Production and analysis of synthesized bacterial cellulose by Enterococcus faecalis strain AEF using Phoenix dactylifera and Musa acuminata fruit extracts.
Enterococcus faecalis
Musa acuminata
Phoenix dactylifera
ATR-FTIR spectroscopy
Bacterial cellulose
LC-MS
Journal
World journal of microbiology & biotechnology
ISSN: 1573-0972
Titre abrégé: World J Microbiol Biotechnol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9012472
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
24 Oct 2024
24 Oct 2024
Historique:
received:
28
07
2024
accepted:
07
10
2024
medline:
24
10
2024
pubmed:
24
10
2024
entrez:
24
10
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Bacterial cellulose (BC) is a highly versatile biopolymer renowned for its exceptional mechanical strength, water retention, and biocompatibility. These properties make it a valuable material for various industrial and biomedical applications. In this study, Enterococcus faecalis synthesized extracellular BC, utilizing Phoenix dactylifera and Musa acuminata fruit extracts as sustainable carbon sources. LC-MS analysis identified glucose as the primary carbohydrate in these extracts, providing a suitable substrate for BC production. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) revealed a network of BC nanofibers on Congo red agar plates. ATR-FTIR spectroscopy confirmed the presence of characteristic cellulose functional groups, further supporting BC synthesis. X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis indicated a high crystallinity index of 71%, consistent with the cellulose I structure, as evidenced by peaks at 16.22°, 21.46°, 22.52°, and 34.70°. Whole-genome sequencing of E. faecalis identified vital genes involved in BC biosynthesis, including bcsA, bcsB, diguanylate cyclase (DGC), and 6-phosphofructokinase (pfkA). Antibiotic susceptibility tests revealed resistance to cefotaxime, ceftazidime, and ceftriaxone, while susceptibility to imipenem was observed. Quantitative assessment demonstrated that higher concentrations of fruit extracts (5.0-20 mg/mL) significantly enhanced BC production. Cytotoxicity testing via the MTT assay confirmed excellent biocompatibility with NIH/3T3 fibroblast cells, showing high cell viability (97-105%). Unlike commonly studied Gram-negative bacteria like Acetobacter xylinum for BC production, this research focuses on Gram-positive Enterococcus faecalis and utilizes Phoenix dactylifera and Musa acuminata fruit extracts as carbon sources. This approach offers a sustainable and promising avenue for BC production.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39446188
doi: 10.1007/s11274-024-04159-9
pii: 10.1007/s11274-024-04159-9
doi:
Substances chimiques
Cellulose
9004-34-6
Plant Extracts
0
Anti-Bacterial Agents
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
362Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.
Références
Abidi W, ´anchez LT-S, Siroy A, Krasteva PV (2022) Weaving of bacterial cellulose by the bcs secretion. FEMS Microbiol Rev 46:fuab051. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsre/fuab051
doi: 10.1093/femsre/fuab051
pubmed: 34634120
Ali-Shtayeh, Ghdeib SIA, Key (1999) Antifungal activity of plant extracts against dermatophytes. Mycoses 42:665–672. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0507.1999.00499.x
doi: 10.1046/j.1439-0507.1999.00499.x
pubmed: 10680445
Assirey EAR (2015) Nutritional composition of fruit of 10 date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) cultivars grown in Saudi Arabia. J Taibah Univ Sci 9:75–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtusci.2014.07.002
doi: 10.1016/j.jtusci.2014.07.002
Aswini K, Gopal NO, Uthandi S (2020) Optimized culture conditions for bacterial cellulose production by Acetobacter senegalensis MA1. BMC Biotechnol 20:1–16
doi: 10.1186/s12896-020-00639-6
Azeredo HMC, Barud H, Farinas CS (2019) Bacterial cellulose as a raw material for Food and Food Packaging Applications. Front Sustain Food Syst 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2019.00007
Aziz WSWA, Adnan A (2022) Employed bacterial species and bacterial cellulose (BC) applications: the state of play. Squalen Bull Mar Fish Postharvest Biotechnol 17:155–167. https://doi.org/10.15578/squalen.672
doi: 10.15578/squalen.672
Bagewadi ZK, Bhavikatti JS, Muddapur UM et al (2020) Statistical optimization and characterization of bacterial cellulose produced by isolated thermophilic Bacillus licheniformis strain ZBT2. Carbohydr Res 491:107979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carres.2020.107979
doi: 10.1016/j.carres.2020.107979
