On the Role of the Glycosylation of Type I Collagen in Bone.

Glycan-protein interactions play a crucial role in biology, providing additional functions capable of inducing biochemical and cellular responses. In the extracellular matrix of bone, this type of interactions is ubiquitous. During the synthesis of the collagen molecule, glycans are post-translationally added to specific lysine residues through an enzymatically catalysed hydroxylation and subsequent glycosylation. During and after fibril assembly, proteoglycans are essential for maintaining tissue structure, porosity, and integrity. Glycosaminoglycans (GAGs), the carbohydrate chains attached to interstitial proteoglycans, are known to be involved in mineralization. They can attract and retain water, which is critical for the mechanical properties of bone. In addition, like other long-lived proteins, collagen is susceptible to glycation. Prolonged exposure of the amine group to glucose eventually leads to the formation of advanced glycation end-products (AGEs). Changes in the degree of glycosylation and glycation have been identified in bone pathologies such as osteogenesis imperfecta and diabetes and appear to be associated with a reduction in bone quality. However, how these changes affect mineralisation is not well understood. Based on the literature review, we hypothesize that the covalently attached carbohydrates may have a water-attracting function similar to that of GAGs, but at different lengths and timescales in the bone formation process. Glycosylation potentially increases the hydration around the collagen triple helix, leading to increased mineralization (hypermineralization) after water has been replaced by mineral. Meanwhile, glycation leads to the formation of crosslinking AGEs, which are associated with a decrease in hydration levels, reducing the mechanical properties of bone.

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.