Methane cycling in temperate forests.
CH4 flux
CH4 sink
CH4 source
Deadwood
Foliage
Greenhouse gas
Litter
Soil
Stem
Volatile organic compounds
Journal
Carbon balance and management
ISSN: 1750-0680
Titre abrégé: Carbon Balance Manag
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101271519
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
22 Oct 2024
22 Oct 2024
Historique:
received:
19
06
2024
accepted:
09
10
2024
medline:
23
10
2024
pubmed:
23
10
2024
entrez:
22
10
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Temperate forest soils are considered significant methane (CH
Identifiants
pubmed: 39438363
doi: 10.1186/s13021-024-00283-z
pii: 10.1186/s13021-024-00283-z
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Pagination
37Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Myhre G, Shindell D, Bréon F, Collins W, Fuglestvedt J, Huang J, et al. Anthropogenic and natural anthropogenic and natural radiative forcing. In: Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner GK, Tignor M, Allen SK, Boschung J, et al. editors. Climate change 2013: the physical science basis contribution of working group to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Volume 8. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press; 2013.
Forster P, Ramaswamy V, Artaxo P, Berntsen T, Betts R, Fahey DW, et al. Changes in atmospheric constituents and in radiative forcing. In: Solomon S, Qin Q, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, et al. editors. Climate Change 2007: the Physical Science Basis Contribution of Working Group I to the 4th Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press; 2007.
IPCC. Climate change 2022: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press; 2022.
Saunois M, Stavert AR, Poulter B, Bousquet P, Canadell JG, Jackson RB, et al. The global methane budget 2000–2017. Earth Syst Sci data. 2020;12(3):1561–623.
doi: 10.5194/essd-12-1561-2020
West JJ, Fiore AM. Management of tropospheric ozone by reducing methane emissions. Environ Sci Technol. 2005;39(13):4685–91.
doi: 10.1021/es048629f
Pachauri RK, Allen MR, Barros VR, Broome J, Cramer W, Christ R, et al. Chapter 2: Drivers of Climate Change. Section 2.2.3: Greenhouse Gas Forcing and Its Role in Climate Change. In: Pachauri RK, Meyer LA, editors. Climate change 2014: synthesis report contribution of Working groups I, II and III to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Geneva, Switzerland: IPCC; 2014. pp. 76–80. Core Writing Team.
Nisbet EG, Manning M, Dlugokencky E, Fisher R, Lowry D, Michel S, et al. Very strong atmospheric methane growth in the 4 years 2014–2017: implications for the Paris Agreement. Glob Biogeochem Cycles. 2019;33(3):318–42.
doi: 10.1029/2018GB006009
Forster P, Storelvmo T, Armour K, Collins W, Dufresne J-L, Frame D, et al. The Earth’s energy budget, climate feedbacks, and climate sensitivity. In: Masson-Delmotte V, Zhai P, Pirani A, Connors SL, Péan C, Berger S, et al. editors. Climate Change 2021: the Physical Science Basis Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press; 2021.
Shindell D, Kuylenstierna JC, Vignati E, van Dingenen R, Amann M, Klimont Z, et al. Simultaneously mitigating near-term climate change and improving human health and food security. Science. 2012;335(6065):183–9.
doi: 10.1126/science.1210026
Ganesan AL, Schwietzke S, Poulter B, Arnold T, Lan X, Rigby M, et al. Advancing scientific understanding of the global methane budget in support of the Paris Agreement. Glob Biogeochem Cycles. 2019;33(12):1475–512.
doi: 10.1029/2018GB006065
Knief C. Diversity of methane-cycling microorganisms in soils and their relation to oxygen. Curr Issues Mol Biol. 2019;33(1):23–56.
doi: 10.21775/cimb.033.023
Conrad R. The global methane cycle: recent advances in understanding the microbial processes involved. Environ Microbiol Rep. 2009;1(5):285–92.
doi: 10.1111/j.1758-2229.2009.00038.x
Lenhart K, Bunge M, Ratering S, Neu TR, Schüttmann I, Greule M, et al. Evidence for methane production by saprotrophic fungi. Nat Commun. 2012;3(1):1046.
doi: 10.1038/ncomms2049
Bižić M, Klintzsch T, Ionescu D, Hindiyeh M, Günthel M, Muro-Pastor AM, et al. Aquatic and terrestrial cyanobacteria produce methane. Sci Adv. 2020;6(3):eaax5343.
doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aax5343
Liu L-Y, Xie G-J, Ding J, Liu B-F, Xing D-F, Ren N-Q, et al. Microbial methane emissions from the non-methanogenesis processes: a critical review. Sci Total Environ. 2022;806:151362.