pubmed: 32171995
Barja F (2021) Bacterial nanocellulose production and biomedical applications. J Biomed Res 35:310–317. https://doi.org/10.7555/JBR.35.20210036
doi: 10.7555/JBR.35.20210036
pubmed: 34253695
pmcid: 8383174
Bhatti JM, Raza SA, Alam AF et al (2023) Antibiotic choices among healthcare professionals for enterococcal bacteremia with patterns of resistance and risk factors of mortality, in settings of poor antibiotic stewardship program — a five-year retrospective cohort study. BMC Infect Dis 23:514. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-023-08498-0
doi: 10.1186/s12879-023-08498-0
pubmed: 37544982
pmcid: 10405468
Boccella M, Santella B, Pagliano P et al (2021) Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance of Enterococcus species: a retrospective cohort study in Italy. Antibiotics 10:1552
doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10121552
pubmed: 34943764
pmcid: 8698357
Bryan NC, Lebreton F, Gilmore M et al (2021) Genomic and functional characterization of Enterococcus faecalis isolates recovered from the International Space Station and their potential for pathogenicity. Front Microbiol 11:1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.515319
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.515319
Chandrasekaran PT, Bari NK, Sinha S (2017) Enhanced bacterial cellulose production from Gluconobacter xylinus using super optimal broth. Cellulose 24:4367–4381. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-017-1419-2
doi: 10.1007/s10570-017-1419-2
Choi SM, Shin EJ (2020) The nanofication and functionalization of bacterial cellulose and its applications. Nanomaterials 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10030406
Costa AFS, Almeida FCG, Vinhas GM, Sarubbo LA (2017) Production of bacterial cellulose by Gluconacetobacter hansenii using Corn Steep Liquor as Nutrient sources. Front Microbiol 8:1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.02027
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02027
Dechojarassri D, Okada T, Tamura H, Furuike T (2023) Evaluation of cytotoxicity of Hyaluronic Acid/Chitosan/Bacterial cellulose-based membrane. Mater (Basel) 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16145189
Dhar P, Etula J, Bankar SB (2019) In situ Bioprocessing of Bacterial Cellulose with Graphene: Percolation Network Formation, Kinetic Analysis with Physicochemical and Structural properties Assessment. ACS Appl Bio Mater 2:4052–4066. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsabm.9b00581
doi: 10.1021/acsabm.9b00581
pubmed: 35021339
Diego O, Serra HR (2019) Cellulose in bacterial Biofilm Botryosphaeran – A Fungal Glucan Kind. Structure and Biological Functions
Digel I, Akimbekov N, Rogachev E, Pogorelova N (2023) Bacterial cellulose produced by Medusomyces gisevii on glucose and sucrose: biosynthesis and structural properties. Cellulose 30:11439–11453. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-023-05592-z
doi: 10.1007/s10570-023-05592-z
Dressing W (2015) Development of Chitosan/Bacterial Cellulose Composite films Containing nanodiamonds as a potential flexible platform for Wound Dressing. Mater (Basel) 8:6401–6418. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma8095309
doi: 10.3390/ma8095309
El-Naggar NEA, Mohammed ABA, El-Malkey SE (2023) Bacterial nanocellulose production using cantaloupe juice, statistical optimization and characterization. Sci Rep 13:1–25. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-26642-9
doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-26642-9
Felsenstein J (1985) Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evol (N Y) 39:783–791
Gajan EB, Shirmohammadi A, Aghazadeh M et al (2013) Antibiotic Resistance in Enterococcus faecalis isolated from hospitalized patients. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospect 7:7–9. https://doi.org/10.5681/joddd.2013.018
doi: 10.5681/joddd.2013.018
Gao G, Liao Z, Cao Y et al (2021) Highly efficient production of bacterial cellulose from corn stover total hydrolysate by Enterobacter sp. FY-07. Bioresour Technol 341:125781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125781
doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125781
pubmed: 34454235
Ghasemi M, Turnbull T, Sebastian S, Kempson I (2021) The mtt assay: utility, limitations, pitfalls, and interpretation in bulk and single-cell analysis. Int J Mol Sci 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms222312827
Ghazzawy HS, Gouda MM, Awad NS et al (2022) Potential bioactivity of Phoenix dactylifera fruits, leaves, and seeds against prostate and pancreatic cancer cells. Front Nutr 9:1–16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2022.998929
doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.998929
Gorgieva S, Jančič U, Cepec E, Trček J (2023) Production efficiency and properties of bacterial cellulose membranes in a novel grape pomace hydrolysate by Komagataeibacter Melomenusus AV436T and komagataeibacter xylinus LMG 1518. Int J Biol Macromol 244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.125368
Gromovykh TI, Demchenko AG, Feldman NB (2019) Development of bacterial cellulose biomaterial: preparation and establishment of cytotoxicity for eukaryotic cells. Int J Nanotechnol 16:87–99
doi: 10.1504/IJNT.2019.102395
Gromovykh TI, Pigaleva MA, Gallyamov MO et al (2020) Structural organization of bacterial cellulose: the origin of anisotropy and layered structures. Carbohydr Polym 237:116140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116140
doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116140
pubmed: 32241418
Harwood VJ, Delahoya NC, Ulrich RM et al (2004) Molecular confirmation of Enterococcus faecalis and E. faecium from clinical, faecal and environmental sources. Lett Appl Microbiol 38:476–482. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-765X.2004.01518.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2004.01518.x
pubmed: 15130142
Hasanin MS, Abdelraof M, Hashem AH, El Saied H (2023) Sustainable bacterial cellulose production by Achromobacter using mango peel waste. Microb Cell Fact 22:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-023-02031-3
doi: 10.1186/s12934-023-02031-3
Hassan Z, Mustafa S, Rahim RA, Isa NM (2016) Identification, characterisation and phylogenetic analysis of commensal bacteria isolated from human breast milk in Malaysia. Pertanika J Sci Technol 24:351–370
Hess JF, Kohl TA, Kotrová M et al (2020) Library preparation for next generation sequencing: a review of automation strategies. Biotechnol Adv 41:107537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2020.107537
doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2020.107537
pubmed: 32199980
Homthong M, Kubera A, Srihuttagum M, Hongtrakul V (2016) Isolation and characterization of chitinase from soil fungi, Paecilomyces Sp. Agric Nat Resour 50:232–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anres.2015.09.005
doi: 10.1016/j.anres.2015.09.005
Hospodarova V, Singovszka E, Stevulova N (2018) Characterization of cellulosic fibers by FTIR Spectroscopy for their further implementation to building materials. Am J Anal Chem 9:303–310. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajac.2018.96023
doi: 10.4236/ajac.2018.96023
Hudzicki J (2009) Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion susceptibility test protocol. Am Soc Microbiol 15(1):1–23
Id AB, Id BT, Raj M et al (2023) Assessment of four in vitro phenotypic biofilm detection methods in relation to antimicrobial resistance in aerobic clinical bacterial isolates. PLoS ONE 18:e0294646. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0294646
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294646
Ivanchenko MV, Indzhykulian AA, Corey DP (2021) Electron Microscopy Techniques for investigating structure and composition of hair-cell Stereociliary bundles. Front Cell Dev Biol 9:744248. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2021.744248
doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.744248
pubmed: 34746139
pmcid: 8569945
Iwase T, Tajima A, Sugimoto S et al (2013) A simple assay for measuring catalase activity: a visual approach. Sci Rep 3:3–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep03081
doi: 10.1038/srep03081
Ji K, Wang W, Zeng B et al (2016) Bacterial cellulose synthesis mechanism of facultative anaerobe Enterobacter sp. FY-07. Sci Rep 6:21863. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep21863
doi: 10.1038/srep21863
pubmed: 26911736
pmcid: 4766428
Khan H, Kadam A, Dutt D (2020) Studies on bacterial cellulose produced by a novel strain of Lactobacillus genus. Carbohydr Polym 229:115513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.115513
doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.115513
pubmed: 31826477
Kovacs (1956) Identification of E.coli by the oxidase reaction. Nature 703:178
Lahiri D, Nag M, Dutta B et al (2021) Bacterial cellulose: production, characterization and application as antimicrobial agent. Int J Mol Sci 22:1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms222312984
doi: 10.3390/ijms222312984
Lischer HEL, Shimizu KK (2017) Reference-guided de novo assembly approach improves genome reconstruction for related species. BMC Bioinformatics 18:474. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-017-1911-6
