Comparison of the long-term efficacy of ROI-C and conventional cage-plate in treatment of spinal cord injury without fracture or dislocation: a retrospective study.
ACDF
Conventional cage-plate (CCP)
ROI-C
Spinal cord injury without fracture or dislocation (SCIWFD)
Journal
BMC musculoskeletal disorders
ISSN: 1471-2474
Titre abrégé: BMC Musculoskelet Disord
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968565
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
25 Oct 2024
25 Oct 2024
Historique:
received:
15
03
2024
accepted:
21
10
2024
medline:
25
10
2024
pubmed:
25
10
2024
entrez:
25
10
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The self-locking cage (ROI-C, LDR, Troyes, France) has been clinically applied in the treatment of cervical degenerative disc disease (CDDD). However, only a few long-term clinical and radiographic studies have been conducted on the treatment of spinal cord injury without fracture or dislocation (SCIWFD) so far. A comparison between ACDF with either ROI-C or CCP was performed to determine the better treatment for SCIWFD. A total of 83 patients who underwent ACDF using either ROI-C or CCP were reviewed for radiological and clinical outcomes. The cohort comprised 60 males and 23 females, aged between 32 and 88 years old, with an average age of 58.23 years. All patients exhibited symptoms of nerve injury, including limb numbness, muscle weakness, hypoesthesia or urinary dysfunction. The preoperative ASIA classification of spinal nerve function: 7 cases of grade A, 23 cases of grade B, 34 cases of grade C and 19 cases of grade D were included in the study. A total of 48 patients underwent ACDF with ROI-C, while 35 patients received a conventional cage-plate. They were studied with a follow-up of 28.63 ± 17.41 months and 29.48 ± 15.43 months respectively. No significant difference was found in blood loss, JOA and ASIA between the two groups. No significant difference was found in cervical lordosis (CL) (P > 0.05). However, statistical difference was found in disc height of fused segment and T1 slope between the two groups (P < 0.05). No statistical difference was in the incidence of cage subsidence (P > 0.05). There was significant difference in the incidence of dysphagia. Both of two groups achieved bony fusion at final follow-up. Our study demonstrated that ROI-C has the same efficacy as CCP in improving the cervical stability in treatment of SCIWFD. The migration of cage didn't occur in ROI-C group at final follow-up, showing steadily fixed in cervical column. Moreover, the ROI-C does have the advantages of good therapeutic effect, mis-invasive, shorter operation time and fewer complications.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The self-locking cage (ROI-C, LDR, Troyes, France) has been clinically applied in the treatment of cervical degenerative disc disease (CDDD). However, only a few long-term clinical and radiographic studies have been conducted on the treatment of spinal cord injury without fracture or dislocation (SCIWFD) so far. A comparison between ACDF with either ROI-C or CCP was performed to determine the better treatment for SCIWFD.
METHODS
METHODS
A total of 83 patients who underwent ACDF using either ROI-C or CCP were reviewed for radiological and clinical outcomes. The cohort comprised 60 males and 23 females, aged between 32 and 88 years old, with an average age of 58.23 years. All patients exhibited symptoms of nerve injury, including limb numbness, muscle weakness, hypoesthesia or urinary dysfunction. The preoperative ASIA classification of spinal nerve function: 7 cases of grade A, 23 cases of grade B, 34 cases of grade C and 19 cases of grade D were included in the study.
RESULTS
RESULTS
A total of 48 patients underwent ACDF with ROI-C, while 35 patients received a conventional cage-plate. They were studied with a follow-up of 28.63 ± 17.41 months and 29.48 ± 15.43 months respectively. No significant difference was found in blood loss, JOA and ASIA between the two groups. No significant difference was found in cervical lordosis (CL) (P > 0.05). However, statistical difference was found in disc height of fused segment and T1 slope between the two groups (P < 0.05). No statistical difference was in the incidence of cage subsidence (P > 0.05). There was significant difference in the incidence of dysphagia. Both of two groups achieved bony fusion at final follow-up.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Our study demonstrated that ROI-C has the same efficacy as CCP in improving the cervical stability in treatment of SCIWFD. The migration of cage didn't occur in ROI-C group at final follow-up, showing steadily fixed in cervical column. Moreover, the ROI-C does have the advantages of good therapeutic effect, mis-invasive, shorter operation time and fewer complications.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39448926
doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07985-y
pii: 10.1186/s12891-024-07985-y
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Comparative Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
848Subventions
Organisme : the Project of Suzhou Science and Technology Development Plan (Medical and Health Science and Technology Innovation)
ID : SKJY2021018
Organisme : the Project of Suzhou Science and Technology Development Plan (Medical and Health Science and Technology Innovation)
ID : SKJYD2021060
Organisme : the Project of Wuzhong District Science and Technology
ID : WZYW2021007
Organisme : the Project of National Orthopedics and Sports Rehabilitation Research Center Innovation Fund
ID : 2021-NCRC-CXJJ-PY-03
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Lambrechts MJ, Brush PL, Lee Y, et al. Patient reported outcomes following anterior and posterior Surgical approaches for Multilevel Cervical Myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2023;48(8):526–33.
doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004586
pubmed: 36716386
Babici D, Johansen PM, Miller TD, et al. Five-Level Anterior Cerv Discectomy Fusion Cureus. 2021;13(11):e19961.
