Exploration of the barriers and facilitators influencing use of telehealth for orthotic/prosthetic services in the United States of America: An orthotist/prosthetists perspective.


Journal

PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2024
Historique:
received: 24 10 2023
accepted: 07 08 2024
medline: 25 10 2024
pubmed: 25 10 2024
entrez: 24 10 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Innovative models of healthcare, such as telehealth, are required to meet the growing demand for orthotic/prosthetic (O&P) services. While O&P users report being very satisfied with telehealth, many clinical facilities have reverted to in-person modes of care as COVID-19 restrictions have eased. As such, there is a disconnect between benefits of telehealth to O&P users, and the clinical services being delivered in-person. The aim of this study was to explore the orthotist/prosthetist's perspective of the barriers and facilitators influencing use of telehealth in the United States of America (USA). O&P practitioners were recruited from across the USA. In-depth, semi-structured interviews were used to document practitioner demographics, the services being provided using telehealth, and practitioners' perspective of the barriers and facilitators influencing use of telehealth. Data describing participant demographics and services were summarised. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using thematic analysis. 30 practitioners from across the USA participated. Telehealth was used to deliver a range of O&P services including: initial evaluations, routine follow-ups, and delivery of a device in rare circumstances. Barriers to using telehealth included: poor phone/internet connection and lack of access to technology. Facilitators to using telehealth included: a patient-focussed attitude, and recognition of the benefit of telehealth. Telehealth is being used across the entire spectrum of O&P care. Once the significant barriers were resolved, like access to reliable internet/phone reception, telehealth was feasible. An outstanding telehealth experience was facilitated by practitioners who focused on the benefits that telehealth can provide (not the limitations), as well as giving O&P users agency over the choice to use telehealth. There are opportunities to improve access to safe and effective O&P telehealth services by adopting a right-touch approach to practitioner regulation, and advocating for reimbursement that supports better systems and procedures within clinical facilities.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39446742
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309194
pii: PONE-D-23-34260
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e0309194

Informations de copyright

Copyright: © 2024 Dillon et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors report there are no competing interests to declare.

Auteurs

Michael Dillon (M)

Department of Physiotherapy, Podiatry, Prosthetics and Orthotics, School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, Health Sciences, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Emily Ridgewell (E)

Department of Physiotherapy, Podiatry, Prosthetics and Orthotics, School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, Health Sciences, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Leigh Clarke (L)

Department of Physiotherapy, Podiatry, Prosthetics and Orthotics, School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, Health Sciences, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Katie Bishop (K)

Department of Physiotherapy, Podiatry, Prosthetics and Orthotics, School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, Health Sciences, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Saravana Kumar (S)

IIMPACT in Health, Allied Health & Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH