Big data research is everyone's research-Making epilepsy data science accessible to the global community: Report of the ILAE big data commission.
artificial intelligence
big data
common data models
epilepsy
ethics
Journal
Epileptic disorders : international epilepsy journal with videotape
ISSN: 1950-6945
Titre abrégé: Epileptic Disord
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100891853
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
24 Oct 2024
24 Oct 2024
Historique:
revised:
24
07
2024
received:
23
04
2024
accepted:
04
09
2024
medline:
24
10
2024
pubmed:
24
10
2024
entrez:
24
10
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Epilepsy care generates multiple sources of high-dimensional data, including clinical, imaging, electroencephalographic, genomic, and neuropsychological information, that are collected routinely to establish the diagnosis and guide management. Thanks to high-performance computing, sophisticated graphics processing units, and advanced analytics, we are now on the cusp of being able to use these data to significantly improve individualized care for people with epilepsy. Despite this, many clinicians, health care providers, and people with epilepsy are apprehensive about implementing Big Data and accompanying technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI). Practical, ethical, privacy, and climate issues represent real and enduring concerns that have yet to be completely resolved. Similarly, Big Data and AI-related biases have the potential to exacerbate local and global disparities. These are highly germane concerns to the field of epilepsy, given its high burden in developing nations and areas of socioeconomic deprivation. This educational paper from the International League Against Epilepsy's (ILAE) Big Data Commission aims to help clinicians caring for people with epilepsy become familiar with how Big Data is collected and processed, how they are applied to studies using AI, and outline the immense potential positive impact Big Data can have on diagnosis and management.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2024 The Author(s). Epileptic Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International League Against Epilepsy.
Références
Mehta N, Pandit A. Concurrence of big data analytics and healthcare: a systematic review. Int J Med Inform. 2018;114:57–65.
Scruggs SB, Watson K, Su AI, Hermjakob H, Yates JR III, Lindsey ML, et al. Harnessing the heart of big data. Circ Res. 2015;116:1115–1119.
Scheffer IE, Berkovic S, Capovilla G, Connolly MB, French J, Guilhoto L, et al. ILAE classification of the epilepsies: position paper of the ILAE Commission for Classification and Terminology. Epilepsia. 2017;58:512–521.
Brinkmann BH, Bower MR, Stengel KA, Worrell GA, Stead M. Large‐scale electrophysiology: acquisition, compression, encryption, and storage of big data. J Neurosci Methods. 2009;180:185–192.
Bohr A, Memarzadeh K. The rise of artificial intelligence in healthcare applications. In: Bohr A, Memarzadeh K, editors. Artificial intelligence in healthcare. London, UK: Academic Press is an imprint of Elsevier; 2020. p. 25–60.
Chen P‐HC, Liu Y, Peng L. How to develop machine learning models for healthcare. Nat Mater. 2019;18:410–414.
Herrett E, Thomas SL, Schoonen WM, Smeeth L, Hall AJ. Validation and validity of diagnoses in the general practice research database: a systematic review. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2010;69:4–14.
Hripcsak G, Albers DJ. Next‐generation phenotyping of electronic health records. J Am Med Inform Assoc JAMIA. 2013;20:117–121.
Banda JM, Seneviratne M, Hernandez‐Boussard T, Shah NH. Advances in electronic phenotyping: from rule‐based definitions to machine learning models. Annu Rev Biomed Data Sci. 2018;1:53–68.
Kotecha D, Asselbergs FW, Achenbach S, Anker SD, Atar D, Baigent C, et al. CODE‐EHR best‐practice framework for the use of structured electronic health‐care records in clinical research. Lancet Digit Health. 2022;4:e757–e764.
Weeks J, Pardee R. Learning to share health care data: a brief timeline of influential common data models and distributed health data networks in U.S. health care research. eGEMs. 2019;7:4.
Liyanage H, Liaw S‐T, Jonnagaddala J, Hinton W, de Lusignan S. Common data models (CDMs) to enhance international big data analytics: a diabetes use case to compare three CDMs. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2018;255:60–64.
Biedermann P, Ong R, Davydov A, Orlova A, Solovyev P, Sun H, et al. Standardizing registry data to the OMOP common data model: experience from three pulmonary hypertension databases. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021;21:238.
OMOP. Common Data Model. https://ohdsi.github.io/CommonDataModel/index.html Accessed Nov 10, 2023.
