A cry for kelp: Evidence for polyphenolic inhibition of Oxford Nanopore sequencing of brown algae.
DNA extraction
genome
macroalgae
nanopore
polyphenols
sequencing
Journal
Journal of phycology
ISSN: 1529-8817
Titre abrégé: J Phycol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9882935
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
22 Oct 2024
22 Oct 2024
Historique:
revised:
12
09
2024
received:
26
06
2024
accepted:
16
09
2024
medline:
22
10
2024
pubmed:
22
10
2024
entrez:
22
10
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Genomic resources have yielded unprecedented insights into ecological and evolutionary processes, not to mention their importance in economic and conservation management of specific organisms. However, the field of macroalgal genomics is hampered by difficulties in the isolation of suitable DNA. Even when DNA that appears high quality by standard metrics has been isolated, such samples may not perform well during the sequencing process. We here have compared Oxford Nanopore long-read sequencing results for three species of macroalgae to those of nonmacroalgal species and determined that when using macroalgal samples, sequencing activity declined rapidly, resulting in reduced sequencing yield. Chemical analysis of macroalgal DNA that would be considered suitable for sequencing revealed that DNA derived from dried macroalgae was enriched for polyphenol-DNA adducts (DNA with large polyphenols chemically attached to it), which may have led to sequencing inhibition. Of note, we observed the strongest evidence of sequencing inhibition and reduced sequence output when using samples dried using silica gel-suggesting that such storage approaches may not be appropriate for samples destined for Oxford Nanopore sequencing. Our findings have wide-ranging implications for the generation of genomic resources from macroalgae and suggest a need to develop new storage methods that are more amenable to Oxford Nanopore sequencing or to use fresh flash-frozen tissue wherever possible for genome sequencing.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2024 The Author(s). Journal of Phycology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Phycological Society of America.
Références
Akinnagbe, A., Ji, X. B., Yang, M., & Ewald, D. (2011). Ethanol pretreatment increases DNA yields from dried tree foliage. Conservation Genetics Resources, 3(3), 409–411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12686‐010‐9367‐2
Aminina, N. M., Karaulova, E. P., Vishnevskaya, T. I., Yakush, E. V., Kim, Y.‐K., Nam, K.‐H., & Son, K.‐T. (2020). Characteristics of polyphenolic content in brown algae of the Pacific coast of Russia. Molecules, 25(17), 3909. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25173909
Bai, M., Huang, J., Zheng, X., Song, Z., Tang, M., Mao, W., Yuan, L., Wu, J., Weng, X., & Zhou, X. (2010). Highly selective suppression of melanoma cells by inducible DNA cross‐linking agents: Bis(catechol) derivatives. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 132(43), 15321–15327. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja106637e
Bainard, L. D., Klironomos, J. N., & Hart, M. M. (2010). Differential effect of sample preservation methods on plant and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal DNA. Journal of Microbiological Methods, 82(2), 124–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2010.05.001
Balbo, S., Turesky, R. J., & Villalta, P. W. (2014). DNA adductomics. Chemical Research in Toxicology, 27(3), 356–366. https://doi.org/10.1021/tx4004352
Cavalieri, E. L., Li, K.‐M., Balu, N., Saeed, M., Devanesan, P., Higginbotham, S., Zhao, J., Gross, M. L., & Rogan, E. G. (2002). Catechol ortho‐quinones: The electrophilic compounds that form depurinating DNA adducts and could initiate cancer and other diseases. Carcinogenesis, 23(6), 1071–1077. https://doi.org/10.1093/carcin/23.6.1071
De La Cerda, G. Y., Landis, J. B., Eifler, E., Hernandez, A. I., Li, F., Zhang, J., Tribble, C. M., Karimi, N., Chan, P., Givnish, T., Strickler, S. R., & Specht, C. D. (2023). Balancing read length and sequencing depth: Optimizing nanopore long‐read sequencing for monocots with an emphasis on the Liliales. Applications in Plant Sciences, 11(3), e11524. https://doi.org/10.1002/aps3.11524
Dobashi, Y., Hirano, T., Hirano, M., & Ohkatsu, Y. (2008). Antioxidant and photo‐antioxidant abilities of catechins. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry, 197(2), 141–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochem.2007.12.019
Es‐Safi, N.‐E., Ghidouche, S., & Ducrot, P. H. (2007). Flavonoids: Hemisynthesis, reactivity, characterization and free radical scavenging activity. Molecules, 12, 2228–2258. https://doi.org/10.3390/12092228
Greco, M., Sáez, C. A., Brown, M. T., & Bitonti, M. B. (2014). A simple and effective method for high quality co‐extraction of genomic DNA and total RNA from low biomass Ectocarpus siliculosus, the model brown alga. PLoS ONE, 9(5), e96470. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096470