doi: 10.1186/s12859-017-1911-6
pubmed: 29126390
pmcid: 5681816
Logan BNA, Berkeley RCW (1984) Identification of Bacillus strains using the API system. J Gen Microbiol 130:1871–1882. https://doi.org/10.1099/00221287-130-7-1871
doi: 10.1099/00221287-130-7-1871
pubmed: 6432953
Lu T, Gao H, Liao B et al (2020) Characterization and optimization of production of bacterial cellulose from strain CGMCC 17276 based on whole-genome analysis. Carbohydr Polym 232:115788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.115788
doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.115788
pubmed: 31952596
Lupașcu RE, Ghica MV, Dinu-Pîrvu CE et al (2022) An overview regarding Microbial aspects of production and applications of bacterial cellulose. Mater (Basel) 15:1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15020676
doi: 10.3390/ma15020676
Mahrous AA, El-Tahan AAH, Hafez YH et al (2021) Effect of date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) leaves on productive performance of growing lambs. Trop Anim Health Prod 53:72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-020-02493-2
doi: 10.1007/s11250-020-02493-2
pubmed: 33400015
pmcid: 7785545
Mathur T, Singhal S, Khan S et al (2006) Detection of Biofilm formation among the clinical isolates of Staphylococci: an evaluation of three different screening methods. Indian J Med Microbiol 24:25–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0255-0857(21)02466-x
doi: 10.1016/s0255-0857(21)02466-x
pubmed: 16505551
Matsunami RK, Angelides K, Engler DA (2015) Development and validation of a Rapid 13 C 6 -Glucose isotope dilution UPLC-MRM Mass Spectrometry Method for Use in determining System Accuracy and performance of blood glucose monitoring devices. J Diabetes Sci Technol 9:1051–1060. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932296815586015
doi: 10.1177/1932296815586015
pubmed: 25986627
pmcid: 4667352
Mishra S, Singh PK, Pattnaik R et al (2022) Biochemistry, synthesis, and applications of bacterial cellulose: a review. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 10:1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.780409
doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.780409
Morgan JLW, Mcnamara JT, Zimmer J, Physics B (2014) Mechanism of activation of bacterial cellulose synthase by cyclic-di-GMP. Nat Struct Mol Biol 21:489–496. https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.2803
doi: 10.1038/nsmb.2803
pubmed: 24704788
pmcid: 4013215
Nezhad NG, Rahman RNZRA, Normi YM et al (2023) Isolation, screening and molecular characterization of phytase-producing microorganisms to discover the novel phytase. Biol (Bratisl). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11756-023-01391-w
doi: 10.1007/s11756-023-01391-w
Omadjela O, Narahari A, Strumillo J et al (2013) BcsA and BcsB form the catalytically active core of bacterial cellulose synthase sufficient for in vitro cellulose synthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci 110:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1314063110
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1314063110
Öz YE, Bingül ND, Morçimen ZG et al (2024) Fabrication of porous bone scaffolds using degradable and mouldable bacterial cellulose. Cellulose 31:2921–2935. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-024-05771-6
doi: 10.1007/s10570-024-05771-6
Pham TT, Tran TTA (2023) Evaluation of the crystallinity of bacterial cellulose produced from Pineapple Waste Solution by using Acetobacter Xylinum. ASEAN Eng J 13:81–91. https://doi.org/10.11113/aej.V13.18868
doi: 10.11113/aej.V13.18868
Rajaratanam DD, Ariffin H, Hassan MA et al (2018) In vitro cytotoxicity of superheated steam hydrolyzed oligo((R)-3-hydroxybutyrate-co®3-hydroxyhexanoate) and characteristics of its blend with poly(L-lactic acid) for biomaterial applications. PLoS ONE 13:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199742
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199742
Rastogi A, Banerjee R (2019) Production and characterization of cellulose from Leifsonia Sp. Process Biochem 85:35–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2019.06.008
doi: 10.1016/j.procbio.2019.06.008
Rathinamoorthy R, Kiruba T (2022) Bacterial cellulose-A potential material for sustainable eco-friendly fashion products. J Nat Fibers 19:3275–3287. https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2020.1842841
doi: 10.1080/15440478.2020.1842841
