Comparing the effectiveness of augmented reality and anatomical atlases in student preparation for neuroanatomy dissection.
Augmented reality
Gross anatomy education
Medical education
Preparation
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
22 10 2024
22 10 2024
Historique:
received:
20
06
2024
accepted:
14
10
2024
medline:
23
10
2024
pubmed:
23
10
2024
entrez:
22
10
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Anatomy teachers urge students to come to education sessions at the dissection rooms as well-prepared as possible. To effectuate optimal preparation, assignments are designed to guide the students' learning processes. These assignment often include the use of anatomical figures in atlases. The role of augmented reality (AR) applications in helping students prepare for body donor-based teaching sessions at the dissection rooms remains quite elusive. Therefore, this study examines the effects of the use of an AR application compared to the use of anatomical atlases in helping students (n = 28) prepare for a neuroanatomy session at the dissection rooms with prosections. The study shows that students from both groups showed a similar improvement in anatomy test scores. The amount of experienced cognitive engagement, however, is higher in the experimental AR group. Based on these results, it can be suggested that an AR application is a valid method to help students prepare and could be an alternative to the use of anatomical atlases. Nevertheless, future studies should re-investigate this research question in larger cohorts. Also, it remains unknown whether cognitive engaged students are indeed the students who are better prepared for educational sessions at the dissection rooms.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39438578
doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-76379-w
pii: 10.1038/s41598-024-76379-w
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Comparative Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
24939Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Ma, M. et al. Personalized augmented reality for anatomy education. Clin. Anat. 29 (4), 446–453 (2016).
doi: 10.1002/ca.22675
Andrews, C., Southworth, M. K., Silva, J. N. A. & Silva, J. R. Extended reality in Medical Practice. Curr. Treat. Options Cardiovasc. Med. 21 (4), 18 (2019).
doi: 10.1007/s11936-019-0722-7
Drake, R. L., McBride, J. M., Lachman, N. & Pawlina, W. Medical education in the anatomical sciences: the winds of change continue to blow. Anat. Sci. Educ. 2 (6), 253–259 (2009).
doi: 10.1002/ase.117
McBride, J. M. & Drake, R. L. National survey on anatomical sciences in medical education. Anat. Sci. Educ. 11 (1), 7–14 (2018).
doi: 10.1002/ase.1760
Bui, I., Bhattacharya, A., Wong, S. H., Singh, H. R. & Agarwal, A. Role of three-dimensional visualization modalities in medical education. Front. Pediatr. 9, 760363 (2021).
doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.760363
Moro, C., Stromberga, Z., Raikos, A. & Stirling, A. The effectiveness of virtual and augmented reality in health sciences and medical anatomy. Anat. Sci. Educ. 10 (6), 549–559 (2017).
doi: 10.1002/ase.1696
Linn, M. C. & Petersen, A. C. Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: a meta-analysis. Child. Dev. 56 (6), 1479–1498 (1985).
doi: 10.2307/1130467
Munzer, B. W., Khan, M. M., Shipman, B. & Mahajan, P. Augmented reality in emergency medicine: a scoping review. J. Med. Internet Res. 21 (4), e12368 (2019).
doi: 10.2196/12368
Călin, R-A. Virtual reality, augmented reality and mixed reality-trends in pedagogy. Soc. Sci. Educ. Res. Rev. 5 (1), 169–179 (2018).
McGovern, E., Moreira, G. & Luna-Nevarez, C. An application of virtual reality in education: can this technology enhance the quality of students’ learning experience? J. Educ. Bus. 95 (7), 490–496 (2020).
doi: 10.1080/08832323.2019.1703096
van Deursen, M. et al. Virtual reality and annotated radiological data as effective and motivating tools to help Social Sciences students learn neuroanatomy. Sci. Rep. 11 (1), 12843 (2021).