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151362
Putkinen A, Siljanen HM, Laihonen A, Paasisalo I, Porkka K, Tiirola M, et al. New insight to the role of microbes in the methane exchange in trees: evidence from metagenomic sequencing. New Phytol. 2021;231(2):524–36.
doi: 10.1111/nph.17365
Ehhalt D. The atmospheric cycle of methane. Tellus. 1974;26(1–2):58–70.
doi: 10.1111/j.2153-3490.1974.tb01952.x
Le Mer J, Roger P. Production, oxidation, emission and consumption of methane by soils: a review. Eur J Soil Biol. 2001;37(1):25–50.
doi: 10.1016/S1164-5563(01)01067-6
Dutaur L, Verchot LV. A global inventory of the soil CH
Hanson RS, Hanson TE. Methanotrophic bacteria. Microbiol Rev. 1996;60(2):439–71.
doi: 10.1128/mr.60.2.439-471.1996
Smith GJ, Wrighton KC. Metagenomic approaches unearth methanotroph phylogenetic and metabolic diversity. Curr Issues Mol Biol. 2019;33(1):57–84.
doi: 10.21775/cimb.033.057
Saggar S, Tate K, Giltrap D, Singh J. Soil-atmosphere exchange of nitrous oxide and methane in New Zealand terrestrial ecosystems and their mitigation options: a review. Plant Soil. 2008;309:25–42.
doi: 10.1007/s11104-007-9421-3
Tate KR, Ross D, Saggar S, Hedley C, Dando J, Singh BK, et al. Methane uptake in soils from Pinus radiata plantations, a reverting shrubland and adjacent pastures: effects of land-use change, and soil texture, water and mineral nitrogen. Soil Biol Biochem. 2007;39(7):1437–49.
doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2007.01.005
Singh BK, Tate KR, Kolipaka G, Hedley CB, Macdonald CA, Millard P, et al. Effect of afforestation and reforestation of pastures on the activity and population dynamics of methanotrophic bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007;73(16):5153–61.
doi: 10.1128/AEM.00620-07
Feng H, Guo J, Peng C, Ma X, Kneeshaw D, Chen H, et al. Global estimates of forest soil methane flux identify a temperate and tropical forest methane sink. Geoderma. 2023;429:116239.
doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2022.116239
Feng H, Guo J, Han M, Wang W, Peng C, Jin J, et al. A review of the mechanisms and controlling factors of methane dynamics in forest ecosystems. For Ecol Manag. 2020;455:117702.
doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2019.117702
FOA, Facts. and Fig. 2015/2016: New Zealand plantation forest industry. Wellington: FOA; 2016.
Bölöni J, Aszalós R, Frank T, Odor P. Forest type matters: global review about the structure of oak dominated old-growth temperate forests. For Ecol Manag. 2021;500:119629.
doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119629
FAO. Global Forest Resources Assessment 2020: Main report. Rome. 2020.
Gilliam FS. Forest ecosystems of temperate climatic regions: from ancient use to climate change. New Phytol. 2016;212(4):871–87.
doi: 10.1111/nph.14255
de Gouvenain R, Silander J. Temperate Forests. Reference Module in Life Sciences. 2017.
Jandl R, Lindner M, Vesterdal L, Bauwens B, Baritz R, Hagedorn F, et al. How strongly can forest management influence soil carbon sequestration? Geoderma. 2007;137(3–4):253–68.
doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2006.09.003
Mukul SA, Halim MA, Herbohn J. Forest carbon stock and fluxes: Distribution, biogeochemical cycles, and measurement techniques. Life on land, encyclopedia of the UN sustainable development goals. 2021:365 – 80.
Currie WS, Bergen KM. Temperate Forest. In: Jørgensen SE, Fath BD, editors. Encyclopedia of Ecology. Volume 5. Academic; 2008. pp. 3494–503.
Stevens CJ, David TI, Storkey J. Atmospheric nitrogen deposition in terrestrial ecosystems: its impact on plant communities and consequences across trophic levels. Funct Ecol. 2018;32(7):1757–69.
doi: 10.1111/1365-2435.13063
Ellis EC, Ramankutty N. Putting people in the map: anthropogenic biomes of the world. Front Ecol Environ. 2008;6(8):439–47.
doi: 10.1890/070062
Lewis SL, Maslin MA. Defining the anthropocene. Nature. 2015;519(7542):171–80.
doi: 10.1038/nature14258
Holt RD. Bringing the Hutchinsonian niche into the 21st century: ecological and evolutionary perspectives. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2009;106(supplement_2):19659–65.
Hill AP, Nolan CJ, Hemes KS, Cambron TW, Field CB. Low-elevation conifers in California’s Sierra Nevada are out of equilibrium with climate. PNAS Nexus. 2023;2(2):pgad004.
doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgad004
Girisha GK. Effects of litter and woody debris quality on decomposition and nutrient release in exotic forests in New Zealand. Lincoln University; 2001.