Duda SN, Kennedy N, Conway D, Cheng AC, Nguyen V, Zayas‐Cabán T, et al. HL7 FHIR‐based tools and initiatives to support clinical research: a scoping review. J Am Med Inform Assoc JAMIA. 2022;29:1642–1653.
Laohathai C, Ebersole JS, Mosher JC, Bagić AI, Sumida A, von Allmen G, et al. Practical fundamentals of clinical MEG interpretation in epilepsy. Front Neurol. 2021;12:722986. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.722986 (Accessed June 22, 2023).
Noachtar S, Rémi J. The role of EEG in epilepsy: a critical review. Epilepsy Behav EB. 2009;15:22–33.
Hari R, Puce A. An overview of EEG and MEG. In: PhD HM, Riitta PP, Aina HR, Puce A, editors. MEG‐EEG Primer. New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press; 2017.
Frauscher B, Bartolomei F, Kobayashi K, Cimbalnik J, van't Klooster MA, Rampp S, et al. High‐frequency oscillations: The state of clinical research. Epilepsia. 2017;58:1316–1329.
Tveit J, Aurlien H, Plis S, Calhoun VD, Tatum WO, Schomer DL, et al. Automated interpretation of clinical electroencephalograms using artificial intelligence. JAMA Neurol. 2023;20:805–812. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2023.1645
Wang I, Bernasconi A, Bernhardt B, Blumenfeld H, Cendes F, Chinvarun Y, et al. MRI essentials in epileptology: a review from the ILAE imaging taskforce. Epileptic Disord. 2020;22:421–437.
Bernasconi A, Cendes F, Theodore WH, Gill RS, Koepp MJ, Hogan RE, et al. Recommendations for the use of structural magnetic resonance imaging in the care of patients with epilepsy: a consensus report from the international league against epilepsy neuroimaging task force. Epilepsia. 2019;60:1054–1068.
Davagnanam I, Chen Z, Hoskote C, Ding D, Yang B, Wang Y, et al. Prevalence of MRI abnormalities in people with epilepsy in rural China. Neurology. 2020;95:e1236–e1243.
Sisodiya SM, Whelan CD, Hatton SN, Huynh K, Altmann A, Ryten M, et al. The ENIGMA‐epilepsy working group: mapping disease from large data sets. Hum Brain Mapp. 2020;43:113–128.
Bank AM, Kuzniecky R, Knowlton RC, Cascino GD, Jackson G, Pardoe HR, et al. Structural neuroimaging in adults and adolescents with newly diagnosed focal epilepsy: The human epilepsy project. Neurology. 2022;99:e2181–e2187.
Norman M, Wilson SJ, Baxendale S, Barr W, Block C, Busch RM, et al. Addressing neuropsychological diagnostics in adults with epilepsy: introducing the international classification of cognitive disorders in epilepsy: The IC CODE initiative. Epilepsia Open. 2021;6:266–275.
McDonald CR, Busch RM, Reyes A, Arrotta K, Barr W, Block C, et al. Development and application of the International Classification of Cognitive Disorders in Epilepsy (IC‐CoDE): initial results from a multi‐center study of adults with temporal lobe epilepsy. Neuropsychology. 2023;37:301–314.
Arrotta K, Reyes A, Kaestner E, McDonald CR, Hermann BP, Barr WB, et al. Cognitive phenotypes in frontal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2022;63:1671–1681.
Reyes A, Salinas L, Hermann BP, Baxendale S, Busch RM, Barr WB, et al. Establishing the cross‐cultural applicability of a harmonized approach to cognitive diagnostics in epilepsy: initial results of the international classification of cognitive disorders in epilepsy in a Spanish‐speaking sample. Epilepsia. 2023;64:728–741.
Oliver KL, Scheffer IE, Bennett MF, Grinton BE, Bahlo M, Berkovic SF. Genes4Epilepsy: an epilepsy gene resource. Epilepsia. 2023;64:1368–1375.
Ruggiero SM, Xian J, Helbig I. The current landscape of epilepsy genetics: where are we, and where are we going? Curr Opin Neurol. 2023;36:86–94.
Martins Custodio H, Clayton LM, Bellampalli R, Pagni S, Silvennoinen K, Caswell R, et al. Widespread genomic influences on phenotype in Dravet syndrome, a 'monogenic' condition. Brain. 2023;146(9):3885–3897.
Sheidley BR, Malinowski J, Bergner AL, Bier L, Gloss DS, Mu W, et al. Genetic testing for the epilepsies: a systematic review. Epilepsia. 2022;63:375–387.
