullivan JM, et al. RAS-pathway mutations are common in patients with ruxolitinib refractory/intolerant myelofibrosis: molecular analysis of the PAC203 cohort. Leukemia. 2023;37:2497–501.
pubmed: 37864122
pmcid: 10681886
doi: 10.1038/s41375-023-02027-3
Harrison CN, et al. Safety and efficacy of fedratinib, a selective oral inhibitor of Janus kinase-2 (JAK2), in patients with myelofibrosis and low pretreatment platelet counts. Br J Haematol. 2022;198:317–27.
pubmed: 35476316
pmcid: 9541243
doi: 10.1111/bjh.18207
Duminuco A et al. ACVR1: a Novel Therapeutic Target to treat Anemia in myelofibrosis. Cancers (Basel) 16, (2023).
Gerds AT, et al. Momelotinib versus danazol in symptomatic patients with anaemia and myelofibrosis previously treated with a JAK inhibitor (MOMENTUM): an updated analysis of an international, double-blind, randomised phase 3 study. Lancet Haematol. 2023;10:e735–46.
pubmed: 37517413
doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(23)00174-6
Mesa RA, et al. SIMPLIFY-1: a phase III Randomized Trial of Momelotinib Versus Ruxolitinib in Janus kinase Inhibitor-Naïve patients with myelofibrosis. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35:3844–50.
pubmed: 28930494
pmcid: 6553796
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.73.4418
Tefferi A, Pardanani A, Gangat N. Momelotinib expands the therapeutic armamentarium for myelofibrosis: impact on hierarchy of treatment choices. Am J Hematol. 2024;99:300–8.
pubmed: 38164985
doi: 10.1002/ajh.27163
Mesa R, et al. Overall survival in the SIMPLIFY-1 and SIMPLIFY-2 phase 3 trials of momelotinib in patients with myelofibrosis. Leukemia. 2022;36:2261–8.
pubmed: 35869266
pmcid: 9417985
doi: 10.1038/s41375-022-01637-7
Mascarenhas J, et al. Pelabresib in Combination with Ruxolitinib for Janus kinase inhibitor Treatment-Naïve myelofibrosis. J Clin Oncol. 2023;41:4993–5004.
pubmed: 36881782
pmcid: 10642902
doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.01972
Megan M, Zachary A, Pankit MV, Julian W, John M. A novel application of XPO1 inhibition for the treatment of myelofibrosis. Blood Neoplasia. 2024;1:1–13.
Tremblay D, Mesa R. New treatments for myelofibrosis. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2023;24:61–75.
pubmed: 36640223
doi: 10.1007/s11864-023-01052-9
Harrison CN, et al. Momelotinib versus continued Ruxolitinib or best available therapy in JAK inhibitor-experienced patients with myelofibrosis and Anemia: Subgroup Analysis of SIMPLIFY-2. Adv Ther. 2024;41:3722–35.
pubmed: 38990433
pmcid: 11349857
doi: 10.1007/s12325-024-02928-4
Reynolds SB, Pettit K. New approaches to tackle cytopenic myelofibrosis. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program 2022;235–244 (2022).
Chifotides HT, Bose P, Verstovsek S. Momelotinib: an emerging treatment for myelofibrosis patients with anemia. J Hematol Oncol. 2022;15:7.
pubmed: 35045875
pmcid: 8772195
doi: 10.1186/s13045-021-01157-4
Bose P, Alfayez M, Verstovsek S. New concepts of treatment for patients with myelofibrosis. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2019;20:5.
pubmed: 30675650
doi: 10.1007/s11864-019-0604-y
Williams CG, Lee HJ, Asatsuma T, Vento-Tormo R, Haque A. An introduction to spatial transcriptomics for biomedical research. Genome Med. 2022;14:68.
pubmed: 35761361
pmcid: 9238181
doi: 10.1186/s13073-022-01075-1
Peroni E, Randi ML, Rosato A, Cagnin S. Acute myeloid leukemia: from NGS, through scRNA-seq, to CAR-T. dissect cancer heterogeneity and tailor the treatment. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2023;42:259.