Will GM. Nutrient return in litter and rainfall under some exotic conifer stands in New Zealand. New Z J Agricultural Res. 1959;2(4):719–34.
doi: 10.1080/00288233.1959.10422832
Smith-Hall C, Chamberlain J. Environmental products: a definition, a typology, and a goodbye to non-timber forest products. Int Forestry Rev. 2023;25(4):491–502.
doi: 10.1505/146554823838028247
Covey KR, Megonigal JP. Methane production and emissions in trees and forests. New Phytol. 2019;222(1):35–51.
doi: 10.1111/nph.15624
Maurer D, Kolb S, Haumaier L, Borken W. Inhibition of atmospheric methane oxidation by monoterpenes in Norway spruce and European beech soils. Soil Biol Biochem. 2008;40(12):3014–20.
doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2008.08.023
Fehsenfeld F, Calvert J, Fall R, Goldan P, Guenther AB, Hewitt CN, et al. Emissions of volatile organic compounds from vegetation and the implications for atmospheric chemistry. Glob Biogeochem Cycles. 1992;6(4):389–430.
doi: 10.1029/92GB02125
Dalal RC, Allen DE. Greenhouse gas fluxes from natural ecosystems. Aust J Bot. 2008;56(5):369–407.
doi: 10.1071/BT07128
Dalal R, Allen D, Livesley S, Richards G. Magnitude and biophysical regulators of methane emission and consumption in the Australian agricultural, forest, and submerged landscapes: a review. Plant Soil. 2008;309:43–76.
doi: 10.1007/s11104-007-9446-7
Fest BJ, Livesley SJ, Drösler M, van Gorsel E, Arndt SK. Soil–atmosphere greenhouse gas exchange in a cool, temperate Eucalyptus delegatensis forest in south-eastern Australia. Agric for Meteorol. 2009;149(3–4):393–406.
doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2008.09.007
Rowlings D, Grace P, Kiese R, Weier K. Environmental factors controlling temporal and spatial variability in the soil-atmosphere exchange of CO
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02563.x
Maier M, Weber TK, Fiedler J, Fuss R, Glatzel S, Huth V, et al. Introduction of a guideline for measurements of greenhouse gas fluxes from soils using non-steady‐state chambers. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci. 2022;185(4):447–61.
doi: 10.1002/jpln.202200199
Wang J, Murphy J, Geddes J, Winsborough C, Basiliko N, Thomas S. Methane fluxes measured by eddy covariance and static chamber techniques at a temperate forest in central Ontario, Canada. Biogeosciences. 2013;10(6):4371–82.
doi: 10.5194/bg-10-4371-2013
Clement R, Verma S, Verry E. Relating chamber measurements to eddy correlation measurements of methane flux. J Geophys Research: Atmos. 1995;100(D10):21047–56.
doi: 10.1029/95JD02196
Denmead O. Approaches to measure fluxes of trace gases between landscapes and atmosphere. Plant Soil Special Issue S26–Non-CO
Hartmann AA, Buchmann N, Niklaus PA. A study of soil methane sink regulation in two grasslands exposed to drought and N fertilization. Plant Soil. 2011;342:265–75.
doi: 10.1007/s11104-010-0690-x
Kruse C, Moldrup P, Iversen N. Modeling diffusion and reaction in soils: II. Atmospheric methane diffusion and consumption in a forest soil. Soil Sci. 1996;161(6):355–65.
doi: 10.1097/00010694-199606000-00002
Kolb S. The quest for atmospheric methane oxidizers in forest soils. Environ Microbiol Rep. 2009;1(5):336–46.
doi: 10.1111/j.1758-2229.2009.00047.x
Price SJ, Sherlock RR, Kelliher FM, McSeveny TM, Tate KR, Condron LM. Pristine New Zealand forest soil is a strong methane sink. Glob Change Biol. 2004;10(1):16–26.
doi: 10.1046/j.1529-8817.2003.00710x
Adamsen A, King G. Methane consumption in temperate and subarctic forest soils: rates, vertical zonation, and responses to water and nitrogen. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1993;59(2):485–90.
doi: 10.1128/aem.59.2.485-490.1993
Price SJ, Kelliher FM, Sherlock RR, Tate KR, Condron LM. Environmental and chemical factors regulating methane oxidation in a New Zealand forest soil. Soil Res. 2004;42(7):767–76.
doi: 10.1071/SR04026
Bender M, Conrad R. Effect of CH
doi: 10.1016/0038-0717(95)00104-M
Fest B, Hinko-Najera N, von Fischer JC, Livesley SJ, Arndt SK. Soil methane uptake increases under continuous throughfall reduction in a temperate evergreen, broadleaved eucalypt forest. Ecosystems. 2017;20:368–79.
doi: 10.1007/s10021-016-0030-y
Tate K, Saggar S, Hedley C, Dando J, Price S, Rys G. Does afforestation of pastures with pine trees reduce net emissions of methane in New Zealand. Non-CO
Zhou X, Dong H, Chen C, Smaill SJ, Clinton PW. Ethylene rather than dissolved organic carbon controls methane uptake in upland soils. Glob Change Biol. 2014;20(8):2379–80.