Oegema R, Barakat TS, Wilke M, Stouffs K, Amrom D, Aronica E, et al. International consensus recommendations on the diagnostic work‐up for malformations of cortical development. Nat Rev Neurol. 2020;16:618–635.
Najm I, Lal D, Alonso Vanegas M, Cendes F, Lopes‐Cendes I, Palmini A, et al. The ILAE consensus classification of focal cortical dysplasia: an update proposed by an ad hoc task force of the ILAE diagnostic methods commission. Epilepsia. 2022;63:1899–1919.
Epi25 Collaborative. Electronic address: s.berkovic@unimelb.edu.au, Epi25 Collaborative. Ultra‐Rare genetic variation in the epilepsies: a whole‐exome sequencing study of 17,606 individuals. Am J Hum Genet 2019; 105: 267–282.
Beniczky S, Rubboli G. Use of fitness trackers to identify and document epileptic seizures. Epileptic Disord Int Epilepsy J Videotape. 2021;23:432–434.
Beniczky S, Wiebe S, Jeppesen J, Tatum WO, Brazdil M, Wang Y, et al. Automated seizure detection using wearable devices: a clinical practice guideline of the international league against epilepsy and the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Epilepsia. 2021;62:632–646.
Japaridze G, Loeckx D, Buckinx T, Armand Larsen S, Proost R, Jansen K, et al. Automated detection of absence seizures using a wearable electroencephalographic device: a phase 3 validation study and feasibility of automated behavioral testing. Epilepsia. 2022;64:S40–S46. https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.17200
Jeppesen J, Christensen J, Mølgaard H, Beniczky S. Automated detection of focal seizures using subcutaneously implanted electrocardiographic device: a proof‐of‐concept study. Epilepsia. 2023;64(Suppl 4):S59–S64.
Naganur V, Sivathamboo S, Chen Z, Kusmakar S, Antonic‐Baker A, O'Brien TJ, et al. Automated seizure detection with noninvasive wearable devices: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Epilepsia. 2022;63:1930–1941.
Gray TE, Hirsch LJ, Quraishi IH. Electronic seizure diaries for clinical care and research. Epileptic Disord. 2022;24:803–811.
Rao VR. Chronic electroencephalography in epilepsy with a responsive neurostimulation device: current status and future prospects. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2021;18:1093–1105.
Sivathamboo S, Nhu D, Piccenna L, Yang A, Antonic‐Baker A, Vishwanath S, et al. Preferences and user experiences of wearable devices in epilepsy: a systematic review and mixed‐methods synthesis. Neurology. 2022;99:e1380–e1392.
Smith PEM. Epilepsy: mimics, borderland and chameleons. Pract Neurol. 2012;12:299–307.
Jetté N, Reid AY, Quan H, Hill MD, Wiebe S. How accurate is ICD coding for epilepsy? Epilepsia. 2010;51:62–69.
Hamade N, Terry A, Malvankar‐Mehta M. Interventions to improve the use of EMRs in primary health care: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. BMJ Health Care Inform. 2019;26:e000023.
Blake HA, Sharples LD, Harron K, van der Meulen JH, Walker K. Probabilistic linkage without personal information successfully linked national clinical datasets. J Clin Epidemiol. 2021;136:136–145.
Morley KI, Wallace J, Denaxas SC, Hunter RJ, Patel RS, Perel P, et al. Defining disease phenotypes using National Linked Electronic Health Records: a case study of atrial fibrillation. PLoS One. 2014;9:e110900.
Little RJ, D'Agostino R, Cohen ML, Dickersin K, Emerson SS, Farrar JT, et al. The prevention and treatment of missing data in clinical trials. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:1355–1360.
Steyerberg EW, Vergouwe Y. Towards better clinical prediction models: seven steps for development and an ABCD for validation. Eur Heart J. 2014;35:1925–1931.
Altman N, Krzywinski M. The curse(s) of dimensionality. Nat Methods. 2018;15:399–400.
Ten CD. Quick tips for machine learning in computational biology. BioData min. 2017;10:35.
Hunter DJ, Holmes C. Where medical statistics meets artificial intelligence. N Engl J Med. 2023;389:1211–1219.
Diprose WK, Buist N, Hua N, Thurier Q, Shand G, Robinson R. Physician understanding, explainability, and trust in a hypothetical machine learning risk calculator. J Am Med Inform Assoc JAMIA. 2020;27:592–600.
Time to discuss consent in digital‐data studies. Time to discuss consent in digital‐data studies. Nature. 2019;572:5.
