A phase III trial of adjuvant ribociclib plus endocrine therapy vs endocrine therapy alone in patients with HR+/HER2- early breast cancer: final invasive disease-free survival results from the NATALEE trial.

NATALEE breast cancer cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitors hormone-receptor positive human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative ribociclib

Journal

Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology
ISSN: 1569-8041
Titre abrégé: Ann Oncol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9007735

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
21 Oct 2024
Historique:
received: 01 07 2024
revised: 10 10 2024
accepted: 11 10 2024
medline: 24 10 2024
pubmed: 24 10 2024
entrez: 23 10 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

NATALEE assessed efficacy and tolerability of 3 years of adjuvant ribociclib plus NSAI compared with a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor (NSAI) alone in a broad population of patients with HR+/HER2- early breast cancer, including a select group without nodal involvement. This is the final preplanned analysis of invasive disease-free survival (iDFS). Premenopausal/postmenopausal women and men were randomized 1:1 to ribociclib (n=2549; 400 mg/day, 3 weeks on/1 week off for 36 months) plus NSAI (letrozole 2.5 mg/day or anastrozole 1 mg/day for 60 months) or NSAI alone (n=2552). Men and premenopausal women also received goserelin (3.6 mg once every 28 days). Patients had anatomical stage IIA (N0 with additional risk factors or N1), IIB, or III disease. The primary endpoint was iDFS. Secondary efficacy endpoints were recurrence-free survival (RFS), distant DFS (DDFS), and overall survival (OS). This final iDFS analysis was planned after ≈500 events. At data cutoff (21 July 2023), ribociclib was stopped for 1996 patients (78.3%); 1091 (42.8%) completed 3 years of ribociclib, and ribociclib treatment was ongoing for 528 (20.7%). Median follow-up for iDFS was 33.3 months. Overall, 226 and 283 iDFS events occurred with ribociclib plus NSAI vs NSAI alone, respectively. Ribociclib plus NSAI demonstrated significant iDFS benefit over NSAI alone (Hazard Ratio 0.749, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 0.628-0.892; P=0.0012). The 3-year iDFS rates were 90.7% (95% CI 89.3%-91.8%) vs 87.6% (95% CI 86.1%-88.9%). A consistent benefit was observed across prespecified subgroups, including stage (II/III) and nodal status (+/-). DDFS and RFS favored ribociclib plus NSAI. OS data were immature. No new safety signals were observed. With longer follow-up and most patients off ribociclib, NATALEE continues to demonstrate iDFS benefit with ribociclib plus NSAI over NSAI alone in the overall population and across key subgroups. Observed adverse events remained stable.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
NATALEE assessed efficacy and tolerability of 3 years of adjuvant ribociclib plus NSAI compared with a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor (NSAI) alone in a broad population of patients with HR+/HER2- early breast cancer, including a select group without nodal involvement. This is the final preplanned analysis of invasive disease-free survival (iDFS).
PATIENTS AND METHODS METHODS
Premenopausal/postmenopausal women and men were randomized 1:1 to ribociclib (n=2549; 400 mg/day, 3 weeks on/1 week off for 36 months) plus NSAI (letrozole 2.5 mg/day or anastrozole 1 mg/day for 60 months) or NSAI alone (n=2552). Men and premenopausal women also received goserelin (3.6 mg once every 28 days). Patients had anatomical stage IIA (N0 with additional risk factors or N1), IIB, or III disease. The primary endpoint was iDFS. Secondary efficacy endpoints were recurrence-free survival (RFS), distant DFS (DDFS), and overall survival (OS). This final iDFS analysis was planned after ≈500 events.
RESULTS RESULTS
At data cutoff (21 July 2023), ribociclib was stopped for 1996 patients (78.3%); 1091 (42.8%) completed 3 years of ribociclib, and ribociclib treatment was ongoing for 528 (20.7%). Median follow-up for iDFS was 33.3 months. Overall, 226 and 283 iDFS events occurred with ribociclib plus NSAI vs NSAI alone, respectively. Ribociclib plus NSAI demonstrated significant iDFS benefit over NSAI alone (Hazard Ratio 0.749, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 0.628-0.892; P=0.0012). The 3-year iDFS rates were 90.7% (95% CI 89.3%-91.8%) vs 87.6% (95% CI 86.1%-88.9%). A consistent benefit was observed across prespecified subgroups, including stage (II/III) and nodal status (+/-). DDFS and RFS favored ribociclib plus NSAI. OS data were immature. No new safety signals were observed.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
With longer follow-up and most patients off ribociclib, NATALEE continues to demonstrate iDFS benefit with ribociclib plus NSAI over NSAI alone in the overall population and across key subgroups. Observed adverse events remained stable.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39442617
pii: S0923-7534(24)04064-X
doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2024.10.015
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Auteurs

G N Hortobagyi (GN)

Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. Electronic address: ghortoba@mdanderson.org.

A Lacko (A)

Dolnoslaskie Centrum Onkologii, Wroclaw, Poland.

J Sohn (J)

Severance Hospital, Seoul, Korea.

F Cruz (F)

Instituto Brasileiro de Controle do Câncer, São Paulo, Brazil.

M Ruiz Borrego (MR)

Hospital Virgen del Rocio de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain.

A Manikhas (A)

Saint Petersburg City Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Saint Petersburg, Russia.

Y Hee Park (YH)

Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.

D Stroyakovskiy (D)

Moscow City Oncology Hospital No. 62 of Moscow Healthcare Department, Moscow, Russia.

D A Yardley (DA)

Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN, USA.

C-S Huang (CS)

National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei City, Taiwan.

P A Fasching (PA)

University Hospital Erlangen Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.

J Crown (J)

St Vincent's Private Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.

A Bardia (A)

David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

S Chia (S)

BC Cancer - Vancouver, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

S-A Im (SA)

Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

M Martin (M)

Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer, Grupo Español de Investigación en Cáncer de Mama, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain.

S Loi (S)

Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

B Xu (B)

Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

S Hurvitz (S)

University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA.

C Barrios (C)

Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group, Porto Alegre, Brazil.

M Untch (M)

Interdisciplinary Breast Cancer Center, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany.

R Moroose (R)

Orlando Health Cancer Institute, Orlando, FL, USA.

F Visco (F)

National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC, USA.

F Parnizari (F)

TRIO - Translational Research in Oncology, Montevideo, Uruguay.

J P Zarate (JP)

Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, USA.

Z Li (Z)

Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, USA.

S Waters (S)

Novartis Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.

A Chakravartty (A)

Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, USA.

D Slamon (D)

David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Classifications MeSH