The effect of different treatment protocols on shear bond strength in resin composite restoration repair.
Composite Resins
/ chemistry
Shear Strength
Dental Restoration Repair
/ methods
Dental Bonding
/ methods
Surface Properties
Lasers, Solid-State
/ therapeutic use
Dental Stress Analysis
Humans
Materials Testing
Acid Etching, Dental
/ methods
Microscopy, Electron, Scanning
Dental Restoration, Permanent
/ methods
Dental Etching
/ methods
Dental Materials
/ chemistry
Adhesives
Composite resins
Lasers
Shear strength
Journal
BMC oral health
ISSN: 1472-6831
Titre abrégé: BMC Oral Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088684
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
24 Oct 2024
24 Oct 2024
Historique:
received:
16
05
2024
accepted:
16
09
2024
medline:
25
10
2024
pubmed:
25
10
2024
entrez:
25
10
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
It was aimed to investigate the effect of sandblasting and laser surface treatment on shear bond strength in composite restoration repair in vitro. A micro-hybrid composite (Filtek Z250, 3 M-ESPE, USA) was used to prepare 120 samples. The samples were subjected to a thermal cycle test 5,000 times between 5 and 55 The highest mean shear bond strength values were obtained from the samples sandblasted with CoJet, followed by Er, Cr: YSGG laser, and the control group. It was determined that there was a significant difference between the mean shear bond strength values obtained from the control group and the other surface treatment groups (p < 0.05). In general, significantly higher mean shear bond strength values were obtained when the universal adhesive was applied in total-etch mode compared to the application in self-etch mode (p < 0.05). Additionally, it was determined that higher shear bond strength values were obtained with Filtek Ultimate compared to Filtek Z250 (p < 0.05). Within the limitations of this study, it can be concluded that the use of universal adhesive in total-etch mode, in addition to surface treatments on the resin composite surface in the repair protocol and the use of nano-filled resin composite as repair material can increase the mean shear bond values in repair.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
It was aimed to investigate the effect of sandblasting and laser surface treatment on shear bond strength in composite restoration repair in vitro.
METHODS
METHODS
A micro-hybrid composite (Filtek Z250, 3 M-ESPE, USA) was used to prepare 120 samples. The samples were subjected to a thermal cycle test 5,000 times between 5 and 55
RESULTS
RESULTS
The highest mean shear bond strength values were obtained from the samples sandblasted with CoJet, followed by Er, Cr: YSGG laser, and the control group. It was determined that there was a significant difference between the mean shear bond strength values obtained from the control group and the other surface treatment groups (p < 0.05). In general, significantly higher mean shear bond strength values were obtained when the universal adhesive was applied in total-etch mode compared to the application in self-etch mode (p < 0.05). Additionally, it was determined that higher shear bond strength values were obtained with Filtek Ultimate compared to Filtek Z250 (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Within the limitations of this study, it can be concluded that the use of universal adhesive in total-etch mode, in addition to surface treatments on the resin composite surface in the repair protocol and the use of nano-filled resin composite as repair material can increase the mean shear bond values in repair.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39449150
doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04918-y
pii: 10.1186/s12903-024-04918-y
doi:
Substances chimiques
Composite Resins
0
Filtek Z250
0
Dental Materials
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1279Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Mammadlı N. Minimally invasive treatment approaches in Pediatric Dentistry, HEALTH & SCIENCE 2022: Odontology-II, Assist Prof. Istanbul: Aycan DAL DÖNERTAŞ, Editor, Efe Academy; 2022. pp. 163–70.
De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Peumans M. A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: methods and results. J Dent Res. 2005;84:118–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910508400204 .
doi: 10.1177/154405910508400204
pubmed: 15668328
Demarco FF, Corrêa MB, Cenci MS, Moraes RR, Opdam NJ. Longevity of posterior composite restorations: not only a matter of materials. Dent Mater. 2012;28:87–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2011.09.003 .
doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2011.09.003
pubmed: 22192253
Hickel R, Brüshaver K, Ilie N. Repair of restorations criteria for decision making and clinical recommendations. Dent Mater. 2013;29:28–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2012.07.006 .
doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2012.07.006
pubmed: 22867859
Fernández E, Martín J, Vildósola P, Oliveira Junior OB, Gordan V, Mjor I, Bersezio C, Estay J, de Andrade MF, Moncada G. Can repair increase the longevity of composite resins? Results of a 10-year clinical trial. J Dent. 2015;43:279–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2014.05.015 .
doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2014.05.015
pubmed: 24907560
Moncada G, Vildósola P, Fernández E, Estay J, de Oliveira Júnior OB, De Andrade MF, Gordan VV. Longitudinal results of a 10-year clinical trial of repair of amalgam restorations. Oper Dent. 2015;40:34–43. https://doi.org/10.2341/14-045-C .
doi: 10.2341/14-045-C
pubmed: 25100406
Frankenberger R, Krämer N, Ebert J, Lohbauer U, Käppel S, ten Weges S, Petschelt A. Fatigue behavior of the resin-resin bond of partially replaced resin-based composite restorations. Am J Dent. 2003;16:17–22.
pubmed: 12744407
Fawzy AS, El-Askary FS, Amer MA. Effect of surface treatments on the tensile bond strength of repaired water-aged anterior restorative micro-fine hybrid resin composite. J Dent. 2008;36:969–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2008.07.014 .
doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2008.07.014
pubmed: 18842330
Özcan M, Corazza PH, Marocho SM, Barbosa SH, Bottino MA. Repair bond strength of microhybrid, nanohybrid and nanofilled resin composites: effect of substrate resin type, surface conditioning and ageing. Clin Oral Investig. 2013;17:1751–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-012-0863-5 .
doi: 10.1007/s00784-012-0863-5
pubmed: 23081754
Kim SH, Lee YK, Lim BS. Influence of porcine liver esterase on the color of dental resin composites by CIEDE2000 system. J Biomed Mat Res. 2005;72:276–83. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.30141 .
doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.30141
Baena E, Vignolo V, Fuentes MVF, Ceballos L. Influence of repair procedure on composite to composite microtensile bond strength. Am J Dent. 2005;28:255–60.
Stawarczyk B, Krawczuk A, Ilie N. Tensile bond strength of resin com- posite repair in vitro using different surface preparation conditionings to an aged CAD/CAM resin nanoceramic. Clin Oral Inves. 2015;19:299–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-014-1269-3 .
doi: 10.1007/s00784-014-1269-3
Uğurlu M, Sari F. The clinical success of repaired posterior composite restorations with and without silane application. Clin Oral Inves. 2022;26:5785–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-022-04535-5 .
doi: 10.1007/s00784-022-04535-5
Yoshida Y, Van Meerbeek B, Nakayama Y, Snauwaert J, Hellemans L, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G, Wakasa K. Evidence of chemical bonding at biomaterial-hard tissue interfaces. J Dent Res. 2000;79:709–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345000790020301 .
doi: 10.1177/00220345000790020301
pubmed: 10728971
Van Landuyt KL, Snauwaert J, Peumans M, De Munck J, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. The role of HEMA in one-step self-etch adhesives. Dent Mater. 2008;24:1412–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2008.02.018 .
doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2008.02.018
pubmed: 18433860
Brendeke J, Ozcan M. Effect of physicochemical aging conditions on the composite-composite repair bond strength. J Adhes Dent. 2007;9:399–406.
pubmed: 17847643
Savas TY, Aykent F. Effect of Veneering techniques on Shear and Microtensile Bond strengths of Zirconia-based all-Ceramic systems. J Adhes Dent. 2017;19:507–15. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a39595 .
doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a39595
Cavalcanti AN, De Lima AF, Peris AR, Mitsui FH, Marchi GM. Effect of surface treatments and bonding agents on the bond strength of repaired composites. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2017;19:90–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2007.00073.x .
doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2007.00073.x
Cheung CK, Botelho MG, Matinlinna JP. Effect of surface treatments on zirconia ceramics on the bond strength to resin cement. J Adhes Dent. 2014;16:49–56. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a30753 .
doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a30753
pubmed: 24179986
Bonstein T, Garlapo D, Donarummo J, Bush PJ. Evaluation of varied repair protocols applied to aged composite resin. J Adhes Dent. 2005;7:41–9. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a10084 .
doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a10084
pubmed: 15892363
Ozel Bektas O, Eren D, Herguner Siso S, Akin GE. Effect of thermocycling on the bond strength of composite resin to bur and laser treated composite resin. Lasers Med Sci. 2012;27:723–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-011-0958-2 .
