Management of Plastic Surgery Complications at a Tertiary Medical Center after Aesthetic Procedures.


Journal

Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open
ISSN: 2169-7574
Titre abrégé: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101622231

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Oct 2024
Historique:
received: 20 03 2024
accepted: 27 08 2024
medline: 24 10 2024
pubmed: 24 10 2024
entrez: 24 10 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The aesthetic plastic surgery industry has seen tremendous growth, with Americans spending an estimated 20 billion dollars on procedures in 2020. However, the effect of complications from these procedures on the healthcare system is poorly understood. This study aims to create awareness regarding aesthetic procedure complications through the scope of plastic surgeons at a tertiary medical facility. A retrospective chart review was performed on patients who received care at a single academic tertiary referral center over 5 years for complications from a cash-paid aesthetic procedure at an outside facility. Physician and hospital billing data were analyzed for relevant encounters. Patients in this study (n = 40) presented to the emergency department most frequently with complications secondary to abdominoplasty (35%), breast augmentation (27.5%), and injectable fillers (17.5%). The most common complications were infection (32.5%) and wound dehiscence (22.5%). Of those evaluated, 50% required inpatient admission. Additionally, 42.5% required surgical intervention. The distribution of payors included Medicaid (55%), commercial insurance (30%), and Medicare (7.5%), and 7.5% were uninsured. For physician billing, the total gross collection ratio was 21.3%, whereas the hospital billing total gross collection ratio was 25.16%. Larger referral hospitals are well-suited to support the aesthetic community with complication management; however, the care required to serve this population is resource-intensive. These data advocate for thorough closed-loop patient-surgeon communication regarding risk-benefit analysis and detailed courses of action should complications arise. Likewise, stronger communication between ambulatory surgical centers and tertiary referral centers may also help minimize complications and subsequent healthcare needs.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
The aesthetic plastic surgery industry has seen tremendous growth, with Americans spending an estimated 20 billion dollars on procedures in 2020. However, the effect of complications from these procedures on the healthcare system is poorly understood. This study aims to create awareness regarding aesthetic procedure complications through the scope of plastic surgeons at a tertiary medical facility.
Methods UNASSIGNED
A retrospective chart review was performed on patients who received care at a single academic tertiary referral center over 5 years for complications from a cash-paid aesthetic procedure at an outside facility. Physician and hospital billing data were analyzed for relevant encounters.
Results UNASSIGNED
Patients in this study (n = 40) presented to the emergency department most frequently with complications secondary to abdominoplasty (35%), breast augmentation (27.5%), and injectable fillers (17.5%). The most common complications were infection (32.5%) and wound dehiscence (22.5%). Of those evaluated, 50% required inpatient admission. Additionally, 42.5% required surgical intervention. The distribution of payors included Medicaid (55%), commercial insurance (30%), and Medicare (7.5%), and 7.5% were uninsured. For physician billing, the total gross collection ratio was 21.3%, whereas the hospital billing total gross collection ratio was 25.16%.
Conclusions UNASSIGNED
Larger referral hospitals are well-suited to support the aesthetic community with complication management; however, the care required to serve this population is resource-intensive. These data advocate for thorough closed-loop patient-surgeon communication regarding risk-benefit analysis and detailed courses of action should complications arise. Likewise, stronger communication between ambulatory surgical centers and tertiary referral centers may also help minimize complications and subsequent healthcare needs.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39444536
doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006250
pii: GOX-D-24-00321
pmc: PMC11498925
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e6250

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have no financial interest to declare in relation to the content of this article.

Auteurs

Caitlyn C Belza (CC)

From the School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, San Diego, Calif.

Kelli Lopes (K)

From the School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, San Diego, Calif.

Paige Benyamein (P)

Division of Plastic Surgery, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, Calif.

Cyril Harfouche (C)

Division of Plastic Surgery, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, Calif.

Riley Dean (R)

Division of Plastic Surgery, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, Calif.

Santaria Geter (S)

Department of Medicine, Division of Medicine, Meharry Medical College School of Medicine, Nashville, Tenn.

Clara J Lee (CJ)

Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, United States Navy, Naval Medical Center San Diego, San Diego, Calif.

Dan Neubauer (D)

Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, United States Navy, Naval Medical Center San Diego, San Diego, Calif.

Chris M Reid (CM)

Division of Plastic Surgery, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, Calif.

Ahmed Suliman (A)

Division of Plastic Surgery, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, Calif.

Amanda A Gosman (AA)

Division of Plastic Surgery, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, Calif.

Classifications MeSH