Alberto IRI, Alberto NRI, Ghosh AK, Jain B, Jayakumar S, Martinez‐Martin N, et al. The impact of commercial health datasets on medical research and health‐care algorithms. Lancet Digit Health. 2023;5:e288–e294.
Rocher L, Hendrickx JM, de Montjoye Y‐A. Estimating the success of re‐identifications in incomplete datasets using generative models. Nat Commun. 2019;10:3069.
Piasecki J, Cheah PY. Ownership of individual‐level health data, data sharing, and data governance. BMC Med Ethics. 2022;23:1–9.
Cheah PY, Day NPJ. Data sharing: experience from a tropical medicine research unit. Lancet. 2017;390:1642.
Beigang F. On the advantages of distinguishing between predictive and allocative fairness in algorithmic decision‐making. Minds Mach. 2022;32:655–682.
Kamitaki BK, Zhang P, Master A, Adler S, Jain S, Thomas‐Hawkins C, et al. Differences in elective epilepsy monitoring unit admission rates by race/ethnicity and primary payer in New Jersey. Epilepsy Behav. 2022;136:108923.
Hooker S. Moving beyond “algorithmic bias is a data problem”. Patterns. 2021;2:100241.
The Bletchley Declaration by Countries Attending the AI Safety Summit. London, UK: GOV.UK; 2023. p. 1–2. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ai‐safety‐summit‐2023‐the‐bletchley‐declaration/the‐bletchley‐declaration‐by‐countries‐attending‐the‐ai‐safety‐summit‐1‐2‐november‐2023 Accessed Nov 17, 2023.
Glossary. Gloss. Washington, DC: PCORI; 2014. https://www.pcori.org/funding‐opportunities/what‐you‐need‐know‐apply/glossary Accessed July 14, 2023.
Domecq JP, Prutsky G, Elraiyah T, Wang Z, Nabhan M, Shippee N, et al. Patient engagement in research: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:89.
Noble AJ, Marson AG. Which outcomes should we measure in adult epilepsy trials? The views of people with epilepsy and informal carers. Epilepsy Behav. 2016;59:105–110.
Norton AC, Smeaton M, Twohig‐Bennett C, Thomas RH. What the top Ten epilepsy research priorities mean for the UK Research Ecosystem. EBioMedicine. 2024;100:104919.
Nott E, Behl KE, Brambilla I, Green TE, Lucente M, Vavassori R, et al. The importance of research, analysis, reporting and education in ‘solving’ the genetic epilepsies: a perspective from the European patient advocacy group for EpiCARE. Eur J Med Genet. 2023;66:104680.
Kaplan S. F.D.A. Panel Recommends Approval of Cannabis‐Based Drug for Epilepsy. New York, NY, USA: N. Y. Times; 2018. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/19/health/epidiolex‐fda‐cannabis‐marajuana.html Accessed July 14, 2023.
Ho NT, Kroner B, Grinspan Z, Fureman B, Farrell K, Zhang J, et al. Comorbidities of Rare epilepsies: results from the Rare epilepsy network. J Pediatr. 2018;203:249–258.
Comparative Effectiveness of Palliative Surgery versus Additional Anti‐Seizure Medications for Lennox‐Gastaut Syndrome. Comp. Eff. Palliat. Surg. Addit. Anti‐Seizure Medicat. Lennox‐Gastaut Syndr. PCORI. 2021 https://www.pcori.org/research‐results/2021/comparative‐effectiveness‐palliative‐surgery‐versus‐additional‐anti‐seizure‐medications‐lennox‐gastaut‐syndrome Accessed July 14, 2023.
University of Pennsylvania. Orphan Disease Center CDKL5 Deficiency Disorder International Patient Registry. 2023 clinicaltrials.gov, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04486768 Accessed July 13, 2023.
Northrup H, Aronow ME, Bebin EM, Bissler J, Darling TN, de Vries PJ, et al. Updated international tuberous sclerosis complex diagnostic criteria and surveillance and management recommendations. Pediatr Neurol. 2021;123:50–66.
Reeder S, Foster E, Vishwanath S, Kwan P. Experience of waiting for seizure freedom and perception of machine learning technologies to support treatment decision: a qualitative study in adults with recent onset epilepsy. Epilepsy Res. 2023;190:107096.
The Promise of Patient‐Led Research Integration into Clinical Registries and Research. CMSS. https://cmss.org/patient‐led‐research‐integration/ Accessed July 14, 2023.
