Clinical performance of polyethylenefiber reinforced resin composite restorations in endodontically treated teeth: (a randomized controlled clinical trial).
Bulk fill composite
Class II cavities
Clinical trial that is controlled and randomized
Fiber reinforced composite
Polyethylene fibers
Ribbond
Teeth that have undergone endodontic treatment
Journal
BMC oral health
ISSN: 1472-6831
Titre abrégé: BMC Oral Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088684
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
24 Oct 2024
24 Oct 2024
Historique:
received:
22
07
2024
accepted:
03
10
2024
medline:
25
10
2024
pubmed:
25
10
2024
entrez:
25
10
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of polyethylene fiber reinforced resin composite fillings compared to bulk fill resin composite fillings in endodontically treated teeth over a two-year monitoring period. A total of 240 individuals with endodontically treated lower molars and a moderate amount of tooth structure were divided into two equal groups of 120 each. One group received polyethylene fiber reinforced bulk fill resin composite restorations while the other group received only bulk fill resin composite restorations, both applied as per manufacturer guidelines. Two proficient experienced blinded assessors assessed the restorations using modified USPHS criteria at baseline, 6, 12, and 24 months. Data analysis involved the utilization of Mann-Whitney U, Friedman's test, and Nemenyi post hoc test, with age data being displayed as mean and standard deviation. The significance level was established as p < 0.05, and R software was utilized for statistical analysis. There were no notable distinctions in any parameters or scores between the intervention and comparator groups at various time points. Alpha scores were present for retention, gross fracture, and secondary caries at all follow up intervals. Both direct resin composite restorations reinforced with polyethylene fibers and direct bulk fill resin composite restorations placed in endodontically treated molars with moderate remaining tooth structure demonstrated satisfactory clinical outcomes during a 24-month follow-up period. Bulk fill resin composites directly placed in endodontically treated molars with moderate remaining tooth structure showed promise as a treatment option over a two-year period. (06-01-2022) on https://ClinicalTrials.gov with the ID (NCT05180903).
Identifiants
pubmed: 39448991
doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-05009-8
pii: 10.1186/s12903-024-05009-8
doi:
Substances chimiques
Composite Resins
0
Polyethylene
9002-88-4
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT05180903']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1285Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Selvaraj H, Krithikadatta J, Shrivastava D, Onazi MA, Algarni HA, Munaga S, Hamza MO, saad Al-fridy T, Teja KV, Janani K, Alam MK. Systematic review fracture resistance of endodontically treated posterior teeth restored with fiber reinforced composites-a systematic review. BMC Oral Health. 2023;23(1):566.
doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03217-2
pubmed: 37574536
pmcid: 10423428
Kimble P, Stuhr S, McDonald N, Venugopalan A, Campos MS, Cavalcanti B. Decision making in the restoration of endodontically treated Teeth: Effect of Biomimetic Dentistry Training. Dentistry J. 2023;11(7):159.
doi: 10.3390/dj11070159
Ray HA, Trope M. Periapical status of endodontically treated teeth in relation to the technical quality of the root filling and the coronal restoration. Int Endod J. 1995;28(1):12–8.
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.1995.tb00150.x
pubmed: 7642323
Garoushi S, Gargoum A, Vallittu PK, Lassila L. Short fiber-reinforced composite restorations: a review of the current literature. J Invest Clin Dent. 2018;9(3):e12330.
doi: 10.1111/jicd.12330
Valizadeh S, Ranjbar Omrani L, Deliperi S, Sadeghi Mahounak F. Restoration of a nonvital tooth with fiber reinforce composite (wallpapering technique). Case reports in dentistry. 2020;2020.
Ozsevik AS, Yildirim C, Aydin U, Culha E, Surmelioglu D. Effect of fibre-reinforced composite on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth. Australian Endodontic J. 2016;42(2):82–7.
doi: 10.1111/aej.12136
Scribante A, Vallittu PK, Özcan M. Fiber-reinforced composites for dental applications. BioMed Research International. 2018;2018.
Deliperi S, Alleman D, Rudo D. Stress-reduced direct composites for the restoration of structurally compromised teeth: Fiber design according to the wallpapering technique. Oper Dent. 2017;42(3):233–43.
doi: 10.2341/15-289-T
pubmed: 28467261
Shah EH, Shetty P, Aggarwal S, Sawant S, Shinde R, Bhol R. Effect of fibre-reinforced composite as a post-obturation restorative material on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth: a systematic review. Saudi Dent J. 2021;33(7):363–9.
doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2021.07.006
pubmed: 34803275
pmcid: 8589613
Kandil SA, Farid MR, Ibrahim SH. Clinical fracture of Fiber Reinforced Resin Composite Versus Conventional Resin Composite restorations in Endodontically treated molars: a Randomized Clinical Trial. Indian J Public Health Res Dev. 2021;12(2):332–9.
doi: 10.37506/ijphrd.v12i2.14141
Karaman E, Keskin B, Inan U. Three-year clinical evaluation of class II posterior composite restorations placed with different techniques and flowable composite linings in endodontically treated teeth. Clin Oral Invest. 2017;21:709–16.