doi: 10.1111/gcb.12487
Gundersen P, Christiansen J, Alberti G, Brüggemann N, Castaldi S, Gasche R, et al. The response of methane and nitrous oxide fluxes to forest change in Europe. Biogeosciences. 2012;9(10):3999–4012.
doi: 10.5194/bg-9-3999-2012
Liu L, Estiarte M, Peñuelas J. Soil moisture as the key factor of atmospheric CH
doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.113920
Shen Y, Feng J, Zhou D, He K, Zhu B. Impacts of aboveground litter and belowground roots on soil greenhouse gas emissions: evidence from a DIRT experiment in a pine plantation. Agric for Meteorol. 2023;343:109792.
doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2023.109792
Ni X, Groffman PM. Declines in methane uptake in forest soils. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2018;115(34):8587-90.
Dörr H, Katruff L, Levin I. Soil texture parameterization of the methane uptake in aerated soils. Chemosphere. 1993;26(1–4):697–713.
doi: 10.1016/0045-6535(93)90454-D
Smith K, Dobbie K, Ball B, Bakken L, Sitaula B, Hansen S, et al. Oxidation of atmospheric methane in northern European soils, comparison with other ecosystems, and uncertainties in the global terrestrial sink. Glob Change Biol. 2000;6(7):791–803.
doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2486.2000.00356.x
Hu R, Hirano T, Sakaguchi K, Yamashita S, Cui R, Sun L, et al. Spatiotemporal variation in soil methane uptake in a cool-temperate immature deciduous forest. Soil Biol Biochem. 2023;184:109094.
doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2023.109094
Oni OE, Friedrich MW. Metal oxide reduction linked to anaerobic methane oxidation. Trends Microbiol. 2017;25(2):88–90.
doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2016.12.001
Lacroix EM, Aeppli M, Boye K, Brodie E, Fendorf S, Keiluweit M, et al. Consider the anoxic microsite: acknowledging and appreciating Spatiotemporal Redox Heterogeneity in soils and sediments. ACS Earth Space Chem. 2023;7(9):1592–609.
doi: 10.1021/acsearthspacechem.3c00032
Wang J, Zhao Y, Zhou M, Hu J, Hu B. Aerobic and denitrifying methanotrophs: dual wheels driving soil methane emission reduction. Sci Total Environ. 2023;867:161437.
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.161437
Angle JC, Morin TH, Solden LM, Narrowe AB, Smith GJ, Borton MA, et al. Methanogenesis in oxygenated soils is a substantial fraction of wetland methane emissions. Nat Commun. 2017;8(1):1567.
doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-01753-4
McClain ME, Boyer EW, Dent CL, Gergel SE, Grimm NB, Groffman PM et al. Biogeochemical hot spots and hot moments at the interface of terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. Ecosystems. 2003:301 – 12.
Topp E, Pattey E. Soils as sources and sinks for atmospheric methane. Can J Soil Sci. 1997;77(2):167–77.
doi: 10.4141/S96-107
Mohanty SR, Bodelier PL, Conrad R. Effect of temperature on composition of the methanotrophic community in rice field and forest soil. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2007;62(1):24–31.
doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2007.00370.x
Castro MS, Steudler PA, Melillo JM, Aber JD, Bowden RD. Factors controlling atmospheric methane consumption by temperate forest soils. Glob Biogeochem Cycles. 1995;9(1):1–10.
doi: 10.1029/94GB02651
Borken W, Xu YJ, Beese F. Conversion of hardwood forests to spruce and pine plantations strongly reduced soil methane sink in Germany. Glob Change Biol. 2003;9(6):956–66.
doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00631.x
Gatica G, Fernández ME, Juliarena MP, Gyenge J. Environmental and anthropogenic drivers of soil methane fluxes in forests: global patterns and among-biomes differences. Glob Change Biol. 2020;26(11):6604–15.
doi: 10.1111/gcb.15331
Von Fischer JC, Hedin LO. Controls on soil methane fluxes: tests of biophysical mechanisms using stable isotope tracers. Glob Biogeochem Cycles. 2007;21(2).
Lee J, Oh Y, Lee ST, Seo YO, Yun J, Yang Y, et al. Soil organic carbon is a key determinant of CH
doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-38905-8
Weslien P, Kasimir Klemedtsson Å, Börjesson G, Klemedtsson L. Strong pH influence on N
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2389.2009.01123.x
Oertel C, Matschullat J, Zurba K, Zimmermann F, Erasmi S. Greenhouse gas emissions from soils—A review. Geochemistry. 2016;76(3):327–52.
doi: 10.1016/j.chemer.2016.04.002
Cai Y-J, Liu Z-A, Zhang S, Liu H, Nicol GW, Chen Z. Microbial community structure is stratified at the millimeter-scale across the soil–water interface. ISME Commun. 2022;2(1):53.
doi: 10.1038/s43705-022-00138-z
Krause SM, Johnson T, Samadhi Karunaratne Y, Fu Y, Beck DA, Chistoserdova L et al. Lanthanide-dependent cross-feeding of methane-derived carbon is linked by microbial community interactions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2017;114(2):358 – 63.