Briefing notes for researchers‐public involvement in NHS, health and social care research. https://www.nihr.ac.uk/documents/briefing‐notes‐for‐researchers‐public‐involvement‐in‐nhs‐health‐and‐social‐care‐research/27371 Accessed July 14, 2023.
Oehrlein EM, Schoch S, Majercak K, Gressler LE, Costantino R, Perfetto EM, et al. Patient Experience Mapping Toolbox. National Health Council; 2021. Available from: https://nationalhealthcouncil.org/resources/patient‐experience‐map Accessed July 14, 2023.
Big Data for Patients. Big Data For Patients. https://bigdataforpatients.reaganudall.org/ Accessed July 14, 2023.
Shippee ND, Domecq Garces JP, Prutsky Lopez GJ, Wang Z, Elraiyah TA, Nabhan M, et al. Patient and service user engagement in research: a systematic review and synthesized framework. Health Expect Int J Public Particip Health Care Health Policy. 2015;18:1151–1166.
Climate Change Indicators Reached Record Levels in 2023: WMO. Geneva, Switzerland: World Meteorological Organization; 2024. https://wmo.int/news/media‐centre/climate‐change‐indicators‐reached‐record‐levels‐2023‐wmo Accessed April 20, 2024.
Wise J. Climate crisis: over 200 health journals urge world leaders to tackle “catastrophic harm”. BMJ. 2021;374:n2177.
Abbasi K, Ali P, Barbour V, Benfield T, Bibbins‐Domingo K, Hancocks S, et al. Time to treat the climate and nature crisis as one indivisible global health emergency. BMJ. 2023;383:p2355.
Health Care Climate Footprint Report. Reston, VA: Health Care Harm; 2019. https://noharm‐global.org/documents/health‐care‐climate‐footprint‐report Accessed Nov 29, 2023.
Picano E, Mangia C, D'Andrea A. Climate change, carbon dioxide emissions, and medical imaging contribution. J Clin Med. 2022;12:215.
McAlister S, McGain F, Petersen M, Story D, Charlesworth K, Ison G, et al. The carbon footprint of hospital diagnostic imaging in Australia. Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2022;24:100459.
Grealey J, Lannelongue L, Saw W‐Y, Marten J, Méric G, Ruiz‐Carmona S, et al. The carbon footprint of bioinformatics. Mol Biol Evol. 2022;39:msac034.
Lannelongue L, Aronson H‐EG, Bateman A, Birney E, Caplan T, Juckes M, et al. GREENER principles for environmentally sustainable computational science. Nat Comput Sci. 2023;3:514–521.
Genomics Firms Tackle Carbon Emissions, Face Obstacles to Net‐Zero Goals From Suppliers, Shipping. New York, USA: GenomeWeb. Dec 21, 2022. https://www.genomeweb.com/business‐news/genomics‐firms‐tackle‐carbon‐emissions‐face‐obstacles‐net‐zero‐goals‐suppliers Accessed Nov 29, 2023.
Luccioni AS, Viguier S, Ligozat A‐L. Estimating the Carbon Footprint of BLOOM, a 176B Parameter Language Model. 2022 https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2211.02001
Simmons L. The carbon cost of AI. Carbon Lit Proj. 2023. https://carbonliteracy.com/the‐carbon‐cost‐of‐ai/ Accessed Nov 29, 2023.
Woolen SA, Becker AE, Martin AJ, Knoerl R, Lam V, Folsom J, et al. Ecodesign and operational strategies to reduce the carbon footprint of MRI for energy cost savings. Radiology. 2023;307:e230441.
Heatwave is Forcing Some UK Firms to Turn Off High‐Power Computers. London, UK: New Scientist; July 19, 2022. https://www.newscientist.com/article/2329313‐heatwave‐is‐forcing‐some‐uk‐firms‐to‐turn‐off‐high‐power‐computers/Accessed Nov 29, 2023.
Record‐Breaking Heatwave Causes Cloud‐Computing Problems. Fort mill, South Africa: ZDNET; July 19, 2022. https://www.zdnet.com/article/the‐uk‐heat‐wave‐brings‐down‐some‐oracle‐and‐google‐cloud‐data‐centers/ Accessed Nov 29, 2023.
Climate change threatens supercomputers | Science | AAAS. https://www.science.org/content/article/climate‐change‐threatens‐supercomputers (accessed Nov 29, 2023).
Steyerberg EW, Harrell FE. Prediction models need appropriate internal, internal‐external, and external validation. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016;69:245–247.
Collins GS, Reitsma JB, Altman DG, Moons KGM. Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD). Circulation. 2015;131:211–219.