doi: 10.1007/s00784-016-1940-y
ElAziz RH, Mohammed MM, Gomaa HA. Clinical performance of short-fiber-reinforced resin composite restorations vs resin composite onlay restorations in complex cavities of molars (randomized clinical trial). J Contemp Dent Pract. 2020;21(3):296–303.
doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2785
pubmed: 32434978
Polesel A. Restoration of the endodontically treated posterior tooth. Giornale Italiano Di Endodonzia. 2014;28(1):2–16.
doi: 10.1016/j.gien.2014.05.007
Soares CJ, Rodrigues MD, Faria-e-Silva AL, Santos-Filho PC, Veríssimo C, Kim HC, Versluis A. How biomechanics can affect the endodontic treated teeth and their restorative procedures? Brazilian oral Res. 2018;32:e76.
doi: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2018.vol32.0076
Belli S, Eraslan O, Eskitascioglu G. Direct restoration of endodontically treated teeth: a brief summary of materials and techniques. Curr Oral Health Rep. 2015;2:182–9.
doi: 10.1007/s40496-015-0068-5
Rocca GT, Rizcalla N, Krejci I. Fiber-reinforced resin coating for endocrown preparations: a technical report. Operative dentistry. 2013;38(3):242-8.
Magne P, Carvalho AO, Bruzi G, Anderson RE, Maia HP, Giannini M. Influence of no-ferrule and no-post buildup design on the fatigue resistance of endodontically treated molars restored with resin nanoceramic CAD/CAM crowns. Oper Dent. 2014;39(6):595–602.
doi: 10.2341/13-004-L
pubmed: 25084102
Ramírez-Sebastià A, Bortolotto T, Cattani-Lorente M, Giner L, Roig M, Krejci I. Adhesive restoration of anterior endodontically treated teeth: influence of post length on fracture strength. Clin Oral Invest. 2014;18:545–54.
doi: 10.1007/s00784-013-0978-3
Suksaphar W, Banomyong D, Jirathanyanatt T, Ngoenwiwatkul Y. Survival rates against fracture of endodontically treated posterior teeth restored with full-coverage crowns or resin composite restorations: a systematic review. Restor Dentistry Endodontics. 2017;42(3):157.
doi: 10.5395/rde.2017.42.3.157
Kama JC. Conservative treatment of cracked tooth syndrome using Ribbond fibre-reinforced composite resin. Dent Prod Rep. 2000 Sep:48 – 9.
Belli S, Eskitascioglu GÜ. Biomechanical properties and clinical use of a polyethylene fibre post-core material. Int Dentistry South Afr. 2006;8(3):20–6.
Sadan A. Biomechanical considerations for the restoration of endodontically treated teeth: a systematic review of the literature—part 1. Composition and micro-and macrostructure alterations. Quintessence Int. 2007;38(9):733–43.
pubmed: 17873980
Nagasiri R, Chitmongkolsuk S. Long-term survival of endodontically treated molars without crown coverage: a retrospective cohort study. J Prosthet Dent. 2005;93(2):164–70.
doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.11.001
pubmed: 15674228
Hamburger JT, Opdam NJ, Bronkhorst EM, Roeters JJ, Huysmans MC. Effect of thickness of bonded composite resin on compressive strength. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2014;37:42–7.
doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2014.05.008
pubmed: 24880567
Ayna B, Celenk S, Atakul F, Uysal E. Three-year clinical evaluation of endodontically treated anterior teeth restored with a polyethylene fibre-reinforced composite. Aust Dent J. 2009;54(2):136–40.
doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2009.01106.x
pubmed: 19473155
Torres CR, Mailart MC, Rocha RS, Sellan PL, Contreras SC, Di Nicoló R, Borges AB. The influence of a liner on deep bulk-fill restorations: randomized clinical trial. J Dent. 2020;102:103454.
doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2020.103454
pubmed: 32835711
Gianordoli-Neto R, Padovani GC, Mondelli J, de Lima Navarro MF, Mendonça JS, Santiago SL. Two-year clinical evaluation of resin composite in posterior teeth: a randomized controlled study. J Conservative Dentistry Endodontics. 2016;19(4):306–10.
doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.186446
Santos MH, Santos LR, Alves LN, Moura HS, Carvalho MM, Lins RB. Do bulk-fill Resin composites Present more susceptibility to marginal degradation in different clinical scenarios? A systematic review and Meta-analysis. Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria E Clínica Integrada. 2022;22:e210145.
doi: 10.1590/pboci.2022.055
Loguercio AD, Rezende M, Gutierrez MF, Costa TF, Armas-Vega A, Reis A. Randomized 36-month follow-up of posterior bulk-filled resin composite restorations. J Dent. 2019;85:93–102.
doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2019.05.018
pubmed: 31100332
Nedeljkovic I, Teughels W, De Munck J, Van Meerbeek B, Van Landuyt KL. Is secondary caries with composites a material-based problem? Dent Mater. 2015;31(11):e247–77.
doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2015.09.001
pubmed: 26410151
Jokstad A. Secondary caries and microleakage. Dent Mater. 2016;32(1):11–25.
doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2015.09.006
pubmed: 26423008