Yu Z, Chistoserdova L. Communal metabolism of methane and the rare earth element switch. J Bacteriol. 2017;199(22). https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.00328-17 .
Steudler P, Bowden R, Melillo J, Aber J. Influence of nitrogen fertilization on methane uptake in temperate forest soils. Nature. 1989;341(6240):314–6.
doi: 10.1038/341314a0
Bodelier PL, Laanbroek HJ. Nitrogen as a regulatory factor of methane oxidation in soils and sediments. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2004;47(3):265–77.
doi: 10.1016/S0168-6496(03)00304-0
Wang Z-P, Ineson P. Methane oxidation in a temperate coniferous forest soil: effects of inorganic N. Soil Biol Biochem. 2003;35(3):427–33.
doi: 10.1016/S0038-0717(02)00294-8
Castro MS, Peterjohn WT, Melillo JM, Steudler PA, Gholz HL, Lewis D. Effects of nitrogen fertilization on the fluxes of N
doi: 10.1139/x94-002
Wu J, Cheng X, Xing W, Liu G. Soil-atmosphere exchange of CH
doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2021.108467
Gulledge J, Hrywna Y, Cavanaugh C, Steudler PA. Effects of long-term nitrogen fertilization on the uptake kinetics of atmospheric methane in temperate forest soils. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2004;49(3):389–400.
doi: 10.1016/j.femsec.2004.04.013
Xia N, Du E, Wu X, Tang Y, Wang Y, de Vries W. Effects of nitrogen addition on soil methane uptake in global forest biomes. Environ Pollut. 2020;264:114751.
doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114751
Steinkamp R, Butterbach-Bahl K, Papen H. Methane oxidation by soils of an N limited and N fertilized spruce forest in the Black Forest. Ger Soil Biology Biochem. 2001;33(2):145–53.
doi: 10.1016/S0038-0717(00)00124-3
Börjesson G, Nohrstedt H-Ö. Fast recovery of atmospheric methane consumption in a Swedish forest soil after single-shot N-fertilization. For Ecol Manag. 2000;134(1–3):83–8.
doi: 10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00249-2
Rigler E, Zechmeister-Boltenstern S. Oxidation of ethylene and methane in forest soils—effect of CO
doi: 10.1016/S0016-7061(98)00099-8
Papen H, Daum M, Steinkamp R, Butterbach-Bahl K. N
Hütsch BW, Webster CP, Powlson DS. Long-term effects of nitrogen fertilization on methane oxidation in soil of the Broadbalk wheat experiment. Soil Biol Biochem. 1993;25(10):1307–15.
doi: 10.1016/0038-0717(93)90045-D
Xu C, Xu X, Ju C, Chen HY, Wilsey BJ, Luo Y, et al. Long-term, amplified responses of soil organic carbon to nitrogen addition worldwide. Glob Change Biol. 2021;27(6):1170–80.
doi: 10.1111/gcb.15489
Mohanty SR, Bodelier PL, Floris V, Conrad R. Differential effects of nitrogenous fertilizers on methane-consuming microbes in rice field and forest soils. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006;72(2):1346–54.
doi: 10.1128/AEM.72.2.1346-1354.2006
Maxfield P, Hornibrook E, Evershed R. Acute impact of agriculture on high-affinity methanotrophic bacterial populations. Environ Microbiol. 2008;10(7):1917–24.
doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2008.01587.x
Kuypers MM, Marchant HK, Kartal B. The microbial nitrogen-cycling network. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2018;16(5):263–76.
doi: 10.1038/nrmicro.2018.9
Winsborough CL, Thomas SC, Basiliko N. Soil responses to non-nitrogenous amendments in a nitrogen-saturated temperate forest: an unexpected decrease in methane oxidation after phosphorus and lime addition. Can J Soil Sci. 2017;97(4):796–800.
Burke DJ, Smemo KA, López-Gutiérrez JC, DeForest JL. Soil fungi influence the distribution of microbial functional groups that mediate forest greenhouse gas emissions. Soil Biol Biochem. 2012;53:112–9.
doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.05.008
Veraart AJ, Steenbergh AK, Ho A, Kim SY, Bodelier PL. Beyond nitrogen: the importance of phosphorus for CH
doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.03.025
Smethurst PJ. Forest fertilization: trends in knowledge and practice compared to agriculture. Plant Soil. 2010;335(1–2):83–100.
doi: 10.1007/s11104-010-0316-3
Scion. Fertiliser Use. New Zealand planted forests environmental facts. 2019.
