Nurses' adherence to ethical principles - A qualitative study.

Adherence ethical principles ethics nurses nursing ethics

Journal

Nursing ethics
ISSN: 1477-0989
Titre abrégé: Nurs Ethics
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9433357

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
22 Oct 2024
Historique:
medline: 23 10 2024
pubmed: 23 10 2024
entrez: 22 10 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Nursing is regulated by a set of professional standards. Whilst many forms of ethics apply to nursing, the biomedical ethical framework is common, involving autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence and justice. In healthcare, nurses often encounter ethical dilemmas that require them to navigate conflicting ethical principles. However, how nurses adhere to these principles in such situations is unclear. To explore how registered nurses adhere to ethical principles when dealing with ethical dilemmas at work. A qualitative descriptive study design. Between August and December 2023, 21 registered nurses were recruited from a teaching hospital through purposive sampling. Data were collected through semi-structured in-person interviews or online video conferencing. Braun and Clarke's thematic analysis approach was employed to analyse the data. Interview participation was voluntary. Written consent was obtained before participation. Participants' real identities were replaced with pseudonyms. This study was approved by the SingHealth Centralised Institutional Review Board. The data analysis developed four major themes and 15 subthemes. The four major themes are "Addressing the dilemma," "Contemplating the principles and consequences," "Coordinating for well-informed, ethical decision," and "Self-reflecting and finding consolation." This study explains how nurses navigate and uphold ethical principles when caring for patients to the best of their ability. Fully adhering to ethical principles can be challenging for caring for actively dying patients. Further research can expound on nurses' experiences and adherence to ethical principles in complex clinical cases.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Nursing is regulated by a set of professional standards. Whilst many forms of ethics apply to nursing, the biomedical ethical framework is common, involving autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence and justice. In healthcare, nurses often encounter ethical dilemmas that require them to navigate conflicting ethical principles. However, how nurses adhere to these principles in such situations is unclear.
RESEARCH AIM OBJECTIVE
To explore how registered nurses adhere to ethical principles when dealing with ethical dilemmas at work.
RESEARCH DESIGN METHODS
A qualitative descriptive study design.
PARTICIPANTS AND RESEARCH CONTEXT METHODS
Between August and December 2023, 21 registered nurses were recruited from a teaching hospital through purposive sampling. Data were collected through semi-structured in-person interviews or online video conferencing. Braun and Clarke's thematic analysis approach was employed to analyse the data.
ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS METHODS
Interview participation was voluntary. Written consent was obtained before participation. Participants' real identities were replaced with pseudonyms. This study was approved by the SingHealth Centralised Institutional Review Board.
FINDINGS RESULTS
The data analysis developed four major themes and 15 subthemes. The four major themes are "Addressing the dilemma," "Contemplating the principles and consequences," "Coordinating for well-informed, ethical decision," and "Self-reflecting and finding consolation."
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
This study explains how nurses navigate and uphold ethical principles when caring for patients to the best of their ability. Fully adhering to ethical principles can be challenging for caring for actively dying patients. Further research can expound on nurses' experiences and adherence to ethical principles in complex clinical cases.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39438787
doi: 10.1177/09697330241291159
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

9697330241291159

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Auteurs

Norasyikin Hassan (N)

Changi General Hospital.

Yoke Ping Wong (YP)

Changi General Hospital.

Sophia Yen Nee Chua (SYN)

Changi General Hospital.

Shaliza Abdul Rahman (S)

Changi General Hospital.

Mas Linda Mohamad (ML)

Changi General Hospital.

Siriwan Lim (S)

National University of Singapore.
National University Health System.

Classifications MeSH