A self-help mobile messaging intervention to improve subthreshold depressive symptoms among older adults in a socioeconomically deprived region of Brazil (PRODIGITAL): a pragmatic, two-arm randomised controlled trial.

Brazil Depression Digital intervention LMIC Older adults Primary healthcare Psychosocial intervention Randomised controlled trial Subthreshold depression

Journal

Lancet regional health. Americas
ISSN: 2667-193X
Titre abrégé: Lancet Reg Health Am
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9918232503006676

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Nov 2024
Historique:
received: 09 02 2024
revised: 11 09 2024
accepted: 13 09 2024
medline: 22 10 2024
pubmed: 22 10 2024
entrez: 22 10 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Subthreshold depression is a risk factor for major depression and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality, especially in older adults. There is emerging evidence that digital interventions, including self-help interventions, may reduce depressive symptoms. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a mobile messaging intervention at reducing subthreshold depressive symptoms among older adults in Brazil. PRODIGITAL was a single blind, two-arm, individually randomised controlled trial conducted in 46 primary care clinics in the city of Guarulhos, Brazil. Individuals aged 60+ years were contacted by phone following a randomly ordered list for a screening assessment. Those who presented with anhedonia and/or depressed mood (Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-2≥1), and who subsequently scored between 5 and 9 on the PHQ-9 were invited to participate. The intervention arm received the 'Viva Vida' digital self-help intervention consisting of automated multi-media messages sent via WhatsApp. Forty-eight audio and visual messages based on psychoeducation and behavioural activation were automatically delivered over six weeks. The control arm received a single message containing information about depression. The primary outcome was the difference in mean PHQ-9 scores between treatment arms at the three-month follow-up. All primary analyses were performed according to allocated arm with imputed data. The trial is registered with ReBEC, RBR-6c7ghfd. Participants were recruited between 8 September 2021 and 19 August 2022. Of the 454 participants enrolled, 223 were randomised to the intervention arm, 231 to the control arm. Participants' mean age was 65.3 years (SD 5.0) and 64.0% (n = 292) were female. A total of 385 (84.8%) completed the three-month follow-up assessment; no difference in mean PHQ-9 scores between the treatment arms was observed (adjusted difference: -0.61; 95% CI: -1.75, 0.53; These results demonstrate that the Viva Vida digital self-help intervention did not help to improve subthreshold depressive symptoms amongst older adults. Further research is needed to understand why this self-help intervention was not effective in this population, and to explore how it might be adapted to achieve this goal. São Paulo Research Foundation and UK Joint Global Health Trials.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
Subthreshold depression is a risk factor for major depression and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality, especially in older adults. There is emerging evidence that digital interventions, including self-help interventions, may reduce depressive symptoms. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a mobile messaging intervention at reducing subthreshold depressive symptoms among older adults in Brazil.
Methods UNASSIGNED
PRODIGITAL was a single blind, two-arm, individually randomised controlled trial conducted in 46 primary care clinics in the city of Guarulhos, Brazil. Individuals aged 60+ years were contacted by phone following a randomly ordered list for a screening assessment. Those who presented with anhedonia and/or depressed mood (Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-2≥1), and who subsequently scored between 5 and 9 on the PHQ-9 were invited to participate. The intervention arm received the 'Viva Vida' digital self-help intervention consisting of automated multi-media messages sent via WhatsApp. Forty-eight audio and visual messages based on psychoeducation and behavioural activation were automatically delivered over six weeks. The control arm received a single message containing information about depression. The primary outcome was the difference in mean PHQ-9 scores between treatment arms at the three-month follow-up. All primary analyses were performed according to allocated arm with imputed data. The trial is registered with ReBEC, RBR-6c7ghfd.
Findings UNASSIGNED
Participants were recruited between 8 September 2021 and 19 August 2022. Of the 454 participants enrolled, 223 were randomised to the intervention arm, 231 to the control arm. Participants' mean age was 65.3 years (SD 5.0) and 64.0% (n = 292) were female. A total of 385 (84.8%) completed the three-month follow-up assessment; no difference in mean PHQ-9 scores between the treatment arms was observed (adjusted difference: -0.61; 95% CI: -1.75, 0.53;
Interpretation UNASSIGNED
These results demonstrate that the Viva Vida digital self-help intervention did not help to improve subthreshold depressive symptoms amongst older adults. Further research is needed to understand why this self-help intervention was not effective in this population, and to explore how it might be adapted to achieve this goal.
Funding UNASSIGNED
São Paulo Research Foundation and UK Joint Global Health Trials.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39435262
doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2024.100897
pii: S2667-193X(24)00224-2
pmc: PMC11491721
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

100897

Informations de copyright

© 2024 The Author(s).

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

We declare no competing interests.

Auteurs

Carina Akemi Nakamura (CA)

Departamento de Psiquiatria, Faculdade de Medicina FMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Nadine Seward (N)

Health Service and Population Research, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Department of Clinical Psychology, Health and Social Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

Tim J Peters (TJ)

Bristol Dental School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

Thiago Vinicius Nadaleto Didone (TV)

Departamento de Psiquiatria, Faculdade de Medicina FMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.

Felipe Azevedo Moretti (FA)

Departamento de Psiquiatria, Faculdade de Medicina FMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.

Marcelo Oliveira da Costa (M)

Departamento de Psiquiatria, Faculdade de Medicina FMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.

Caio Hudson Queiroz de Souza (CH)

Departamento de Psiquiatria, Faculdade de Medicina FMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.

Gabriel Macias de Oliveira (G)

Departamento de Psiquiatria, Faculdade de Medicina FMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.

Monica Souza Dos Santos (M)

Departamento de Psiquiatria, Faculdade de Medicina FMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.

Luara Aragoni Pereira (L)

Instituto de Psiquiatria, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.

Mariana Mendes de Sá Martins (M)

Departamento de Psiquiatria, Faculdade de Medicina FMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.

Pepijn van de Ven (P)

Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.

William Hollingworth (W)

Health Economics Bristol, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

Ricardo Araya (R)

Health Service and Population Research, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.

Marcia Scazufca (M)

Departamento de Psiquiatria, Faculdade de Medicina FMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Instituto de Psiquiatria, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.

Classifications MeSH