Gatica G, Fernández ME, Juliarena MP, Gyenge J. Does forest management affect the magnitude and direction of the afforestation effect on soil methane fluxes? A meta-analysis. For Ecol Manag. 2022;507:120009.
doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2022.120009
Nazaries L, Tate KR, Ross DJ, Singh J, Dando J, Saggar S, et al. Response of methanotrophic communities to afforestation and reforestation in New Zealand. ISME J. 2011;5(11):1832–6.
doi: 10.1038/ismej.2011.62
Hiltbrunner D, Zimmermann S, Karbin S, Hagedorn F, Niklaus PA. Increasing soil methane sink along a 120-year afforestation chronosequence is driven by soil moisture. Glob Change Biol. 2012;18(12):3664–71.
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2012.02798.x
De Bernardi M, Priano ME, Fusé VS, Fernández ME, Gyenge J, Guzmán SA, et al. High methane uptake from soils of low and high density radiata pine afforestations compared to herbaceous systems. J Sustainable Forestry. 2021;40(1):99–109.
doi: 10.1080/10549811.2020.1745653
Sullivan B, Kolb T, Hart S, Kaye J, Dore S, Montes-Helu M. Thinning reduces soil carbon dioxide but not methane flux from southwestern USA ponderosa pine forests. For Ecol Manag. 2008;255(12):4047–55.
doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2008.03.051
Reay D, Nedwell D, McNamara N, Ineson P. Effect of tree species on methane and ammonium oxidation capacity in forest soils. Soil Biol Biochem. 2005;37(4):719–30.
doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2004.10.004
Borken W, Beese F. Methane and nitrous oxide fluxes of soils in pure and mixed stands of European beech and Norway spruce. Eur J Soil Sci. 2006;57(5):617–25.
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2389.2005.00752.x
Mazza G, Agnelli AE, Lagomarsino A. The effect of tree species composition on soil C and N pools and greenhouse gas fluxes in a Mediterranean reforestation. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr. 2021;21(2):1339–52.
doi: 10.1007/s42729-021-00444-w
Christiansen J, Gundersen P. Stand age and tree species affect N
doi: 10.5194/bg-8-2535-2011
Cambi M, Certini G, Neri F, Marchi E. The impact of heavy traffic on forest soils: a review. For Ecol Manag. 2015;338:124–38.
doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2014.11.022
Teepe R, Brumme R, Beese F, Ludwig B. Nitrous oxide emission and methane consumption following compaction of forest soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 2004;68(2):605–11.
doi: 10.2136/sssaj2004.6050
Frey B, Niklaus PA, Kremer J, Lüscher P, Zimmermann S. Heavy-machinery traffic impacts methane emissions as well as methanogen abundance and community structure in oxic forest soils. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011;77(17):6060–8.
doi: 10.1128/AEM.05206-11
Pitz S, Megonigal JP. Temperate forest methane sink diminished by tree emissions. New Phytol. 2017;214(4):1432–9.
doi: 10.1111/nph.14559
Gauci V, Pangala SR, Shenkin A, Barba J, Bastviken D, Figueiredo V, et al. Global atmospheric methane uptake by upland tree woody surfaces. Nature. 2024;631(8022):796–800.
doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07592-w
Warner DL, Villarreal S, McWilliams K, Inamdar S, Vargas R. Carbon dioxide and methane fluxes from tree stems, coarse woody debris, and soils in an upland temperate forest. Ecosystems. 2017;20:1205–16.
doi: 10.1007/s10021-016-0106-8
Wang ZP, Gu Q, Deng FD, Huang JH, Megonigal JP, Yu Q, et al. Methane emissions from the trunks of living trees on upland soils. New Phytol. 2016;211(2):429–39.
doi: 10.1111/nph.13909
Yip DZ, Veach AM, Yang ZK, Cregger MA, Schadt CW. Methanogenic Archaea dominate mature heartwood habitats of Eastern Cottonwood (Populus deltoides). New Phytol. 2019;222(1):115–21.
doi: 10.1111/nph.15346
Jeffrey LC, Maher DT, Chiri E, Leung PM, Nauer PA, Arndt SK, et al. Bark-dwelling methanotrophic bacteria decrease methane emissions from trees. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):2127.
doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-22333-7
Epron D, Mochidome T, Tanabe T, Dannoura M, Sakabe A. Variability in stem methane emissions and wood methane production of different tree species in a cold temperate mountain forest. Ecosystems. 2023;26(4):784–99.
doi: 10.1007/s10021-022-00795-0
Covey KR, Wood SA, Warren RJ, Lee X, Bradford MA. Elevated methane concentrations in trees of an upland forest. Geophys Res Lett. 2012;39(15).