Ratiu IA, Al-suod H, Ligor M et al (2019) Simultaneous determination of Cyclitols and sugars following a Comprehensive Investigation of 40 plants. Food Anal Methods 12:1466–1478. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12161-019-01481-z
Rezvanian M, Mohd Amin MCI, Ng SF (2016) Development and physicochemical characterization of alginate composite film loaded with simvastatin as a potential wound dressing. Carbohydr Polym 137:295–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.10.091
doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.10.091
pubmed: 26686133
Römling U, Galperin MY (2015) Bacterial cellulose biosynthesis: diversity of operons, subunits, products and functions. Physiol Behav 23:545–557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2015.05.005
doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2015.05.005
Rosa SML, Rehman N, De Miranda MIG et al (2012) Chlorine-free extraction of cellulose from rice husk and whisker isolation. Carbohydr Polym 87:1131–1138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.08.084
doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.08.084
Ruan C, Zhu Y, Zhou X et al (2016) Effect of cellulose crystallinity on bacterial cellulose assembly. Cellulose 23:3417–3427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-016-1065-0
doi: 10.1007/s10570-016-1065-0
Rühs PA, Storz F, López Gómez YA et al (2018) 3D bacterial cellulose biofilms formed by foam templating. Npj Biofilms Microbiomes 4:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41522-018-0064-3
doi: 10.1038/s41522-018-0064-3
Saitou N, Nei M (1987) The neighbor-joining method: a New Method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4:406–425. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040454
doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040454
pubmed: 3447015
Saleh AK, El-Gendi H, Soliman NA et al (2022) Bioprocess development for bacterial cellulose biosynthesis by novel lactiplantibacillus plantarum isolate along with characterization and antimicrobial assessment of fabricated membrane. Sci Rep 12:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-06117-7
doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-06117-7
Sasidharan S, Tey LH, Djearamane S et al (2024) Development of novel biofilm using Musa acuminata (waste banana leaves) mediated biogenic zinc oxide nanoparticles reinforced with chitosan blend. J King Saud Univ - Sci 36:103080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksus.2023.103080
doi: 10.1016/j.jksus.2023.103080
Saxena IM, Kudlicka K, Okuda K, Brown RM (1994) Characterization of genes in the cellulose-synthesizing Operon (acs Operon) of Acetobacter xylinum: implications for cellulose crystallization. J Bacteriol 176:5735–5752
doi: 10.1128/jb.176.18.5735-5752.1994
pubmed: 8083166
pmcid: 196778
Seto A, Saito Y, Matsushige M (2006) Effective cellulose production by a coculture of Gluconacetobacter xylinus and Lactobacillus mali. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 73:915–921. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-006-0515-2
doi: 10.1007/s00253-006-0515-2
pubmed: 17093989
Shi L, de Souza TSP, Ahmadi F et al (2023) Valorization of date fruit (Phoenix dactylifera L.) Processing Waste and By-Products: a review. Appl Sci 13:12315. https://doi.org/10.3390/app132212315
doi: 10.3390/app132212315
Souza EF, Furtado MR, Carvalho CWP, Gottshalk LMF (2019) Production and characterization of Gluconacetobacter xylinus bacterial cellulose using cashew apple juice and soybean molasses. Int J Biol Macromol 146:285–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.12.180
doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.12.180
pubmed: 31883899
Sulaiman AM, Hussein SA, Husain VI (2023) Detection of Antibiotic Resistance genes (CTX-M, Van A and Van B) of Enterococcus faecalis isolated from children with bacteremia by RT-PCR. Arch Razi Inst 78:73–77. https://doi.org/10.22092/ARI.2022.359148.2380
doi: 10.22092/ARI.2022.359148.2380
pubmed: 37312703
pmcid: 10258284
Sun XF, Sun RC, Su Y, Sun JX (2004) Comparative study of crude and purified cellulose from wheat Straw. J Agric Food Chem 52:839–847. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf0349230
doi: 10.1021/jf0349230
pubmed: 14969539
Tamura K, Nei M, Kumar S (2004) Prospects for inferring very large phylogenies by using the neighbor-joining method. Proc Natl Acad Sci 101:11030–11035. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0404206101
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0404206101
pubmed: 15258291
pmcid: 491989
