Measurement properties of the Brazilian-Portuguese version of the PROMIS-29 questionnaire and the Impact Score in patients with chronic low back pain.
Humans
Low Back Pain
/ diagnosis
Female
Brazil
Male
Adult
Middle Aged
Prospective Studies
Chronic Pain
/ diagnosis
Reproducibility of Results
Patient Reported Outcome Measures
Aged
Surveys and Questionnaires
/ standards
Young Adult
Adolescent
Aged, 80 and over
Disability Evaluation
Pain Measurement
/ methods
Psychometrics
Impact score
Chronic low back pain
Measurement properties
PROMIS-29
Journal
BMC musculoskeletal disorders
ISSN: 1471-2474
Titre abrégé: BMC Musculoskelet Disord
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968565
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
22 Oct 2024
22 Oct 2024
Historique:
received:
01
06
2024
accepted:
10
10
2024
medline:
23
10
2024
pubmed:
23
10
2024
entrez:
22
10
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
A task force from the US National Institute of Health aimed to establish parameters for surveys with patients with chronic low back pain (LBP) by recommending the use of the Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System 29-item (PROMIS-29) questionnaire and the stratification according to the Impact Score. We aimed to assess the internal consistency, reliability, measurement error, construct validity and responsiveness of the Brazilian-Portuguese version of the PROMIS-29 questionnaire (version 2.1) and the Impact Score in patients with chronic LBP. A prospective cohort study was carried out with patients with chronic LBP who were receiving physiotherapy treatment in clinics in São Paulo and Vitória cities, Brazil. The sample included 102 patients with chronic LBP, aged between 18 and 80 years, and with the ability to read and write in the Brazilian-Portuguese language. Exclusion criteria were patients with serious spinal conditions, cognitive impairment, pregnant women, and patients who had undergone lumbar surgery within the past six months. The PROMIS-29 questionnaire, the 12-item Short-Form Health Survey and the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire were applied. The PROMIS-29 questionnaire was reapplied after 24 hours and 4 weeks. The PROMIS-29 questionnaire showed Cronbach's Alpha values between 0.81 (anxiety) and 0.91 (depression). The ICC Both the Brazilian-Portuguese version of the PROMIS-29 questionnaire and the Impact Score showed sufficient internal consistency, reliability, construct validity and responsiveness in Brazilian patients with chronic LBP. The results support the US National Institutes of Health's recommendation to use the PROMIS-29 questionnaire and the Impact Score in patients with chronic LBP. We suggest that future studies evaluate the structural validity of the Brazilian-Portuguese version of the PROMIS-29 questionnaire. Not applicable.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
A task force from the US National Institute of Health aimed to establish parameters for surveys with patients with chronic low back pain (LBP) by recommending the use of the Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System 29-item (PROMIS-29) questionnaire and the stratification according to the Impact Score. We aimed to assess the internal consistency, reliability, measurement error, construct validity and responsiveness of the Brazilian-Portuguese version of the PROMIS-29 questionnaire (version 2.1) and the Impact Score in patients with chronic LBP.
METHODS
METHODS
A prospective cohort study was carried out with patients with chronic LBP who were receiving physiotherapy treatment in clinics in São Paulo and Vitória cities, Brazil. The sample included 102 patients with chronic LBP, aged between 18 and 80 years, and with the ability to read and write in the Brazilian-Portuguese language. Exclusion criteria were patients with serious spinal conditions, cognitive impairment, pregnant women, and patients who had undergone lumbar surgery within the past six months. The PROMIS-29 questionnaire, the 12-item Short-Form Health Survey and the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire were applied. The PROMIS-29 questionnaire was reapplied after 24 hours and 4 weeks.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The PROMIS-29 questionnaire showed Cronbach's Alpha values between 0.81 (anxiety) and 0.91 (depression). The ICC
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Both the Brazilian-Portuguese version of the PROMIS-29 questionnaire and the Impact Score showed sufficient internal consistency, reliability, construct validity and responsiveness in Brazilian patients with chronic LBP. The results support the US National Institutes of Health's recommendation to use the PROMIS-29 questionnaire and the Impact Score in patients with chronic LBP. We suggest that future studies evaluate the structural validity of the Brazilian-Portuguese version of the PROMIS-29 questionnaire.
CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER
BACKGROUND
Not applicable.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39438832
doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07946-5
pii: 10.1186/s12891-024-07946-5
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
833Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
McKenna SP. Measuring patient-reported outcomes: moving beyond misplaced common sense to hard science. BMC Med. 2011;9(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-9-86 .
doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-9-86
Chiarotto A, Deyo RA, Terwee CB, Boers M, Buchbinder R, Corbin TP, et al. Core outcome domains for clinical trials in non-specific low back pain. Eur Spine J. 2015;24(6):1127–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-3892-3 .
doi: 10.1007/s00586-015-3892-3
pubmed: 25841358
Turk DC, Dworkin RH, Revicki D, Harding G, Burke LB, Cella D, et al. Identifying important outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: an IMMPACT survey of people with pain. PAIN
doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2007.09.002
pubmed: 17937976
Tagliaferri SD, Miller CT, Owen PJ, Mitchell UH, Brisby H, Fitzgibbon B, et al. Domains of chronic low back pain and assessing treatment effectiveness: a clinical perspective. Pain Pract. 2020;20(2):211–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/papr.12846 .
doi: 10.1111/papr.12846
pubmed: 31610090
Deyo RA, Dworkin SF, Amtmann D, Andersson G, Borenstein D, Carragee E, et al. Report of the NIH Task Force on research standards for chronic low back pain. Phys Ther. 2015;95(2):e1–18. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.2015.95.2.e1 .
doi: 10.2522/ptj.2015.95.2.e1
pubmed: 25639530
pmcid: 5396149
Cella D, Choi SW, Condon DM, Schalet B, Hays RD, Rothrock NE, et al. PROMIS
doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2019.02.004
pubmed: 31104731
pmcid: 7201383
Deyo RA, Ramsey K, Buckley DI, Michaels L, Kobus A, Eckstrom E, et al. Performance of a patient reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) short form in older adults with chronic musculoskeletal pain. Pain Med. 2016;17(2):314–24. https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnv046 .
doi: 10.1093/pm/pnv046
pubmed: 26814279
Katz P, Pedro S, Michaud K. Performance of the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system 29‐item profile in rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, fibromyalgia, and systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Care Res. 2017;69(9):1312–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.23183 .
doi: 10.1002/acr.23183
Rawang P, Janwantanakul P, Correia H, Jensen MP, Kanlayanaphotporn R. Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and construct validity of the Thai version of the patient-reported outcomes Measurement Information System-29 in individuals with chronic low back pain. Qual Life Res. 2020;29(3):793–803. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-019-02363-x .
doi: 10.1007/s11136-019-02363-x
pubmed: 31722084
Alves FSM, Pinto RMC, Mendonça TMS, Silva CHM. Tradução E adaptação transcultural do domínio Fadiga do patient-reported-outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) para a língua portuguesa. Cadernos De saúde pública. 2014;30:1103–10. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311X00104513 .
doi: 10.1590/0102-311X00104513
pubmed: 24936825
Braga DdAC. Tradução e adaptação transcultural do domínio função física do Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System–PROMIS
Castro NFC. Validação psicométrica dos bancos de itens de ansiedade e depressão do patient-reported outcomes measurement information system–PROMIS
Castro NFCd R, CHAd Mendonça, CHMd TMSS, Pinto RdMC. Adaptação transcultural dos Bancos De Itens De Ansiedade E Depressão do patient-reported outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) para língua portuguesa. Cadernos De saúde pública. 2014;30:879–84. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311X00108013 .
doi: 10.1590/0102-311X00108013
Costa ZMSS. Validação do banco de itens Distúrbio do Sono e do banco de itens Distúrbio da Vigília do Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS
Morales RR. Validação da versão em português do banco de itens função física do PROMIS
Silva e Costa ZMS, Pinto RMC. Mendonça TMdS, Silva CHMd. Tradução E adaptação cultural para a língua portuguesa dos domínios Distúrbios do Sono E Distúrbios Da Vigília do patient-reported-outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS). Cadernos De saúde pública. 2014;30:1391–401. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311X00108013 .
doi: 10.1590/0102-311X00108013
pubmed: 25166937
Silva MCL. Tradução e adaptação transcultural do banco de itens satisfação com a participação social do patient-reported outcomes measurement information system PROMIS
Silva MCL. Validação e calibração da versão brasileira do domínio satisfação com a participação social do Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-PROMIS
Simon KC. Tradução e adaptação cultural do banco de itens impacto da dor do PROMIS
Teixeira BS. Validação e calibração do Banco de Itens Fadiga do Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS
Dionne CE, Dunn KM, Croft PR, Nachemson AL, Buchbinder R, Walker BF, et al. A consensus approach toward the standardization of back pain definitions for use in prevalence studies. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008;33(1):95–103. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31815e7f94 .
doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31815e7f94
pubmed: 18165754
Mokkink LB, Prinsen CA, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Bouter LM, Vet HC et al. COSMIN Study Design checklist for Patient-reported outcome measurement instruments 2019 [ https://www.cosmin.nl/wp-content/uploads/COSMIN-study-designing-checklist_final.pdf . Accessed 15 August 2023.