Pitz SL, Megonigal JP, Chang C-H, Szlavecz K. Methane fluxes from tree stems and soils along a habitat gradient. Biogeochemistry. 2018;137:307–20.
doi: 10.1007/s10533-017-0400-3
Barba J, Bradford MA, Brewer PE, Bruhn D, Covey K, van Haren J, et al. Methane emissions from tree stems: a new frontier in the global carbon cycle. New Phytol. 2019;222(1):18–28.
doi: 10.1111/nph.15582
Barba J, Poyatos R, Vargas R. Automated measurements of greenhouse gases fluxes from tree stems and soils: magnitudes, patterns and drivers. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):4005.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-39663-8
Wang ZP, Han SJ, Li HL, Deng FD, Zheng YH, Liu HF, et al. Methane production explained largely by water content in the heartwood of living trees in upland forests. J Geophys Research: Biogeosciences. 2017;122(10):2479–89.
doi: 10.1002/2017JG003991
Plain C, Ndiaye FK, Bonnaud P, Ranger J, Epron D. Impact of vegetation on the methane budget of a temperate forest. New Phytol. 2019;221(3):1447–56.
doi: 10.1111/nph.15452
Maier M, Machacova K, Lang F, Svobodova K, Urban O. Combining soil and tree-stem flux measurements and soil gas profiles to understand CH
doi: 10.1002/jpln.201600405
Sundqvist E, Crill P, Mölder M, Vestin P, Lindroth A. Atmospheric methane removal by boreal plants. Geophys Res Lett. 2012;39(21).
Kohl L, Koskinen M, Polvinen T, Tenhovirta S, Rissanen K, Patama M, et al. An automated system for trace gas flux measurements from plant foliage and other plant compartments. Atmos Meas Tech. 2021;14(6):4445–60.
doi: 10.5194/amt-14-4445-2021
Machacova K, Bäck J, Vanhatalo A, Halmeenmäki E, Kolari P, Mammarella I, et al. Pinus sylvestris as a missing source of nitrous oxide and methane in boreal forest. Sci Rep. 2016;6(1):23410.
doi: 10.1038/srep23410
Gorgolewski AS, Caspersen JP, Vantellingen J, Thomas SC. Tree foliage is a methane sink in upland temperate forests. Ecosystems. 2023;26(1):174–86.
doi: 10.1007/s10021-022-00751-y
Keppler F, Hamilton JT, Braß M, Röckmann T. Methane emissions from terrestrial plants under aerobic conditions. Nature. 2006;439(7073):187–91.
doi: 10.1038/nature04420
Bruhn D, Møller IM, Mikkelsen TN, Ambus P. Terrestrial plant methane production and emission. Physiol Plant. 2012;144(3):201–9.
doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2011.01551.x
Kirschbaum MU, Bruhn D, Etheridge DM, Evans JR, Farquhar GD, Gifford RM, et al. A comment on the quantitative significance of aerobic methane release by plants. Funct Plant Biol. 2006;33(6):521–30.
doi: 10.1071/FP06051
Pan Y, Birdsey RA, Fang J, Houghton R, Kauppi PE, Kurz WA, et al. A large and persistent carbon sink in the world’s forests. Science. 2011;333(6045):988–93.
doi: 10.1126/science.1201609
Schipper L, Harfoot C, McFarlane P, Cooper A. Anaerobic decomposition and denitrification during plant decomposition in an organic soil. J Environ Qual. 1994;23(5):923–8.
doi: 10.2134/jeq1994.00472425002300050012x
Gritsch C, Egger F, Zehetner F, Zechmeister-Boltenstern S. The effect of temperature and moisture on trace gas emissions from deciduous and coniferous leaf litter. J Geophys Research: Biogeosciences. 2016;121(5):1339–51.
doi: 10.1002/2015JG003223
Peichl M, Brodeur JJ, Khomik M, Arain MA. Biometric and eddy-covariance based estimates of carbon fluxes in an age-sequence of temperate pine forests. Agric for Meteorol. 2010;150(7–8):952–65.
doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2010.03.002
Walkiewicz A, Rafalska A, Bulak P, Bieganowski A, Osborne B. How can litter modify the fluxes of CO
doi: 10.3390/f12091276
Gorgolewski AS. Methane fluxes from living and dead trees in a temperate forest. Canada: University of Toronto; 2022.
Covey K, de Mesquita CB, Oberle B, Maynard D, Bettigole C, Crowther T, et al. Greenhouse trace gases in deadwood. Biogeochemistry. 2016;130:215–26.
doi: 10.1007/s10533-016-0253-1
Perreault L, Forrester JA, Mladenoff DJ, Gower ST. Linking deadwood and soil GHG fluxes in a second growth north temperate deciduous forest (Upper Midwest USA). Biogeochemistry. 2021;156(2):177–94.
doi: 10.1007/s10533-021-00839-y
Kipping L, Gossner MM, Koschorreck M, Muszynski S, Maurer F, Weisser WW, et al. Emission of CO
doi: 10.1029/2021GB007143
Lagomarsino A, De Meo I, Agnelli AE, Paletto A, Mazza G, Bianchetto E, et al. Decomposition of black pine (Pinus nigra JF Arnold) deadwood and its impact on forest soil components. Sci Total Environ. 2021;754:142039.