Tamura K, Stecher G, Kumar S (2021) MEGA11: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 11. Mol Biol Evol 38:3022–3027. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msab120
doi: 10.1093/molbev/msab120
pubmed: 33892491
pmcid: 8233496
Tan L, He Y, Li S et al (2024) Proximate composition and nutritional analysis of selected bananas cultivated in Hainan, China. J Food Compos Anal 125:87–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2023.105798
doi: 10.1016/j.jfca.2023.105798
Tanskul S, Amornthatree K, Jaturonlak N (2013) A new cellulose-producing bacterium, Rhodococcus sp. MI 2: screening and optimization of culture conditions. Carbohydr Polym 92:421–428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.09.017
doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.09.017
pubmed: 23218315
Thongwai N, Futui W, Ladpala N et al (2022) Characterization of bacterial cellulose produced by Komagataeibacter maltaceti P285 isolated from contaminated Honey Wine. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10030528 . Microorganisms 10:
Tischler AH, Vanek ME, Peterson N, Visick KL (2021) Calcium-responsive Diguanylate Cyclase CasA drives cellulose- dependent biofilm formation and inhibits motility in Vibrio fischeri. Am Soc Microbiol 12:1–18
Tollu G, Ekin IH (2020) Biotyping and Antimicrobial susceptibility of Enterococcus faecalis and E. faecium isolated from urine and stool samples. Jundishapur J Microbiol 13:e105136. https://doi.org/10.5812/jjm.105136
doi: 10.5812/jjm.105136
Tomé LC, Pinto RJB, Trovatti E et al (2011) Transparent bionanocomposites with improved properties prepared from acetylated bacterial cellulose and poly(lactic acid) through a simple approach. Green Chem 13:419–427. https://doi.org/10.1039/c0gc00545b
doi: 10.1039/c0gc00545b
Tseng YS, Patel AK, Chen CW, Dong C Di (2023) Improved production of bacterial cellulose by Komagataeibacter europaeus employing fruit extract as carbon source. J Food Sci Technol 60:1054–1064. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-022-05451-y
doi: 10.1007/s13197-022-05451-y
pubmed: 36908337
Ullah H, Santos HA, Khan T (2016) Applications of bacterial cellulose in food, cosmetics and drug delivery. Cellulose 23:2291–2314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-016-0986-y
doi: 10.1007/s10570-016-0986-y
Velmurugan P, Myung H, Govarthanan M et al (2015) Production and characterization of bacterial cellulose by Leifsonia sp. CBNU-EW3 isolated from the earthworm, Eisenia fetida. 416:410–416. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12257-014-0793-y
Volova TG, Prudnikova SV, Sukovatyi AG, Shishatskaya EI (2018) Production and properties of bacterial cellulose by the strain komagataeibacter xylinus B-12068. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 102:7417–7428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-018-9198-8
doi: 10.1007/s00253-018-9198-8
pubmed: 29982923
Wilcks A, Andersen SR, Licht TR (2005) Characterization of transferable tetracycline resistance genes in Enterococcus faecalis isolated from raw food. FEMS Microbiol Lett 243:15–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.femsle.2004.11.028
doi: 10.1016/j.femsle.2004.11.028
pubmed: 15667995
Wong HC, Fear AL, Calhoont RD et al (1990) Genetic organization of the cellulose synthase operon in Acetobacter Xylinum. Proc Natl Acad Sci 87:8130–8134. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.87.20.8130
doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.20.8130
pubmed: 2146681
pmcid: 54906
Xu G, Zhou L, Qian G, Liu F (2022) Diguanylate Cyclase and Phosphodiesterase interact to maintain the specificity of cyclic di-GMP Signaling in the regulation of antibiotic synthesis in Lysobacter enzymogenes. Appl Environ Microbiol 88:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01895-21
doi: 10.1128/AEM.01895-21
Yadav S, Dubey SK (2018) Cellulose degradation potential of Paenibacillus lautus strain BHU3 and its whole genome sequence. Bioresour Technol 262:124–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.04.067
doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.04.067
pubmed: 29702421
Zhang Y, Chen Y, Cao G et al (2021) Bacterial cellulose production from terylene ammonia hydrolysate by Taonella mepensis WT-6. Int J Biol Macromol 166:251–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.10.172
doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.10.172
pubmed: 33122073
Zhong C (2020) Industrial-Scale production and applications of bacterial cellulose. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 8:1–19. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.605374
doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.605374