His bundle pacing is continually relevant for patients with atrial fibrillation and bradycardia without prior atrioventricular nodal ablation, data from mid-term follow-up.

LV reverse remodeling atrial fibrillation bradycardia conduction system pacing heart failure

Journal

Kardiologia polska
ISSN: 1897-4279
Titre abrégé: Kardiol Pol
Pays: Poland
ID NLM: 0376352

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
23 Oct 2024
Historique:
received: 11 10 2024
medline: 23 10 2024
pubmed: 23 10 2024
entrez: 23 10 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

In patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and symptomatic bradycardia, His Bundle pacing (HBP) is used to achieve an appropriate heart rate and physiological depolarization of the left ventricle (LV). We aimed to evaluate the impact of HBP on LV function in two different populations: normal LV ejection fraction (LVEF) and low LVEF (<50%). Patients who received HBP as de novo therapy or as an upgrade were divided into two groups based on initial LVEF, followed by echocardiographic and device monitoring. One hundred and twenty three patients (aged 76.0 [69.2-79.8] years, 74.0% men) with AF and bradycardia received HBP and completed follow-up with a median of 6.2 months (6.0-8.0). LV function remained unchanged in initially normal LV function patients (65 participants, LVEF 59.0% [55.0 - 62.0] vs. 58.0% [55.0-63.0]). In patients with low LVEF (58 participants), there was an increase in LVEF (37.5% [30.0-43.0] vs. 44.0% [35.0-50.0]; p < 0.0001), reduction of indexed LV end-systolic volume (62.4 [20.7] ml vs. 51.5 [21.5] ml; p = 0.001) and indexed LV end-diastolic volume (97.5 [26.2] ml vs. 88.1 [25.1] ml; p = 0.009), and improvement in the New York Heart Association class (2.3 [0.71] to 1.6 [0.9]; p < 0.0001). With permanent HBP, patients with AF and bradycardia and without prior atrioventricular nodal ablation did not experience LV systolic function deterioration. Those with reduced baseline LVEF experienced improvements in LV function and its reverse remodeling at the mid-term follow-up.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
In patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and symptomatic bradycardia, His Bundle pacing (HBP) is used to achieve an appropriate heart rate and physiological depolarization of the left ventricle (LV).
AIMS OBJECTIVE
We aimed to evaluate the impact of HBP on LV function in two different populations: normal LV ejection fraction (LVEF) and low LVEF (<50%).
METHODS METHODS
Patients who received HBP as de novo therapy or as an upgrade were divided into two groups based on initial LVEF, followed by echocardiographic and device monitoring.
RESULTS RESULTS
One hundred and twenty three patients (aged 76.0 [69.2-79.8] years, 74.0% men) with AF and bradycardia received HBP and completed follow-up with a median of 6.2 months (6.0-8.0). LV function remained unchanged in initially normal LV function patients (65 participants, LVEF 59.0% [55.0 - 62.0] vs. 58.0% [55.0-63.0]). In patients with low LVEF (58 participants), there was an increase in LVEF (37.5% [30.0-43.0] vs. 44.0% [35.0-50.0]; p < 0.0001), reduction of indexed LV end-systolic volume (62.4 [20.7] ml vs. 51.5 [21.5] ml; p = 0.001) and indexed LV end-diastolic volume (97.5 [26.2] ml vs. 88.1 [25.1] ml; p = 0.009), and improvement in the New York Heart Association class (2.3 [0.71] to 1.6 [0.9]; p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
With permanent HBP, patients with AF and bradycardia and without prior atrioventricular nodal ablation did not experience LV systolic function deterioration. Those with reduced baseline LVEF experienced improvements in LV function and its reverse remodeling at the mid-term follow-up.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39440743
pii: VM/OJS/J/103041
doi: 10.33963/v.phj.103041
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Auteurs

Tomasz Soral (T)

Department of Electrocardiology and Heart Failure, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland. tomasz.soral@gmail.com.
Department of Electrocardiology, Leszek Giec Upper-Silesian Medical Center, Silesian Medical University, Katowice, Poland. tomasz.soral@gmail.com.
Doctoral School of The Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland. tomasz.soral@gmail.com.

Rafał Gardas (R)

Department of Electrocardiology and Heart Failure, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.
Department of Electrocardiology, Leszek Giec Upper-Silesian Medical Center, Silesian Medical University, Katowice, Poland.

Krzysztof S Gołba (KS)

Department of Electrocardiology and Heart Failure, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.
Department of Electrocardiology, Leszek Giec Upper-Silesian Medical Center, Silesian Medical University, Katowice, Poland.

Piotr Kulesza (P)

Department of Electrocardiology and Heart Failure, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.
Department of Electrocardiology, Leszek Giec Upper-Silesian Medical Center, Silesian Medical University, Katowice, Poland.
Doctoral School of The Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.

Jolanta Biernat (J)

Department of Electrocardiology, Leszek Giec Upper-Silesian Medical Center, Silesian Medical University, Katowice, Poland.

Danuta Łoboda (D)

Department of Electrocardiology and Heart Failure, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.
Department of Electrocardiology, Leszek Giec Upper-Silesian Medical Center, Silesian Medical University, Katowice, Poland.

Classifications MeSH