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142039
Mukhortova L, Pashenova N, Meteleva M, Krivobokov L, Guggenberger G. Temperature sensitivity of CO
doi: 10.3390/f12050624
Mukhin V, Voronin PY. Methanogenic activity of woody debris. Russian J Ecol. 2009;40:149–53.
doi: 10.1134/S1067413609030011
Mäkipää R, Leppänen SM, Munoz SS, Smolander A, Tiirola M, Tuomivirta T, et al. Methanotrophs are core members of the diazotroph community in decaying Norway spruce logs. Soil Biol Biochem. 2018;120:230–2.
doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.02.012
Schroll M, Keppler F, Greule M, Eckhardt C, Zorn H, Lenhart K. The stable carbon isotope signature of methane produced by saprotrophic fungi. Biogeosciences. 2020;17(14):3891–901.
doi: 10.5194/bg-17-3891-2020
Rigby M, Montzka SA, Prinn RG, White JW, Young D, O’doherty S, et al. Role of atmospheric oxidation in recent methane growth. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2017;114(21):5373–7.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1616426114
Wuebbles DJ, Hayhoe K. Atmospheric methane and global change. Earth Sci Rev. 2002;57(3–4):177–210.
doi: 10.1016/S0012-8252(01)00062-9
Prather M, Ehhalt D, Dentener F, Derwent R, Dlugokencky E, Holland E et al. Atmospheric chemistry and greenhouse gases. 2001.
Aydin YM, Yaman B, Koca H, Dasdemir O, Kara M, Altiok H, et al. Biogenic volatile organic compound (BVOC) emissions from forested areas in Turkey: determination of specific emission rates for thirty-one tree species. Sci Total Environ. 2014;490:239–53.
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.04.132
Ramasamy S, Ida A, Jones C, Kato S, Tsurumaru H, Kishimoto I, et al. Total OH reactivity measurement in a BVOC dominated temperate forest during a summer campaign, 2014. Atmos Environ. 2016;131:41–54.
doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.01.039
Sinha V, Williams J, Lelieveld J, Ruuskanen T, Kajos M, Patokoski J, et al. OH reactivity measurements within a boreal forest: evidence for unknown reactive emissions. Environ Sci Technol. 2010;44(17):6614–20.
doi: 10.1021/es101780b
Zannoni N, Gros V, Lanza M, Sarda R, Bonsang B, Kalogridis C, et al. OH reactivity and concentrations of biogenic volatile organic compounds in a Mediterranean forest of downy oak trees. Atmos Chem Phys. 2016;16(3):1619–36.
doi: 10.5194/acp-16-1619-2016
Zhang Y, Jacob DJ, Maasakkers JD, Sulprizio MP, Sheng J-X, Gautam R, et al. Monitoring global tropospheric OH concentrations using satellite observations of atmospheric methane. Atmos Chem Phys. 2018;18(21):15959–73.
doi: 10.5194/acp-18-15959-2018
Zhao Y, Saunois M, Bousquet P, Lin X, Berchet A, Hegglin MI, et al. Inter-model comparison of global hydroxyl radical (OH) distributions and their impact on atmospheric methane over the 2000–2016 period. Atmos Chem Phys. 2019;19(21):13701–23.
doi: 10.5194/acp-19-13701-2019
Chen J, Tang J, Yu X. Environmental and physiological controls on diurnal and seasonal patterns of biogenic volatile organic compound emissions from five dominant woody species under field conditions. Environ Pollut. 2020;259:113955.
doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.113955
Holmes CD, Prather MJ, Søvde O, Myhre G. Future methane, hydroxyl, and their uncertainties: key climate and emission parameters for future predictions. Atmos Chem Phys. 2013;13(1):285–302.
doi: 10.5194/acp-13-285-2013
Lelieveld J, Dentener F, Peters W, Krol M. On the role of hydroxyl radicals in the self-cleansing capacity of the Troposphere. Atmos Chem Phys. 2004;4(9/10):2337–44.
doi: 10.5194/acp-4-2337-2004
Lelieveld Ja, Butler T, Crowley J, Dillon T, Fischer H, Ganzeveld L, et al. Atmospheric oxidation capacity sustained by a tropical forest. Nature. 2008;452(7188):737–40.
doi: 10.1038/nature06870
Soper FM, Taylor BN, Winbourne JB, Wong MY, Dynarski KA, Reis CR, et al. A roadmap for sampling and scaling biological nitrogen fixation in terrestrial ecosystems. Methods Ecol Evol. 2021;12(6):1122–37.
doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.13586