Gagnier JJ, Lai J, Mokkink LB, Terwee CB. COSMIN reporting guideline for studies on measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures. Qual Life Res. 2021;30:2197–218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-021-02822-4 .
doi: 10.1007/s11136-021-02822-4
pubmed: 33818733
Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, et al. The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. Qual Life Res. 2010;19(4):539–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-010-9606-8 .
doi: 10.1007/s11136-010-9606-8
pubmed: 20169472
pmcid: 2852520
Costa LCM, Maher CG, Hancock MJ, McAuley JH, Herbert RD, Costa LO. The prognosis of acute and persistent low-back pain: a meta-analysis. CMAJ. 2012;184(11):E613–24. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.111271 .
doi: 10.1503/cmaj.111271
pubmed: 22586331
pmcid: 3414626
Costa LO, Maher CG, Latimer J, Ferreira PH, Pozzi GC, Ribeiro RN. Psychometric characteristics of the brazilian-portuguese versions of the functional rating index and the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007;32(17):1902–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31811eab33 .
doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31811eab33
pubmed: 17762300
Costa LOP, Maher CG, Latimer J, Ferreira PH, Ferreira ML, Pozzi GC, et al. Clinimetric testing of three self-report outcome measures for low back Pain patients in Brazil: which one is the best? Spine. 2008;33(22):2459–63. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181849dbe .
doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181849dbe
pubmed: 18923324
de Souza FS, da Silva Marinho C, Siqueira FB, Maher CG, Costa LOP. Psychometric testing confirms that the brazilian-portuguese adaptations, the original versions of the fear-avoidance beliefs Questionnaire, and the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia Have Similar Measurement Properties. Spine. 2008;33(9):1028–33. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31816c8329 .
doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31816c8329
pubmed: 18427325
Costa LCM, Maher CG, McAuley JH, Hancock MJ, Herbert RD, Refshauge KM, et al. Prognosis for patients with chronic low back pain: inception cohort study. BMJ. 2009;339. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b3829 .
Herbert R, Jamtvedt G, Hagen KB, Mead J. Practical evidence-based physiotherapy. -E-Book: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2011.
Amtmann D, Cook KF, Jensen MP, Chen W-H, Choi S, Revicki D, et al. Development of a PROMIS item bank to measure pain interference. Pain. 2010;150(1):173–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2010.04.025 .
doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.04.025
pubmed: 20554116
pmcid: 2916053
Coste J, Rouquette A, Valderas JM, Rose M, Leplege A. The French PROMIS-29. Psychometric validation and population reference values. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2018;66(5):317–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respe.2018.05.563 .
doi: 10.1016/j.respe.2018.05.563
pubmed: 30055979
Score, Interpret. PROMIS Health Measures [ https://www.healthmeasures.net/score-and-interpret/interpret-scores/promis
Stevens ML, Lin CC, Maher CG. The Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire. J Physiother. 2016;62(2):116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphys.2015.10.003 .
doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2015.10.003
pubmed: 26687949
Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire. [ http://www.rmdq.org/
Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical care. 1992:473 – 83.
Ware J Jr., Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-Item short-form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996;34(3):220–33. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8628042 .
doi: 10.1097/00005650-199603000-00003
pubmed: 8628042
Ware J Jr, Kosinski M, Keller S. SF-12: how to score the SF-12 physical and mental health summary scales. Boston: QualityMetric Inc. Health Assessment Lab; 2002.
Luo X, George ML, Kakouras I, Edwards CL, Pietrobon R, Richardson W, et al. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the short form 12-item survey (SF-12) in patients with back pain. Spine. 2003;28(15):1739–45. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.BRS.0000083169.58671.96 .
doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000083169.58671.96
pubmed: 12897502
Nakai M, Ke W. Review of the methods for handling missing data in longitudinal data analysis. Int J Math Anal. 2011;5(1):1–13.
Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, Knol DL, Dekker J, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60(1):34–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012 .
doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012
pubmed: 17161752
Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull. 1979;86(2):420. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420 .
doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420
pubmed: 18839484
Weir JP. Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. J Strength Conditioning Res. 2005;19(1):231–40.
Hinkle DE, Wiersma W, Jurs SG. Applied statistics for the behavioral sciences. Houghton Mifflin College Division; 2003.
De Boer MR, Moll AC, De Vet HC, Terwee CB, Völker-Dieben HJ, Van Rens GH. Psychometric properties of vision‐related quality of life questionnaires: a systematic review. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2004;24(4):257–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-1313.2004.00187.x .
doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2004.00187.x
pubmed: 15228503
Triola MF. Introdução à Estatística. 12ª ed2017.
Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. Mini-mental state: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12(3):189–98.
doi: 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6
pubmed: 1202204
Fischer F, Gibbons C, Coste J, Valderas JM, Rose M, Leplège A. Measurement invariance and general population reference values of the PROMIS Profile 29 in the UK, France, and Germany. Qual Life Res. 2018;27:999–1014. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1785-8 .
doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1785-8
pubmed: 29350345