Utility of cervical dynamic magnetic resonance imaging for evaluating patients with cervical myelopathy: a retrospective study.

Cervical vertebrae Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging Dynamic stenosis

Journal

Asian spine journal
ISSN: 1976-1902
Titre abrégé: Asian Spine J
Pays: Korea (South)
ID NLM: 101314177

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
22 Oct 2024
Historique:
received: 22 05 2024
accepted: 12 08 2024
medline: 22 10 2024
pubmed: 22 10 2024
entrez: 22 10 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Retrospective observational study. This study aimed to evaluate the utility of cervical dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI) in the assessment of cervical canal stenosis. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy has been intricately linked to both static and dynamic narrowing of the cervical spinal canal. Traditional MRI with the neck in a neutral position fails to identify the dynamic changes and may lead to misdiagnosis. Cervical dMRI is a promising tool for evaluating cervical myelopathy, enabling clinicians to assess spinal cord compression, segmental instability, and alterations in range of motion, often missed on conventional imaging. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 369 patients with symptoms of cervical myelopathy assessed using cervical dMRI. After assessing the subaxial cervical spine at each disc level (C3-T1), significant changes in the degree of central canal stenosis were determined. The appearance and extent of hyperintense lesions on T2-weighted sequences were also noted. Overall, 653/1,845 (35.39%) disc levels showed an increase in stenosis grade on extension MRI, with 168/653 (25.72%) and 180/653 (27.56%) disc levels changing from grades 0/1 to grades 2 and 3, respectively. Moreover, 120/369 (32.52%) patients showed a mean increase of 1.55±0.75 levels of compression on extension MRI when compared to neutral MRI. A fresh-appearing hyperintense lesion was observed in 79 (4.28%) disc levels on flexion MRI, which was not visualized on neutral MRI. Cervical dMRI may help surgeons plan for surgery, discuss the prognosis with the patient, and safeguard themselves from medico-legal issues arising from improper or missed diagnosis and treatment.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39434226
pii: asj.2024.0176
doi: 10.31616/asj.2024.0176
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Auteurs

Bharatkumar Rajendraprasad Dave (BR)

Department of Spine, Stavya Spine Hospital and Research Institute, Ahmedabad, India.

Devanand Degulmadi (D)

Department of Spine, Stavya Spine Hospital and Research Institute, Ahmedabad, India.

Mrugank Narvekar (M)

Department of Spine, Stavya Spine Hospital and Research Institute, Ahmedabad, India.

Charde Pranav (C)

Department of Spine, Stavya Spine Hospital and Research Institute, Ahmedabad, India.

Ajay Krishnan (A)

Department of Spine, Stavya Spine Hospital and Research Institute, Ahmedabad, India.

Shivanand Mayi (S)

Department of Spine, Stavya Spine Hospital and Research Institute, Ahmedabad, India.

Ravi Ranjan Rai (RR)

Department of Spine, Stavya Spine Hospital and Research Institute, Ahmedabad, India.

Mirant Dave (M)

Department of Spine, Stavya Spine Hospital and Research Institute, Ahmedabad, India.

Abhijith Anil (A)

Department of Spine, Stavya Spine Hospital and Research Institute, Ahmedabad, India.

Rohan Killekar (R)

Department of Spine, Stavya Spine Hospital and Research Institute, Ahmedabad, India.

Panthackel Mikeson (P)

Department of Spine, Stavya Spine Hospital and Research Institute, Ahmedabad, India.

Kishor Murkute (K)

Department of Spine, Stavya Spine Hospital and Research Institute, Ahmedabad, India.

Classifications MeSH