Heikrujam, J., Kishor, R., Mazumder, P. B., Heikrujam, J., Kishor, R., & Mazumder, P. B. (2020). The chemistry behind plant DNA isolation protocols. In O.‐M. Boldura, C. Baltă, & N. Sayed Awwad (Eds.), Biochemical analysis tools—Methods for bio‐molecules studies. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.92206
Hoarau, G., Coyer, J. A., Stam, W. T., & Olsen, J. L. (2007). A fast and inexpensive DNA extraction/purification protocol for brown macroalgae. Molecular Ecology Notes, 7(2), 191–193. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471‐8286.2006.01587.x
Jones, A., Torkel, C., Stanley, D., Nasim, J., Borevitz, J., & Schwessinger, B. (2021). High‐molecular weight DNA extraction, clean‐up and size selection for long‐read sequencing. PLoS ONE, 16(7), e0253830. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253830
Jukanti, A. (2017). Distribution, localization, and structure of plant polyphenol oxidases (PPOs). In A. Jukanti (Ed.), Polyphenol oxidases (PPOs) in plants (pp. 11–32). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978‐981‐10‐5747‐2_2
Li, X.‐L., Hu, Y.‐J., Mi, R., Li, X.‐Y., Li, P.‐Q., & Ouyang, Y. (2013). Spectroscopic exploring the affinities, characteristics, and mode of binding interaction of curcumin with DNA. Molecular Biology Reports, 40(7), 4405–4413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033‐013‐2530‐6
Mgwatyu, Y., Cornelissen, S., van Heusden, P., Stander, A., Ranketse, M., & Hesse, U. (2022). Establishing MinION sequencing and genome assembly procedures for the analysis of the rooibos (Aspalathus linearis) genome. Plants, 11(16), 2156. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11162156
Nath, O., Fletcher, S. J., Hayward, A., Shaw, L. M., Agarwal, R., Furtado, A., Henry, R. J., & Mitter, N. (2022). A comprehensive high‐quality DNA and RNA extraction protocol for a range of cultivars and tissue types of the woody crop avocado. Plants, 11(3), 242. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11030242
Olate‐Gallegos, C., Barriga, A., Vergara, C., Fredes, C., García, P., Giménez, B., & Robert, P. (2019). Identification of polyphenols from Chilean brown seaweeds extracts by LC‐DAD‐ESI‐MS/MS. Journal of Aquatic Food Product Technology, 28(4), 375–391. https://doi.org/10.1080/10498850.2019.1594483
Pearman, W. S., Duffy, G. A., Liu, X. P., Gemmell, N. J., Morales, S. E., & Fraser, C. I. (2024). Macroalgal microbiome biogeography is shaped by environmental drivers rather than geographical distance. Annals of Botany, 133(1), 169–182. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcad151
Pinzauti, D., Iannelli, F., Pozzi, G., & Santoro, F. (2022). DNA isolation methods for nanopore sequencing of the Streptococcus mitis genome. Microbial Genomics, 8(2), 000764. https://doi.org/10.1099/mgen.0.000764
Quick, J., & Loman, N. J. (2018). DNA extraction strategies for nanopore sequencing. In D. Branton, & D. Deamer (Eds.), Nanopore sequencing (pp. 91–105). World Scientific. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789813270619_0007
Ramakrishnan, G. S., Fathima, A. A., & Ramya, M. (2017). A rapid and efficient DNA extraction method suitable for marine macroalgae. 3 Biotech, 7(6), 364. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205‐017‐0992‐2
Savolainen, V., Cuénoud, P., Spichiger, R., Martinez, M. D. P., Crèvecoeur, M., & Manen, J.‐F. (1995). The use of herbarium specimens in DNA phylogenetics: Evaluation and improvement. Plant Systematics and Evolution, 197(1), 87–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00984634
Slatko, B. E., Gardner, A. F., & Ausubel, F. M. (2018). Overview of next‐generation sequencing technologies. Current Protocols in Molecular Biology, 122(1), e59. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpmb.59
Wang, X., Cao, G., Yang, Z., Zhao, H., & Cai, Z. (2021). DNA and RNA adducts formation from 3,4‐quinone metabolites of bisphenol F. Environmental Science & Technology Letters, 8(11), 1009–1014. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.1c00753
Wilson, L. J., Weber, X. A., King, T. M., & Fraser, C. I. (2016). DNA extraction techniques for genomic analyses of macroalgae. In Z.‐M. Hu & C. Fraser (Eds.), Seaweed phylogeography: Adaptation and evolution of seaweeds under environmental change (pp. 363–386). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978‐94‐017‐7534‐2_15
Xiong, Y., Kaw, H. Y., Zhu, L., & Wang, W. (2022). Genotoxicity of quinone: An insight on DNA adducts and its LC‐MS‐based detection. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 52(23), 4217–4240. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2021.2001276
Yuan, L., Tian, T., Chen, Y., Yan, S., Xing, X., Zhang, Z., Zhai, Q., Xu, L., Wang, S., Weng, X., Yuan, B., Feng, Y., & Zhou, X. (2013). Existence of G‐quadruplex structures in promoter region of oncogenes confirmed by G‐quadruplex DNA cross‐linking strategy. Scientific Reports, 3, 1811. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep01811
Zhao, H., Wei, J., Xiang, L., & Cai, Z. (2018). Mass spectrometry investigation of DNA adduct formation from bisphenol a quinone metabolite and MCF‐7 cell DNA. Talanta, 182, 583–589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2018.02.037