Siontis GCM, Tzoulaki I, Castaldi PJ, Ioannidis JPA. External validation of new risk prediction models is infrequent and reveals worse prognostic discrimination. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015;68:25–34.
Vickers AJ, Elkin EB. Decision curve analysis: a novel method for evaluating prediction models. Med Decis Mak Int J Soc Med Decis Mak. 2006;26:565–574.
Vickers AJ, van Calster B, Steyerberg EW. A simple, step‐by‐step guide to interpreting decision curve analysis. Diagn Progn Res. 2019;3:18.
Beede E, Baylor E, Hersch F, Iurchenko A, Wilcox L, Ruamviboonsuk P, et al. A human‐centered evaluation of a deep learning system deployed in clinics for the detection of diabetic retinopathy. Proceedings of the 2020 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. Honolulu, HI, USA: ACM; 2020. p. 1–12.
Gulshan V, Peng L, Coram M, Stumpe MC, Wu D, Narayanaswamy A, et al. Development and validation of a deep learning algorithm for detection of diabetic retinopathy in retinal fundus photographs. JAMA. 2016;316:2402–2410.
Kawamoto K, Houlihan CA, Balas EA, Lobach DF. Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success. BMJ. 2005;330:765.
McGreevey JD, Mallozzi CP, Perkins RM, Shelov E, Schreiber R. Reducing alert burden in electronic health records: state of the art recommendations from four health systems. Appl Clin Inform. 2020;11:1–12.
Shah T, Patel‐Teague S, Kroupa L, Meyer AND, Singh H. Impact of a national QI programme on reducing electronic health record notifications to clinicians. BMJ Qual Saf. 2019;28:10–14.
Bates DW, Kuperman GJ, Wang S, Gandhi T, Kittler A, Volk L, et al. Ten commandments for effective clinical decision support: making the practice of evidence‐based medicine a reality. J Am Med Inform Assoc JAMIA. 2003;10:523–530.
Okpechi IG, Muneer S, Ye F, Zaidi D, Ghimire A, Tinwala MM, et al. Global eHealth capacity: secondary analysis of WHO data on eHealth and implications for kidney care delivery in low‐resource settings. BMJ Open. 2022;12:e055658.
Panch T, Mattie H, Celi LA. The “inconvenient truth” about AI in healthcare. Npj Digit Med. 2019;2:1–3.
Beniczky S, Aurlien H, Brøgger JC, Fuglsang‐Frederiksen A, Martins‐da‐Silva A, Trinka E, et al. Standardized computer‐based organized reporting of EEG: SCORE. Epilepsia. 2013;54:1112–1124.
Beniczky S, Aurlien H, Brøgger JC, Hirsch LJ, Schomer DL, Trinka E, et al. Standardized computer‐based organized reporting of EEG: SCORE–second version. Clin Neurophysiol. 2017;128:2334–2346.
Altmann A, Ryten M, Di Nunzio M, Ravizza T, Tolomeo D, Reynolds RH, et al. A systems‐level analysis highlights microglial activation as a modifying factor in common epilepsies. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2022;48:e12758.
Spitzer H, Ripart M, Whitaker K, D'Arco F, Mankad K, Chen AA, et al. Interpretable surface‐based detection of focal cortical dysplasias: a multi‐centre epilepsy lesion detection study. Brain. 2022;145:3859–3871.
Whelan CD, Altmann A, Botía JA, Jahanshad N, Hibar DP, Absil J, et al. Structural brain abnormalities in the common epilepsies assessed in a worldwide ENIGMA study. Brain. 2018;141:391–408. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awx341
Hatton SN, Huynh KH, Bonilha L, Abela E, Alhusaini S, Altmann A, et al. White matter abnormalities across different epilepsy syndromes in adults: an ENIGMA‐epilepsy study. Brain. 2020;143:2454–2473.
Gill RS, Lee H‐M, Caldairou B, Hong SJ, Barba C, Deleo F, et al. Multicenter validation of a deep learning detection algorithm for focal cortical dysplasia. Neurology. 2021;97:e1571–e1582. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000012698
Definition of Decision Intelligence‐Gartner Information Technology Glossary. Stamford, CT, USA: Gartner. https://www.gartner.com/en/information‐technology/glossary/decision‐intelligence Accessed Nov 18, 2023.
Hemingway H, Asselbergs FW, Danesh J, Dobson R, Maniadakis N, Maggioni A, et al. Big data from electronic health records for early and late translational cardiovascular research: challenges and potential. Eur Heart J. 2018;39:1481–1495.