pubmed: 37803464
pmcid: 10557350
doi: 10.1186/s13046-023-02841-8
Luecken MD, Theis FJ. Current best practices in single-cell RNA-seq analysis: a tutorial. Mol Syst Biol. 2019;15:e8746.
pubmed: 31217225
pmcid: 6582955
doi: 10.15252/msb.20188746
Ahmed R et al. Single-cell RNA sequencing with spatial transcriptomics of Cancer tissues. Int J Mol Sci 23, (2022).
Stuart T, Satija R. Integrative single-cell analysis. Nat Rev Genet. 2019;20:257–72.
pubmed: 30696980
doi: 10.1038/s41576-019-0093-7
Chen TY, You L, Hardillo JAU, Chien MP. Spat Transcriptomic Technol Cells 12, (2023).
Beechem JM. High-plex spatially resolved RNA and protein detection using Digital spatial profiling: a technology designed for Immuno-Oncology Biomarker Discovery and Translational Research. Methods Mol Biol. 2020;2055:563–83.
pubmed: 31502169
doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-9773-2_25
Wang N, et al. Tumor Microenvironment profiles reveal distinct therapy-oriented proteogenomic characteristics in Colorectal Cancer. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021;9:757378.
pubmed: 34778231
pmcid: 8581216
doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.757378
Elhanani O, Ben-Uri R, Keren L. Spatial profiling technologies illuminate the tumor microenvironment. Cancer Cell. 2023;41:404–20.
pubmed: 36800999
doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2023.01.010
Moffitt JR, Lundberg E, Heyn H. The emerging landscape of spatial profiling technologies. Nat Rev Genet. 2022;23:741–59.
pubmed: 35859028
doi: 10.1038/s41576-022-00515-3
Vandereyken K, Sifrim A, Thienpont B, Voet T. Methods and applications for single-cell and spatial multi-omics. Nat Rev Genet. 2023;24:494–515.
pubmed: 36864178
doi: 10.1038/s41576-023-00580-2
Peroni E et al. Hematologic neoplasms Associated with Down Syndrome: Cellular and Molecular Heterogeneity of the diseases. Int J Mol Sci 24, (2023).
Hernandez S, et al. Challenges and opportunities for Immunoprofiling using a spatial high-Plex Technology: the NanoString GeoMx. Front Oncol. 2022;12:890410.
pubmed: 35847846
pmcid: 9277770
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.890410
Yang F, Nourse C, Helgason GV, Kirschner K. Unraveling heterogeneity in the aging hematopoietic stem cell compartment: an insight from single-cell approaches. Hemasphere. 2023;7:e895.
pubmed: 37304939
pmcid: 10256339
doi: 10.1097/HS9.0000000000000895
Lee H, Marco Salas S, Gyllborg D, Nilsson M. Direct RNA targeted in situ sequencing for transcriptomic profiling in tissue. Sci Rep. 2022;12:7976.
pubmed: 35562352
pmcid: 9106737
doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-11534-9
Gyllborg D, et al. Hybridization-based in situ sequencing (HybISS) for spatially resolved transcriptomics in human and mouse brain tissue. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020;48:e112.
pubmed: 32990747
pmcid: 7641728
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa792
Rodriques SG, et al. Slide-seq: a scalable technology for measuring genome-wide expression at high spatial resolution. Science. 2019;363:1463–7.
pubmed: 30923225
pmcid: 6927209
doi: 10.1126/science.aaw1219
Stickels RR, et al. Highly sensitive spatial transcriptomics at near-cellular resolution with Slide-seqV2. Nat Biotechnol. 2021;39:313–9.
pubmed: 33288904
doi: 10.1038/s41587-020-0739-1
Eng CL, et al. Transcriptome-scale super-resolved imaging in tissues by RNA seqFISH. Nature. 2019;568:235–9.
