World Health Organization repository of systematic reviews on interventions in environment, climate change and health: a new resource for decision makers, intervention implementers, and researchers.
Climate change
Environment
Environmental health
Evidence
Health
Interventions
Overview
Policies
Policy-making
Systematic reviews
Journal
Environmental health : a global access science source
ISSN: 1476-069X
Titre abrégé: Environ Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101147645
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
22 Oct 2024
22 Oct 2024
Historique:
received:
23
04
2024
accepted:
13
07
2024
medline:
22
10
2024
pubmed:
22
10
2024
entrez:
21
10
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To facilitate the use of the mounting evidence on how human health is inextricably linked to the health of the planet and the urgent need for measures against the escalating triple planetary crisis, the WHO has developed a repository of systematic reviews on interventions in the area of environment, climate change and health (ECH). This commentary introduces the repository, describes its rationale and development, and points to potential future evolutions. The repository aims to provide a user-friendly tool for quickly finding systematic reviews and meta-analyses on specific ECH topics. The spreadsheet includes details on each systematic review, such as population, intervention type, control group, outcomes, and location, among other information. This supports effective assessment of the available evidence, potentially informing policy decisions across various sectors. The repository is a resource for anyone interested in the interlinkages between health and environment and is also targeted at decision makers, intervention implementers and researchers in order to identify priority issues and support evidence-based action. Furthermore, it can be used to identify areas in need of greater research. Additionally, systematic reviews of intervention effectiveness are often used for setting general guidelines and standards, for choosing the most promising intervention in a certain situation and for calculating the disease burden attributable to a specific environmental risk.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39434138
doi: 10.1186/s12940-024-01105-y
pii: 10.1186/s12940-024-01105-y
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Letter
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
88Subventions
Organisme : Marie Skłodowska-Curie SSPH+ Global PhD Fellowship Programme in Public Health Sciences (GlobalP3HS) of the Swiss School of Public Health
ID : 801076
Informations de copyright
© 2024. World Health Organization.
Références
Prüss-Ustün A, Wolf J, Corvalán C, Bos R, Neira M. Preventing disease through healthy environments: a global assessment of the environmental burden of disease from environmental risks. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2016.
Compendium of WHO and other UN guidance on health and environment: 2024 update [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization, United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) & United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF). 2024. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240095380 .
Landrigan PJ, Fuller R, Acosta NJ, Adeyi O, Arnold R, Baldé AB, et al. The Lancet Commission on pollution and health. Lancet. 2018;391:462–512.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32345-0
WHO. Repository of systematic reviews on interventions in environment, climate change and health [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2024 Feb 23]. https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/repository-of-systematic-reviews-on-interventions-in-environment--climate-change-and-health .
Pollock M, Fernandes R, Becker L, Pieper D, Hartling L, Chapter V. Overviews of Reviews. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions [Internet]. version 6.4. Cochrane; 2023 [cited 2024 Feb 23]. www.training.cochrane.org/handbook .
Cochrane reviews about occupational. safety and health | Cochrane Work [Internet]. [cited 2024 Mar 8]. https://work.cochrane.org/cochrane-reviews-about-occupational-safety-and-health .
Richardson WS, Wilson MC, Nishikawa J, Hayward RS. The well-built clinical question: a key to evidence-based decisions. ACP J Club. 1995;123:A12–3.
doi: 10.7326/ACPJC-1995-123-3-A12
Shea BJ, Reeves BC, Wells G, Thuku M, Hamel C, Moran J, et al. AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. BMJ. 2017;358:j4008.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.j4008
Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, Kunz R, Falck-Ytter Y, Alonso-Coello P, et al. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2008;336:924–6.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.AD