Leng X, Zhang Y, Wang G, et al. An enhanced recovery after surgery pathway: LOS reduction, rapid discharge and minimal complications after anterior cervical spine surgery. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022;23(1):252.
doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05185-0
pubmed: 35292011
pmcid: 8925186
Zavras AG, Nolte MT, Sayari AJ, et al. Stand-alone cage Versus Anterior plating for 1-Level and 2-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: a Randomized Controlled Trial. Clin Spine Surg. 2022;35(4):155–65.
doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001332
pubmed: 35394961
Li C, He Q, Zhu Y, et al. Is the anterior cervical dynamic plate fixation better than the anterior static plate fixation: a retrospective review with over 5 years follow-up. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023;24(1):37.
doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-06156-9
pubmed: 36650488
pmcid: 9847137
Niu J, Song D, Liu Y, et al. Revision surgery for symptomatic adjacent segment disc degeneration after initial Anterior Cervical Fusion: is ROI-C better than plate-cage construct? Biomed Res Int. 2021;2021:6597754.
doi: 10.1155/2021/6597754
pubmed: 34970626
pmcid: 8714349
Eseonu K, Laurent E, Bishi H, et al. A retrospective comparative study of long-term outcomes following cervical total disc replacement Versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion. Cureus. 2022;14(12):e32399.
pubmed: 36636537
pmcid: 9831620
Maccormick AP, Sharma H. Analysis of the variables affecting the incidence, location, and severity of cage subsidence following anterior cervical discectomy and Fusion Operation. Int J Spine Surg. 2020;14(6):896–900.
doi: 10.14444/7137
pubmed: 33560248
Qi M, Xu C, Liu Y, et al. Comparison of clinical outcomes between cervical disc arthroplasty and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for the treatment of single-level cervical spondylosis: a 10-year follow-up study. Spine J. 2023;23(3):361–8.
doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.11.013
pubmed: 36481680
Sharma JK, Rustagi T, Marathe N, et al. Clinico-Radiological outcome of single-level and hybrid total disc replacement with Spineart Baguera
doi: 10.4103/ajns.AJNS_288_20
pubmed: 33708654
pmcid: 7869274
Iampreechakul P, Choochaimangkhala P, Tirakotai W, et al. Zero-Profile Anchored Spacer (ROI-C) in the treatment of cervical adjacent segment disease. Asian J Neurosurg. 2022;17(2):209–17.
doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1750837
pubmed: 36120612
pmcid: 9473862
Xiong Y, Yang YD, Yu X, et al. Comparison of 2-year follow-up results of the hybrid surgery using Mobi-C combined with ROI-C and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for the treatment of contiguous two-level cervical degenerative disc diseases. J Clin Neurosci. 2020;73:42–7.
doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2020.01.090
pubmed: 32029368
Li H, Jiang C. Multivariate analysis of the operative effect on cervical spinal cord injury without fracture or dislocation. Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2020;33(2):158–65.
pubmed: 32133817
Wei Z, Zhang Y, Yang S, et al. Retrospective analysis of Sagittal Balance Parameters and clinical efficacy after short-segment anterior cervical spine surgery with different Fusion devices. Int J Gen Med. 2022;15:3237–46.
doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S340877
pubmed: 35345776
pmcid: 8957297
Wei L, Xu C, Dong M, et al. Application of a new integrated low-profile anterior plate and cage system in single-level cervical spondylosis: a preliminary retrospective study. J Orthop Surg Res. 2022;17(1):26.
doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-02917-9
pubmed: 35033153
pmcid: 8760824
Wang H, Huang K, Liu H, et al. Is cervical disc replacement Valuable in 3-Level hybrid surgery compared with 3-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion? World Neurosurg. 2021;146:e151–60.
doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.10.057
pubmed: 33075576
Salari N, Konz G, Ferry C, et al. Anterior cervical discectomy and Fusion with a No-Profile Integrated fixation allograft device: an in Vitro Biomechanical Analysis and Clinical Case Series. Int J Spine Surg. 2022;16(2):247–55.
doi: 10.14444/8224
pubmed: 35444033
pmcid: 9930650
Song D, Deng Z, Feng T, et al. The clinical efficacy of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with ROI-C device vs. plate-cage in managing traumatic central cord syndrome. Front Surg. 2023;9:1055317.
doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1055317
pubmed: 36684339
pmcid: 9852637
Mazmudar A, Paziuk T, Mangan J, et al. Evaluating the effect of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease on postoperative Dysphagia following anterior cervical spine Surgery-A prospective, Multicenter Study. Global Spine J. 2023;21925682231151645. https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682231151645 .
Molfenter SM, Amin MR, Balou M, et al. A scoping review of the methods used to capture dysphagia after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: the need for a paradigm shift. Eur Spine J. 2023;32(3):969–76.
doi: 10.1007/s00586-022-07515-1
pubmed: 36625955
Guo Z, Wu X, Yang S, et al. Anterior cervical discectomy and Fusion using Zero-P system for treatment of cervical spondylosis: a Meta-analysis. Pain Res Manag. 2021;2021:3960553.
doi: 10.1155/2021/3960553
pubmed: 34956433
pmcid: 8702348
He S, Zhou Z, Shao X, et al. Comparing the Bridge-Type Zero-Profile Anchored Spacer (ROI-C) Interbody Fusion Cage System and Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) with plating and cage system in cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Orthop Surg. 2022;14(6):1100–8.
doi: 10.1111/os.13268
pubmed: 35478487
pmcid: 9163982