pubmed: 30911168
pmcid: 6544023
doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1049-y
Shah S, Lubeck E, Zhou W, Cai L. seqFISH accurately detects transcripts in single cells and reveals robust spatial Organization in the Hippocampus. Neuron. 2017;94:752–e758751.
pubmed: 28521130
doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.05.008
Zhang D, et al. Spatial epigenome-transcriptome co-profiling of mammalian tissues. Nature. 2023;616:113–22.
pubmed: 36922587
pmcid: 10076218
doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-05795-1
Baccin C, et al. Combined single-cell and spatial transcriptomics reveal the molecular, cellular and spatial bone marrow niche organization. Nat Cell Biol. 2020;22:38–48.
pubmed: 31871321
doi: 10.1038/s41556-019-0439-6
Zhu J et al. Mapping cellular interactions from spatially resolved transcriptomics data. Nat Methods, (2024).
Denisenko E, et al. Spatial transcriptomics reveals discrete tumour microenvironments and autocrine loops within ovarian cancer subclones. Nat Commun. 2024;15:2860.
pubmed: 38570491
pmcid: 10991508
doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-47271-y
He S, et al. High-plex imaging of RNA and proteins at subcellular resolution in fixed tissue by spatial molecular imaging. Nat Biotechnol. 2022;40:1794–806.
pubmed: 36203011
doi: 10.1038/s41587-022-01483-z
Mund A, et al. Deep visual proteomics defines single-cell identity and heterogeneity. Nat Biotechnol. 2022;40:1231–40.
pubmed: 35590073
pmcid: 9371970
doi: 10.1038/s41587-022-01302-5
Liao YC, et al. Spatially resolved top-down proteomics of tissue sections based on a Microfluidic Nanodroplet Sample Preparation platform. Mol Cell Proteom. 2023;22:100491.
doi: 10.1016/j.mcpro.2022.100491
Ptacek J, et al. Multiplexed ion beam imaging (MIBI) for characterization of the tumor microenvironment across tumor types. Lab Invest. 2020;100:1111–23.
pubmed: 32203152
doi: 10.1038/s41374-020-0417-4
Giesen C, et al. Highly multiplexed imaging of tumor tissues with subcellular resolution by mass cytometry. Nat Methods. 2014;11:417–22.
pubmed: 24584193
doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2869
Kuswanto W, Nolan G, Lu G. Highly multiplexed spatial profiling with CODEX: bioinformatic analysis and application in human disease. Semin Immunopathol. 2023;45:145–57.
pubmed: 36414691
doi: 10.1007/s00281-022-00974-0
Black S, et al. CODEX multiplexed tissue imaging with DNA-conjugated antibodies. Nat Protoc. 2021;16:3802–35.
pubmed: 34215862
pmcid: 8647621
doi: 10.1038/s41596-021-00556-8
O’Sullivan JM, Mead AJ, Psaila B. Single-cell methods in myeloproliferative neoplasms: old questions, new technologies. Blood. 2023;141:380–90.
pubmed: 36322938
doi: 10.1182/blood.2021014668
Koldej RM, Ritchie DS. High multiplex analysis of the immune microenvironment in bone marrow trephine samples using GeoMX™ digital spatial profiling. Immunooncol Technol. 2020;5:1–9.
pubmed: 35756143
pmcid: 9216341
doi: 10.1016/j.iotech.2020.02.001
Koldej RM, et al. Dissection of the bone marrow microenvironment in hairy cell leukaemia identifies prognostic tumour and immune related biomarkers. Sci Rep. 2021;11:19056.
pubmed: 34561502
pmcid: 8463612
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-98536-1
Tomasoni C, Pievani A, Rambaldi B, Biondi A, Serafini M. A question of Frame: the role of the bone marrow stromal niche in myeloid malignancies. Hemasphere. 2023;7:e896.
pubmed: 37234820
pmcid: 10208717
doi: 10.1097/HS9.0000000000000896