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-92109-y
Henssen, D. et al. Neuroanatomy Learning: augmented reality vs. cross-sections. Anat. Sci. Educ. 13 (3), 353–365 (2020).
doi: 10.1002/ase.1912
Bork, F. et al. The benefits of an augmented reality Magic Mirror System for Integrated Radiology Teaching in Gross anatomy. Anat. Sci. Educ. 12 (6), 585–598 (2019).
doi: 10.1002/ase.1864
Harackiewicz, J. M., Smith, J. L. & Priniski, S. J. Interest matters: the importance of promoting interest in education. Polic. Insights Behav. Brain Sci. 3 (2), 220–227 (2016).
doi: 10.1177/2372732216655542
Moreno, R. & Mayer, R. Interactive multimodal learning environments: special issue on interactive learning environments: contemporary issues and trends. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 19, 309–326 (2007).
doi: 10.1007/s10648-007-9047-2
Rotgans, J. I. & Schmidt, H. G. Cognitive engagement in the problem-based learning classroom. Adv. Health Sci. Educ. Theor. Pract. 16 (4), 465–479 (2011).
doi: 10.1007/s10459-011-9272-9
Sesmiyanti, S. Student’s Cognitive Engagement in learning process. J. Polingua Sci. J. Linguist. Lit. Lang. Educ. 5 (2), 48–51 (2016).
doi: 10.30630/polingua.v5i2.34
Bruce, G. S. Learning efficiency goes to college. Evidence-based educational methods: Elsevier; 267 – 75 (2004).
Berlyne, D. E. Novelty, complexity, and hedonic value. Percept. Psychophys. 8 (5), 279–286 (1970).
doi: 10.3758/BF03212593
Peterson, C. N., Tavana, S. Z., Akinleye, O. P., Johnson, W. H. & Berkmen, M. B. An idea to explore: Use of augmented reality for teaching three-dimensional biomolecular structures. Biochem. Mol. Biol. Educ. 48 (3), 276–282 (2020).
doi: 10.1002/bmb.21341
Moro, C. et al. Virtual and augmented reality enhancements to medical and science student physiology and anatomy test performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Anat. Sci. Educ. 14 (3), 368–376 (2021).
doi: 10.1002/ase.2049
Bolek, K. A., De Jong, G. & Henssen, D. The effectiveness of the use of augmented reality in anatomy education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci. Rep. 11 (1), 15292 (2021).
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-94721-4
McBain, K. A., Habib, R., Laggis, G., Quaiattini, A. & Noel, N. M. V. Scoping review: the use of augmented reality in clinical anatomical education and its assessment tools. Anat. Sci. Educ. 15 (4), 765–796 (2022).
doi: 10.1002/ase.2155
Radboudumc Radboudumc Health Academy Studiecatalogus. In: Academy RH, editor.
Bergman, E. M. Dissecting anatomy education in the medical curriculum. (2014).
Henssen, DJHA. et al. Neuroanatomy Learning: Augmented Reality vs. Cross-Sections. Anat. Sci. Educ. 13 (3), 353–365 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1912
doi: 10.1002/ase.1912
Vandenberg, S. G. & Kuse, A. R. Mental rotations, a group test of three-dimensional spatial visualization. Percept. Mot. Skills 47 (2), 599–604 (1978).
doi: 10.2466/pms.1978.47.2.599
Kooloos, J. G., Schepens-Franke, A. N., Bergman, E. M., Donders, R. A. & Vorstenbosch, M. A. Anatomical knowledge gain through a clay-modeling exercise compared to live and video observations. Anat. Sci. Educ. 7 (6), 420–429 (2014).
doi: 10.1002/ase.1443
Hayes, A. F. Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A regression-based Approach (Guilford, 2017).
Williams, A. D., Greenwald, E. E., Soricelli, R. L. & DePace, D. M. Medical students’ reactions to anatomic dissection and the phenomenon of cadaver naming. Anat. Sci. Educ. 7 (3), 169–180 (2014).
doi: 10.1002/ase.1391
Peterson, D. C. & Mlynarczyk, G. S. Analysis of traditional versus three-dimensional augmented curriculum on anatomical learning outcome measures. Anat. Sci. Educ. 9 (6), 529–536 (2016).
doi: 10.1002/ase.1612
Mayer, R. The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning (Cambridge University Press, 2005).
Hamilton, D., McKechnie, J., Edgerton, E. & Wilson, C. Immersive virtual reality as a pedagogical tool in education: a systematic literature review of quantitative learning outcomes and experimental design. J. Computers Educ. 8 (1), 1–32 (2021).
doi: 10.1007/s40692-020-00169-2
Langlois, J., Bellemare, C., Toulouse, J. & Wells, G. A. Spatial abilities and anatomy knowledge assessment: a systematic review. Anat. Sci. Educ. 10 (3), 235–241 (2017).
doi: 10.1002/ase.1655