doi: 10.1007/s10103-011-0958-2
pubmed: 21833556
Dursun MN, Ergin E, Ozgunaltay G. The effect of different surface preparation methods and various aging periods on microtensile bond strength for composite resin repair. Niger J Clin Prac. 2021;24:282–91. https://doi.org/10.4103/njcp.njcp_83_20 .
doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_83_20
Rashidi M, Berangi S, Chiniforush N, Ahmadi E, Ranjbar Omrani L. Microtensile repair bond strength of a composite after accelerated artificial aging: effect of the air abrasion, bur, Er:YAG laser, two-step self-etch bonding and universal bonding repair system. J Lasers Med Sci. 2022;25:13–8. https://doi.org/10.34172/jlms.2022.18 .
doi: 10.34172/jlms.2022.18
Ahmed AA, Hassan MM, Abdalla AI. Microshear bond strength of universal adhesives to dentin used in total-etch and self-etch modes. Tanta Dent J. 2018;15:91–8. https://doi.org/10.4103/tdj.tdj_52_17 .
doi: 10.4103/tdj.tdj_52_17
Takamizawa T, Barkmeier WW, Tsujimoto A, Berry TP, Watanabe H, Erickson RL, Miyazaki M. Influence of different etching modes on bond strength and fatigue strength to dentin using universal adhesive systems. Dent Mat. 2016;32:9–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.11.005 .
doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2015.11.005
Tsujimoto A, Fischer NG, Barkmeier WW, Latta MA. Bond durability of two-step HEMA-free universal adhesive. J Func Biomater. 2022;13:134. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb13030134 .
doi: 10.3390/jfb13030134
Ghiorghe CA, Iovan G, Topoliceanu C, Sandu AV, Andrian S. Comparative study regarding the colorimetric changes of two composite resins after immersion in several beverages and one antibacterial mouthwash. Revista De Chemie. 2013;64:1436–40.
Nassoohi N, Kazemi H, Sadaghiani M. Effects of three surface conditioning techniques on repair bond strength of nanohybrid and nanofilled composites. Dent Res. 2015;12:554–61. https://doi.org/10.4103/1735-3327.170575 .
doi: 10.4103/1735-3327.170575
Irmak Ö, Celiksöz O, Yilmaz B, Yaman BC. Adhesive system affects repair bond strength of resin composite. J Istanbul Uni Dent. 2017; 51: 25–31. https://doi.org/10.17096/jiufd.31921 . eCollection 2017.
Özcan M, Niedermier W. Clinical study on the reasons for and location of failures of metal-ceramic restorations and survival of repairs. Int J Prosthodont. 2002;15:299–302.
pubmed: 12066495
Li H, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. The effect of thermocycling regimens on the nanoleakage of dentin bonding systems. Dent Mater. 2002;18:189–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0109-5641(01)00081-1 .
doi: 10.1016/s0109-5641(01)00081-1
pubmed: 11823009
Inoue S, Koshiro K, Yoshida Y. Hydrolytic stability of self-etch adhesives bonded to dentin. J Dent Res. 2005;84:1160–4. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910508401213 .
doi: 10.1177/154405910508401213
pubmed: 16304447
Ahmadizenouz G, Esmaeili B, Taghvaei A, Jamali Z, Jafari T, Daneshvar FA, Khafri S. Effect of different surface treatments on the shear bond strength of nanofilled composite repairs. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2016;10:9–16. https://doi.org/10.15171/joddd.2016.002 .
doi: 10.15171/joddd.2016.002
pubmed: 27092209
pmcid: 4831615
Fornazari IA, Wille I, Meda EM, Brum RT, Souza EM. Effect of surface treatment silane and universal adhesive on microshear bond strength of nanofilled composite repairs. Oper Dent. 2017;42:367–74. https://doi.org/10.2341/16-259-L . Epub 2017 Apr 12.
doi: 10.2341/16-259-L
pubmed: 28402733
Kiomarsi N, Saburian P, Chiniforush N, Karazifard MJ, Hashemikamangar SS. Effect of thermocycling and surface treatment on repair bond strength of composite. J Clin Exp Dent. 2017;9:945–51. https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.53721 . eCollection 2017 Aug.
doi: 10.4317/jced.53721
Cho SD, Rajitrangson P, Matis BA, Platt JA. Effect of Er,Cr:YSGG laser, air abrasion, and silane application on repaired shear bond strength of composites. Oper Dent. 2013;38:1–9. https://doi.org/10.2341/11-054-L . Epub 2012 Nov 6.
doi: 10.2341/11-054-L