Mandatory Reporting: An Exploration of Student Perceptions of University Response to Sexual Misconduct.

colleges mandatory reporting sexual assault sexual misconduct universities

Journal

Violence against women
ISSN: 1552-8448
Titre abrégé: Violence Against Women
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9506308

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
24 Oct 2024
Historique:
medline: 24 10 2024
pubmed: 24 10 2024
entrez: 24 10 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

To respond to sexual misconduct many universities have implemented mandatory reporting (MR), which requires university employees to report disclosures of sexual misconduct to university officials. The current study examines student perceptions of three different approaches to MR (universal, selective, and student-directed). Results revealed that most students preferred a student-directed approach to MR over selective or universal approaches. Survivors of sexual misconduct indicated lower intent to report misconduct under the universal approach to MR compared to their nonvictimized peers. Additionally, under the universal approach to MR, LGBQ+ individuals endorsed lower intent to report misconduct compared to heterosexual individuals.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39444358
doi: 10.1177/10778012241292287
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

10778012241292287

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Auteurs

Natalie Quinn Poole (NQ)

University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY, USA.

Matt J Gray (MJ)

University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY, USA.

Classifications MeSH